Employment has long been an area of concern for people with disabilities. National samples in the United States are needed to understand the experiences of people with disabilities related to employment.
OBJECTIVES:
(1) Describe and evaluate associations between personal and health-related factors with employment after disability, and (2) describe and evaluate associations between facilitators, barriers, and work-related external factors with maintaining a longest held job after disability.
METHODS:
We recruited a national sample of people with physical disabilities from panels assembled by a United States market research organization; by selection, 1309 were working and 491 were not. We evaluated the likelihood of employment and maintaining employment after disability onset using Poisson regression. Model 1 evaluated factors associated with employment; Model 2 evaluated factors associated with maintained employment.
RESULTS:
Model 1: Older age, decreased ability to pay bills on time, and assistive device use were associated with decreased likelihood of employment after disability onset. Non-Black minority identification, fatigue, and higher physical function were associated with increased likelihood of employment. For Model 2, the likelihood of maintaining a longest held job was associated with acquiring a disability at work, receipt of job accommodations, valuing opportunities for advancement and health benefits, having a helpful living situation, and helpful human resource attitudes. Decreased likelihood of maintaining a longest held job after disability onset was associated with job dissatisfaction and supervisors’ attitudes.
CONCLUSIONS:
This work highlights opportunities for employers to focus efforts on job accommodations and support in the maintenance of employment after disability.
U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. Persons with a Disability: Barriers to Employment and Other Labor-Related Issues News Release Washington, DC: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics; 2020 [Available from: https://www.bls.gov/news.release/archives/dissup_05012020.htm.
VornholtK, UitdewilligenS, NijhuisFJ. Factors affecting the acceptance of people with disabilities at work: A literature review. J Occup Rehabil. 2013;23(4):463–75.
7.
EricksonWA, SchraderSv, BruyèreSM, VanLooySA, MattesonDS. Disability-Inclusive Employer Practices and Hiring of Individuals With Disabilities. Rehabilitation Research, Policy, and Education. 2014;28(4):309–28.
8.
CullerKH, WangYC, ByersK, TrierweilerR. Barriers and facilitators of return to work for individuals with strokes: Perspectives of the stroke survivor, vocational specialist, and employer. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2011;18(4):325–40.
9.
HartkeRJ, TrierweilerR. Survey of survivors’ perspective on return to work after stroke. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2015;22(5):326–34.
10.
Van DeynseH, Ilunga KazadiC, KimpeE, HubloueI, MoensM, PutmanK. Predictors of return to work after moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury: A systematic review of current literature and recommendations for future research. Disabil Rehabil. 2022;44(20):5750–7.
11.
OttomanelliL, LindL. Review of critical factors related to employment after spinal cord injury: Implications for research and vocational services. J Spinal Cord Med. 2009;32(5):503–31.
12.
AllaireSH, WeiL, LaValleyMP. Work Barriers Experienced and Job Accommodations Used by Persons with Arthritis and Other Rheumatic Diseases. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin. 2016;46(3):147–56.
13.
SuH, WongJ, KudlaA, ParkM, TrierweilerR, CapraroP, et al.. Disability Phenotypes and Job Accommodations Utilization Among People with Physical Disability. J Occup Rehabil. 2023;33(2):352–61.
CarrD, NamkungEH. Physical Disability at Work: How Functional Limitation Affects Perceived Discrimination and Interpersonal Relationships in the Workplace. J Health Soc Behav. 2021;62(4):545–61.
16.
BarbareschiG, CarewMT, JohnsonEA, KopiN, HollowayC. “When They See a Wheelchair, They’ve Not Even Seen Me”-Factors Shaping the Experience of Disability Stigma and Discrimination in Kenya. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(8).
17.
HeerkensY, EngelsJ, KuiperC, Van der GuldenJ, OostendorpR. The use of the ICF to describe work related factors influencing the health of employees. Disabil Rehabil. 2004;26(17):1060–6.
18.
Office of Disability Employment Policy. Job Accommodations Network [Website]. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Labor; 2023 [Available from: https://askjan.org/.
19.
