Mines are often home to many dangers with a high rate of accidents and occupational diseases. One of the most effective ways to prevent these adverse incidents is to identify and control the influential factors causing human error in design and the ensuing negative consequences.
OBJECTIVE:
This study aimed to explore, categorize and prioritize factors affecting human errors in the mine design process.
METHODS:
The study has a mixed-method design combining qualitative and quantitative data. In the qualitative phase, the required data were collected by conducting semi-structured interviews with 12 surface mine designers. The causes of errors were extracted and categorized by the latent content analysis using MAXQDA2022 software. The identified causes in the qualitative phase were sent to expert designers in Q tables, and the data were analyzed by factor analysis.
RESULTS:
Of the identified codes in the qualitative phase, 40 main themes in five different categories (individual, organizational, external, task, and environmental factors) were determined as causes. The results of the quantitative phase suggest the existence of four different mental patterns regarding the causes of design errors (DEs). The data analysis also shows that organizational and personal factors, particularly supervision and inspection, experience, and technical knowledge, were the strongest causes of DEs and environmental (hotness, coldness, indoor air quality, and noise) and external (work-family conflict) factors being the weakest ones.
CONCLUSION:
This study not only identifies and categorizes the causes of design errors in the mining industry but also suggests some control strategies for these errors based on the mental patterns of the experts.
Mirzaei AliabadiM, AskaripoorT, GhamariF, AghaeiH. An investigation of the relationship between human and organizational factors in occupational accidents using Bayesian network approach: A case study in mining accidents. Iran Occupational Health. 2020;17(1):990–1001.
2.
JiskaniIM, UllahB, ShahKS, BachaS, ShahaniNM, AliM, et al. Overcoming mine safety crisis in Pakistan: An appraisal. Process Safety Progress. 2019;38(4):e12041.
3.
KramerDM, HolnessDL, HaynesE, McMillanK, BerriaultC, KalengeS, et al. From awareness to action: Sudbury, mining and occupational disease in a time of change. Work. 2017;58(2):149–62.
4.
JianhuaL, XiaoyanS. Countermeasures of mine safety management based on behavior safety mode. Procedia Engineering. 2014;84:144–50.
5.
ZeqiriK. Investigation of the mining accidents at “Stan Terg” mine. Mining Science. 2020:27.
6.
AliabadiMM, AghaeiH, KalatpourO, SoltanianAR, SeyedTabibM. Effects of human and organizational deficiencies on workers’ safety behavior at a mining site in Iran. Epidemiology and Health. 2018:40.
7.
MaQ, WanM, ShaoJ, ZhongM, GuoY, WangW. Six-hierarchy model of accident analysis and its application in coal mine accidents. Journal of Safety Science and Resilience. 2022;3(1):61–71.
8.
Mirzaei AliabadiM, AghaeiH, KalatpourO, SoltanianAR, NikraveshA. Analysis of human and organizational factors that influence mining accidents based on Bayesian network. International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics. 2020;26(4):670–7.
9.
SarterN. 11 Design-Induced Error and Error-Informed Design: A Two-Way Street. Cognitive Systems Engineering: The Future for a Changing World. 2017.
10.
SalvendyG, KarwowskiW. Handbook of human factors and ergonomics: John Wiley & Sons; 2021.
11.
TaylorJ. Statistics of design error in the process industries. Safety Science. 2007.
12.
LopezR, LovePE, EdwardsDJ, DavisPR. Design error classification, causation, and prevention in construction engineering. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities. 2010;24(4):399–408.
13.
Norouzi MasirR, AtaeiM, MottahediA. Risk assessment of Flyrock in Surface Mines using a FFTA-MCDM Combination. Journal of Mining and Environment. 2021;12(1):191–203.
14.
MargolinV. Design for a sustainable world. Design Issues. 1998;14(2):83–92.
15.
BharathiR, SelvaraniR. A machine learning approach for quantifying the design error propagation in safety critical software system. IETE Journal of Research. 2019:1–15.
16.
LoveP, LopezR, EdwardsD, GohY. Error begat error: Design error analysis and prevention in social infrastructure projects. Accident Analysis & Prevention. 2012.
17.
ElsherbinyA. Prediction of Design Error Rework Cost in Epc Industrial Projects: The George Washington University; 2021.
18.
ChaoLP, IshiiK, editors. Design process error-proofing: benchmarking gate and phased review life-cycle models. International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference; 2005.
19.
ReasonJ. Managing the Risks of Organizational Accidents, ISBN 1 4 104 2. Ashgate Published Limited, England; 1997.
20.
RodziewiczTL, HousemanB, HipskindJE. Medical error prevention. 2018.
21.
ChaoLP, IshiiK. Design error classification and knowledge management. Journal of Knowledge Management Practice. 2004;5:1705–9232.
22.
LovePE, LopezR, KimJT, KimMJ. Influence of organizational and project practices on design error costs. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities. 2014;28(2):303–10.
23.
DayR. Preventing design error in control room systems: a human factors approach: CQUniversity; 2013.
