Helping Teachers to Encourage Talented Girls in Mathematics

American College Testing Program. (1989). State and national trend data for students who take the ACT Assessment. Iowa City: American College Testing Program.

Becker D. F. Forsyth R. A. (1990). Gender differences in grades 3 through 12: A longitudinal analysis. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Boston.

Becker J. R. (1994, April). Research on gender and mathematics perspectives and new directions. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.

Brandon P. R. Newton B. J. Hammond O. W. (1987). Children's mathematics achievement in Hawaii: Sex differences favoring girls. American Educational Research Journal, 24, 437–461.

Buerk D. Gibson H. (1994). Students’ metaphors for mathematics: Gathering, interpreting, implications. WME Newsletter, 16(2), 2–8.

Campbell G. (1996). National Action Council for Minorities in Engineering, Inc. research letter. New York: National Action Council for Minorities in Engineering.

Campbell J. R. Connolly C. Lacattiva C. Pizzo J. (1985). Math/science gender gap: Influence of parents on gifted Asian and Caucasian children. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago.

Campbell P. B. (1992). Nothing can stop us now: Designing effective programs for girls in math, science, and engineering. Newton, MA: Women's Educational Equity Act.

Chipman S. F. Brush L. R. Wilson D. M. (Eds.)(1985). Women and mathematics: Balancing the equation. New York: Erlbaum Associates.

Cooley D. Chauvin J. C. Karnes F. A. (1984). Gifted females: A comparison of attitudes by male and female teachers. Roeper Review, 6, 164–167.

Damarin S. K. (1990). Teaching mathematics: A feminist perspective. In Cooney T. J. Hirsch C. R. (Eds.), Teaching and learning mathematics in the 1990's. (pp. 144–158). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

Dickens M. N. (1990). Parental influences on the mathematics self-concept of high achieving adolescent girls. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA.

Dreyden J. I. Gallagher S. A. (1989). The effects of time and direction changes on the SAT performance of academically talented adolescents. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 12, 187–204.

Eccles J. S. (1987). Gender roles and women's achievement-related decisions. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 11, 135–171.

Educational Testing Service. (1996). 1996 College-Bound Seniors: A Profile of SAT Program Test Takers. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.

EQUALS. (1986). Cooperative Geometry. Berkeley, CA: Lawrence Hall of Science, University of California.

Family Math. (1989). Portland, OR: Northwest Equals.

Fennema E. (1990). Teachers’ beliefs and gender differences in mathematics. In Fennema E. Leder G. (Eds.), Mathematics and gender (pp. 1–9). New York: Teachers College Press.

Gavin M. K. (1996). The development of math talent: Influences on students at a women's college. The Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 7, 476–485.

Gavin M. K. (1997). A gender study of students with high mathematics ability: Personological, educational, and parental variables related to the intent to pursue quantitative fields of study. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Connecticut, Storrs.

Gavin M. K. Shmurak C. B. (1999). Learning together, learning apart: The effects of single sex mathematics classes in a coeducational school. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association Annual Conference on Women and Education, Hofstra University, Uniondale, NY.

Gill J. (1996). Different contexts: Similar outcomes. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York.

Good T. L. Brophy J. E. (1973). Looking in classrooms. New York: Harper & Row.

Grandy J. (1987). Trends in the selection of science, mathematics, or engineering as major fields of study among top scoring SAT takers. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.

Hallinan M. T. Sorenson A. B. (1987). Ability grouping and sex differences in mathematics achievement. Sociology of Education, 60, 63–72.

Halpern D. F. (1989). The disappearance of cognitive gender differences: What you see depends on where you look. American Psychologist, 44, 1156–1158.

Hanson K. (1992). Teaching mathematics effectively and equitably to females Newton, MA: WEEA Publishing Center/Center for Equity and Cultural Diversity.

Henry J. Manning G. N. (1998). Gender-based intervention making computer science appealing to girls in high school. Unpublished master's inquiry project, University of Connecticut, Storrs.

Hernandez Garduno Letitia E. (1997). Effects of teaching problem solving through cooperative learning methods on student mathematics achievement, attitudes toward mathematics, mathematics self-efficacy, and metacognition. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Connecticut, Storrs.

Hess R. D. Holloway S. D. Dickson W. P. Price G. G. (1984). Maternal variables as predictors of children's school readiness and later achievement in vocabulary and mathematics in sixth grade. Child Development, 55, 1902–1912.

Hyde J. S. Fennema E. (1990). Gender differences in mathematics performance and affect: Results of two meta-analyses. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Boston.

Karp K. S. Niemi R. C. (2000). The math club for girls and other problem solvers. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 5, 426–432.

Kimball M. M. (1989). A new perspective on women's math achievement. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 198–214.

Kissane B. V. (1986). Selection of mathematically talented students. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 17, 221–241.