Office of Disability Employment Policy. Accommodations and compliance series: Five practical tips for providing and maintaining effective job accommodationsWashington, DC: U.S. Department of Labor; 2023 [Available from: https://askjan.org/publications/index.cfm.
Office of Disability Employment Policy. Survey of Employer Perspectives on the Employment of People with DisabilitiesWashington, DC: United States Department of Labor; 2008.
25.
ShawWS, KristmanVL, Williams-WhittK, SoklaridisS, HuangYH, CoteP, et al.. The Job Accommodation Scale (JAS): Psychometric evaluation of a new measure of employer support for temporary job modifications. J Occup Rehabil. 2014;24(4):755–65.
26.
IyerA, MaslingS Recruiting, Hiring, Retaining, and Promoting People with Disabilities: A Resource Guide for Employers. Disability Rights WI; 2015.
27.
HartkeRJ, TrierweilerR, BodeR. Critical Factors Related to Return to Work After Stroke: A Qualitative Study. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation. 2011;18(4):341–51.
28.
SliceMR. Complex Data Collection Made Simple: Slice MR; 2023 [Available from https://slicemr.com/.
29.
StorozukA, AshleyM, DelageV, MaloneyEA. Got Bots? Practical Recommendations to Protect Online Survey Data from Bot Attacks. The Quantitative Methods for Psychology. 2020;16(5):472–81.
WongJ, KallishN, CrownD, CapraroP, TrierweilerR, WaffordQE, et al.. Job Accommodations, Return to Work and Job Retention of People with Physical Disabilities: A Systematic Review. J Occup Rehabil. 2021;31(3):474–90.
37.
David CellaP, Richard GershonP, Michael BassM, Nan RothrockP. Assessment Center Chicago, IL2023 [Available from: www.assessmentcenter.net.
RivkinD, McCoyR. Stratifying occupational units by specific vocational preparation (SVP) In: Development NCfON, editor. Stratifying occupational units by specific vocational preparation 1999.
40.
FisherRA. Statistical Methods for Research Workers: Hafner; 1958.
41.
SchorkMA, RemingtonRD Statistics with Applications to the Biological and Health Sciences: Prentice Hall; 2000.
42.
LindseyJK. Introduction to Applied Statistics: A Modelling Approach: Oxford University Press; 2004.
43.
ZouG. A Modified Poisson Regression Approach to Prospective Studies with Binary Data. 2004. p. 702–6.
44.
BahEI, LamahMC, FletcherT, JacobST, Brett-MajorDM, SallAA, et al.. Clinical presentation of patients with Ebola virus disease in Conakry, Guinea. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(1):40–7.
45.
JacobME, MarronMM, BoudreauRM, OddenMC, ArnoldAM, NewmanAB. Age, Race, and Gender Factors in Incident Disability. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2018;73(2):194–7.
46.
MantonKG, StallardE, CorderLS. The dynamics of dimensions of age-related disability 1982 to 1994 in the U.S. elderly population. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 1998;53(1):B59–70.
47.
WrayLA, BlaumCS. Explaining the role of sex on disability: A population-based study. Gerontologist. 2001;41(4):499–510.
48.
AronL, LoprestP. Disability and the education system. Future Child. 2012;22(1):97–122.
49.
KendallR, WagnerB, BrodkeD, BounsangaJ, VossM, GuY, et al.. The Relationship of PROMIS Pain Interference and Physical Function Scales. Pain Med. 2018;19(9):1720–4.
50.
BarrosAJ, HirakataVN. Alternatives for logistic regression in cross-sectional studies: An empirical comparison of models that directly estimate the prevalence ratio. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2003;3(1):21.
51.
PrinsJ. 6.3.3.1. Counts Control Charts. E-Handbook of Statistical Methods: NIST/SEMATECH; 2012. Available from: https://doi.org/10.18434/M32189.
52.
Your age as a vocational factor, 404.1563 2008.
53.
AudetJ, LecoursA, NastasiaI. Experiences in the return-to-work process of workers having suffered occupational injuries in small and medium size enterprises. Work. 2023;74(1):265–81.
