The aim of this article is to contribute to the elaboration of a deliberative approach to global institutional design. A deliberative approach aims to embed processes of mutual reason-giving at the heart of international relations and global decision-making. The theoretical framework that orientates this discussion is the liberal approach to international law developed by John Rawls. It may seem strange to invoke this model: after all, Rawls does not specifically discuss the issue of global institutional design and indeed has been widely criticized for neglecting this topic. In fact, in its account of global public reason, Rawls's approach can be shown to contain important and surprisingly neglected resources for constructing a dynamic and inclusive theory of global deliberative politics.
AngleS. C.2005 ‘Decent Democratic Centralism’, Political Theory33: 518–46.
2.
BeitzC. R.2009. The Idea of Human Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
3.
BernsteinA. R.2006. ‘A Human Right to Democracy? Legitimacy and Intervention’, in MartinR.ReidyD. A. (eds), Rawls's Law of Peoples: A Realistic Utopia?Oxford: Blackwell.
4.
BernsteinA. R.2007. ‘Human Rights, Global Justice, and Disaggregated States: John Rawls, Onora O'Neill and Anne-Marie Slaughter’, American Journal of Economics and Sociology66: 87–111.
5.
BohmanJ.2007. Democracy Across Borders: From Děmos to Děmoi. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
6.
BrownA.2010 ‘On the Public Reason of the Society of Peoples’, Public Reason2: 43–60.
7.
BrownC.2002. ‘The Construction of a “Realistic Utopia”: John Rawls and International Political Theory’, Review of International Studies28: 5–21.
8.
BuchananA.2004. Justice, Legitimacy, and Self-Determination: Moral Foundations for International Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
9.
BuchananA.2006. ‘Taking the Human out of Human Rights’, in MartinR.ReidyD. A. (eds) Rawls's Law of Peoples: A Realistic Utopia?Oxford: Blackwell.
10.
BuchananA.KeohaneR. O.2006. ‘The Legitimacy of Global Governance Institutions’, Ethics & International Affairs20: 405–37.
11.
CaneyS.2005. Justice Beyond Borders: A Global Political Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
12.
CohenJ.2004. ‘Minimalism About Human Rights: The Best We Can Hope For?’, Journal of Political Philosophy12: 190–213.
13.
CohenJ.SabelC. F.2006. ‘Extra Rempublicam Nulla Justitia?’, Philosophy & Public Affairs34: 147–75.
14.
DigeserP. E.2009. ‘Public Reason and International Friendship’, Journal of International Political Theory5: 22–40.
15.
DryzekJ. S.2006. Deliberative Global Politics: Discourse and Democracy in a Divided World. Cambridge: Polity.
16.
EckertA. E.2006. ‘Peoples and Persons: Moral Standing, Power, and the Equality of States’, International Studies Quarterly50: 841–59.
17.
EstlundD.2008. Democratic Authority: A Philosophical Framework. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
18.
FreemanS.2007. Justice and the Social Contract: Essays on Rawlsian Political Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
19.
GilpinR.2002. ‘A Realist Perspective on Global Governance’, in HeldD.McGrewA. (eds), Governing Globalization: Power, Authority and Global Governance. Cambridge: Polity.
20.
GlennJ.2008. ‘Global Governance and the Democratic Deficit: Stifling the Voice of the South’, Third World Quarterly29: 217–38.
21.
HaydenP.2002. John Rawls: Towards a Just World Order. Cardiff: University of Wales Press.
22.
HeldD.2004. Global Covenant: The Social Democratic Alternative to the Washington Consensus. Cambridge: Polity.
23.
KaldorM.2003. Global Civil Society: An Answer to War. Cambridge: Polity.
24.
KellyE.2004. ‘Human Rights as Foreign Policy Imperatives’, in ChatterjeeD. K. (ed.), The Ethics of Assistance: Morality and the Distant Needy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
25.
KeohaneR. O.2002. ‘Governance in a Partially Globalized World’, in HeldD.McGrewA. (eds), Governing Globalization: Power, Authority and Global Governance. Cambridge: Polity.
26.
KrasnerS. D. (ed.). 1983. International Regimes. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
27.
KuperA.2004. Democracy beyond Borders: Justice and Representation in Global Institutions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
28.
LuC.2009. ‘Political Friendship among Peoples’, Journal of International Political Theory5: 41–58.
29.
MartinR.ReidyD. A. (eds). 2006. Rawls's Law of Peoples: A Realistic Utopia?Oxford: Blackwell.
30.
NanzP.SteffekJ.2005. ‘Global Governance, Participation and the Public Sphere’, in HeldD.Koenig-ArchibugiM. (eds), Global Governance and Public Accountability. Cambridge: Polity.
31.
PoggeT.2006. ‘Do Rawls's Two Theories of Justice Fit Together?’, in MartinR.ReidyD. A. (eds), Rawls's Law of Peoples: A Realistic Utopia?Oxford: Blackwell.
32.
RawlsJ.1997 ‘The Idea of Public Reason Revisited’, The University of Chicago Law Review64: 765–807.
33.
RawlsJ.1999a. The Law of Peoples: With “The Idea of Public Reason Revisited”. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
34.
RawlsJ.1999b. A Theory of Justice, revised edn.Oxford: Oxford University Press.
35.
ReidyD. A.2004. ‘Rawls on International Justice: A Defence’, Political Theory32: 291–319.
36.
ReidyD. A.2006. ‘Political Authority and Human Rights’, in MartinR.ReidyD. A. (eds), Rawls's Law of Peoples: A Realistic Utopia?Oxford: Blackwell.
37.
RonzoniM.2009. ‘The Global Order: A Case of Background Justice? A Practice-Dependent Account’, Philosophy & Public Affairs37: 329–56.
38.
SlaughterA-M. 2004. A New World Order. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
39.
SmithW.BrassettJ.2008. ‘Deliberation and Global Governance: Liberal, Cosmopolitan, and Critical Perspectives’, Ethics & International Affairs22: 69–92.
40.
SmithW.FineR.2004: ‘Kantisan Cosmopolitanism Today: John Rawls and Jürgen Habermas on Immanuel Kant's Foedus Pacificum’, King's College Law Journal15: 5–22.
41.
WenarL.2002. ‘The Legitimacy of Peoples’, in De GrieffP.CroninC. (eds), Global Justice and Transnational Politics: Essays on the Moral and Political Challenges of Globalization. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