24.
MohammadfamI, AliabadiMM, SoltanianAR, TabibzadehM, MahdiniaM. Investigating interactions among vital variables affecting situation awareness based on Fuzzy DEMATEL method. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics. 2019;74:102842.
25.
MohammadfamI, Mirzaei AliabadiM, SoltanianAR, MahdiniaM. Modeling the causes-effect relationships among major accident predictors based on a fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making method. Work. 2020;67(2):313–21.
26.
GhaziJM, HamdollahiM, MoazzenM. Geotourism of mining sites in Iran: An opportunity for sustainable rural development. International Journal of Geoheritage and Parks. 2021;9(1):129–42.
27.
BagherpourR, YarahmadiR, KhademianA, AlmasiSN. Safety survey of Iran’s mines and comparison to some other countries. International Journal of Injury Control and Safety Promotion. 2017;24(1):3–9.
28.
YarahmadiR, Zamani-BadiH, FazeliP, KashaniM, KhajevandiA. Occupational trauma in industrial and mining accidents in Iran during –Archives of Trauma Research (2018;7(4):161–5.
29.
MonjeziM, ShahriarK, DehghaniH, Samimi NaminF. Environmental impact assessment of open pit mining in Iran. Environmental Geology. 2009;58(1):205–16.
30.
HendrenK, NewcomerK, PandeySK, SmithM, SumnerN. How qualitative research methods can be leveraged to strengthen mixed methods research in public policy and public administration. Public Administration Review. 2022.
31.
IrandoostSF, ZiapourA, GharehghaniMAM, AzarFEF, SoofizadG, KhosraviB, et al. Experiences and challenges of Prostitute Women in Iran: A phenomenological qualitative study. Heliyon. 2020;6(12):e05649.
32.
SliškovićA. Seafarers’ well-being in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic: A qualitative study. Work. 2020;67(4):799–809.
33.
LebniJY, IrandoostSF, MehediN, SedighiS, ZiapourA. The role of celebrities during the COVID-19 pandemic in Iran: opportunity or threat? Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness (2021)1–2.
34.
LebniJY, IrandoostSF, DehghanAA, ZiapourA, KhosraviB, MehediN. Exploring the reasons for women to engage in sex work in Tehran, Iran: A qualitative study. Heliyon. 2021;7(12):e08512.
35.
KuskeS, BorgmannSO, WolfF, BleckC. Emotional Safety in the Context of Dementia: A Multiperspective Qualitative Study. Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease. 2021;79(1):355–75.
36.
GuestG, NameyE, ChenM. A simple method to assess and report thematic saturation in qualitative research. PLoS One. 2020;15(5):e0232076.
37.
HenninkM, KaiserBN. Sample sizes for saturation in qualitative research: A systematic review of empirical tests. Social Science & Medicine. 2021:114523.
38.
VasileiouK, BarnettJ, ThorpeS, YoungT. Characterising and justifying sample size sufficiency in interview-based studies: systematic analysis of qualitative health research over a 15-year period. BMC Medical Research Methodology. 2018;18(1):1–18.
39.
BraunV, ClarkeV. To saturate or not to saturate? Questioning data saturation as a useful concept for thematic analysis and sample-size rationales. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health. 2021;13(2):201–16.
40.
BelgraveL, SeideK. Coding for grounded theory. The SAGE Handbook of Current Developments in Grounded Theory. 2019)167–85.
41.
GubaEG, LincolnYS. Competing paradigms in qualitative research. Handbook of Qualitative Research. 1994;2(163-194):105.
42.
RamloSE. Divergent viewpoints about the statistical stage of a mixed method: Qualitative versus quantitative orientations. International Journal of Research & Method in Education. 2020;43(1):93–111.
43.
SticklJE, WesterKL, Wachter MorrisCA. Making sense of subjectivity: Q methodology in counseling research. Counseling Outcome Research and Evaluation. 2019;10(2):106–18.
44.
HampsonDI, FerriniS, TurnerRK. Assessing subjective preferences for river quality improvements: combining Q-methodology and choice experiment data. Journal of Environmental Economics and Policy. 2022;11(1):56–74.
45.
ChaE, ShinMH, SmartM, JangH, LeeJ, JoungKH, et al. Q-Methodology and Psychological Phenotyping to Design Patient-Centered Diabetes Education for Persons With Type 2 Diabetes on Insulin Therapy. The Science of Diabetes Self-Management and Care. 2022;48(2):98–110.
46.
HenselD, TorontoC, LawlessJ, BurgessJ. A scoping review of Q methodology nursing education studies. Nurse Education Today. 2022;109:105220.
47.
NasrollahtabarA, BabagoliH, ArghandE. Detection of cause of accidents based on mental patterns of rural drivers using factor analysis. Journal of Safety Promotion and Injury Prevention. 2019;7(1).
48.
ÁsványiK, MiskolcziM, JászberényiM, KeneseiZ, KökényL. The Emergence of Unconventional Tourism Services Based on Autonomous Vehicles (AVs)— Attitude Analysis of Tourism Experts Using the Q Methodology. Sustainability. 2022;14(6):3691.
