Haptic exploration, or active touch, is a perceptual modality that has demonstrated therapeutic potential for elementary age children but is not commonly studied with this age group. The aim of this exploratory study was to discover the characteristics of haptic scanning that are associated with efficiency and accuracy in a shape matching task. The study tasks were designed to resemble common visual perception tests, but in a haptic form using wooden shapes. Children ages 6 years, 6 months to 9 years, 6 months (N = 25), and adults (N = 25) engaged in shape matching tasks that involved either cross-modal (haptic with vision) or unimodal (haptic only) exploration. Video recordings were analyzed and four types of haptic strategies were identified that were significantly related to both age and correctness of response: the simultaneous use of two hands was the highest level and the use of one hand was the lowest. The findings are discussed in terms of attention capacity and ability to use points of reference.
AyresA. J. (1989). Sensory integration and praxis tests. Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services.
2.
BaraF.GentazE.ColéP., & Sprenger-CharollesL. (2004). The visuo-haptic and haptic exploration of letters increases the kindergarten-children's understanding of the alphabetic principle. Cognitive Development, 19, 433–449.
3.
BushnellE. W., & BaxtC. (1999). Children's haptic and cross-modal recognition with familiar and unfamiliar objects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 1867–1881.
4.
CermakS. A. (2006). Perceptual functions of the hand. In HendersonA. & PehoskiC. (Eds.), Hand function in the child: Foundations for remediation (2nd ed., pp. 63–88). Maryland Heights, MO: Mosby.
5.
CowanN.ElliottE. M.SaultsJ. S.MoreyC. C.MattoxS.HismjatullinaA., & ConwayA. R. (2005). On the capacity of attention: Its estimation and its role in working memory and cognitive aptitudes. Cognitive Psychology, 51, 42–100.
6.
GarbinC. P. (1990). Visual-touch perceptual equivalence for shape information in children and adults. Perception & Psychophysics, 48, 271–279.
7.
GardnerM. F. (1996). Test of Visual-Perceptual Skills (Non-motor)-Revised. San Francisco: Psychological and Educational Publications.
8.
GibsonJ. J. (1962). Observations on active touch. Psychological Review, 69, 477–491.
9.
GoriM.Del VivaM.SandiniG., & BurrD. C. (2008). Young children do not integrate visual and haptic form information. Current Biology, 18, 694–698.
10.
HatwellY. (2003). Intermodal coordinations in children and adults. In HatwellY.StreriA., & GentazE. (Eds.), Touching for knowing. Cognitive psychology of haptic manual perception (pp. 207–219). Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing.
11.
HendersonJ. M. (2007). Regarding scenes. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16, 219–222.
12.
HoopN. H. (1971). Haptic perception in preschool children. Part II: Object manipulation. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 25, 415–419.
13.
JamesT. W.HumphreyG. K.GatiJ. S.ServosP.MenonR. S., & GoodaleM. A. (2002). Haptic study of three-dimensional objects activates extrastriate visual areas. Neuropsychologia, 40, 1706–1714.
14.
KalagherH., & JonesS. S. (2011a). Developmental change in young children's use of haptic information in a visual task: The role of hand movements. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 108, 293–307.
15.
KalagherH., & JonesS. S. (2011b). Young children's haptic exploratory procedures. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 110, 592–602.
16.
KalenineS.PinetL., & GentazE. (2013). The visual and visuo-haptic exploration of geometrical shapes increases their recognition in preschoolers. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 35, 8–26.
17.
KlatzkyR. L., & LedermanS. (2003). Touch. In HealyA. F. & ProctorR. W. (Eds.), Handbook of psychology: Volume 4—Experimental psychology (pp. 147–176). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
18.
KlatzkyR. L.LedermanS., & BalakrishnanJ. D. (1991). Task-driven extraction of object contour by human haptics: Part 1. Robotica, 9, 43–51.
19.
KlatzkyR. L.LedermanS., & ReedC. (1989). Haptic integration of object properties: Texture, hardness and planar contour. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15, 45–57.
20.
LaceyS.CampbellC., & SathianK. (2007). Vision and touch: Multiple or multisensory representations of objects?Perception, 36, 1513–1521.
21.
LedermanS., & KlatzkyR. L. (1987). Hand movements: A window into haptic object recognition. Cognitive Psychology, 19, 342–368.
22.
LocherP. J. (1985). Use of haptic training to modify impulse and attention control deficits of learning disabled children. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 18, 89–93.
23.
MillarS. (1987). The perceptual “window” in two-handed Braille: Do the left and right hands process text simultaneously?Cortex, 23, 111–122.
24.
MillarS. (1999). Memory in touch. Psicothema, 11, 747–767.
25.
MorraS. (1994). Issues in working memory measurement: Testing for M capacity. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 17, 143–159.
26.
PiagetJ., & InhelderB. (1967). The child's conception of space. New York: Norton.
27.
SathianK., & ZangaladzeA. (2002). Feeling with the mind's eye: Contribution of visual cortex to tactile perception. Behavioural Brain Research, 135, 127–132.
28.
SchaafR. C., & LaneS. J. (2009). Neuroscience foundations of vestibular, proprioceptive, and tactile sensory strategies. OT Practice, 14(22), CE1–CE8.
29.
SchneckC. M. (2010). Visual perception. In Case-SmithJ. & O'BrienJ. C. (Ed.), Occupational therapy for children (6th ed., pp. 373–402). Maryland Heights, MO: Mosby.
30.
SchwarzerG.KuferI., & WilkeningF. (1999). Learning categories by touch: On the development of holistic and analytic processing. Memory and Cognition, 27, 868–877.
