Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Several in vivo studies have found that transplanting mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) into degenerative intervertebral discs (IVDs) leads to regeneration of disc cells. Since the exact underlying mechanisms are not understood, we investigated the mechanisms of action of MSCs in regeneration of degenerative IVDs via paracrine actions. Human MSCs and degenerative disc cells from the same donor vertebrae were directly or indirectly cocultured. The multidifferentiation potential, cell proliferation, collagen synthesis, and mRNA expression levels were assessed. The proliferation rates of MSCs and degenerative disc cells were higher in the coculture system than in the monolayer cultures or in the conditioned medium of each cell type. During coculturing with nucleus pulposus (NP) cells, mRNA expression of the extracellular matrix (ECM) components aggrecan, versican (VCAN), SOX9, and type II and type VI collagen was significantly increased in MSCs, whereas mRNA expression for type V collagen was increased in MSCs cocultured with annulus fibrosus (AF) cells. In addition, the accumulation of total ECM collagen was greater in cocultured degenerative disc cells than in monocultured cells. During coculturing, MSCs downregulated the expression levels of various proinflammatory cytokine genes in degenerative NP [interleukin-1α (IL-1α), IL-1β, IL-6, and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α)] and AF cells (IL-1α and IL-6), which are involved in the degradation of ECM molecules. In association with the trophic effect of MSCs on degenerative disc cells, upregulation of growth factor mRNA expression was shown in MSCs cocultured with degenerative NP cells [epidermal growth factor (EGF), insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1), osteogenic protein-1 (OP-1), growth and differentiation factor-7 (GDF-7), and transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β)] or degenerative AF cells (IGF-1, OP-1, and GDF-7). In terms of MSC-based clinical approaches to IVD regeneration, implanting MSCs into a degenerative IVD may both stimulate MSC differentiation into an NP- or AF-like phenotype and stimulate the biological activation of degenerative disc cells for self-repair.

Keywords

Annulus fibrosis (AF)Intervertebral disc degeneration Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs)Nucleus pulposus (NP)Vertebral body

Introduction

Degeneration of the intervertebral disc (IVD) is a leading cause of morbidity, resulting in substantial pain, disabling spinal symptoms, and increased healthcare costs¹. Lower back pain is a common symptom that can present as a debilitating health problem, and it is therefore an economically important disorder. Several studies have identified the loss of the IVD extracellular matrix (ECM) as a consequence of disc degeneration to be a major cause of lower back pain².

The IVD is composed of a central, highly hydrated gelatinous nucleus pulposus (NP) surrounded by a more highly organized ring composed predominantly of collagen fibrils called the annulus fibrosus (AF). Within the NP, rounded chondrocyte-like cells are embedded in a disorganized matrix made primarily of type II collagen (COL 2) and aggrecan and supplemented with other proteoglycans (PGs), including versican (VCAN)^3,4, and collagens, including type VI collagen (COL 6). Aggrecan is a highly hydrophilic molecule, and the amount of aggrecan in the NP is sufficient for water absorption to generate swelling pressure capable of exerting a significant force even on loaded vertebrae, with this force being resisted by the AF. Vertebral stability depends, in part, on the balance of these two opposing forces.

In a healthy IVD, there is a balance between anabolic and catabolic processes through regulation by mechanical loading, cytokines, enzymes, and endogenous cells^5–7. Changes in IVD morphology as well as biochemical changes have been observed⁸ during the process of IVD degeneration, which is believed to be caused by aging, trauma, excessive mechanical loading, and other diseases. These changes include increased cellular senescence and death, degradation of ECM molecules and PGs, increased proteinases and inflammatory cytokines, and the production of an acidic pH^9,10.

The degeneration of IVDs is thought to be mediated by the abnormal production of proinflammatory cytokines secreted by NP and AF cells, as well as immune cells^11–13. These cytokines can cause pathogenic responses in the IVD cells that promote senescence or death^14–16. Secreted proinflammatory cytokines associated with IVD degeneration include tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), interleukin-1α (IL-1α), IL-1β, IL-6, IL-17, and various chemokines^5–7,17,18.

A decreased number of NP cells seems to be the cause of disc degeneration, and so transplanting autologous cells might be effective at inhibiting further disc degeneration in vivo¹⁹. However, typically very few endogenous cells can be obtained from the NP tissues for cell expansion²⁰, and it has also been found that the NP harvesting procedure itself may cause degenerative diseases²¹. Because mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) provide several theoretical and practical advantages, due to their extensive renewal potential and multilineage differentiation potential, they have become excellent cells for use in the grafting procedures of cell therapy and IVD regeneration²². Additionally, MSCs are available from many autologous sources and are currently the most popular cells for use in stem cell therapies. However, it is not fully understood how the complicated microenvironment regulates the detailed functions of MSCs for IVD regeneration, and most of the recent studies have focused on the outcomes of MSC transplantation rather than the mechanisms of action.

Several studies have found that cells in the NP or AF region may respond to exogenous growth factors with changes in collagen and PG synthesis, including transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β), insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1), bone morphogenetic protein-2 (BMP-2), and BMP-7^23–28. These effects may be related to increased cell proliferation or to an intrinsic stimulatory effect on transcriptional regulation of matrix protein biosynthesis; however, it is not fully understood how cells of the NP and AF respond differently to these cytokines and how these changes may be regulated.

The bone marrow (BM) used in MSC-based clinical applications is harvested from the iliac crest (IC) in almost all cases. However, morbidity at the donor site (i.e., the IC) in clinical applications is a serious postoperative concern^29–31 since it manifests as chronic pain in the donor. One way of circumventing problems associated with additional surgical morbidity at the donor site is to use MSCs harvested from the recipient site itself or adjacent tissue. The vertebral body (VB) contains BM that can be easily collected and used during an operative procedure such as orthopedic surgery. In addition, previous studies found that the regenerative potential was higher for BM stem cells from the VB than those from the IC, with higher concentrations of colony-forming unit fibroblasts and progenitor cells^32–34. If cells of the lumbar VB BM could be used for IVD regeneration, this would obviate problems linked to applying surgical interventions to other healthy tissues, and possibly also donor site morbidity at the IC.

The aim of the current study was to identify the mechanisms of action of MSC-mediated regeneration of the degenerative IVDs, particularly via paracrine mechanisms. Therefore, this study investigated changes in the cellular responses of MSCs and degenerative disc cells (NP or AF cells) obtained from the same donor vertebrae using a coculture system.

