Despite considerable differences in national work-family (WF) policies offered in countries around the world, research concerning the implications of such policies for employee reactions to work-family and family-work conflict (WFC/FWC) is limited.
OBJECTIVE:
The current study examines the contextual role of country-level national WF policies as a moderator of the relationships between individual-level WFC/FWC and job stress, job satisfaction, turnover intentions, organizational commitment, and general health.
METHODS:
Using archival data sources, the ISSP Work Orientations Survey (2015) and the WORLD Policy Analysis Center Adults Labor Database (2014), multilevel analyses tested the predicted cross-level interaction effect in a sample of 49,637 individuals (54% female; Mage = 48 years) nested across 36 countries.
RESULTS:
Results were largely counter to expectations: while more supportive national WF policies attenuated the positive relationship between FWC and job stress, it exacerbated the negative relationships between WFC and organizational commitment, WFC and job stress, and FWC and general health.
CONCLUSIONS:
Our study responds to calls to consider phenomena functioning at multiple levels of analysis. While reactions were more negative in countries with more robust national-level policies, it suggests an unexpected dark side of such policies. That is, it may not be enough to legislate the availability of national-level policies; it may also be needed to ensure that such policies are meeting employees’ needs.
BroughP, O’DriscollMP. Organizational interventions for balancing work and home demands: An overview. Work & Stress. 2010;24(3):280–97.
2.
FrenchKA, AllenTD. Episodic work-family conflict and strain: A dynamic perspective. J Appl Psychol. 2020;105(8):863–88.
3.
KossekE, DistelbergB. Work and family employment policy for a transformed labor force: Current trends and themes. In: AlanBooth and Ann C.Crouter, Suzanne M.Bianchi, Judith A.Seltzer, editors. Work-life Policies that Make a Difference. 2008:4–71.
4.
KossekE, Ollier-MalaterreA. Linking national contexts, organizational practice and people for mulit-level change. New frontiers in work-family research. A vision for the future in a global world. London: Palgrave2013.
5.
CasperWJ, WeltmanD, KwesigaE. Beyond family-friendly: The construct and measurement of singles-friendly work culture. J Vocat Behav. 2007;70(3):478–501.
6.
KossekEE. Implementing organizational work– life interventions: toward a triple bottom line. Community, Work & Family. 2016;19(2):242–56.
7.
AycanZ. Cross-cultural industrial and organizational psychology: Contributions, past developments, and future directions. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology. 2000;31(1):110–28.
8.
ten BrummelhuisLL, BakkerAB. A resource perspective on the work– home interface: The work– home resources model. American Psychologist. 2012;67(7):545.
9.
GreenhausJH, BeutellNJ. Sources of conflict between work and family roles. Academy of Management Review. 1985;10(1):76–88.
10.
AllenTD. The work– family role interface: a synthesis of theresearch from industrial and organizational psychology. Handbook of Psychology, Second Edition. 2012:12.
11.
NottenN, GrunowD, VerbakelE. Social policies and families in stress: Gender and educational differences in work-family conflict from a European perspective. Soc Indic Res. 2017;132(3):1281–305.
12.
AndersonSE, CoffeyBS, ByerlyRT. Formal organizational initiatives and informal workplace practices: Links to work-family conflict and job-related outcomes. Journal of Management. 2002;28(6):787–810.
13.
AmstadFT, MeierLL, FaselU, ElferingA, SemmerNK. A meta-analysis of work– family conflict and various outcomes with a special emphasis on cross-domain versus matching-domain relations. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology. 2011;16(2):151.
14.
FrenchKA, DumaniS, AllenTD, ShockleyKM. A meta-analysis of work– family conflict and social support. Psychological Bulletin. 2018;144(3):284.
15.
GrzywaczJG, BassBL. Work, family, and mental health: Testing different models of work-family fit. Journal of Marriage and Family. 2003;65(1):248–61.
16.
JonesWM, McKennaJ. Women and work-home conflict: a dual paradigm approach. Health Education. 2002;102(5):249–59.
17.
HobfollSE. Conservation of resources: A new attempt at conceptualizing stress. American Psychologist. 1989;44(3):513.
18.
