This essay discusses how international political theory can become more receptive towards Islamism. The central claim is that Islamism can be interpreted as a form of communitarianism. To underpin this claim, the study relies on an analysis of how the concepts of community and person are conceived in communitarianism and Islamism. On the basis of the affinities of these conceptions between Islamism and communitarianism the essay shows that Islamism can be interpreted as a form of communitarianism. The study then concludes that understanding Islamism as communitarianism produces a common space for public reasoning which would deserve more consideration from political theorists. Secondly Islamism as communitarianism reassesses the possibility of a political theory engagement with Islamist theory that can benefit the recognition of human rights norms in circumstances in which Islamism is particularly influential.
AbduhM.1906/2000. ‘Al Islah al-Haqiqi wa al-Wajib lil al-Azhar’ (The Real Reform and its Necessity towards al Azhar) in Al Manar 10(28). Translation by K. Talattof in MoaddelTalattof (eds), Modernist and Fundamentalist Debates in Islam: A Reader. New York: Palgrave.
2.
AbduhM.1966. The Theology of Unity. London: Allen and Unwin.
3.
BielefeldtH.1995. ‘Muslim Voices in the Human Rights Debate’, Human Rights Quarterly17(4): 587–617.
4.
BinderL.1964. The Ideological Revolution in the Middle East. London: Wiley and Sons.
5.
BlackA.2001. The History of Islamic Political Thought: From the Prophet to the Present. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
6.
BrownC.1992. International Relations Theory: New Normative Approaches. New York: Columbia University Press.
7.
BrownC.1997. ‘Universal Human Rights: A Critique’, The International Journal of Human Rights1(2): 41–65.
8.
CalderN.2007. ‘The Limits of Islamic Orthodoxy’, in RippinA. (ed.), Defining Islam. London: Equinox.
9.
CalvertJ.2010. Sayyd Qutb and the Origins of Radical Islamism. London: Hurst.
10.
CochranM.1999. Normative Theory and International Relations: A Pragmatic Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
11.
CohenJ.2004. ‘Minimalism about Human Rights: The Most we Can Hope For?’, The Journal of Political Philosophy12(2): 190–213.
12.
DalacouraK.2002. ‘A Critique of Communitarianism with Reference to Revolutionary Iran’, Review of International Studies28(1): 75–92.
13.
DodgeT.2010. ‘The Ideological Roots of Failure: The Application of Kinetic Neo-Liberalism to Iraq’, International Affairs86(6): 1269–86.
14.
EubenR.1999. Enemy in the Mirror: Islamic Fundamentalism and the Limits of Modern Rationalism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
15.
EubenR.ZamanQ.2009. Princeton Readings in Islamist Thought: Text and Context from Al-Banna to Bin Laden. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
16.
EubenR.2010. ‘Making the World Safe for Compatibility’, Political Theory38(3): 424–41.
17.
FrostM.1996. Ethics in International Relations: A Constitutive Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
18.
HaidarH. H.2008. Liberalism and Islam: Practical Reconciliation between the Liberal State and Shiite Muslims. London: Palgrave.
19.
HanleyW.2008. ‘Grieving Cosmopolitanism in Middle East Studies’, History Compass6(5): 1346–67.
20.
HajS.2009. Reconfiguring Islamic Tradition: Reform Rationality and Modernity. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
21.
HallidayF.2000. ‘Liberal Theory and the Middle East’, in HallidayF. (ed.), Nation and Religion in the Middle East. London: Saqi Books
22.
HallidayF.2003. Islam and the Myth of Confrontation: Religion and Politics in the Middle East, revised edn.London: I. B. Tauris.
23.
HonnethA.2001. The Pathologies of Individual Freedom: Hegel's Social Theory. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
24.
HouraniA.1962. Arabic Thought in the Liberal Age: 1798–1939. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
25.
JacksonR.2007. ‘Constructing Enemies: ‘Islamic Terrorism’ in Political and Academic Discourse’, Government and Opposition42(3): 394–426.