Materials and Methods

Disc Cell Source and Culture

Human NP and AF cells were isolated from the degenerative lumbar IVD tissue (disc level L4 or L5) of five patients (mean ± SD: 40.60 ± 9.61 years; one female and four males) for the experiments of this study, and representative results from one subject (a 57-year-old male) are reported herein. The donors voluntarily provided written informed consent for their tissue to be used in accordance with guidelines approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of the College of Dentistry at Yonsei University (IRB No. 2-2012-0048). After obtaining informed consent from the donors and local Ethics Committee approval, degenerative lumbar IVD tissue was obtained during surgery for herniation of the lumbar disc. NP and AF tissues were separated and digested in a solution containing 2 mg/ml collagenase (Serva Electrophoresis, Heidelberg, Germany) and 1 mg/ml dispase (Gibco, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Grand Island, NY, USA) in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM; Gibco) containing antibiotics. The digested tissue/cell suspension was passed through a 100-μm mesh (Becton Dickinson, San Jose, CA, USA) to remove tissue debris, and cells were then pelleted by centrifugation at 380 × g for 5 min. The supernatant was removed, and the cells were resuspended and cultured to confluence in T25 cell culture flasks (Nunc, Thermo Fisher Scientific) with DMEM/nutrient mixture F-12 (Gibco) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS; Gibco) and 20 μg/ml gentamicin (Gibco) at 37°C in a humid atmosphere containing 5% CO₂, with the medium changed every 3 days.

MSC Source and Culture

Fresh human BM was harvested from the VB adjacent to the degenerative IVD tissue in the same subject during orthopedic surgery (Naeun Hospital, Suwon, Korea), using the same protocol as in our previous studies^35,36. The patients provided informed consent for their tissue to be used in accordance with guidelines approved by the IRB of the College of Dentistry at Yonsei University (IRB No. 2-2012-0048). The mononuclear cell (MNC) fraction was harvested from BM aspirates to isolate MSCs using conventional density gradient centrifugation with a density gradient solution (Histopaque 1077; Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). These cells were cultured in T75 cell culture flasks with α-modification of minimum essential medium (α-MEM; Gibco), supplemented with 10% FBS (Gibco), 20 μg/ml gentamicin (Gibco), 100 μM L-ascorbic acid 2-phosphate (Sigma-Aldrich), and 1% GlutaMAX (Gibco) at 37°C in a humid atmosphere containing 5% CO₂. Nonadherent cells were discarded after 7 days, and the adherent cells were cultured to confluence, with the medium changed every 3 days.

Coculturing of MSCs and Disc Cells

Six-well culture plates and inserts (Becton Dickinson) were used to coculture MSCs and disc cells. Culture inserts consisted of a polyethylene terephthalate track-etched membrane with 0.4-μm pores at the bottom to prevent the exchange of cellular components. MSCs were seeded into plates/inserts at 1 × 10³/cm², while NP or AF cells were seeded at 3 × 10³/cm². For coculture wells without contact (indirect), MSCs (or disc cells) were seeded onto the tissue culture plastic, whereas disc cells (or MSCs) were seeded onto the upper surface of the membrane of the tissue culture inserts. For cocultures with cell–cell contact (direct), MSCs (or disc cells) were cultured on the reverse side of the membrane of the insert in culture media, and disc cells (MSCs) were cultured on the outer culture plate. Each cell type was separately precultured in each aforementioned medium for 4 h, and the culture insert was set in the culture plate including the other cells. The outer plate and the insert including two types of cells were maintained at 37°C and 5% CO₂ in a humidified atmosphere. Cocultured cells were maintained for 7 days, with the medium changed every 3 days.

Morphology of MSCs and Disc Cells

MSCs and disc cells were expanded continuously at 37°C and 5% CO₂ in a humidified atmosphere. Cell morphologies were observed using a light microscope (CKX41; Olympus, Tokyo, Japan).

In Vitro Osteogenic, Adipogenic, and Chondrogenic Differentiation

Cells at passage 5 (P5) were seeded into six-well plates (Nunc, Roskilde, Denmark) at 1 × 10⁵ cells/well and cultured until they reached subconfluence. Osteogenic differentiation was induced by culturing in α-MEM containing 10% FBS, 20 μg/ml gentamicin (Gibco), 2 mM GlutaMAX-1 100X, 100 μM L-ascorbic acid (Sigma-Aldrich), 0.01 μM dexamethasone (Sigma-Aldrich), and 1.8 mM potassium phosphate monobasic (Sigma-Aldrich). After 2–3 weeks of induction, the cells were fixed in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS; Gibco) containing 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA; BBC Biochemical, Mt. Vernon, WA, USA) solution, and then stained with Alizarin red stain (Sigma-Aldrich). The culture medium for adipogenic differentiation comprised α-MEM containing 10% FBS, 20 μg/ml gentamicin, 2 mM GlutaMAX-1 100X, 100 μM L-ascorbic acid, 0.5 μM hydrocortisone (Sigma-Aldrich), 10 μg/ml insulin (Sigma-Aldrich), 60 μM indomethacin (Sigma-Aldrich), and 0.5 mM methylisobutylxanthine (Sigma-Aldrich). After 2–3 weeks of induction, the cells were fixed in PBS containing 10% formaldehyde solution, and then stained with Oil red O stain (Sigma-Aldrich).

Chondrogenic differentiation was performed with 4 × 10⁵ cells (at P5 in the pellet culture in 15-ml conical tubes; SPL Life Sciences, Pocheon, Korea) and centrifuged at 530 × g for 5 min. After 2–3 days of incubation with chondrogenic media, the cells had coalesced and formed free-floating cell pellets. The chondrogenic differentiation medium used contained α-MEM supplemented with 20 μg/ml gentamicin, 1% ITS (Becton Dickinson), 0.1 μM dexamethasone (Sigma-Aldrich), 0.172 mM L-ascorbic acid, 40 μg/ml proline (Sigma-Aldrich), and 10 ng/ml TGF-β (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA). After 3 weeks of chondrogenic induction, the pellets were fixed in PBS containing 4% formaldehyde solution, embedded in paraffin (Sigma-Aldrich), and then sectioned at a thickness of 5 μm. The sections were immunostained with Alcian blue (Sigma-Aldrich) to enable the visual assessment of chondrogenic differentiation. The total areas of mineralized nodule formation (Alizarin red stain), lipid vacuoles (Oil red O stain), and sulfated PG deposition (Alcian blue stain) were measured using an automated image analysis system (Image-Pro Plus; Media Cybernetics, Rockville, MD, USA).

Expression of Surface Markers Using Fluorescence-Activated Cell Sorting

The characteristics of the cells were investigated further by analyzing the cell surface markers of isolated cells using flow cytometry analysis (fluorescence-activated cell sorting; FACSCalibur; Becton-Dickinson), the procedure for which has been previously described³⁷. Briefly, the cells were then incubated with 3% bovine serum albumin (BSA; Sigma-Aldrich) and antibodies against CD14, CD44, CD45 (1:100; Beckman Coulter, Pasadena, CA, USA), CD34, CD90 (1:100; BD Pharmingen, La Jolla, CA, USA), CD73, and CD105 (1:50; Becton-Dickinson) for 1 h at room temperature. The cells were then washed three times with washing buffer composed of PBS with 2% FBS and observed with a flow cytometer.

Measurement of Proliferation

Cell proliferation was determined using the Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK-8; Dojindo Molecular Technologies, Rockville, MD, USA)³⁸. A 96-well plate (Nunc) containing MSCs or disc cells was inoculated with prepackaged CCK-8 solution. The samples were incubated at 37°C in a humid atmosphere containing 5% CO₂ for 2 h, and the absorbance of the supernatant at 450 nm was measured by a spectrophotometric device (VersaMax; Molecular Devices, San Jose, CA, USA). Cell counts were determined using a calibration curve.