54.
Social Security Administration. Social Security Disability Benefits SSA.gov: Social Security Administration 2023 [Available from: https://www.ssa.gov/benefits/disability/.
JethaA, NavaratnerajahL, ShahidiFV, CarnideN, BiswasA, YanarB, et al.. Racial and Ethnic Inequities in the Return-to-Work of Workers Experiencing Injury or Illness: A Systematic Review. J Occup Rehabil. 2023;33(3):432–49.
MollerS, WissenbergM, SondergaardK, KragholmK, FolkeF, HansenCM, et al.. Long-term outcomes after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in relation to socioeconomic status. Resuscitation. 2021;167, 336–44.
61.
Herrera-EscobarJP, SeshadriAJ, RiveroR, ToppoA, Al RafaiSS, ScottJW, et al.. Lower education and income predict worse long-term outcomes after injury. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2019;87(1):104–10.
62.
GladerEL, JonssonB, NorrvingB, ErikssonM. Socioeconomic factors’ effect on return to work after first stroke. Acta Neurol Scand. 2017;135(6):608–13.
63.
FalkAL, HansteinR, KulsakdinunC. Impact of Socioeconomic Status on Return to Work after Acute Ankle Fracture. Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics. 2020;5(4).
64.
UllrichA, RathHM, OttoU, KerschgensC, RaidaM, Hagen-AukampC, et al.. Outcomes across the return-to-work process in PC survivors attending a rehabilitation measure-results from a prospective study. Support Care Cancer. 2017;25(10):3007–15.
65.
CancelliereC, DonovanJ, StochkendahlMJ, BiscardiM, AmmendoliaC, MyburghC, et al.. Factors affecting return to work after injury or illness: Best evidence synthesis of systematic reviews. Chiropr Man Thera. 2016;24(1):32.
66.
TwardzikE, ClarkeP, ElliottMR, HaleyWE, JuddS, ColabianchiN. Neighborhood Socioeconomic Status and Trajectories of Physical Health-Related Quality of Life Among Stroke Survivors. Stroke. 2019;50(11):3191–7.
67.
DiemerMA, Rasheed AliS. Integrating Social Class Into Vocational Psychology. Journal of Career Assessment. 2009;17(3):247–65.
DominguesI, PinheiroJ, SilveiraJ, FranciscoP, JutaiJ, MartinsAC. Psychosocial Impact of Powered Wheelchair, Users’ Satisfaction and Their Relation to Social Participation. Technologies. 2019;7(4).
73.
HallJP, KurthNK, GoddardKS. Assessing factors associated with social connectedness in adults with mobility disabilities. Disabil Health J. 2022;15(1S):101206.
74.
PooleJL, MurphySL, FosterER, SleightAG, Van DenendT, AsherA, et al.. Fatigue as an Understudied Barrier to Participation in Life Roles. OTJR (Thorofare N J). 2023;43(4):583–91.
75.
HardySE, StudenskiSA. Qualities of fatigue and associated chronic conditions among older adults. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2010;39(6):1033–42.
76.
MullenK, MaestasN, HillM. Effects of Employer Health Insurance on Disability Insurance Claiming. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation; 2014.
77.
BoelhouwerIG, VermeerW, van VuurenT. Late effects of cancer (treatment) and work ability: Guidance by managers and professionals. BMC Public Health. 2021;21(1):1255.
78.
BoardTC. Job Satisfaction 2023. The Conference Board, Inc; 2023.
79.
SchwarzB, Claros-SalinasD, StreibeltM. Meta-Synthesis of Qualitative Research on Facilitators and Barriers of Return to Work After Stroke. J Occup Rehabil. 2018;28(1):28–44.
Schloemer-JarvisA, BaderB, BöhmSA. The role of human resource practices for including persons with disabilities in the workforce: A systematic literature review. The International Journal of Human Resource Management. 2022;33(1):45–98.
82.
JacobUS, PillayJ, AdeoyeOE, OniTK. Barriers to employment of people with intellectual disability. Work. 2023;74(1):207–18.
