AntilL.JenkinsJ.WayneS.VadasyP. (1998). Cooperative learning: Prevalence, conceptualization, and the relation between research and practice. American Educational Research Journal, 35, 419–454.
2.
AllanS. (1991). Ability grouping research reviews: What do they say about grouping and the gifted?Educational Leadership, 48(6), 60–65.
3.
CohenE. (1994). Restructuring the classroom: Conditions for productive small groups. Review of Educational Research, 64, 1–35.
4.
ColemanM. (1994). Using cooperative learning with gifted students. Gifted Child Today, 17(6), 36–38.
5.
ColemanM. R.GallagherJ. J. (1995). The successful blending of gifted education with middle schools and cooperative learning: Two studies. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 18, 362–384.
6.
FeldhusenJ. (1989). Synthesis of research on gifted youth. Educational Leadership, 46(6), 6–11.
7.
FiedlerE.LangeR.WinebrennerS. (2002). In search of reality: Unraveling the myths about tracking, ability grouping and the gifted. Roeper Review, 24, 108–111.
8.
GallagherJ.ColemanM. R. (1994). Cooperative learning and gifted students: Five case studies. Cooperative Learning, 14, 21–25.
9.
JohnsonD. W.JohnsonR. T. (1989). Cooperation and competition: Theory and research.Edina, MN: Interaction Book Company.
10.
JohnsonD. W.JohnsonR. T. (1991). Learning together and alone (3rd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
11.
JohnsonD. W.JohnsonR. T.SmithK. A. (1991). Cooperative learning: Increasing college faculty instructional productivity (ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No. 4). Washington, DC: The George Washington University School of Education and Human Development. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED347871).
12.
KaganS. (1990). The structural approach to cooperative learning. Educational Leadership, 47(4), 12–15.
13.
KaganS. (1992). Cooperative learning.San Juan Capistrano, CA: Resources for Teachers.
14.
KulikJ. A.KulikC. C. (1990). Ability grouping and gifted students. In ColangeloN.DavisG. A. (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (pp. 178–196). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
15.
Massachusetts Advocacy Center. (1990). Locked in/locked out: Tracking and placement practices in public schools.Boston: Eusey Press.
16.
McManusS. M.GettingerM. (1996). Teacher and student evaluations of cooperative learning and observed interactive behaviors. Journal of Educational Research, 90, 13–22.
17.
MillisB. J.CottellP. G. (1998). Cooperative learning for higher education faculty.Phoenix, AZ: Oryx Press.
18.
MillsC. J.DurdenW. G. (1992). Cooperative learning and ability grouping: An issue of choice. Gifted Child Quarterly, 36, 11–16.
19.
RobinsonA. (1990). Point-counterpoint: Cooperation? The argument against cooperative learning for talented students. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 14, 9–27.
20.
RobinsonA. (1991). Cooperative learning and the academically talented students.Storrs: The National Research on the Gifted and Talented, University of Connecticut.
21.
RogersK. (1993). Grouping the gifted and talented. Roeper Review, 16, 8–12.
22.
RossJ.SmythE. (1995). Differentiating cooperative learning to meet the needs of gifted learners: A case for transformational leadership. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 19, 63–82.
23.
Sapon-ShevinM.SchniedewindN. (1993). Why (even) gifted children need cooperative learning. Educational Leadership, 50(6), 62–63.
24.
SlavinR. E. (1990). Cooperative learning: Theory, research, and practice.Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
25.
SpearR. (1992). Appropriate grouping practices for middle level students. In IrvinJ. (Ed.), Transforming middle level education: Perspectives and possibilities (pp. 244–274). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
26.
Texas Center for Educational Research. (2001). Effective instructional practices and student performance: Highlights from the third year survey of Texas principals.Austin, TX: Author.