In Vitro Expression of ECM Collagen Synthesis Assay

Levels of total ECM collagen in the culture were measured using the Sircol Collagen Assay Kit (Biocolor, Carrickfergus, County Antrim, UK) as described previously³⁹. In brief, MSCs and disc cells were cocultured without contact for 5 days, and the cells adherent to the insert were used in the ECM collagen assay. Cell supernatants were collected by centrifugation at 260 × g for 5 min, and a 200-μl aliquot was added to the dye reagent in the assay kit. The solution was incubated for 30 min and then centrifuged at 9,300 × g, with the suspensions and pellets then being separated. The remnant pellets were dissolved with alkali reagent, and the same aliquots were plated and their relative absorbance was measured at 540 nm.

Generation of Cell-Conditioned Medium

To generate cell-conditioned medium (CM), MSCs or disc cells were seeded at 5 × 10⁵ cells/well (six-well culture plates) in 0.1% FBS medium and cultured at 37°C and 5% CO₂. After 24 h of cell culturing, 0.1% FBS medium was replaced with serum-free medium (without FBS) and cultured for an additional 48 h. The medium was retained and filtered through a 0.2-μm Minisart filter (Sartorius Stedim Biotech, Goettingen, Germany) to remove cell debris.

Proliferation in CM

Cells were seeded at 2 × 10³ cells/well (24-well culture plates; Nunc) in culture medium and then replaced in culture medium with control (serum-free medium) or CM after 24 h of cell culturing. These cells were incubated in each condition for 7 days. The cell proliferation was measured using the CCK-8 assay.

Quantitative Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction Analysis of Gene Expression

The characteristics of the cells (MSCs and degenerative disc cells) were investigated on the basis of the expression of ECM, proinflammatory cytokines, and growth factor genes using quantitative real-time poly-merase chain reaction (qRT-PCR). Cells were harvested from the MSCs or disc cells cultivated on the insert using TRIzol (Invitrogen, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Carlsbad, CA, USA), and total cell RNA was prepared. The qRT-PCR analysis was performed for several ECM genes (including aggrecan, VCAN, SOX9, COL 2, COL 6, COL 5, and COL 1) and proinflammatory cytokine genes (including IL-1α, IL-1β, IL-6, and TNF-α) according to the aforementioned procedures. In addition, the expression levels of the genes encoding epidermal growth factor (EGF), IGF-1, osteogenic protein-1 (OP-1; also known as BMP-7), growth and differentiation factor-7 (GDF-7; also known as BMP-12), and TGF-β were measured. The primers used for each gene are listed in Table 1.

Table 1.

Gene Primers Used for qRT-PCR

Gene (GenBank No.)	Forward Primer (5′-3′)	Reverse Primer (5′-3′)	Product Size (bp)	Melting Temperature (MT; °C)
GAPDH (NM_002046.4)	AGGCTGTGGGCAAGGTCAT	GGAAGGCCATGCCAGTGA	57	61
Aggrecan (NM 001135.3)	AGGGCGAGTGGAATGATGTT	GGTGGCTGTGCCCTTTTTAC	68	57.9
Versican (NM_004385.4)	TGGAATGATGTTCCCTGCAA	AAGGTCTTGGCATTTTCTACAACAG	98	55.7
SOX9 (NM-000346.3)	GACTTCCGCGACGTGGAC	GTTGGGCGGCAGGTACTG	99	61.2
Collagen type II (NM_033150.2)	GGCAATAGCAGGTTCACGTACA	CGATAACAGTCTTGCCCCACTT	79	59
Collagen type V (NM_000093)	ACGCGGCGATCTTCCAAAG	GGAAATGCAGACGCAGGGTA	101	60.4
Collagen type VI (BT007617)	CGAGAGCATTGGGTACACCAA	CAGCCTGTTGACCACGTTGA	61	58.8
IL-1α (NM_000575.3)	TTGCCCATCCAAACTTGTTTATT	CCCCCCTGCCAAGCA	62	54.1
IL-1β (NM_000576.2)	ACGATGCACCTGTACGATCACT	CACCAAGCTTTTTTGCTGTGAGT	62	59.4
IL-6 (NM_000600.3)	GCTGCAGGCACAGAACCA	GCTGCGCAGAATGAGATGAG	58	60.5
TNF-α (NM_000594.3)	TGCTCCTCACCCACACCAT	GGAGGTTGACCTTGGTCTGGTA	60	60.4
EGF (NM_001963)	GGTCAATGCAACCAACTTCATG	GCTCTGTGCCCATTCCACAT	60	56.1
IGF-1 (NM_001111283)	AAGGAGGCTGGAGATGTATTGC	CGGACAGAGCGAGCTGACTT	60	58.6
OP-1 (NM_001719.2)	CACGCTACCACCATCGAGAGT	GCTTCCCCTTCTGGGATCTT	58	60.6
GDF-7 (NM_182828.2)	CCACTGCGAGGGCCTTT	TGAATGATGGCATGGTTGGT	69	60.3
TGF-β (NM_000660)	GGGAAATTGAGGGCTTTCG	AGTGTGTTATCCCTGCTGTCACA	61	56.0

Statistical Analysis

All of the in vitro experiments were performed in triplicate. Data were analyzed using SPSS statistics software (version 20.0; IBM, Armonk, NY, USA). Unpaired t-tests were used to analyze differences between two groups. Multiple comparisons were performed using repeated-measures analysis of variance followed by Scheffé's test for post hoc analysis. Differences were considered statistically significant at p < 0.05.

Results

Characterization of MSCs and Degenerative Disc Cells

The MSCs were established from MNC fractions obtained by the Ficoll density gradient method, and the degenerative disc cells were obtained from surgical degenerative lumbar IVD tissue. Figure 1A shows that the MSCs and degenerative disc cells displayed similar fibroblastic morphologies. The NP cells appeared rounded, and the AF cells appeared thin and elongated, which is consistent with previous reports⁴⁰. Flow cytometry analysis showed that both MSCs and degenerative disc cells were positive for the presence of CD105, CD90, CD73, and CD44, and negative for CD45, CD34, and CD14 (Fig. 1B). The in vitro differentiation model revealed that both cell types also successfully differentiated into osteogenic, adipogenic, and chondrogenic lineages under specific differentiation stimuli (Fig. 1C), although osteogenic and adipogenic differentiation was stronger for MSCs than for degenerative disc cells. We examined ECM-related gene expression levels, which revealed that aggrecan showed higher expression in degenerative disc cells despite the similar expression levels of VCAN. The expression levels of SOX9, COL 2, and COL 6 were higher in NP cells than in AF cells, whereas the expression of COL 5 was higher in AF cells (Fig. 1D). Both NP and AF cells exhibited the characteristics of stem cells, but they differed from those of MSCs.

Figure 1.

