Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Objective

Visfatin is a novel adipokine initially reported to exhibit insulin-mimetic effects that increase insulin sensitivity. Further studies indicate it may also be associated with obesity, serum lipids, and systemic inflammation. At the current time, the role of genetic variation in the visfatin gene (NAMPT) on these parameters is not clear. In the present study, we examined the association between 10 SNPs in NAMPT and insulin resistance, obesity, serum lipids and hsCRP levels.

Research design and methods

A total of 1838 subjects (413 men, 1425 women) were recruited from the ongoing CODING Study. All subjects were from the genetically homogenous population of Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada. BMI, waist circumference, waist-to-hip ratio, and body fat percentage (determined using DXA) were measured for all subjects. Serum glucose, insulin, HOMA_IR, HOMAβ, total cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, triglycerides and hsCRP were also determined after a 12-hour fast. Ten SNPs in NAMPT were genotyped using TaqMan validated or functionally tested SNP genotyping assays including rs7789066 (A > G 5′ flanking region), rs3801266 (A > G intron), rs6963243 (G > C intron), rs2058539 (A > C intron), rs6947766 (C > T intron), rs4730153 (G > A intron), rs10808150 (G > A intron), rs2098291 (C > T intron), rs10953502 (T > C intron), and rs10953501 (A > G 3′ UTR).

Results

We observed no significant associations between any of the variants sites and any parameter of insulin resistance, body composition, serum lipids or hsCRP under an additive model with age and gender included as covariates. This was also true when both dominant and recessive models were applied.

Conclusions

Our results do not support a significant role for variations in NAMPT with differences in the measured variables in the Newfoundland population.

Keywords

visfatin genetic association insulin resistance obesity serum lipids inflammation

Introduction

Visfatin was first reported as a novel adipokine predominantly secreted from visceral adipose tissue however evidence now supports a pro-inflammatory role. Specifically, visfatin is expressed by macrofages infiltrating adipose tissue and is produced in response to inflammatory signals.^1,2 Although it was initially suggested that visfatin had insulin-mimetic properties that increased insulin sensitivity,³ this study was later retracted⁴ as a subsequent report could not confirm the insulin-mimetic action of this adipocy-tokine.⁵ Despite this, it has been demonstrated that circulating visfatin is elevated in patients with type 2 diabetes^6,7 and obesity.^8,9 Furthermore, we recently demonstrated that visfatin is positively associated with serum triglycerides and down-regulated by a short-term positive energy balance.¹⁰

Visfatin is a 473 amino acid protein with a molecular mass of 52 kD that is encoded by the gene nicotinamide phosphoribosyltransferase (NAMPT) (Entrez ID: 10135), previously known as pre-B cell colony-enhancing factor gene.¹¹ NAMPT is mapped to 7q22.3 and includes 11 exons encompassing 34.7 kb.¹² This region of the genome has shown linkage to phenotypes related to the metabolic syndrome including body mass index (BMI), HDL cholesterol and triglyceride (TG) levels.^13–15 In addition, recent studies have shown that SNPs within the promoter region of the visfatin gene are associated with increased risk of type 2 diabetes¹⁶ and its related parameters,^17,18 serum lipids including total apolipoprotein B and the apolipoprotein B component of LDL cholesterol,¹⁷ higher HDL cholesterol,^19,20 LDL cholesterol and total cholesterol,¹⁷ as well as systemic inflammation¹⁶ and reduced risk of cardiovascular disease.²¹ Moreover, a very rare, noncoding SNP has been associated with severe obesity in both adults and children.²² Contrary to these findings, others have found no association between genetic variation in the visfatin gene and type 2 diabetes using case-control analyses,^18,20,23 measures of obesity^16,18,19,24 or serum lipids.²⁴ Sample sizes were small in the majority of these studies and therefore, were likely underpowered to detect a true association. Furthermore, the study by Korner et al was not corrected for multiple testing, and consequently their results should be interpreted with caution. As such, the influence of genetic variation in NAMPT on the aforementioned variables remains unclear. In the current study, we sought to clarify the influence of genetic variation in the visfatin gene on obesity, parameters of glucose and lipid metabolism, as well as systemic inflammation. We assessed the effect of 10 SNPs in this gene on measurements of body composition, insulin resistance, serum lipids, and hsCRP in a large, healthy Newfoundland (NL) population.