HobfollSE, HalbeslebenJ, NeveuJ-P, WestmanM. Conservation of resources in the organizational context: The reality of resources and their consequences. Annu Rev Organ Psychol Organ Behav. 2018;5(1):103–28.
19.
GorgievskiMJ, HalbeslebenJR, BakkerAB. Expanding the boundaries of psychological resource theories. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology. 2011;84(1):1–7.
20.
JiangL, ProbstTM. The rich get richer and the poor get poorer: Country-and state-level income inequality moderates the job insecurity-burnout relationship. Journal of Applied Psychology. 2017;102(4):672.
21.
JohnsG. The essential impact of context on organizational behavior. Academy of Management Review. 2006;31(2):386–408.
22.
HaseltonMG, BryantGA, WilkeA, FrederickDA, GalperinA, FrankenhuisWE, et al. Adaptive rationality: An evolutionary perspective on cognitive bias. Soc Cogn. 2009;27(5):733–63.
23.
KossekEE, PichlerS, BodnerT, HammerLB. Workplace social support and work– family conflict: A meta-analysis clarifying the influence of general and work– family-specific supervisor and organizational support. Personnel Psychology. 2011;64(2):289–313.
24.
LapierreLM, AllenTD. Work-supportive family, family-supportive supervision, use of organizational benefits, and problem-focused coping: Implications for work-family conflict and employee well-being. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology. 2006;11(2):169.
25.
BroughP, O’DriscollMP, KalliathTJ. The ability of ‘family friendly’ organizational resources to predict work– family conflict and job and family satisfaction. Stress and Health: Journal of the International Society for the Investigation of Stress. 2005;21(4):223–34.
26.
HaarJM, SpellCS. Programme knowledge and value of work-family practices and organizational commitment. The International Journal of Human Resource Management. 2004;15(6):1040–55.
27.
EatonSC. If you can use them: Flexibility policies, organizational commitment, and perceived performance. Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society. 2003;42(2):145–67.
28.
McNallLA, MasudaAD, NicklinJM. Flexible work arrangements, job satisfaction, and turnover intentions: The mediating role of work-to-family enrichment. The Journal of Psychology. 2009, 24;144(1):61–81.
29.
Ollier-MalaterreA, ValcourM, Den DulkL, KossekEE. Theorizing national context to develop comparative work– life research: A review and research agenda. European Management Journal. 2013;31(5):433–47.
30.
HegewischA, GornickJC. The impact of work-family policies on women’s employment: A review of research from OECD countries. Community, Work & Family. 2011;14(2):119–38.
31.
Ollier-MalaterreA, FoucreaultA. Cross-national work-life research: Cultural and structural impacts for individuals and organizations. Journal of Management. 2017;43(1):111–36.
32.
AllenTD, LapierreLM, SpectorPE, PoelmansSA, O’driscollM, SanchezJI, CooperCL, WalvoordAG, AntoniouAS, BroughP, GeurtsS. The link between national paid leave policy and work– family conflict among married working parents. Applied Psychology. 2014;63(1):5–28.
33.
KingRB, KaruntzosG, CasperLM, MoenP, DavisKD, BerkmanL, DurhamM, KossekEE. Work– family balance issues and work– leave policies. In Handbook of occupational health and wellness. Boston, MA: Springer; 2012. pp. 323–339.
34.
MessingK, CarolyS, BernsteinS. Balancing work and family in the low-wage service sector: The role of legislated and collectively-bargained norms in Quebec. Work. 2011;40, 119–28.
35.
AlexanderM, WhitehouseG, BrennanJ, MossP, WallK. The Australia Report. International Network on Leave Policies and Research; 2011.
KamermanS, MossP, editors. The politics of parental leave policies: Children, parenting, gender and the labour market. Bristol: The Policy Press; 2009.
38.
MessingK, CarolyS, AhlgrenC, BartheB, BernsteinS, Cau-BareilleD, et al. Policy implications of the papers in the special issue of WORK concerning work and family. IEA Gender and Work Technical Committee, 15 October 2010. Work. 2011;40:129–30.
39.
O’BrienM. Work-family balance policies. Background paper. UNDESA, New York. 2012.
40.
EarleA, MokomaneZ, HeymannJ. International perspectives on work-family policies: Lessons from the world’s most competitive economies. The Future of Children. 2011:191–210.
