640-slice coronary CT angiography is becoming an accurate and reliable method of diagnosing coronary heart disease. However, how to reduce the radiation dosage while ensuring the clinically acceptable image quality remains a quite challenging issue.
OBJECTIVE:
To evaluate the effect of low tube voltage on radiation dosage under 640-slice coronary CT angiography (CCTA).
METHODS:
Four hundred patients (236 males, 164 females) with coronary heart disease and underwent CCTA using DCVT were classified into A1 (tube voltage: 120 kV; exposure phase window: 30–80%), B1 (120 kV; 70–80%), A2 (100 kV; 30–80%) and B2 group (100 kV; 70–80%), respectively. Image qualities and effective dose (ED) were assessed and compared.
RESULTS:
No significant differences were observed among the groups in terms of age, height, weight and body mass index (BMI) (P > 0.05). ED were significantly lower in 100 kV group (P < 0.05). CT values of coronary artery in 100 kV groups were 13.5% and 17.3% higher than 120 kV group. ED in B1 group were 64.5% and 67.0% lower than A1 group. ED in B2 group were 65.4% and 65.2% lower than A2 group.
CONCLUSION:
When using a 640-slice CCTA prospective ECG-gating scanning mode, it is preferable to use a 100 kV tube voltage setting because compared to 120 kV tube voltage protocol, it seems to significantly decrease the mean effective radiation dose, without significantly lowering both the subjective and objective image quality.
Lloyd-JonesD., AdamsR.J., BrownT.M.et al., Executive summary: Heart disease and stroke statistics–update: A report from the American Heart Association, Circulation121 (2010), 948–954.
2.
EinsteinA.J., HenzlovaM.J. and RajagopalanS., Estimating risk of cancer associated with radiation exposure from 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography, JAMA298 (2007), 317–323.
3.
di CesareE.,
GennarelliA.,
di SibioA., et al., Assessment of dose exposure and image quality in coronary angiography performed by 640-slice CT: A comparison between adaptive iterative and filtered back-projection algorithm by propensity analysis, Radiol Med119 (2014), 642–649.
4.
di CesareE.,
CarboneI.,
CarrieroA., et al., Clinical indications for cardiac computed tomography. From the Working Group of the Cardiac Radiology Section of the Italian Society of Medical Radiology (SIRM), Radiol Med117 (2012), 901–938.
5.
di CesareE.,
GennarelliA.,
di SibioA., et al., Masciocchi C, Image quality and radiation dose of single heartbeat 640-slice coronary CT angiography: A comparison between patients with chronic atrial fibrillation and subjects in normal sinus rhythm by propensity analysis, Eur J Radiol84 (2015), 631–636.
6.
AngeliniP., Novel imaging of coronary artery anomalies to assess their prevalence, the causes of clinical symptoms, and the risk of sudden cardiac death, Circulation: Cardiovascular Imaging7 (2014), 747–754.
7.
BudoffM.J., NakazatoR., ManciniG.J.et al., CT angiography for the prediction of hemodynamic significance in intermediate and severe lesions: Head-to-head comparison with quantitative coronary angiography using fractional flow reserve as the reference standard, JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging9 (2016), 559–564.
8.
ZhaoR.P., HaoZ.R. and SongZ.J., Diagnostic value of Flash dual-source CT coronary artery imaging combined with dual-energy myocardial perfusion imaging for coronary heart disease, Experimental and therapeutic medicine7 (2014), 865–868.
9.
TangP., DuB., FangX.et al., Submillisievert coronary CT angiography with adaptive prospective ECG-triggered sequence acquisition and iterative reconstruction in patients with high heart rate on dual-source, Journal of X-ray Science and Technology24 (2016), 807–820.
10.
ZhaoY., WuY., ZuoZ.et al., CT pulmonary angiography using different noise index with iterative reconstruction algorithm and dual energy CT imaging using different body mass indices: Image quality and radiation dose, Journal of X-ray Science and Technology25 (2017), 79–91.
11.
PagenstertG., WolfN., BachmannM.et al., Open lateral patellar retinacular lengthening versus open retinacular release in lateral patellar hypercompression syndrome: A prospective double-blinded comparative study on complications and outcome, Arthroscopy28 (2012), 788–797.
12.
VardhanabhutiV., LoaderR. and RoobottomC.A., Assessment of image quality on effects of varying tube voltage and automatic tube current modulation with hybrid and pure iterative reconstruction techniques in abdominal/pelvic CT: A phantom study, Investigative Radiology48 (2013), 167–174.
13.
DesaiG.S., OrregoJ.M.F., KambadakoneA.R. and SahaniD.V., Performance of iterative reconstruction and automated tube voltage selection on the image quality and radiation dose in abdominal CT scans, Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography37 (2013), 897–903.