Materials and Methods

Subjects

Subjects (n = 1838; 413 men, 1425 women) were recruited from an ongoing, large-scale nutrigenom-ics study (CODING Study^25–27). All participants were from the genetically homogenous population of NL, Canada. Inclusion criteria were as follows: 1) at least third generation Newfoundlander; 2) healthy, without any serious metabolic, cardiovascular or endocrine diseases; and 3) not pregnant at the time of the study. The Human Investigation Committee of the Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University of Newfoundland approved the study and all subjects provided written and informed consent.

Measurements of Body composition

All measurements were performed following a 12 hour fasting period. Subjects were weighed to the nearest 0.1 kg in standardized light clothes and without shoes on a platform manual scale balance as previously described by us (Health O Meter Inc., Bridgeview, IL).^25–27 Height was measured using a fixed stadiometer to the nearest 0.1 cm. BMI was calculated as a person's weight in kilograms divided by their height in meters squared. Waist and hip circumference were measured while the participant was in a standing position to the nearest 0.1 cm using a flexible metric measuring tape. Waist circumference was measured as the horizontal distance around the abdomen at the level of the umbilicus; hip circumference was measured as the largest circumference between the waist and thighs and waist-to-hip ratio was calculated. In addition to anthropometric measurements, whole body composition measurements including percentage body fat (%BF) and percentage trunk fat (%TF) were measured using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) Lunar Prodigy (GE Medical Systems, Madison, WI, USA). Measurements were performed on subjects following the removal of all metal accessories, while lying in a supine position as previously described.^25–27

Serum measurements

Blood samples were taken from all subjects in the morning following a 12-hour fasting period. Serum was isolated and stored at –80 °C for subsequent analyses. Insulin levels were measured on an Immulite immunoassay analyzer (DPC, CA, USA). The homeostasis model assessment (HOMA) was used as a measure of insulin resistance (HOMA_IR = insulin (µU/ml) x glucose (mmol/L)/22.5)) and β-cell function (HOMAβ = 20 x insulin (µU/ml)/(glucose-3.5)).²⁸ Serum concentrations of glucose, triacylglycerols (TG), total cholesterol (Chol), and HDL cholesterol were measured using Synchron reagents and performed on an L x 20 analyzer (Beckman Coulter Inc., CA, USA). LDL cholesterol was calculated using the following formula: (Chol)–-(HDL)–-(TG/2.2) which is reliable in the absence of severe hyperlipidemia. High-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) was measured by nephelometry according to the manufacturer's protocol (Beckman Coulter Inc).

Genomic Dna Isolation, Genotyping and Selection of SNPs

Genomic DNA was isolated from approximately 5 ml of whole blood using the Wizard Genomic DNA Purification kit (Promega, WI, USA) according to the manufacturer's protocol as previously described by us.^25,27 To assess the reproducibility of genotyping, 5% of samples were randomly selected and re-genotyped; all genotypes matched their initial called genotype. The ten SNPs investigated in the visfatin gene were rs7789066 (A>G 5′ flanking region), rs3801266 (A>G intron), rs6963243 (G>C intron), rs2058539 (A>C intron), rs6947766 (C>T intron), rs4730153 (G>A intron), rs10808150 (G>A intron), rs2098291 (C>T intron), rs10953502 (T>C intron), and rs10953501 (A>G 3′ UTR). Tagging SNPs were selected using a pairwise r² approach with an r² ≥ 0.9 and MAF ≥ 0.05 (SNPbrowser Version 3.5; based on HapMap data for CEU population). A total of seven tagging SNPs were genotyped (rs3801266, rs6963243, rs2058539, rs6947766, rs10808150, rs2098291, and rs10953502) as well as two additional SNPs to include the flanking regions (rs7789066 and rs10953501). In addition, rs4730153 was chosen to confirm findings from previous studies.^18,19,22

Statistical analyses

All statistical analyses were performed using the statistical software R or SPSS version 16.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium was tested using X² analysis with one degree of freedom. Multiple regression analyses using an additive model were used to assess the association between NAMPT variants and body composition, markers of insulin resistance, serum lipids, and hsCRP with sex and age included as covariates. Hypotheses regarding the effect of NAMPT variants on parameters measured were two-sided and a P-value of 0.05 was taken as the threshold of statistical significance.

