Investigation of AAA dose calculation algorithm accuracy in surface and buildup region for 6MV photon beam using markus parallel-plate ion chamber

Abstract

In radiotherapy, dose distributions are obtained by using dose calculation algorithms that are implanted in treatment planning systems (TPS). This study aims to compare the surface doses of separate field sizes calculated by different version of The Analytical Anisotropic Algorithm (AAA) and measured by the parallel-plate ion chamber that is admitted as the most reliable dosimetry system for the surface region dose measurements. In order to measure the near surface dose, water equivalent solid phantom was used and measurements were made for 6MV photon beam at 100 cm source-detector distance for 5×5, 10×10, and 20×20 cm² field sizes. AAA 8.9 and AAA 15.1 versions of the Varian Eclipse TPS were used for surface dose calculations by generating beams with separate field sizes. The doses were read by considering the effective buildup thickness of Markus parallel-plate ion chamber. The surface doses using 6 MV photon beams for 10×10 cm² field size at 0.07 mm were found to be 11.04%, 26.25%, and 19.69% for AAA v8.9, AAA v15.1 and Markus chamber, respectively. It was seen that for both of the AAA versions and Markus parallel-plate ion chamber, increasing field sizes also increase surface dose. For all field sizes, surface dose was lowest by using AAA v8.9 at 0.07 mm. The different versions of the same TPS algorithms may calculate the surface doses distinctively. After upgrading of TPS algorithms, surface doses should be calculated and compared by measurements with different dosimetry systems to better understand their calculation behaviors in the near surface region.

Keywords

AAA dose algorithm surface dose buildup region Markus parallel plate ion chamber

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Treatment planning algorithms, Journal of the International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements, 14(2) (2014), 65–75.

Oelfke and

Scholz , Dose calculation algorithms, New Technologies in Radiation Oncology (2006),

F.M.

Khan , Treatment Planning in Radiation Oncology, 2nd Edition. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. 2007.

Wang ,

A.J.

Cmelak and

G.X.

Ding , A simple technique to improve calculated skin dose accuracy in a commercial treatment planning system, J Appl Clin Med Phys 19(2) (2018), 191–197.

A.S.

Oinam and

Singh , Verification of IMRT dose calculations using AAA and PBC algorithms in dose buildup regions, J Appl ClinMedPhys 11(4) (2010), 3351.

G.S.

Krishna ,

Srinivas ,

K.M.

Ayyangar and

P.Y.

Reddy , Comparative study of old and new versions of treatment planning system using dose volume histogram indices of clinical plans, J Med Phys 41(3) (2016), 192–197.

B.J.

Gerbi and

F.M.

Khan , Measurement of dose in the buildup region using fixed separation plane-parallel ionization chambers, Medical Physics 17(1) (1990), 17–26.

Oelfke and

Scholz , Dose calculation algorithms, New Technologies in Radiation Oncology (2006), 187–196.

Sievinen ,

Ulmer and

Kaissl , AAA Photon Dose Calculation Model in Eclipse™, Varian Medical Systems, http://www.rtsalon.cn/upload/RTsalon_p_3218_2.pdf, pp. 1–23.

10.

Lu , Dose calculation algorithms in external beam photon radiation therapy, Int J Cancer Ther Oncol 1(2) 2013.

11.

D.E.

Velkley ,

D.J.

Manson ,

J.A.

Purdy and

G.D.

Oliver Jr. , Build up region of megavoltage photon radiation sources, Medical Physics 2(1) (1975), 14–19.

12.

Chan ,

Lee ,

Yu ,

S.P.

Lee ,

Wei ,

Wen ,

Chen ,

Chen and

Tsai , Dosimetric and radiobiological comparison of Cyberknife and Tomotherapy in stereotactic body radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer, JXray Sci Technol 25(3) (2017), 465–477.

13.

Li ,

Xu ,

Lei ,

Zhang ,

Lin and

Li , Evaluation of dose calculations with inhomogeneity correction in intensity-modulated radiation therapy for esophagus cancer, J Xray Sci Technol 26(4) (2018), 657–666.

14.

F.M.

Khan , Treatment Planning in Radiation Oncology, 2nd Edition. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. 2007.

15.

Apipunyasopon ,

Srisatit and

Phaisangittisakul , An investigation of the depth dose in the build-up region, and surface dose for a 6-MV therapeutic photon beam: Monte Carlo simulation and measurements, J Radiat Res 54(2) (2013), 374–382.

16.

Bilge ,

Cakir ,

Okutan and

Acar , Surface dose measurements with GafChromic EBT film for 6 and 18MV photon beams, Physica Medica 25(2) (2009), 101–104.

17.

A.H.

Zhuang and

A.J.

Olch , Validation of OSLD and a treatment planning system for surface dose determination in IMRT treatments, Med Phys 41 2014.

18.

Cao ,

Yang ,

Qiu ,

Lv , et al., Superficial dose evaluation of four dose calculation algorithms, Radiat Phys Chem 137 (2017), 23–28.

19.

Wang ,

A.J.

Cmelak and

G.X.

Ding , A simple technique to improve calculated skin dose accuracy in a commercial treatment planning system, J Appl Clin Med Phys 19(2) (2018), 191–197.