Characterization of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) and disc cells [nucleus pulposus (NP) and annulus fibrosus (AF) cells]. (A) Morphologic observation of MSCs, NP cells, and AF cells used in this study (magnification: 200×, scale bars: 100 μm). (B) Immunophenotype analysis of MSCs, NP cells, and AF cells by flow cytometry analysis. Cultured MSCs, NP cells, and AF cells were incubated with specific monoclonal antibodies against the cell surface marker antigens including CD105, CD90, CD73, CD44, CD45, CD34, and CD14 followed by florescence-conjugated secondary antibodies. Data are representative of three independent experiments. (C) In vitro multipotency of MSCs, NP cells, and AF cells was examined. Osteogenic, adipogenic, and chondrogenic differentiation was determined by Alizarin red, Oil red O (magnification: 200×, scale bars: 100 μm), and Alcian blue stains, respectively (magnification: 100×, scale bars: 200 μm). All the differentiation groups successfully induced specific differentiation responding to specific biologic stimuli, while all the control groups (data not shown) that were cultured in normal growth media did not induce corresponding differentiation. Data are representative of three independent experiments. (D) Relative basal gene expression of aggrecan, VCAN, SOX9, COL 2, COL 5, and COL 6 in MSCs, NP cells, and AF cells was determined in monolayer cell culture. Gene expression was measured by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR). All the values are normalized to GAPDH (glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase), which was used as a housekeeping gene. Each experiment was performed at least in triplicate. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.001.

Cell Proliferation Following Coculture

The average numbers of cells per well in the monocultures (MSCs, NP, or AF control) and indirect cocultures (with NP, AF, or MSCs) were as follows: MSC group: 1.46 × 10⁴ cells in the MSC control, 1.66 × 10⁴ cells when coculturing with NP, and 1.69 × 10⁴ cells when coculturing with AF; NP cell group: 3.89 × 10³ cells in the NP control, and 4.32 × 10³ cells when coculturing with MSCs; AF cell group: 4.70 × 10³ cells in the AF control, and 5.05 × 10³ cells when coculturing with MSCs.

The proliferation rates of MSCs and disc cells were significantly enhanced in cocultures (p < 0.05) (Fig. 2). The results from the coculture system revealed that MSCs and degenerative disc cells each had beneficial effects on the proliferation of the other cell type.

Figure 2.

Cell proliferation in MSCs, NP cells, or AF cells after 7 days of monoculture (control) or coculture. Cell proliferation was determined using a CCK-8 assay kit. MSCs and degenerative disc cell proliferation were slightly enhanced in coculture. (A) MSC, (B) NP cell, and (C) AF cell group. *p < 0.05.

Gene Expression of ECM Following Direct Coculture

The relative expression levels of ECM genes in MSCs and disc cells are shown in Figure 3. When MSCs were directly cocultured with NP cells, MSCs showed a significant increase in aggrecan, VCAN, SOX9, COL 2, and COL 6 mRNA expression after 7 days of coculturing compared with MSCs cultured alone (MSC control). MSCs cocultured with AF cells showed a significant increase in COL 5 mRNA expression. However, mRNA expression of aggrecan, VCAN, and SOX9 slightly decreased (p < 0.05) (Fig. 3A and B). Aggrecan, SOX9, COL 2, and COL 6 gene expression in NP cells was increased following coculturing with MSCs (p < 0.05) (Fig. 3C). In the AF cells, aggrecan, VCAN, and COL 6 expression levels decreased following coculturing with MSCs (Fig. 3D).

Figure 3.

Relative gene expression of extracellular matrix in MSCs, NP cells, or AF cells after 7 days of monoculture (control) or coculture. Gene expression was measured by qRT-PCR. All the values are normalized to GAPDH, which was used as a housekeeping gene. (A) MSCs after coculture with NP cells, (B) MSCs after coculture with AF cells, (C) NP cells after coculture with MSCs, and (D) AF cells after coculture with MSCs. Each experiment was performed at least in triplicate. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.001.

In Vitro Assay of ECM Collagen Synthesis

We examined whether indirect coculturing of MSCs and disc cells affected ECM collagen synthesis. The total amount of ECM collagen in the monoculture (control) or coculture was measured using the Sircol Collagen Assay Kit. More total ECM collagen accumulated in the cocultured disc cells than in the monocultured cells (p < 0.05) (Fig. 4C and D). No significant difference was observed in MSCs cocultured with disc cells (p > 0.05) (Fig. 4A and B).

Figure 4.

Insoluble collagen synthesis in MSCs, NP cells, or AF cells after 5 days of monoculture (control) or coculture. Collagen production was determined using a Sircol Assay Kit. (A) MSCs after coculture with NP cells, (B) MSCs after coculture with AF cells, (C) NP cells after coculture with MSCs, and (D) AF cells after coculture with MSCs. *p < 0.05.

Cell Proliferation in CM

To ensure that interaction between MSCs and disc cells resulted in a paracrine effect on cell proliferation, the cells were cultured with MSCs or disc CM. Cell proliferation was measured using the CCK-8 assay. The final cell numbers in NP-CM, AF-CM, or MSC-CM were as follows: MSCs/NP-CM group: 7.3 × 10³ cells in controls and 11.41 × 10³ cells in NP-CM; MSCs/AF-CM group: 6.5 × 10³ cells in controls and 9.2 × cells in AF-CM; NP/MSC-CM group: 2.6 × 10³ cells in controls and 3.2 × 10³ cells in MSC-CM; AF/MSC-CM group: 2.7 × 10³ cells in controls and 3.2 × 10³ cells in MSC-CM.

The cells (MSCs or disc cells) cultured in CM showed increased proliferation compared with controls cultured in serum-free medium (p < 0.05) (Fig. 5). These results correspond to those obtained in the cocultures (Fig. 2), which suggests that there is a mutually trophic effect on cell proliferation between MSCs and NP or AF cells. We hypothesize that this trophic effect is able to stimulate MSCs or disc cells for disc regeneration, including enhancement of matrix synthesis, MSC differentiation into an NP- or AF-like phenotype, downregulation of proinflammatory cytokines in disc cells, and upregulation of growth factors in MSCs.

Figure 5.

Cell proliferation in MSCs, NP cells, or AF cells after 7 days of MSC, NP, or AF cell-conditioned medium (CM) culture. The cell proliferation was measured by a CCK-8 assay kit. (A) MSCs in NP-CM (MSC/NP-CM group), (B) MSCs in AF-CM (MSC/AF-CM group), (C) NP cells in MSC-CM (NP/MSC-CM group), and (D) AF cells in MSC-CM (AF/MSC-CM group). *p < 0.05.

Proinflammatory Cytokine Gene Expression in Disc Cells Following Coculture

We examined whether the direct coculturing of disc cells and MSCs had an anti-inflammatory effect. The relative expression levels of proinflammatory cytokine genes, including IL-1α, IL-1β, IL-6, and TNF-α, were measured using qRT-PCR. In NP cells directly cocultured with MSCs, IL-1α, IL-1β, and IL-6α mRNA expression levels were significantly decreased, and TNF-α mRNA expression showed the largest decrease (p < 0.05) (Fig. 6A). However, AF cells showed no change in IL-1β and TNF-α mRNA expression levels, while IL-1α and IL-6 mRNA expression levels were slightly decreased (p < 0.05) (Fig. 6B).