Results

Physical and biochemical characteristics of all subjects are shown in Table 1. The mean age of participants was 43.7 ± 11.8 yrs and the mean BMI was 26.8 ± 5.1 kg/m². Furthermore, subjects had normal fasting glucose levels as well as serum lipid profiles. Circulating hsCRP was measured to be 3.14 ± 4.28 mg/mL. A description of the ten SNPs genotyped, including location, type of variant, and minor allele frequencies (MAF), is shown in Table 2. All SNPs were fairly common variants (MAF 0.18–0.43) aside from rs7789066 (MAF 0.07) which is located in the promoter region of NAMPT and therefore is likely highly conserved. Genotype distributions were in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium at all 10 loci (Table 2). Furthermore, linkage disequilibrium (LD) was estimated among the variants and is shown in Table 3. Due to high LD between the variants typed in this study, we believe we have likely captured the majority of genetic variation in and around this gene.

Table 1.

Physical and biochemical characteristics of subjects.*

Variables	Men N = 413	Women N = 1425	Overall N = 1838
Age (yrs)	41.0 ± 14.0	44.5 ± 11.0	43.7 ± 11.8
BMI (kg/m²)	27.6 ± 4.5	26.6 ± 5.2	26.8 ± 5.1
Waist circumference (cm)	97.9 ± 12.0	90.9 ± 14.3	92.4 ± 14.1
Waist-to-hip ratio	0.97 ± 0.06	0.89 ± 0.07	0.90 ± 0.08
Body fat (%)	25.3 ± 7.5	37.8 ± 7.4	35.0 ± 9.1
Trunk fat (%)	30.1 ± 8.8	39.0 ± 8.7	37.0 ± 9.5
Glucose (mmol/L)	5.3 ± 1.0	5.1 ± 0.9	5.1 ± 0.9
Insulin (pmol/L)	77.8 ± 58.0	68.4 ± 67.8	69.7 ± 65.9
HOMA_IR	2.67 ± 3.55	2.32 ± 2.96	2.40 ± 3.10
HOMAβ	130.1 ± 149.7	135.9 ± 251.4	134.6 ± 232.6
Cholesterol (mmol/L)	5.06 ± 1.10	5.21 ± 1.03	5.17 ± 1.05
HDL cholesterol (mmol/L)	1.24 ± 0.27	1.56 ± 0.38	1.49 ± 0.38
LDL cholesterol (mmol/L)	3.12 ± 0.95	3.12 ± 0.88	3.11 ± 0.90
Triacylglycerol (mmol/L)	1.50 ± 0.99	1.15 ± 0.71	1.23 ± 0.79
hsCRP (mg/mL)	2.12 ± 2.73	3.43 ± 4.59	3.14 ± 4.28

Note:

Values are expressed as mean ± standard deviation.

Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; HOMA_IR, homeostasis model assessment for insulin resistance; HOMAβ, homeostasis model assessment for β cell function; HDL, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL, low-density lipoprotein; hsCRP, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein.

Table 2.

Summary of single nucleotide polymorphisms, allele frequencies, and Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium.*

Position	Rs number	Variant	Location	MAF	HWE (P-value)
–2423	rs7789066	A/G	5′ flanking	0.07	0.514
+1079	rs3801266^†	A/G	Intron 1	0.18	0.211
+1382	rs6963243^†	G/C	Intron 1	0.24	0.890
+8692	rs2058539^†	A/C	Intron 2	0.41	0.798
+14663	rs6947766^†	C/T	Intron 4	0.25	0.415
+21179	rs4730153	G/A	Intron 6	0.43	0.703
+24037	rs10808150^†	G/A	Intron 8	0.43	1.00
+24666	rs2098291^†	C/T	Intron 8	0.31	0.815
+32898	rs10953502^†	T/C	Intron 10	0.42	0.717
+37697	rs10953501	A/G	3′ UTR	0.43	0.962

Notes:

Hardy-Weinberg was estimated using X² analysis with one degree of freedom;

†

Tagging SNPs (SNPbrowser Version 3.5, based on HapMap CEU population).

Abbreviations: MAF, minor allele frequency; HWE, Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium.

Table 3.