14.
SunZ. and NgK.H., Diagnostic value of coronary CT angiography with prospective ECG-gating in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis, Int J Cardiovasc Imaging28 (2012), 2109–2119.
15.
FujiokaC., HoriguchiJ., KiguchiM.et al., Survey of aorta and coronary arteries with prospective ECG-triggered 100-kV 64-MDCT angiography, AJR Am J Roentgenol193 (2009), 227–233.
16.
BlanksteinR., ShahA., PaleR.et al., Radiation dose and image quality of prospective triggering with dual-source cardiac computed tomography, Am J Cardiol103 (2009), 1168–1173.
17.
HusmannL., ValentaI., GaemperliO.et al., Feasibility of low-dose coronary CT angiography: First experience with prospective ECG-gating, Eur Heart J29 (2008), 191–197.
18.
JinK.Y. and WangW.C., A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales, (2014).
19.
BischoffB., HeinF., MeyerT.et al., Impact of a reduced tube voltage on CT angiography and radiation dose: Results of the PROTECTION I study, JACC Cardiovasc Imaging2 (2009), 940–946.
ZhangC., ZhangZ., YanZ., L. et al., 320-row CT coronary angiography: Effect of 100-kV tube voltages on image quality, contrast volume, and radiation dose, Int J Cardiovasc Imaging27 (2011), 1059–1068.
22.
AlkadhiH., StolzmannP., ScheffelH.et al., Radiation dose of cardiac dual-source CT: The effect of tailoring the protocol to patient-specific parameters, Eur J Radiol68 (2008), 385–391.
23.
AustenW.G., EdwardsJ.E., FryeR.L.et al., A reporting system on patients evaluated for coronary artery disease. Report of the Ad Hoc Committee for Grading of Coronary Artery Disease, Council on Cardiovascular Surgery, American Heart Association, Circulation51 (1975), 5–40.
24.
NakanishiR., WeigoldW.G. and BudoffM.J., Cardiovascular Computed Tomography: Current and Future Scanning System Design, In: Cardiac CT Imaging. edn.: Springer; 2016:25–32.
25.
HuangB., LiJ., LawM.W.et al., Radiation dose and cancer risk in retrospectively and prospectively ECG-gated coronary angiography using 64-slice multidetector CT, The British Journal of Radiology (2014).
26.
YooR.E., ParkE.A., LeeW.et al., Image quality of adaptive iterative dose reduction 3D of coronary CT angiography of 640-slice CT: Comparison with filtered back-projection, Int J Cardiovasc Imaging29 (2013), 669–676.
27.
BrownD.G. and RiedererS.J., Contrast-to-noise ratios in maximum intensity projection images, Magn Reson Med23 (1992), 130–137.
ZhengS., ChuJ., YangZ.et al., Study of 64 slice detector carotid CT angiography with low tube voltage, Journal of Diagnostic Imaging and Interventional Radiology20 (2011), 323–326.
30.
KoedooderK. and VenemaH.W., Filter materials for dose reduction in screen-film radiography, Phys Med Biol31 (1986), 585–600.
31.
RichterC.P., RajguruS., StaffordR. and StockS.R., Radiant energy during infrared neural stimulation at the target structure, Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng8565 (2013), 85655P.
32.
ParkE.A., LeeW., KangJ.H.et al., The image quality and radiation dose of 100-kVp versus 120-kVp ECG-gated 16-slice CT coronary angiography, Korean J Radiol10 (2009), 235–243.
33.
BlanksteinR., BolenM.A., PaleR.et al., Use of 100kV versus 120kV in cardiac dual source computed tomography: Effect on radiation dose and image quality, Int J Cardiovasc Imaging27 (2011), 579–586.
34.
Rodriguez-GranilloG.A., RosalesM.A., DegrossiE. and RodriguezA.E., Signal density of left ventricular myocardial segments and impact of beam hardening artifact: Implications for myocardial perfusion assessment by multidetector CT coronary angiography, Int J Cardiovasc Imaging26 (2010), 345–354.
35.
CarrascosaP., CapunayC., DeviggianoA.et al., Accuracy of low-dose prospectively gated axial coronary CT angiography for the assessment of coronary artery stenosis in patients with stable heart rate, J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr4 (2010), 197–205.
36.
SchulzJ., BoyacioğluR. and NorrisD.G., Multiband multislab 3D time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography for reduced acquisition time and improved sensitivity, Magnetic Resonance in Medicine (2015).
37.
YanZ., ZhangZ., XuL.et al., Reduction of coronary CTA radiation dose by dual source CT with low tube voltage, Chinese Journal of Medical Imaging Technology25 (2009), 1614–1616.