41.
SholarMA. The history of family leave policies in the United States. The American Historian. 2016;10:41–5.
PremeauxSF, AdkinsCL, MossholderKW. Balancing work and family: A field study of multi-dimensional, multi-role work-family conflict. Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior. 2007;28(6):705–27.
46.
ShockleyKM, DouekJ, SmithCR, PeterPY, DumaniS, FrenchKA. Cross-cultural work and family research: A review of the literature. Journal of Vocational Behavior. 2017;101, 1–20.
47.
CromptonR, LyonetteC. Work-life ‘balance’ in Europe. Acta Sociologica. 2006;49(4):379–93.
48.
SteiberN. Reported levels of time-based and strain-based conflict between work and family roles in Europe: A multilevel approach. Social Indicators Research. 2009;93(3):469–88.
49.
StrandhM, NordenmarkM. The interference of paid work with household demands in different social policy contexts: Perceived work– household conflict in Sweden, the UK, the Netherlands, Hungary, and the Czech Republic. The British Journal of Sociology. 2006;57(4):597–617.
50.
van der LippeT, JagerA, KopsY. Combination pressure: The paid work-family balance of men and women in European countries. Acta Sociologica. 2006;49(3):303–19.
51.
AllenTD, FrenchKA, DumaniS, ShockleyKM. Meta-analysis of work– family conflict mean differences: Does national context matter?Journal of Vocational Behavior. 2015;90:90–100.
52.
YerkesM, StandingK, WattisL, WainS. The disconnection between policy practices and women’s lived experiences: Combining work and life in the UK and the Netherlands. Community, Work & Family. 2010;13(4):411–27.
53.
AitkenZ, GarrettCC, HewittB, KeoghL, HockingJS, KavanaghAM. The maternal health outcomes of paid maternity leave: A systematic review. Social Science & Medicine. 2015;(130):32–41.
54.
KuraniN, RanjiU, SalganicoffA, RaeM. Paid family leave and sick days in the US: Findings from the 2016 Kaiser/HRET Employer Health Benefits Survey. Kaiser Family Foundation; 2017.
55.
ThoitsPA. Stress and health: Major findings and policy implications. Journal of Health and Social Behavior. 2010;51(1_suppl):41–53.
56.
AveyJB, LuthansF, SmithRM, PalmerNF. Impact of positive psychological capital on employee well-being over time. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology. 2010;15(1):17.
57.
DebusME, ProbstTM, KönigCJ, KleinmannM. Catch me if I fall! Enacted uncertainty avoidance and the social safety net as country-level moderators in the job insecurity– job attitudes link. Journal of Applied Psychology. 2012;97(3):690.
58.
ISSP Research Group. International Social Survey Programme: Work Orientation IV – ISSP 2015 [Data source]. Cologne:
GESIS Data Archive; 2015 [cited 2017 Sep]. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.4232/1.12848.
59.
FisherGG, MatthewsRA, GibbonsAM. Developing and investigating the use of single-item measures in organizational research. J Occup Health Psychol. 2016;21(1):3–23.
60.
FleesonW. Toward a structure-and process-integrated view of personality: Traits as density distributions of states. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2001;80(6):1011.
61.
BullockJB, StritchJM, RaineyHG. International comparison of public and private employees’ work motives, attitudes, and perceived rewards. Public Administration Review. 2015;75(3):479–89.
62.
KimSH, WagstaffMF, LaffranchiniG. Does humane orientation matter? A cross-cultural study of job characteristics needs-supplies fit/misfit and affective organizational commitment. Cross cult strateg manag. 2021;28(3):600–25.
63.
AllenNJ, MeyerJP. The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance and normative commitment to the organization. Journal of Occupational Psychology. 1990;63(1):1–8.
64.
TsuiAS, EganTD, O’ReillyIII CA. Being different: Relational demography and organizational attachment. Administrative science quarterly. 1992:549–79.
65.
DeSalvoKB, FisherWP, TranK, BloserN, MerrillW, PeabodyJ. Assessing measurement properties of two single-item general health measures. Quality of Life Research. 2006;15(2):191–201.
66.