Measures of linkage disequilibrium (D' and r²) among ten SNPs in NAMPT.*

r²/D'	P values
	rs7789066	rs3801266	rs6963243	rs2058539	rs6947766	rs4730153	rs10808150	rs2098291	rs10953502	rs10953501
rs7789066		0.350	0.477	0.389	0.995	0.999	0.986	0.996	0.367	0.998
rs3801266	0.038		0.964	0.083	0.939	0.988	0.999	0.988	0.708	0.968
rs6963243	0.049	0.066		0.995	0.999	0.997	0.994	0.992	0.997	0.994
rs2058539	0.015	0.190	0.458		0.971	0.973	0.977	0.989	0.974	0.970
rs6947766	0.023	0.068	0.108	0.221		0.987	0.983	0.953	0.987	0.974
rs4730153	0.093	0.298	0.428	0.880	0.246		0.996	0.997	0.903	0.983
rs10808150	0.090	0.292	0.421	0.878	0.247	0.982		0.994	0.909	0.989
rs2098291	0.031	0.098	0.140	0.301	0.139	0.329	0.330		0.862	0.981
rs10953502	0.013	0.157	0.440	0.905	0.239	0.792	0.795	0.239		0.908
rs10953501	0.997	0.284	0.423	0.870	0.241	0.960	0.972	0.320	0.797

Note:

D' is given in upper right half and r² is given in lower left half of table.

Table 4 shows the genotype effect of the 10 SNPs investigated in this study on measurements of body composition (BMI, waist circumference, waist-to-hip ratio, %BF, and %TF), markers of insulin resistance (fasting glucose, insulin, HOMA-IR, and HOMAβ), serum lipids (total cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, and TG), as well as systemic inflammation (measured as circulating hsCRP). Multiple regression analyses were performed to test for association between the 10 SNPs in NAMPT and the above parameters with gender and age included as model covariates. Under an additive model, we did not find any significant associations between variation in NAMPT and any variables investigated. As can be seen, the P values are from significant thresholds, despite not correcting for multiple testing. This was also true when both dominant and recessive models were applied (data not shown).

Table 4.

Genotype effect often SNPs within NAMPT on body composition, markers of insulin resistance, serum lipids, and systemic inflammation.

Variables	P values
	rs7789066	rs3801266	rs6963243	rs2058539	rs6947766	rs4730153	rs10808150	rs2098291	rs10953502	rs10953501
BMI (kg/m²)	1.00	1.00	0.84	1.00	0.96	1.00	0.99	1.00	1.00	1.00
Waist circumference (cm)	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00	0.91	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00
Waist-to-hip ratio	1.00	1.00	0.99	1.00	1.00	0.95	1.00	1.00	1.00	0.95
Body fat (%)	1.00	1.00	1.00	0.99	1.00	1.00	0.99	1.00	1.00	1.00
Trunk fat (%)	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00
Glucose (mmol/L)	1.00	0.97	0.95	0.99	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00
Insulin (pmol/L)	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00
HOMA_IR	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00
HOMAβ	1.00	0.95	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00
Cholesterol (mmol/L)	1.00	1.00	1.00	0.88	1.00	1.00	0.98	1.00	0.99	0.89
HDL-c (mmol/L)	0.85	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00	0.99	1.00
LDL-c (mmol/L)	1.00	0.98	1.00	0.63	1.00	0.71	0.77	1.00	0.81	0.55
Triacylglycerol (mmol/L)	0.95	0.99	1.00	1.00	0.95	1.00	1.00	1.00	0.99	1.00
hsCRP (mg/mL)	0.81	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00	0.98	1.00	1.00	1.00

Notes:

†

Multiple regression using an additive model was used for quantitative trait analyses to assess the association between NAMPT variants and measurements of body composition, markers of insulin resistance, serum lipids, and systemic inflammation. Sex and age were included as model covariates;

‡

No significant genotype effects when dominant or recessive models were applied.

Abbreviations: *BMI, body mass index; HOMA_IR, homeostasis model assessment for insulin resistance; HOMAβ, homeostasis model assessment for β cell function; HDL, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL, low-density lipoprotein; hsCRP, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein.

Power calculations were carried out for a quantitative trait genetic association study (Fig. 1). Figure 1 illustrates the power profiles as a function of varying coefficients of determination for a range of heritability estimates (h² = 0.05–0.15); type 1 error was fixed to 10⁻⁶ for these calculations. As demonstrated by Figure 1, we had sufficient power (β ≥ 0.80) at R² > 0.4 to detect a positive association, given our sample size.

Figure 1.

Power profiles as a function of varying coefficients of determination for a range of heritability estimates.