DonnerJC. Using Q-sorts in participatory processes: An introduction to the methodology. Social Development Papers. 2001;36:24–49.
51.
LewisT, JonesKD, MilitelloM, MeisenhelderR. A clear and consistent focus on students: Principals’ perceptions of the role of school counselors. Journal of School Leadershi. 2022;32(1):3–26.
52.
Bonyadi NaeiniA, MojaradiB, MosayebiA. Using Q Methodology to Discuss Mental Models of Physicians Concerning Key Effective Factors of Cancer. Health Research Journal. 2019;4(3):137–44.
53.
MaQ, ChangC-C, LinC-T. Detecting the crisis of supply chain management on e-commerce for sustainability using Q-technique. Sustainability. 2021;13(16):9098.
54.
CoimbraLO, VidalVA, SilvaR, RochaRS, GuimarãesJT, BalthazarCF, et al. Are ohmic heating-treated whey dairy beverages an innovation? Insights of the Q methodology. LWT. 2020;134:110052.
55.
VidalVA, PaglariniCS, FreitasMQ, CoimbraLO, EsmerinoEA, PollonioMA, et al. Q Methodology: An interesting strategy for concept profile and sensory description of low sodium salted meat. Meat Science. 2020;161:108000.
56.
ChangCC. Exploring IT entrepreneurs’ dynamic capabilities using Q-technique. Industrial Management & Data Systems. 2012.
57.
RowshanSA, KordB, AhangF, ArianfarM, GhaffariH. Investigating the mental patterns of experts in the face of post-corona ecotourism using Q methodology. Journal of Tourism Planning and Development. 2021;10(36):48–72.
58.
ShresthaN. Factor analysis as a tool for survey analysis. American Journal of Applied Mathematics and Statistics. 2021;9(1):4–11.
59.
ChurrucaK, LudlowK, WuW, GibbonsK, NguyenHM, EllisLA, et al. A scoping review of Q-methodology in healthcare research. BMC Medical Research Methodology. 2021;21(1):1–17.
60.
ShariatikiaG, BeheshtifarM, MontazeriM, KazemiH. Identifying the Mental Model of the Managers of Melli Bank Regarding Quantum Leadership using Q-methodology. Cuestiones Políticas. 2020;38.
61.
AhmadianM, EslamiR. Exploring attitudes toward Relationship between government and nation in Iran: A Q-methodology study. Quarterly Journal of The Macro and Strategic Policies. 2014;1(4):107–33.
62.
LEHBH, LETB. Impact of destination image and satisfaction on tourist loyalty: Mountain destinations in Thanh Hoa province, Vietnam. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business. 2020;7(4):185–95.
63.
DinhL. Determinants of employee engagement mediated by work-life balance and work stress. Management Science Letters. 2020;10(4):923–8.
64.
LeH, LeT, LeQ, NgoC. Examining the structural relationships of destination image and tourist satisfaction. Management Science Letters. 2020;10(9):1993–2000.
65.
IslamR, KhanF, AbbassiR, GaraniyaV. Human error probability assessment during maintenance activities of marine systems. Safety and Health at Work. 2018;9(1):42–52.
66.
ShammiM, Bodrud-DozaM, IslamARMT, RahmanMM. COVID-19 pandemic, socioeconomic crisis and human stress in resource-limited settings: A case from Bangladesh. Heliyon. 2020;6(5):e04063.
67.
AcalC, AguileraAM, EscabiasM. New modeling approaches based on varimax rotation of functional principal components. Mathematics. 2020;8(11):2085.
68.
SumwaltRL, MorrisonR, WatsonA, TaubeE, editors. What ASRS data tell about inadequate flight crew monitoring. Proceedings of the Ninth International Symposium on Aviation Psychology; 1997: Citeseer.
69.
ShappellSA, WiegmannDA. A human error approach to accident investigation: The taxonomy of unsafe operations. The International Journal of Aviation Psychology. 1997;7(4):269–91.
70.
GuoBH, YiuTW, GonzálezVA. Predicting safety behavior in the construction industry: Development and test of an integrative model. Safety Science. 2016;84:1–11.
71.
KhanFI, AmyottePR. Inherent safety in offshore oil and gas activities: a review of the present status and future directions. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries. 2002;15(4):279–89.
72.
LovePE, EdwardsDJ, IraniZ. Moving beyond optimism bias and strategic misrepresentation: An explanation for social infrastructure project cost overruns. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management. 2011;59(4):560–71.
73.
ChoudhryR, LingardH, BlismasN, editors. Designing for safety: perspectives from European Union, United Kingdom, Australia and United States pertaining to safety and health in construction. Proceedings of the CIB W99 International Conference: Working Together: Planning. Designing and Building a Healthy and Safe Construction Industry; 2009; RMIT University.
74.
EdmondsonAC. Learning from failure in health care: frequent opportunities, pervasive barriers. BMJ Quality & Safety. 2004;13(suppl 2):ii3–ii9.