Kramer P. E. Lehman S. (1990). Mismeasuring women: A critique research on computer ability and avoidance. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 16(1), 158–172.

Lappan G. Fey J. T. Fitzgerald W. M. Friel S. N. Phillips E. D. (1998). Ruins of Montarek: Spatial visualization. White Plains, NY: Dale Seymour.

Learning Technology Center. (1996). The Adventures of Jasper Woodbury. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Leroux J. A. Ho C. (1994). Success and mathematically gifted female students: The challenge continues. Feminist Teacher, 7 (2), 42–48.

Linn M. C. Kessel C. (1995). Participation in mathematics courses and careers: Climate, grades, and entrance examination scores. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Education Research Association, San Francisco, CA.

Martin C. D. Murchie-Beyma E. (1992). In search of gender free paradigms for computer science education. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 349 941).

De Lisi McGillicuddy Sigel A. V. (1985). The relationship between parental beliefs and children's cognitive level. In Sigel R. (Eds.), Parental belief systems (pp. 7–24). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.

National Research Council. (1989). Everybody counts: A report to the nation on the future of mathematics education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

National Science Foundation. (1992). Women and minorities in science and engineering: An update. Washington, DC: Author.

National Science Foundation. (1996, September). Women, minorities, and persons with disabilities in science and engineering. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation.

Nelson C. S. Watson J. A. (1991). The computer gender gap: Children's attitudes, performance, and socialization. Journal of Education Technology Systems, 19, 343–353.

Parsons J. E. Adler T. F. Kaczala C. M. (1982). Socialization of achievement attitudes and beliefs: Parental influences. Child Development, 53, 310–321.

Peterson P. L. Fennema E. (1985). Effective teaching, student engagement in classroom activities, and sex-related differences in learning mathematics. American Educational Research Journal, 22, 309–335.

Phillips D. A. (1987). Socialization of perceived academic competence among highly competent children. Child Development, 58, 1308–1320.

Reis S. M. (1987). We can't change what we don't recognize: Understanding the special needs of gifted females. Gifted Child Quarterly, 31, 83–88.

Reis S. M. Callahan C. M. (1989). Gifted females: They've come a long way—or have they? Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 12, 99–117.

Renzulli J. S. (1977). The enrichment triad model. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.

Renzulli J. S. (1994). Schools for talent development: A practical plan for total school improvement. Mansfield, CT: Creative Learning Press.

Rogers P. (1990). Thoughts on power and pedagogy. In Burton Leone (Eds.), Gender and mathematics: An international perspective (pp. 38–46). London: Cassell.

Rosser P. F. (1989). Sex bias in college admissions tests: Why women lose out. Cambridge, MA: National Center for Fair and Open Testing.

Sadker D. M. Sadker M. (1994). Failing at fairness: How America's schools cheat girls. New York: Macmillan.

Sanders J. S. (1986). The neuter computer: Computers for girls and boys. New York: Neal-Schuman.

Sanders J. S. (1994). Bibliography on gender equity in mathematics, science, and technology: Resources for classroom teachers. New York: Gender Equity Program, Center for Advanced Study in Education, CUNY Graduate Center.

Siegle D. Reis S. M. (1994). Gender differences in teacher and student perceptions of student ability and effort. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 6, 86–92.

Sheffield L. J. (1994). The development of gifted and talented mathematics students and the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics standards. Storrs: The National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented, University of Connecticut.

Stevenson H. W. Newman R. S. (1986). Long-term prediction of achievement in mathematics and reading. Child Development, 57, 646–659.

Streitmatter Janice (1997). An Exploratory study of risk-taking and attitudes in a girls-only middle school math class. Elementary School Journal, 98, 15–26.

U.S. Bureau of Census. (1999). Current population reports. Washington, DC: S. Bureau of the Census.

Volman M. (1997). Gender-related effects of computer and information literacy education. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 315–328.

Volpe B. J. (1999). A girls’ Math Olympiad team. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 4(5), 290–293.

Webb N. M. (1984). Sex differences in interaction and achievement and classroom participation: An experiment involving Advanced Placement calculus classes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 33–40.

Webb N. M. Kenduski C. M. (1985). Mathematics small group interactions among high ability learners. Gender differences in small group interaction and achievement in high-and low-achieving classes. In Wilkinson L. C. Marrett C. B. (Eds.), Gender influences in classroom interaction (pp. 209–236). New York: Academic Press.

Wellesley College Center for Research on Women. (1992). The AAUW report: How schools shortchange girls. Washington, DC: American Association of University Women.

Wellesley College Center for Research on Women. (1998). Gender gaps: Where schools still fail our children. Washington, DC: American Association of University Women.

Wellesley College Center for Research on Women. (1998). Separated by sex: A critical look at single-sex education for girls. Washington, DC: American Association of University Women.

Wellesley College Center for Research on Women (2000). Tech-Savvy: Educating girls in the new computer age. Washington, DC: American Association of University Women.