Discussion

The physiological function of visfatin seems to be diverse. Initially, attention was focused on its relationship with type 2 diabetes however recent studies have demonstrated that visfatin may also be involved in the etiology of obesity,^8,9 dyslipidemia,²⁹ systemic inflammation³⁰ and increased cardiovascular disease risk,³⁰ although these associations remain controversial. Furthermore, a number of genetic association studies have been performed investigating the effect of variants in NAMPT on these parameters with contradictory results.^16–20 The main findings from our work do not support a significant role for genetic variation in the visfatin gene on differences in body composition, markers of insulin resistance, serum lipids, and systemic inflammation in the NL population.

The current status of genetic association studies regarding visfatin is questionable at best. Although Zhang et al report a significant association with NAMPT variants between type 2 diabetes cases and healthy controls, after adjustment for the number of SNPs investigated by permutation testing, the association no longer remained significant.¹⁶ A number of other studies have also found no significant differences in allele, genotype, or haplotype frequencies between type 2 diabetes patients and healthy controls.^18,20,23,31 Interestingly, the study by Bottcher et al did observe a marginally significant association between variation in NAMPT and fasting plasma insulin levels as well as 2-h plasma glucose in 626 Caucasian subjects without type 2 diabetes in quantitative trait analyses.¹⁸ This was in contrast to the study by Zhang et al who did not find any association with fasting glucose or insulin levels in 630 healthy individuals.¹⁶ In our much larger cohort, we did not observe any significant associations with any variant in NAMPT and parameters of glucose metabolism, including fasting glucose, insulin, HOMA-IR and HOMA-β supporting the notion that genetic variation in the visfatin gene has little, if any, effect on modulating insulin sensitivity in our cohort. As the subjects in this study were all healthy, it cannot be ruled out that an association may exist among patients with type 2 diabetes. Nonetheless, we believe that if NAMPT played a significant role in determining insulin sensitivity, a significant association would be evident in our quantitative trait analyses.

We also sought to investigate the influence of variants within NAMPT on additional metabolic traits, namely obesity and serum lipids. A rare SNP (rs1047818; MAF < 0.01) was recently identified that conferred a protective effect against obesity in both obese children and adults.²² Interestingly, this SNP was not associated with BMI or waist-to-hip ratio in 5212 healthy controls from this same study. In our cohort, we also failed to identify any significant associations between BMI nor waist-to-hip ratio and variation in NAMPT. Furthermore, we also examined the influence of NAMPT variants on more accurate markers of obesity, specifically %BF and %TF measured using DXA, and failed to detect any significant associations. In addition, we did not find any significant relationship with any parameter of lipid metabolism. Taken together, our results suggest that genetic variation in the visfatin gene does not influence metabolic health in the NL population.

Recent studies have indicated that visfatin may also be involved in low grade inflammation, as evidenced by associations with circulating markers of inflammation, including monocyte chemoattractant protein 1 and interleukin-6.³⁰ Recently, Zhang et al found that a SNP in the promoter region of the visfatin gene (–948 G>T) was significantly associated with higher plasma levels of fibrinogen and C-reactive protein in a group of 630 non-diabetic individuals.¹⁶ In addition, carriers of the minor allele of – 1535 C>T had lower hsCRP and inter-leukin-6 levels in a group of patients presenting with either stable or unstable angina pectoris.³² Contrary to these findings, we found no association between the 10 SNPs genotyped in our cohort and serum hsCRP levels. This is in agreement with the study by Wang et al that showed no association between – 1535 C>T and circulating levels of hsCRP, IL-6, and tumor necrosis factor α in patients with acute myocardial infarction.³² At present, it appears that the role of genetic variation within the visfatin gene on regulating circulating factors related to systemic inflammation is unclear. Further work is required to address this issue.

In summary, no significant association was observed between 10 SNPs in NAMPT and parameters of body composition, markers of insulin resistance, serum lipids, and systemic inflammation, after accounting for gender and age. Consequently, the results of this study do not support a significant role for genetic variations in the visfatin gene with the above mentioned variables in the NL population.

Sources of Funding

This study is supported in part by the Canadian Foundation for Innovation (CFI), the Canadian Institute for Health Research (operating grant: MOP-78947 to Guang Sun), and the Newfoundland and Labrador Centre for Applied Health Research (NLCAHR).

