Abstract

Keywords
Introduction
In recent decades, with the growing recognition of the paramount importance of saving human lives in the workplace, numerous national and international organizations have emerged, dedicated to advancing this crucial concern [1]. Prior to the advent of the fourth industrial revolution, experts convened within these organizations in person, alone or in groups, leveraging their collective experience, knowledge, consultation with each other, and the full spectrum of human intelligence to achieve the final goal, saving humans [2]. An exemplary instance of such collaborative efforts was the proclamation of the slogan by the International Labor Organization (ILO). As elucidated earlier, the overarching aim is to preserve human lives within work environments, enhance their quality of life, and mitigate occupational accidents [3].
In the past few years, particularly in the wake of the recent industrial revolution, there has been a resurgence in the discourse surrounding artificial intelligence (AI). Numerous scientific texts have portrayed AI as a potential substitute for human intelligence. However, many researchers argue that such technology is not yet intelligent enough to entirely supplant human intelligence [4]. Despite this debate, there is a consensus that AI entails the endeavor to impart to computer systems and machines the ability to emulate human intelligence, engage in mental processing, and ultimately make autonomous, intelligent decisions. The overarching aim of this endeavor is to replicate human cognition in order to enhance the capabilities of machines [5].
Reviewing recent articles published in prominent occupational health and safety journals reveals a widespread utilization of artificial intelligence (AI) in the workplace. This deployment aims to bolster safety measures, curtail accidents, and yield benefits for both employees and employers [6]. While this list is by no means exhaustive, it encapsulates several key applications of AI in the workplace:
The aforementioned list can certainly be extended. With the emergence of artificial intelligence and associated technologies like industrial robots and collaborative robots (co-bots), the landscape of work has undergone significant transformations. While the overarching aim of integrating this artificial intelligence with human capabilities is to enhance productivity for the benefit of employers, improve the health and well-being of workers, and elevate occupational safety and health standards overall, it’s crucial not to overlook the accompanying challenges and concerns. Prominent challenges include safeguarding privacy, ensuring data security, among others, necessitating a comprehensive examination. These issues have been addressed in previous systematic review articles [7].
With the daily increase in the importance of sustainability, this topic has been opened to the field of occupational health and industrial safety [8]. Within the framework of this year’s ILO slogan, which highlights the impact of climate change on occupational health and safety, we’ve addressed a less-discussed challenge related to artificial intelligence: its increased energy consumption, particularly concerning the prevalent use of non-renewable and fossil fuels even in the developed countries. Additionally, we’ve explored the sustainability challenges inherent in artificial intelligence [9].
Certain artificial intelligence technologies, particularly deep neural networks, exhibit high energy consumption. Modern artificial intelligence systems heavily rely on robust hardware to handle their extensive data processing needs during both training and testing phases. Moreover, the intensive computational requirements necessitate enhanced cooling systems, often employing more powerful fans, leading to a significant increase in overall energy consumption.
This heightened energy demand can result in increased pressure on energy resources, predominantly fossil fuels at least in the following years, exacerbating greenhouse gas emissions [10]. These shifts in energy consumption and the consequent rise in greenhouse gas emissions align with the focal point highlighted in the ILO’s annual slogan, underscoring the interconnectedness of artificial intelligence advancements and their environmental implications.
Critical thinking
This sounding board raises a critical question: considering the extensive list of benefits previously outlined, is AI truly advantageous for occupational health and safety? Or do the potential drawbacks (as a non-sustainable technology) outweigh the benefits?
Ethical approval
Not applicable.
Informed consent
Not applicable.
Conflict of interest
None declared.
Footnotes
Acknowledgments
None declared.
Funding
None declared.