26.
KepelJ.2004. The War for Muslim Minds: Islam and the West. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
27.
KerrM.1966. Islamic Reform: the Political and Legal Theories of Muhammad ‘Abduh and Rashīd Ridā. Berkley, CA: University of California Press.
28.
LombardiC. B.1998. ‘Islamic Law as a Source for Constitutional Law in Egypt: The Constitutionalization of the Sharia in a Modern Arab State’, Columbia Journal of Transnational Law37: 81–123.
29.
MacIntyreA.1984. After Virtue: a Study in Moral Theory, sec edn.Notre Dame, IN: Notre Dame University Press.
30.
MacIntyreA.1988. Whose Justice? Which Rationality?London: Duckworth.
31.
MallatC.1993. The Renewal of Islamic Law: Muhammad Baqer as-Sadr, Najaf and the Shi'i International. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
32.
MarchA.2009. Islam and Liberal Citizenship: The Search for an Overlapping Consensus. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
33.
MayerA. E.2007. Islam and Human Rights: Tradition and Politics, revised edn.Cambridge: Westview Press.
34.
McLellanD.2000. Karl Marx: Selected Writings. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
35.
MoussalliA.1992. Radical Islamic Fundamentalism: The Ideological and Political Discourse Of Sayyd Qutb. Beirut: American University of Beirut Press
36.
QutbS.1953. Social justice in Islam. Washington: American Council of Learned Societies
37.
QutbS.1964/1990. M'alim fi al Tariq. Damascus: Dar Dimashq. Translation as Milestones. Indianapolis: American Trust
38.
RawlsJ.1971. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
39.
RawlsJ.1999. The Law of Peoples. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
40.
RishmawiM.2005. ‘The Revised Arab Charter on Human Rights: A Step Forward?’, Human Rights Law Review5(2): 361–76.
41.
al-SadrM. B.1987. Our Philosophy. London: The Muhammadi Trust
42.
SandelM.1984. ‘The Procedural Republic and the Unencumbered Self’, Political Theory12(1): 81–96.
43.
SandelM.1998. Liberalism and the Limits of Justice, sec. edn.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
44.
ShepardW.1992. ‘The Development of the Thought of Sayyid Qutb as Reflected in Earlier and Later Editions of “Social Justice in Islam”’, Die Welt Des Islams32: 196–236.
45.
ShepardW.1996. Sayyid Qutb and Islamic Activism: A Translation and Critical Analysis of “Social Justice in Islam”. Leiden: Brill.
46.
ShepardW.2003. ‘Sayyd Qutb's Doctrine of “Jāhiliyya”’, Internationial Journal of Middle East Studies35(4): 521–45.
47.
SutchP.2000. ‘Human Rights as Settled Norms: Mervyn Frost and the Limits of Hegelian Human Rights Theory’, Review of International Studies26(2): 215–31.
48.
TaylorC.1985. ‘Atomism’, in TaylorC. (ed.), Philosophical Papers: Vol. 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
49.
TaylorC.1999. ‘Conditions of an Unforced Consensus on Human Rights’, in BellD.BauerJ. (eds), The East Asian Challenge for Human Rights. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
50.
WaldronJ.1987. ‘Nonsense upon stilts’: Bentham, Burke and Marx on the Rights of Man. London: Methuen.
51.
WalzerM.1985. Spheres of Justice: A Defence of Pluralism and Equality. Oxford: Blackwell.
52.
WalzerM.1990. ‘The Communitarian Critique of Liberalism’, Political Theory18(1): 6–23.
53.
WalzerM.1994. The Thick and the Thin: Moral Arguments at Home and Abroad. Notre Dame: Notre Dame University Press
54.
ZubaidaS.2004. ‘Cosmopolitans, Nationalists and Fundamentalists in the Modern Middle East’. Inaugural Lecture, Birkbeck College London, http://www.bbk.ac.uk/events/inaugural