Author Contributions

JS assisted in data collection and preparation of the manuscript. JCL-O assisted in data analysis and critical revisions of the paper. GS was responsible for study design and concept, as well as editing the manuscript.

Disclosures

This manuscript has been read and approved by all authors. This paper is unique and is not under consideration by any other publication and has not been published elsewhere. The authors and peer reviewers of this paper report no conflicts of interest. The authors confirm that they have permission to reproduce any copyrighted material.

Footnotes

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank all volunteers who participated in the present study. We would also like to recognize the following members of our lab who contributed to data collection: Dax Rumsey, James Thorburn, Amber Snow, Aihua Ma, Sandra Cooke, Christiane Dawe, Lesley Johnson, Curtis French, Sammy Khalili, Jessica Bishop, Kristian Green, Kristina Sheridan, Farrell Cahill and Hong-Wei Zhang. Guang Sun holds the position of chair of pediatric genetics, which is supported by Novartis Pharmaceuticals.

References

Varma

, Yao-Borengasser

, Rasouli

. Human visfatin expression: relationship to insulin sensitivity, intramyocellular lipids, and inflammation. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2007; 92: 666–72.

Curat

C.A.

, Wegner

, Sengenes

. Macrophages in human visceral adipose tissue: increased accumulation in obesity and a source of resistin and visfatin. Diabetologia. 2006; 49: 744–7.

Fukuhara

, Matsuda

, Nishizawa

. Visfatin: a protein secreted by visceral fat that mimics the effects of insulin. Science. 2005; 307: 426–30.

Fukuhara

, Matsuda

, Nishizawa

. Retraction. Science. 2007; 318(5850): 565.

Revollo

J.R.

, Korner

, Mills

K.F.

. Nampt/PBEF/Visfatin regulates insulin secretion in beta cells as a systemic NAD biosynthetic enzyme. Cell Metab. 2007; 67: 796–800.

Chen

M.P.

, Chung

F.M.

, Chang

D.M.

. Elevated plasma level of visfatin/pre-B cell colony-enhancing factor in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2006; 91: 295–9.

El-Mesallamy

H.O.

, Kassen

D.H.

, El-Demerdash

, Amin

A.I.

Vaspin and visfatin/Nampt are interesting interrelated adipokines playing a role in the pathogenesis of type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Metabolism 2010; Epub ahead of print.

Haider

D.G.

, Holzer

, Schaller

. The adipokine visfatin is markedly elevated in obese children. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2006; 43: 548–9.

Berndt

, Kloting

, Kralisch

. Plasma visfatin concentrations and fat depot-specific mRNA expression in humans. Diabetes. 2005; 54: 2911–6.

10.

Sun

, Bishop

, Khalili

. Serum visfatin concentrations are positively correlated with serum triacylglycerols and down-regulated by overfeeding in healthy young men. Am J Clin Nutr. 2007: 85(2): 399–404.

11.

Samal

, Sun

, Stearns

, Xie

, Suggs

, McNiece

Cloning and characterization of the cDNA encoding a novelhuman pre-B-cell colony-enhancing factor.

Molec Cell Biol. 1994; 14: 1431–7.

12.

Ognjanovic

, Bao

, Yamamoto

S.Y.

, Garibay-Tupas

, Samal

, Bryant-Greenwood

G.D.

Genomic organization of the gene coding for human pre-B-cell colony enhancing factor and expression in human fetal membranes.

J Mol Endocrinol. 2001; 26: 107–17.

13.

Adeyemo

A.A.

, Johnson

, Acheampong

. A genome-wide quantitative trait linkage analysis for serum lipids in type 2 diabetes in an African population. Atherosclerosis. 2005; 181: 389–97.

14.

Arya

, Blangero

, Williams

. Factors of insulin resistance syndrome—related phenotypes are linked to genetic locations on chromosomes 6 and 7 in non-diabetic Mexican Americans. Diabetes. 2002; 51: 841–7.

15.

, Cooper

R.S.

, Borecki

. A combined analysis of genome-wide linkage scans for body mass index from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Family Blood Pressure Program. Am J Hum Genet. 2002; 70: 1247–56.

16.

Zhang

Y-Y

, Gottardo

, Thompson

. A visfatin promoter polymorphism is associated with low-grade inflammation and type 2 diabetes. Obesity. 2006; 14(12): 2119–26.

17.

Bailey

S.D.

, Loredo-Osti

J.C.