Figure 6.

Relative gene expression of proinflammatory cytokines in NP or AF cells after 7 days of monoculture (control) or coculture with MSCs. Gene expression was measured by qRT-PCR. All the values are normalized to GAPDH, which was used as a housekeeping gene. (A) NP cells after coculture with MSCs and (B) AF cells after coculture with MSCs. Each experiment was performed at least in triplicate. *p < 0.05.

Growth Factor Gene Expression in MSCs

To confirm the trophic effect of MSCs on disc cells, we measured mRNA expression levels for EGF, IGF-1, OP-1 (BMP-7), GDF-7 (BMP-12), and TGF-β in MSCs after coculturing with NP or AF cells. MSCs were directly cocultured with disc cells, and changes in the expression levels of growth factor genes were measured using the qRT-PCR. MSCs showed significant increases in IGF-1, OP-1, and GDF-7 mRNA expression levels compared with control after coculturing with NP or AF cells. The expression levels of EGF and TGF-β were also increased following coculturing with NP cells (p < 0.05) (Fig. 7).

Figure 7.

Relative gene expression of growth factors in MSCs after 7 days of monoculture (control) or coculture with NP or AF cells. Gene expression was measured by qRT-PCR. All the values are normalized to GAPDH, which was used as a housekeeping gene. (A) MSCs after coculture with NP cells and (B) MSCs after coculture with AF cells. Each experiment was performed at least in triplicate. *p < 0.05.

Discussion

Cell-based therapies or tissue engineering for the repair of degenerative IVDs requires a source of viable cells⁴¹ with an NP-like phenotype that can be implanted into the NP of the degenerative disc to produce a functional NP-like matrix. Several studies have found stimulatory effects of human NP cells using coculturing with MSCs. A maintenance function of MSCs in improving the biological and metabolic viabilities of NP cells was identified in the current study. We found that NP cell proliferation, cytokine/growth factor expression, and activation of DNA and PG synthesis were significantly upregulated in a conventional coculture system of MSCs compared with monolayer culturing of NP cells⁴². Previous studies have shown that MSCs can differentiate into cells with an NP-like phenotype^43,44, including in experiments transplanting MSCs into IVDs^45–49 and coculturing MSCs and IVD cells^50–52.

In order to explain the effects on either cell type, several investigators have utilized coculture model systems. We investigated the in vitro interaction between MSCs and degenerative disc cells using an indirect or direct coculture system to verify whether there is active mutual proliferation between MSCs and degenerative disc cells or whether MSCs stimulate degenerative disc cells in terms of enhancing the ECM gene expression. Importantly, we have compared the stimulatory effects between MSCs and NP or AF cells after coculturing. The proliferation rates of MSCs, NP cells, and AF cells were significantly upregulated in the coculture system compared to the monocultures. In addition, these results were confirmed in the culture using each type of CM. This suggests that there is a trophic effect between MSCs and NP or AF cells. Of particular importance is our demonstration that during coculturing with NP cells, the mRNA expression levels of ECM genes in MSCs such as aggrecan, VCAN, SOX9, COL 2, and COL 6 were significantly increased, whereas MSCs exhibited increased mRNA expression of COL 5 in cocultures with AF cells. The aggrecan, VCAN, COL 2, and COL 6 have been reported as NP cell marker genes, and SOX9 is the most commonly analyzed marker of MSC differentiation into chondrocyte-like cells such as NP cells^3,53,54. On the other hand, COL 5 was expressed markedly more strongly in AF cells than in NP cells⁵⁵. In the evaluation of the effect of MSCs on degenerative disc cells, the mRNA expression levels of aggrecan, SOX9, COL 2, and COL 6 in NP cells were increased following coculturing with MSCs. In the AF cells, COL 5 expression showed no change following coculturing with MSCs. These results suggest that MSCs acquire an NP- or AF-like phenotype after coculturing and stimulate only NP cells in terms of enhancing the mRNA expression of matrix genes. Thus, implanting MSCs into a degenerative IVD may result in the stimulation of regeneration.

The IVD contains various types of collagen, including COL 2, COL 5, COL 6, and types I, III, IX, XI, XII, and XIV. Collagen is an ECM molecule, as is aggrecan. The continuous structural breakdown of ECM molecules of IVDs results in mechanical instability^40,56, which means that the collagen synthesis of NP and AF cells is important for vertebral stability. We used a Sircol collagen assay to assess whether coculturing MSCs and degenerative disc cells affected the synthesis of insoluble collagen. We found that MSCs significantly enhance collagen synthesis of the ECM in NP or AF cells after coculturing with MSCs, whereas MSCs show no change in collagen synthesis of the ECM after coculturing with NP or AF cells. This suggests that during coculturing, MSCs stimulate collagenous ECM regeneration of degenerative disc cells.

Following the initial IVD degeneration, IVD cells upregulate inflammatory cytokines and chemokines, including IL-1α, IL-1β, IL-6, and TNF^6,17,18,57. IVD cells express several catabolic molecules in this inflammatory environment, and these enzymes promote the degradation of ECM molecules such as COL 2 and aggrecan, which leads to IVD degeneration and lower back pain⁵⁸. To assess the anti-inflammatory effect during coculturing in degenerative disc cells, we examined the expression levels of the proinflammatory cytokine genes of IL-1α, IL-1β, IL-6, and TNF-α. The expression levels of all four of these genes were significantly downregulated in NP cells, while IL-1α and IL-6 were slightly downregulated in AF cells after coculturing with MSCs. These results show that MSCs inhibit expression of proinflammatory molecules in degenerative disc cells. The decrease in the expression of proinflammatory molecules may inhibit the degradation of ECM molecules. Furthermore, controlling proinflammatory molecules may improve low back pain. However, this effect requires further investigation.

Several studies have shown that MSCs exert a trophic effect on cells in their vicinity by secreting various growth factors and cytokines that have the potential to stimulate the cells⁵⁹. An early study of cytokine-induced changes in disc cell metabolism found changes in cell proliferation and PG synthesis of disc explants when they were cultured in media supplemented with various growth factors. Multiple investigators have contributed to these findings that cells of the NP or AF region may respond to exogenous growth factors with changes in cell proliferation and collagen and PG synthesis, including EGF, IGF-1, TGF-β, and BMP^23,60–64. Some of these effects may be related to regeneration of degenerative IVDs. To confirm the trophic effect of MSCs on degenerative disc cells, we measured the mRNA expression levels for EGF, IGF-1, OP-1 (BMP-7), GDF-7 (BMP-12), and TGF-β in MSCs after coculturing with NP or AF cells. Both NP and AF cells significantly increased the mRNA expression levels for IGF-1, OP-1, and GDF-7 in MSCs after coculturing. The expression levels of EGF and TGF-β increased only in NP cells, while that of TGF-β was significantly reduced in MSCs cocultured with AF cells compared to MSCs only. Each of these selective cellular responses might be caused by differences in the environmental effects for NP and AF cells. NP and AF layers have structural differences (e.g., cartilaginous vs. fibrous), and MSCs affected by the cells from these layers might show different response patterns. This increased growth factor gene expression might be the mechanism responsible for the observed increase in cell proliferation, the differentiation of MSCs into an NP- or AF-like phenotype, the decrease in proinflammatory molecule-associated gene expression, and the enhancement of matrix-associated gene expression in NP cells.

