Experiences of people with multiple sclerosis at work: Towards the understanding of the needs for a job retention vocational rehabilitation intervention
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online May 19, 2022
Experiences of people with multiple sclerosis at work: Towards the understanding of the needs for a job retention vocational rehabilitation intervention
Supporting people with multiple sclerosis (MS) at work can be challenging due to the unpredictable nature and myriad of disease-related symptoms, and issues related to the work environment.
OBJECTIVE:
To explore, amongst people with MS in employment, their experiences of and need for vocational rehabilitation (VR), and perceived barriers and facilitators to implementing VR.
METHODS:
We conducted 20 semi-structured interviews with people with MS, employers, and healthcare professionals. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, and analysed using the framework method.
RESULTS:
We identified nine themes reflecting the main MS symptoms (e.g. cognition, fatigue), and environmental factors such as support provided at work (e.g. change of working hours) and workplace characteristics. Providing support tailored to the individual’s needs and early intervention were seen as important attributes for the intervention. The barriers identified referred to lack of resources and confidentiality issues; however, having flexibility in the content and delivery of the intervention were seen as facilitators.
CONCLUSION:
The impact of environmental factors (e.g. attitudes towards disability) on employment difficulties is equal to or greater than disease-related factors. Environmental changes in the attitudes of co-workers and workplace flexibility can enable people with MS to remain in work for longer.
SimmonsRD, TribeKL, McDonaldEA. Living with multiple sclerosis: Longitudinal changes in employment and the importance of symptom management. J Neurol. 2010;257(6):926–36.
2.
CardoneA. Having the conversation about work with people with multiple sclerosis: a guide for healthcare professionals. Neurodegener Dis Manag. 2017;7(6):41–4.
3.
SmithMM, ArnettPA. Factors related to employment status changes in individuals with multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler J. 2005;11(5):602–9.
4.
ThompsonA, KobeltG, BergJ, CapsaD, ErikssonJ, MillerD, et al. New insights into the burden and costs of multiple sclerosis in Europe: Results for the United Kingdom. Mult Scler J. 2017;23(2):65–77.
5.
WaddellG, Kim BurtonA. Is Work Good for Your Health and Well-Being? Vol. 57, Occupational Medicine. 2007.
6.
BSRM. Vocational Rehabilitation-The Way Forward. 2nd edition. BSRM Working Party Report. 2003.
7.
BSRM. Vocational asessment and rehabilitation for people with long-term neurological conditions: recommendations for best practice. British Society of Rehabilitation Medicine. 2010.
8.
PlayfordED, RadfordK, BurtonC, GibsonA, JellieB, SweetlandJ, et al. Mapping Vocational Rehabilitation Services for people with Long term neurological conditions: Summary report. 2011.
9.
KhanF, NgL, Turner-StokesL. Effectiveness of vocational rehabilitation intervention on the return to work and employment of persons with multiple sclerosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009;(1).
10.
FraserRT, JohnsonEK, ClemmonsDC, GetterA, JohnsonKL, GibbonsL. Vocational rehabilitation in multiple sclerosis (MS): A profile of clients seeking services. Work. 2003;21:69–76.
11.
SweetlandJ, RiaziA, CanoSJ, PlayfordED. Vocational rehabilitation services for people with multiple sclerosis: what patients want from clinicians and employers. Mult Scler J. 2007;13:1183–9.
12.
JongbloedL. Factors influencing employment status of women with multiple sclerosis. Can J Rehabil. 1996;9(4):213–22.
13.
LiJ, RoesslerRT, RumrillPDJr, AhmedER. Factors Influencing Job Satisfaction for Employed Adults with Multiple Sclerosis. Rehabil Couns Bull. 2016;6(1):28–40.
14.
MooreP, HardingKE, ClarksonH, PickersgillTP, WardleM, RobertsonNP. Demographic and clinical factors associated with changes in employment in multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler J. 2013;19(12):1647–54.
15.
DooganC, PlayfordED. Supporting work for people with multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler J. 2014;20(6):646–50.
16.
LonghurstR. Semi-structured interviews and focus gruops. In: Key methods in geography. 2003. pp. 143-56.
17.
International Q. NVivo qualitative data analysis software. 2018. Version 12.
18.
World Health Organisation. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: ICF. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2001.
19.
MichieS, Van StralenMM, WestR. The behaviour change wheel: A new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions Michie et al. The behaviour change wheel: A new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions. Implement Sci. 2011;6(42):1–11.
20.
ParkinsonS, EatoughV, HolmesJ, StapleyE, MidgleyN. Framework analysis: a worked example of a study exploring young people’s experiences of depression. Qual Res Psychol. 2016;13(2):109–29.
21.
PopeC, ZieblandS, MaysN. Qualitative research in health care Analysing qualitative data. 2000.
22.
GlässelA, FingerME, CiezaA, TreitlerC, CoenenM, EscorpizoR. Vocational Rehabilitation From the Client’s Perspective Using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) as a Reference. J Occup Rehabil. 2011;21:167–78.
23.
KirchbergerI, SinnottA, CharlifueS, KovindhaA, LüthiH, CampbellR, et al. Functioning and disability in spinal cord injury from the consumer perspective: An international qualitative study using focus groups and the ICF. Spinal Cord. 2010;48(8):603–13.
24.
HoefsmitN, HoukesI, NijhuisF. Environmental and personal factors that support early return-to-work: A qualitative study using the ICF as a framework. Work. 2014;48(2):203–15.
25.
YardleyL. Dilemmas in qualitative health research. Psychol Heal. 2000;15(2):215–28.
26.
NobleH, SmithJ. Issues of validity and reliability in qualitative research. Vol. 18, Evidence-Based Nursing. 2015. pp. 34-5.
27.
BevanS, ZeltoukhovaK, McGeeR, BlazeyL. Ready for Work: Meeting the employment and career aspirations of people with multiple sclerosis. London; 2011.
28.
KanellosMC. Enhancing vocational outcomes of spinal cord-injured persons: the occupational therapist’s role. Am J Occup Ther Off Publ Am Occup Ther Assoc. 1985;39(11):726–33.
29.
PhillipsJ, GaffneyK, PhillipsM, RadfordK. Return to work after stroke - Feasibility of 6-year follow-up. Br J Occup Ther. 2019;82(1):27–37.
30.
RadfordK, SuttonC, SachT, HolmesJ, WatkinsC, ForshawD, et al. Early, specialist vocational rehabilitation to facilitate return to work after traumatic brain injury: The FRESH feasibility RCT. Health Technol Assess (Rockv). 2018;22(33):1–123.
31.
RadfordK, PhillipsJ, DrummondA, SachT, WalkerM, TyermanA, et al. Return to work after traumatic brain injury: Cohort comparison and economic evaluation. Brain Inj. 2013;27(5):507–20.
32.
HaywardK, MateenBA, PlayfordED, EvaG. Developing vocational rehabilitation services for people with long-term neurological conditions: Identifying facilitators and barriers to service provision. Br J Occup Ther. 2019;82(6):337–47.
33.
ScoppettaA. Job Carving and Job Crafting A review of practices Mutual Learning ProgrammeViewproject Posting of workers in Eastern Europe (EEPOW) View project.
34.
ScopptettaA, DavernE, GeyerL. Job carving and job crafting - A review of practices. 2019 May.
35.
GriffinC. Job Carving: A guide for job Developers and employment specialists. 1994.
36.
BruckerDL, SundarV. Job Crafting Among American Workers with Disabilities. J Occup Rehabil. 2020;30(4):575–87.