, Lepage

. Common polymorphisms in the promoter of the visfatin gene (PBEF1) influence plasma insulin levels in a French-Canadian population. Diabetes. 2006; 55: 2896–902.

18.

Bottcher

, Teupser

, Enigk

. Genetic variation in the visfatin gene (PBEF1) and its relation to glucose metabolism and fat-depot-specific messenger ribonucleic acid exression in humans. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2006; 91(7): 2725–31.

19.

Johansson

L.M.

, Johansson

L.E.

, Ridderstrale

The visfatin (PBEF1) G-948T gene polymorphism is associated with increased high-density lipoprotein cholesterol in obese subjects.

Metabolism. 2008; 57(11): 1558–62.

20.

Tokunga

, Miura

, Okauchi

. The – 1535 promoter variant of the visfatin gene is associated with serum triglyceride and HDL-cholesterol levels in Japanese subjects. Endocr J. 2008; 55(1): 205–12.

21.

Yan

J-J

, Tang

N-P

, Tang

J-J

. Genetic variant in visfatin gene promoter is associated with decreased risk of coronary artery disease in a Chinese population. Clin Chim Acta. 2010; 411: 26–30.

22.

Blakemore

A.I.F.

, Meyre

, Delplanque

. A rare variant in the visfatin gene (NAMPT/PBEF1) is associated with protection from obesity. Obesity. 2009; 17(8): 1549–53.

23.

Jian

W-X

, Luo

T-H

, Gu

Y-Y

. The visfatin gene is associated with glucose and lipid metabolism in a Chinese population. Diabet Med. 2006; 23(9): 967–73.

24.

Korner

, Bottcher

, Enigk

, Kiess

, Stumvoll

, Kovacs

Effects of genetic variation in the visfatin gene (PBEF1) on obesity, glucose metabolism, and blood pressure in children.

Metabolism. 2007; 56: 772–7.

25.

Martin

, Loredo

J.C.

, Sun

Lack of association of ghrelin precursor gene variants and % body fat or serum lipid profiles.

Obesity. 2008; 16: 908–12.

26.

Kennedy

A.P.

, Shea

J.L.

, Sun

Accuracy of BMI to estimate obesity: A parallel comparison with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in the Newfoundland population.

Obesity. 2009; 17(11): 2094–9.

27.

Shea

J.L.

, Loredo-Osti

J.C.

, Sun

Association of RBP4 gene variants and serum HDL cholesterol levels in the Newfoundland population.

Obesity. 2009; Nov 5. Epub ahead of print.

28.

Matthews

D.R.

, Hosker

J.P.

, Rudenski

A.S.

, Naylor

B.A.

, Treacher

D.F.

, Turner

R.C.

Homeostasis model assessment: insulin resistance and beta-cell function from fasting plasma glucose and insulin concentrations in man.

Diabetologia. 1985; 28: 412–9.

29.

Catalan

, Gomez-Ambrosi

, Rodriguez

. Association of increased visfatin/PBEF/NAMPT circulating concentrations and gene expression levels in peripheral blood cells with lipid metabolism and fatty liver in human morbid obesity. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2010 Jan 25. Epub ahead of print.

30.

Liu

S.W.

, Qiao

S.B.

, Yuan

J.S.

, Liu

D.Q.

Association of plasma visfatin levels with inflammation, atherosclerosis and acute coronary syndromes (ACS) in humans.

Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2009; 71(2): 202–7.

31.

Paschou

, Kukuvitis

, Yavropoulou

M.P.

. Genetic variation in the visfatin (PBEF1/NAMPT) gene and type 2 diabetes in the Greek population. Cytokine. 2010; 51(1): 25–7.

32.

Wang

L.S.

, Yan

J.J.

, Tang

N.P.

. A polymorphism in the visfatin gene promoter is related to decreased plasma levels of inflammatory markers in patients with coronary artery disease. Mol Biol Rep. 2010 Apr 11. Epub ahead of print.

No Association between Visfatin (NAMPT) Gene Variants and Metabolic Traits in the Newfoundland Population

Abstract

Objective

Research design and methods

Results

Conclusions

Keywords

Introduction

Materials and Methods

Subjects

Measurements of Body composition

Serum measurements

Genomic Dna Isolation, Genotyping and Selection of SNPs

Statistical analyses

Results

Discussion

Sources of Funding

Author Contributions

Disclosures

Footnotes

Acknowledgements

References