Several recent in vivo studies found that MSC implantation into the degenerative IVD leads to regeneration of a disc cell matrix, although the exact mechanisms are not understood^38,39,41,65. Our data suggest that implanting MSCs into a degenerative IVD may reduce inflammatory responses and enhance the regenerative capacities of MSCs and NP/AF cells mutually via paracrine effects. In addition, implanted MSCs may lead to enhancement of cell proliferation and collagen synthesis of the ECM and downregulation of proinflammatory cytokine gene expression in degenerative disc cells. Thus, MSCs may be able to stimulate self-repair in degenerative disc cells. Furthermore, our data suggest that these actions in degenerative disc cells during coculturing can be explained by the increase in the growth factor gene expression of MSCs. This further suggests that cocultured MSCs exert trophic effects on degenerative NP or AF cells. In addition, we suggest that different growth factors are involved in the self-repair of degenerative NP or AF cells; therefore, their role in directing MSCs and disc cell behavior in degenerative IVDs requires further investigation.

This study has shown for the first time that MSCs from the VB may be useful in the regeneration of degenerative IVDs via paracrine interaction. The paracrine actions of VB-derived MSCs might enhance the therapeutic efficacy. Additionally, VB-derived MSCs could become a sustainable cell source of MSCs for IVD regeneration in the future, as is currently done for other MSC types, including adipose- and umbilical cord blood-derived MSCs.

Footnotes

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the Bio & Medical Technology Development Program of the National Research Foundation (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Science, ICT & Future Planning (Nos. 2012M3A9C6049862 and 2012M 3A9B2052521). The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

Waddell

Low back pain: A twentieth century health care enigma. Spine 1996; 21(24): 2820–5.

Luoma

, Riihimaki

, Luukkonen

, Raininko

, Viikari-Juntura

, Lamminen

Low back pain in relation to lumbar disc degeneration. Spine 2000; 25(4): 487–92.

Sive

J.I.

, Baird

, Jeziorsk

, Watkins

, Hoyland

J.A.

, Freemont

A.J.

Expression of chondrocyte markers by cells of normal and degenerate intervertebral discs. Mol Pathol. 2002; 55(2): 91–7.

Sztrolovics

, Grover

, Cs-Szabo

, Shi

S.L.

, Zhang

, Mort

J.S.

, Roughley

P.J.

The characterization of versican and its message in human articular cartilage and intervertebral disc. J Orthop Res. 2002; 20(2): 257–66.

Cuellar

J.M.

, Borges

P.M.

, Cuellar

V.G.

, Yoo

, Scuderi

G.J.

, Yeomans

D.C.

Cytokine expression in the epidural space: A model of noncompressive disc herniation-induced inflammation. Spine 2013; 38(1): 17–23.

Seguin

C.A.

, Pilliar

R.M.

, Roughley

P.J.

, Kandel

R.A.

Tumor necrosis factor-alpha modulates matrix production and catabolism in nucleus pulposus tissue. Spine 2005; 30(17): 1940–8.

Shamji

M.F.

, Setton

L.A.

, Jarvis

, So

, Chen

, Jing

, Bullock

, Isaacs

R.E.

, Brown

, Richardson

W.J.

Proinflammatory cytokine expression profile in degenerated and herniated human intervertebral disc tissues. Arthritis Rheum. 2010; 62(7): 1974–82.

Urban

J.P.

, Roberts

Degeneration of the intervertebral disc. Arthritis Res Ther. 2003; 5(3): 120–30.

Adams

M.A.

, Roughley

P.J.

What is intervertebral disc degeneration, and what causes it?

Spine 2006; 31(18): 2151–61.

10.

Leung

V.Y.

, Chan

, Cheung

K.M.

Regeneration of intervertebral disc by mesenchymal stem cells: Potentials, limitations, and future direction. Eur Spine J. 2006; 15(Suppl. 3): S406–13.

11.

Kepler

C.K.

, Markova

D.Z.

, Hilibrand

A.S.

, Vaccaro

A.R.

, Risbud

M.V.

, Albert

T.J.

, Anderson

D.G.

Substance P stimulates production of inflammatory cytokines in human disc cells. Spine 2013; 38(21): E1291–9.

12.

Rand

, Reichert

, Floman

, Rotshenker

Murine nucleus pulposus-derived cells secrete interleukins-1-beta, -6, and -10 and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor in cell culture. Spine 1997; 22(22): 2598–601.

13.

Yamamoto

, Maeno

, Takada

, Kakutani

, Yurube

, Zhang

, Hirata

, Kurakawa

, Sakai

, Mochida

, Doita

, Kurosaka

, Nishida

Fas ligand plays an important role for the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines in intervertebral disc nucleus pulposus cells. J Orthop Res. 2013; 31(4): 608–15.

14.

Purmessur

, Walter

B.A.

, Roughley

P.J.

, Laudier

D.M.

, Hecht

A.C.

, Iatridis

A role for TNFalpha in intervertebral disc degeneration: A non-recoverable catabolic shift. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2013; 433(1): 151–6.

15.

Roberts

, Evans

, Trivedi

, Menage

Histology and pathology of the human intervertebral disc. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006; 88(Suppl. 2): 10–4.

16.

Shen

, Yan

, Jiang

L.S.

, Dai

L.Y.

Autophagy in rat annulus fibrosus cells: Evidence and possible implications. Arthritis Res Ther. 2011; 13(4): R132.

17.

Le Maitre

C.L.

, Freemont

A.J.

, Hoyland

J.A.

The role of interleukin-1 in the pathogenesis of human intervertebral disc degeneration. Arthritis Res Ther. 2005; 7(4): R732–45.

18.

Le Maitre

C.L.

, Hoyland

J.A.

, Freemont

A.J.

Catabolic cytokine expression in degenerate and herniated human intervertebral discs: IL-1beta and TNFalpha expression profile. Arthritis Res Ther. 2007; 9(4): R77.

19.

Gruber

H.E.

, Johnson

T.L.

, Leslie

, Ingram

J.A.

, Martin

, Hoelscher

, Banks

, Phieffer

, Coldham

, Hanley

E.N.

Jr . Autologous intervertebral disc cell implantation: A model using Psammomys obesus, the sand rat. Spine 2002; 27(15): 1626–33.

20.

Oegema

T.R.

Jr . Biochemistry of the intervertebral disc. Clin Sports Med. 1993; 12(3): 419–39.

21.

Nomura

, Mochida

, Okuma

, Nishimura

, Sakabe

Nucleus pulposus allograft retards intervertebral disc degeneration. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001(389): 94–101.

22.

