Collective Occupations among Filipina Migrant Workers: Bridging Disrupted Identities

Abstract

This article exemplifies how social and cultural contexts influenced identity-formation among individuals of a collectivistic community. Specifically, ethnographic data on Filipina workers in Hong Kong showed that disruptions caused by migration and foreign employment resulted in participants feeling conflicted about their sense of selves. Further, while still in the host country, participants' engagement in occupations with their peers also enabled the workers to embody new identities through recreation of familiar sociocultural contexts. Using the concept of “interdependent self construal,” the study shows how participants' identities shifted with changes in sociocultural contexts. Also, collective engagement in occupations proved instrumental in alleviating feelings of conflicted sense of selves. As such, this article may contribute to the body of knowledge about the interrelationships of occupation, culture, and identity-formation that, in turn, may enhance cultural competence among occupational therapy practitioners.

Keywords

culture interdependence adaptation

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bagley

Madrid

, & Bolitho

(1997). Stress factors and mental health adjustment of Filipino domestic workers in Hong Kong. International Social Work, 40, 373–383.

Beattie

(1980). Representations of the self in traditional Africa. Africa, 50, 313–320.

Bellah

R. N.

Madsen

Sullivan

W. M.

Swidler

, & Tipton

S. M.

(1985). Habits of the heart: Individualism and commitment in American life. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

Bond

M. H.

(1986). The psychology of the Chinese people. New York: Oxford University Press.

Boyatzis

(1998). Transforming qualitative information. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.

Brewer

(2000). Ethnography. Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press.

Census and Statistics Department. (2010). Hong Kong annual digest of statistics. Hong Kong: Government Logistics Department.

Christiansen

(1999). Defining lives: Occupation as identity: An essay on competence, coherence, and the creation of meaning. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 53, 547–558.

Church

A. T.

(1987). Personality research in a non-Western culture: The Philippines. Psychological Bulletin, 102, 272–292.

10.

Church

A. T.

, & Katigbak

M. S.

(2000). Filipino personality: Indigenous and cross-cultural studies. Manila, Philippines: De La Salle University Press.

11.

Constable

(1997). Maid to order in Hong Kong: Stories of Filipina workers. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

12.

Enriquez

V. G.

(1992). From colonial to liberation psychology. Quezon City: University of the Philippines Press.

13.

Grimm

S. D.

Church

A. T.

Reyes

J. A. S.

, & Katigbak

M. S.

(1999). Self-described traits, values, and moods associated with individualism and collectivism (I-C): Testing I-C theory in an individualistic (U.S.) and a collectivistic (Philippines) culture. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 30, 416–450.

14.

Gripaldo

(April, 2005). Filipino cultural traits: Philippine philosophical studies, III. Cultural Heritage and Contemporary Change. Series IIId, South East Asia, Vol. 4. Washington, DC: Council for Research in Values and Philosophy.

15.

Hofstede

G. H.

(1980). Culture consequences: International differences in work-related values. London: SAGE Publications.

16.

Kakar

(1978). The inner world: A psychoanalytic study of childhood and society in India. Delhi, India: Oxford University Press.

17.

Kondo

(1990). Crafting selves: Power, gender, and discourses of identity in a Japanese workplace. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

18.

Kondo

(2004). Cultural tension in occupational therapy practice: Considerations from a Japanese vantage point. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 58, 174–184.

19.

Lawlor

M. C.

(2003). The significance of being occupied: The social construction of childhood occupations. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 57, 424–434.

20.

Markus

H. R.

, & Kitayama

(1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224–253.

21.

Miller

J. G.

Bersoff

D. M.

, & Harwood

R. L.

(1990). Perceptions of social responsibilities in India and in the United States: Moral imperatives or personal decisions? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 961–978.

22.

Moran

(2000). Moon handbooks: Hong Kong (3rd ed.). Emeryville, CA: Avalon Travel Publishing Inc.

23.

Odawara

(2005). Cultural competency in occupational therapy: Beyond a cross-cultural view of practice. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 59, 325–334.

24.

Roces

, & Roces

(1992). Culture Shock! Manila, Philippines: Graphic Arts Center Publishing.

25.

Sampson

E. E.

(1988). The decentralization of identity: Towards a revised concept of personal and social order. American Psychologist, 40, 1203–1211.

26.

Simpson

, & Ng

(1992). Deliberate self-harm of Filipino immigrants in Hong Kong. Psychologia, 35, 117–120.

27.

Triandis

H. C.

Marin

Lisansky

, & Betancourt

(1984). Simpatia as a cultural script of Hispanics. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 1363–1375.