This study examined the construct validity of a model and measure of life balance conceptualized as congruence among both desired and actual time spent in activities, and equivalence in the degree of discrepancy between desired and actual time spent across activities that meet health, relationship, challenge/interest, and identity needs. Structural equation modeling was used to test the hypothesized relationships between life balance, perceived stress, personal well-being, and need satisfaction. A total of 458 participants representing mixed demographic groups participated in the study by completing four instruments. Structural equation modeling results indicated that congruence moderated by equivalence predicted lower stress, higher personal well-being, and higher need satisfaction, but equivalence alone did not. Working, having children at home, and being non-white negatively moderated congruence and larger family size positively moderated congruence. This study provides initial construct validity evidence for the model and measure of life balance.
AchatH.KawachiI.LevineS.BerkeyC.CoakleE., & ColditzG. (1998). Social networks, stress and health-related quality of life. Quality of Life Research, 7, 735–750.
2.
BeckM., & ArnoldJ. (2009). Gendered time use at home: An ethnographic examination of leisure time in middle-class families. Leisure Studies, 28, 121–142.
3.
BirchenbachJ., & GlassT. (2009). Life-balance: The meaning and the menace in a metaphor. In MatuskaK. & ChristiansenC. (Eds.), Life balance: Multidisciplinary research and theories (pp. 13–22). Bethesda, MD: AOTA Press and SLACK Incorporated.
4.
BondJ.GalinskyE.SwanbergJ., & ProttasD. (2002). The national study of the changing workforce. New York: Families and Work Institute.
5.
CraigL. (2006). Children and the revolution: A time-diary analysis of the impact of motherhood on daily workload. Journal of Sociology, 42, 125–43.
6.
CraigL., & PoojaS. (2009). Work and family: How does the (gender) balance change as children grow?Gender, Work and Organization, 16, 684–709.
7.
DeciE. L., & RyanR. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 227–268.
8.
DienerE. F.EmmonsR.LarsenR., & GriffinS. (1985). The Satisfaction with Life Scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 71–75.
9.
DillmanD. A. (2007). Mail and internet surveys: The tailored design method (2nd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.
10.
GoodmanL. A. (1961). “Snowball sampling”. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 32, 148–170.
11.
HillR. (1949). Families under stress. New York: Harper and Row.
12.
HillR. (2003). Generic features of families under stress. In BossP. & MulliganC. (Eds.), Family stress: Classic and contemporary readings (pp. 177–190). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
KlineR. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). New York: The Guillford Press.
15.
LaveeY.SharlinS., & KatzR. (1996). The effect of parenting stress on marital quality: An integrated mother—father model. Journal of Family Issues, 17, 114–135.
16.
LovibondS. H., & LovibondP. F. (1995). Manual for the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (2nd ed.). Sydney, Australia: The Psychology Foundation of Australia Inc.
17.
MatuskaK. (2010). Workaholism, life balance, and well-being: A comparative analysis. Journal of Occupational Science, 17, 104–111.
18.
MatuskaK. (2012). Description and development of the Life Balance Inventory. OTJR: Occupation, Participation and Health, 32, 220–228.
19.
MatuskaK., & ChristiansenC. (2008). A proposed model of lifestyle balance. Journal of Occupational Science, 15, 9–19.
20.
MatuskaK., & ChristiansenC. (Eds.). (2009). Life balance: Multidisciplinary theories and research. Bethesda, MD: AOTA Press and SLACK Incorporated.
21.
PentlandW., & McCollM. (2009). Another perspective on life balance: Living in integrity with values. In MatuskaK. & ChristiansenC. (Eds.), Life balance: Multidisciplinary research and theories (pp. 165–180). Bethesda, MD: AOTA Press and SLACK Incorporated.
22.
RepettiR.TaylorS., & SeemanT. (2002). Risky families: Family social environments and the mental and physical health of offspring. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 330–366.
23.
RyffC. D. (1989). Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 1069–1081.
24.
SeemanT.LusignoloT.AlbertM., & BerckmanL. (2001). Social relationships, social support, and patterns of cognitive aging in healthy, high-functioning older adults: MacArthur studies of successful aging. Health Psychology, 20, 243–255.
25.
SeleenD. (1982). The congruence between actual and desired use of time by older adults: A predictor of life satisfaction. The Gerontologist, 22, 95–99.
26.
ShawR. (2003). The agent-environment interface: Simon's indirect or Gibson's direct coupling. Ecological Psychology, 15, 37–106.
27.
SheldonK.CumminsR., & KhambleS. (2010). Life balance and well-being: Testing a novel conceptual and measurement approach. Journal of Personality, 78, 1093–1134.
28.
TaylorJ. Y.WashingtonO. G. M.ArtiniamN. T., & LichtenbergP. (2007). Parental stress among African American parents and grandparents. Issues in Mental Health Nursing, 28, 373–387.
29.
ThompsonM. G., & HellerK. (1990). Facets of support related to well-being: Quantitative social isolation and perceived family support in a sample of elderly women. Psychology and Aging, 5, 535–544.
30.
WallenJ. (2002). Balancing work and family: The role of the workplace. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
31.
WhitefordG. (2009). Problematising life balance: Difference, diversity and disadvantage. In MatuskaK. & ChristiansenC. (Eds.), Life balance: Multidisciplinary research and theories (pp. 23–32). Bethesda, MD: AOTA Press and SLACK Incorporated.
32.
WilcockA. A.HallM., & HambleyN. (1997). The relationship between occupational balance and health: A pilot study. Occupational Therapy International, 4, 17–30.
