BloorM.FranklandJ.ThomasMRobsonK. (1999). Focus groups in social research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
2.
ChanceP. L. (1998). Meeting in the middle: Gifted education and middle schools working together. Roeper Review, 21, 133–139.
3.
BonnerF. A.II (2000). African American giftedness: Our nation's deferred dream. Journal of Black Studies, 30, 643–664.
4.
CaseyK. (2000). Mentors' contributions to gifted adolescents' affective, social, and vocational development. Roeper Review, 22, 227–230.
5.
CoffeyA.HolbrookB.AtkinsonP. (1999). Qualitative data analysis: Technologies and representations. Sociological Research Online, 1(1). Retrieved January 11, 2005, from http://www.socresonline.org.uk/1/1/4.html.
6.
GeertzC. (1973). The interpretation of cultures. New York: Basic Books.
7.
KruegerR. A.CaseyM. A. (2000). Focus groups (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
8.
RenzulliJ. S. (1986). The three-ring conception of giftedness: A developmental model for creative productivity. In SternbergR. J.DavidsonJ. E. (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (pp. 332–357). New York: Cambridge University Press.
9.
RotterJ. (1966). Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychological Monographs, 80(1). (Whole No. 609).
10.
SkollingsbergG. E. (2003). A comparison of intrinsic and extrinsic classroom motivational orientation of gifted and learning-disabled students. Roeper Review, 26, 53.
11.
SternbergR. J. (1982). Lies we live by: Misapplication of tests in identifying the gifted. Gifted Child Quarterly, 26, 157–161.
12.
SternbergR. J.DavidsonJ. (Eds.). (1986). Conceptions of giftedness. New York: Cambridge University Press.
13.
TomlinsonC. A. (1994). Gifted learners: The boomerang kids of middle school?Roeper Review, 16, 177–181.
14.
YongF. L. (1994). Self-concepts, locus of control, and Machiavellianism of ethnically diverse middle school students who are gifted. Roeper Review, 11, 192195.