Richardson

S.M.

, Hoyland

J.A.

, Mobasheri

, Csaki

, Shakibaei

, Mobasheri

Mesenchymal stem cells in regenerative medicine: Opportunities and challenges for articular cartilage and intervertebral disc tissue engineering. J Cell Physiol. 2010; 222(1): 23–32.

23.

Gruber

H.E.

, Fisher

E.C.

Jr. , Desai

, Stasky

A.A.

, Hoelscher

, Hanley

E.N.

Jr . Human intervertebral disc cells from the annulus: Three-dimensional culture in agarose or alginate and responsiveness to TGF-beta1. Exp Cell Res. 1997; 235(1): 13–21.

24.

Lee

J.Y.

, Hall

, Pelinkovic

, Cassinelli

, Usas

, Gilbertson

, Huard

, Kang

New use of a three-dimensional pellet culture system for human intervertebral disc cells: Initial characterization and potential use for tissue engineering. Spine 2001; 26(21): 2316–22.

25.

Nishida

, Kang

J.D.

, Gilbertson

L.G.

, Moon

S.H.

, Suh

J.K.

, Vogt

M.T.

, Robbins

P.D.

, Evans

C.H.

Modulation of the biologic activity of the rabbit intervertebral disc by gene therapy: An in vivo study of adenovirus-mediated transfer of the human transforming growth factor beta 1 encoding gene. Spine 1999; 24(23): 2419–25.

26.

Osada

, Ohshima

, Ishihara

, Yudoh

, Sakai

, Matsui

, Tsuji

Autocrine/paracrine mechanism of insulin-like growth factor-1 secretion, and the effect of insulin-like growth factor-1 on proteoglycan synthesis in bovine intervertebral discs. J Orthop Res. 1996; 14(5): 690–9.

27.

Pattison

S.T.

, Melrose

, Ghosh

, Taylor

T.K.

Regulation of gelatinase-A (MMP-2) production by ovine intervertebral disc nucleus pulposus cells grown in alginate bead culture by transforming growth factor-beta(1) and insulin like growth factor-I. Cell Biol Int. 2001; 25(7): 679–89.

28.

Takegami

, Thonar

E.J.

, An

H.S.

, Kamada

, Masuda

Osteogenic protein-1 enhances matrix replenishment by intervertebral disc cells previously exposed to interleukin-1. Spine 2002; 27(12): 1318–25.

29.

Arrington

E.D.

, Smith

W.J.

, Chambers

H.G.

, Bucknell

A.L.

, Davino

N.A.

Complications of iliac crest bone graft harvesting. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996(329): 300–9.

30.

Keene

J.S.

, McKinley

N.E.

Iliac crest versus spinous process grafts in posttraumatic spinal fusions. Spine 1992; 17(7): 790–4.

31.

St John

T.A.

, Vaccaro

A.R.

, Sah

A.P.

, Schaefer

, Berta

S.C.

, Albert

, Hilibrand

Physical and monetary costs associated with autogenous bone graft harvesting. Am J Orthop. 2003; 32(1): 18–23.

32.

Ahrens

, Tormin

, Paulus

, Roosterman

, Salama

, Krenn

, Neumann

, Scheding

Mesenchymal stem cell content of human vertebral bone marrow. Transplantation 2004; 78(6): 925–9.

33.

McLain

R.F.

, Fleming

J.E.

, Boehm

C.A.

, Muschler

G.F.

Aspiration of osteoprogenitor cells for augmenting spinal fusion: Comparison of progenitor cell concentrations from the vertebral body and iliac crest. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005; 87(12): 2655–61.

34.

Risbud

M.V.

, Shapiro

I.M.

, Guttapalli

, Di Martino

, Danielson

K.G.

, Beiner

J.M.

, Hillibrand

, Albert

T.J.

, Anderson

D.G.

, Vaccaro

A.R.

Osteogenic potential of adult human stem cells of the lumbar vertebral body and the iliac crest. Spine 2006; 31(1): 83–9.

35.

Park

D.S.

, Park

J.C.

, Lee

J.S.

, Kim

T.W.

, Kim

K.J.

, Jung

B.J.

, Shim

E.K.

, Choi

E.Y.

, Park

S.Y.

, Cho

K.S.

, Kim

C.S.

Effect of FGF-2 on collagen tissue regeneration by human vertebral bone marrow stem cells. Stem Cells Dev. 2015; 24(2): 228–43.

36.

Park

S.Y.

, Park

J.C.

, Kim

M.S.

, Lee

S.E.

, Kim

K.J.

, Jung

B.J.

, Park

, Jeon

D.W.

, Cho

K.S.

, Kim

C.S.

Differential effect of water-soluble chitin on collagen synthesis of human bone marrow stem cells and human periodontal ligament stem cells. Tissue Eng Part A 2015; 21(3-4): 451–62.

37.

Park

J.C.

, Kim

J.M.

, Jung

I.H.

, Kim

J.C.

, Choi

S.H.

, Cho

K.S.

, Kim

C.S.

Isolation and characterization of human periodontal ligament (PDL) stem cells (PDLSCs) from the inflamed PDL tissue: In vitro and in vivo evaluations. J Clin Periodontol. 2011; 38(8): 721–31.

38.

Kuhn

D.M.

, Balkis

, Chandra

, Mukherjee

P.K.

, Ghannoum

M.A.

Uses and limitations of the XTT assay in studies of Candida growth and metabolism. J Clin Microbiol. 2003; 41(1): 506–8.

39.

Jung

I.H.

, Park

J.C.

, Kim

J.C.

, Jeon

D.W.

, Choi

S.H.

, Cho

K.S.

, Im

G.I.

, Kim

B.S.

, Kim

C.S.

Novel application of human periodontal ligament stem cells and water-soluble chitin for collagen tissue regeneration: In vitro and in vivo investigations. Tissue Eng Part A 2012; 18(5-6): 643–53.

40.

Pattappa

, Li

, Peroglio

, Wismer

, Alini

, Grad

Diversity of intervertebral disc cells: Phenotype and function. J Anat. 2012; 221(6): 480–96.

41.

Mizuno

, Roy

A.K.

, Vacanti

C.A.

, Kojima

, Ueda

, Bonassar

L.J.

Tissue-engineered composites of anulus fibrosus and nucleus pulposus for intervertebral disc replacement. Spine 2004; 29(12): 1290–7.

42.

Mochida

New strategies for disc repair: Novel preclinical trials. J Orthop Sci. 2005; 10(1): 112–8.

43.

Risbud

M.V.

, Albert

T.J.

, Guttapalli

, Vresilovic

E.J.

, Hillibrand

A.S.

, Vaccaro

A.R.

, Shapiro

I.M.

Differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells towards a nucleus pulposus-like phenotype in vitro: Implications for cell-based transplantation therapy. Spine 2004; 29(23): 2627–32.

44.

Steck

, Bertram

, Abel

, Chen

, Winter

, Richter

Induction of intervertebral disc-like cells from adult mesenchymal stem cells. Stem Cells 2005; 23(3): 403–11.

45.

Crevensten

, Walsh

A.J.

, Ananthakrishnan

, Page

, Wahba

G.M.

, Lotz

J.C.

, Berven

Intervertebral disc cell therapy for regeneration: Mesenchymal stem cell implantation in rat intervertebral discs. Ann Biomed Eng. 2004; 32(3): 430–4.

46.

Sakai

, Mochida

, Iwashina

, Hiyama

, Omi

, Imai

, Nakai

, Ando

, Hotta

Regenerative effects of transplanting mesenchymal stem cells embedded in atelocollagen to the degenerated intervertebral disc. Biomaterials 2006; 27(3): 335–45.

47.

Sakai

, Mochida

, Iwashina

, Watanabe

, Nakai

, Ando

, Hotta

Differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells transplanted to a rabbit degenerative disc model: Potential and limitations for stem cell therapy in disc regeneration. Spine 2005; 30(21): 2379–87.

48.

Sakai

, Mochida

, Yamamoto

, Nomura

, Okuma

, Nishimura

, Nakai

, Ando

, Hotta

Transplantation of mesenchymal stem cells embedded in Atelocollagen gel to the intervertebral disc: A potential therapeutic model for disc degeneration. Biomaterials 2003; 24(20): 3531–41.

49.

Zhang

Y.G.

, Guo

, Xu

, Kang

L.L.

, Li

Bone mesenchymal stem cells transplanted into rabbit intervertebral discs can increase proteoglycans. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005(430): 219–26.

50.

Le Visage

, Kim

S.W.

, Tateno

, Sieber

A.N.

, Kostuik

J.P.

, Leong

K.W.

Interaction of human mesenchymal stem cells with disc cells: Changes in extracellular matrix biosynthesis. Spine 2006; 31(18): 2036–42.

51.

Richardson

S.M.

, Walker

R.V.

, Parker

, Rhodes

N.P.

, Hunt

J.A.

, Freemont

A.J.

, Hoyland

J.A.

Intervertebral disc cell-mediated mesenchymal stem cell differentiation. Stem Cells 2006; 24(3): 707–16.

52.

Yamamoto

, Mochida

, Sakai

, Nakai

, Nishimura

, Kawada

, Hotta

Upregulation of the viability of nucleus pulposus cells by bone marrow-derived stromal cells: Significance of direct cell-to-cell contact in coculture system. Spine 2004; 29(14): 1508–14.

53.

Melrose

, Ghosh

, Taylor

T.K.

A comparative analysis of the differential spatial and temporal distributions of the large (aggrecan, versican) and small (decorin, biglycan, fibromodulin) proteoglycans of the intervertebral disc. J Anat. 2001; 198(Pt 1): 3–15.

54.

Roberts

, Ayad

, Menage

P.J.

Immunolocalisation of type VI collagen in the intervertebral disc. Ann Rheum Dis. 1991; 50(11): 787–91.

55.

Clouet

, Grimandi

, Pot-Vaucel

, Masson

, Fellah

H.B.

, Guigand

, Cherel

, Bord

, Rannou

, Weiss

, Guicheux

, Vinatier

Identification of phenotypic discriminating markers for intervertebral disc cells and articular chondrocytes. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2009; 48(11): 1447–50.

56.

Roughley

P.J.

Biology of intervertebral disc aging and degeneration: Involvement of the extracellular matrix. Spine 2004; 29(23): 2691–9.

57.

Kepler

C.K.

, Markova

D.Z.

, Dibra

, Yadla

, Vaccaro

A.R.

, Risbud

M.V.

, Albert

T.J.

, Anderson

D.G.

Expression and relationship of proinflammatory chemokine RANTES/CCL5 and cytokine IL-1beta in painful human intervertebral discs. Spine 2013; 38(11): 873–80.

58.

Risbud

M.V.

, Shapiro

I.M.

Role of cytokines in intervertebral disc degeneration: Pain and disc content. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2014; 10(1): 44–56.

59.

Caplan

A.I.

, Dennis

J.E.

Mesenchymal stem cells as trophic mediators. J Cell Biochem. 2006; 98(5): 1076–84.

60.

Gilbertson

, Ahn

S.H.

, Teng

P.N.

, Studer

R.K.

, Niyibizi

, Kang

J.D.

The effects of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2, recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-12, and adenoviral bone morphogenetic protein-12 on matrix synthesis in human annulus fibrosis and nucleus pulposus cells. Spine J. 2008; 8(3): 449–56.

61.

Masuda

, Takegami

, An

, Kumano

, Chiba

, Andersson

G.B.

, Schmid

, Thonar

Recombinant osteogenic protein-1 upregulates extracellular matrix metabolism by rabbit annulus fibrosus and nucleus pulposus cells cultured in alginate beads. J Orthop Res. 2003; 21(5): 922–30.

62.

Risbud

M.V.

, Izzo

M.W.

, Adams

C.S.

, Arnold

W.W.

, Hillibrand

A.S.

, Vresilovic

E.J.

, Vaccaro

A.R.

, Albert

T.J.

, Shapiro

I.M.

An organ culture system for the study of the nucleus pulposus: Description of the system and evaluation of the cells. Spine 2003; 28(24): 2652–8.

63.

Thompson

J.P.

, Oegema

T.R.

Jr. , Bradford

D.S.

Stimulation of mature canine intervertebral disc by growth factors. Spine 1991; 16(3): 253–60.

64.

Tim Yoon

, Su Kim

, Li

, Soo Park

, Akamaru

, Elmer

W.A.

, Hutton

W.C.

The effect of bone morphogenetic protein-2 on rat intervertebral disc cells in vitro. Spine 2003; 28(16): 1773–80.

65.

Henriksson

H.B.

, Svanvik

, Jonsson

, Hagman

, Horn

, Lindahl

, Brisby

Transplantation of human mesenchymal stems cells into intervertebral discs in a xenogeneic porcine model. Spine 2009; 34(2): 141–8.

Autogenous Mesenchymal Stem Cells from the Vertebral Body Enhance Intervertebral Disc Regeneration via Paracrine Interaction: An in Vitro Pilot Study

Abstract

Keywords

Introduction

Materials and Methods

Disc Cell Source and Culture

MSC Source and Culture

Coculturing of MSCs and Disc Cells

Morphology of MSCs and Disc Cells

In Vitro Osteogenic, Adipogenic, and Chondrogenic Differentiation

Expression of Surface Markers Using Fluorescence-Activated Cell Sorting

Measurement of Proliferation

In Vitro Expression of ECM Collagen Synthesis Assay

Generation of Cell-Conditioned Medium

Proliferation in CM

Quantitative Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction Analysis of Gene Expression

Statistical Analysis

Results

Characterization of MSCs and Degenerative Disc Cells

Cell Proliferation Following Coculture

Gene Expression of ECM Following Direct Coculture

In Vitro Assay of ECM Collagen Synthesis

Cell Proliferation in CM

Proinflammatory Cytokine Gene Expression in Disc Cells Following Coculture

Growth Factor Gene Expression in MSCs

Discussion

Footnotes

Acknowledgments

References