ProbstTM, SinclairRR, SearsLE, GaileyNJ, BlackKJ, CheungJH. Economic stress and well-being: Does population health context matter?Journal of Applied Psychology. 2018;103(9):959.
67.
BorsboomD, Latent variable theory. Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives. Routledge. 2008;6, 25–53.
68.
MeulemanR, KraaykampG, VerbakelE. Do Female Colleagues and Supervisors Influence Family Role Attitudes? A Three-Level Test of Exposure Explanations Among Employed Men and Women in 27 European Countries. Journal of Marriage and Family. 2017;79(1):277–93.
69.
BudigMJ. The motherhood penalty in cross-national perspective: The importance of work– family policies and cultural attitudes. Social Politics. 2012;19(2):163–93.
70.
TreasJ, van der LippeT, TaiTO. The happy homemaker? Married women’s well-being in cross-national perspective. Social Forces. 2011;90(1):111–32.
71.
HustedBW. Culture and ecology: A cross-national study of the determinants of environmental sustainability. MIR: Management International Review. 2005:349–71.
72.
CoxPL, FriedmanBA, TribunellaT. Relationships among cultural dimensions, national gross domestic product, and environmental sustainability. Journal of Applied Business and Economics. 2011;12(6):46–56.
73.
LenssenG, PerriniF, TencatiA, LacyP, RingovD, ZolloM. The impact of national culture on corporate social performance. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society. 2007;7(4).
74.
HofstedeG. Culture’s Consequences, International Differences in Work-related Values Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications; 1980.
75.
HofstedeG. Dimensionalizing cultures: The Hofstede model in context. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture. 2011;2:2307.
76.
SpectorPE, BrannickMT. Methodological urban legends: The misuse of statistical control variables. Organizational Research Methods. 2011;14(2):287–305.
77.
BeckerTE. Potential problems in the statistical control of variables in organizational research: A qualitative analysis with recommendations. Organizational Research Methods. 2005;8(3):274–89.
78.
CarlsonKD, WuJ. The illusion of statistical control: Control variable practice in management research. Organizational Research Methods. 2012;15, 413–35.
79.
RaudenbushSW, BrykAS. Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods: Sage; 2002.
80.
HeckRH, ThomasSL. An introduction to multilevel modeling techniques: MLM and SEM approaches. Routledge; 2020.
81.
RaudenbushSW, BrykAS, CongdonR. HLM 6 for Windows [Computer software]. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International. 2017.
82.
LaHuisDM, FergusonMW. The accuracy of significance tests for slope variance components in multilevel random coefficient models. Organizational Research Methods. 2009;12(3):418–35.
Mesmer-MagnusJR, ViswesvaranC. Convergence between measures of work-to-family and family-to-work conflict: A meta-analytic examination. Journal of Vocational Behavior. 2005;67(2):215–32.
85.
LiC, LuJ, ZhangY. Cross-domain effects of work-family conflict on organizational commitment and performance. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal. 2013;41(10):1641–53.
86.
BalmforthK, GardnerD. Conflict and facilitation between work and family: Realizing the outcomes for organizations. New Zealand Journal of Psychology. 2006;35(2).
87.
LuL, KaoSF, ChangTT, WuHP, CooperCL. Work/family demands, work flexibility, work/family conflict, and their consequences at work: A national probability sample in Taiwan. International Perspectives in Psychology: Research, Practice, Consultation. 2011;1(5):68.
88.
Schwepker Jr CH. Ethical climate’s relationship to job satisfaction, organizational commitment, and turnover intention in the salesforce. Journal of Business Research. 2001;54(1):39–52.
89.
CohenA. Organizational Commitment and turnover: A meta-analysis. Academy of Management Journal. 1993;36(5):1140–57.
90.
WheelerL, SulsJ. A history of social comparison theory. Oxford University Press. 2020:5–31.
91.
AlickeMD, ZellE, BloomDL. Mere categorization and the frog-pond effect. Psychological Science. 2010;21(2):174–7.
92.
CrosnoeR. Low-income students and the socioeconomic composition of public high schools. American Sociological Review. 2009;74(5):709–30.
93.
JiangL, ProbstTM, BensonWL. Why me? The frog-pond effect, relative deprivation and individual outcomes in the face of budget cuts. Work & Stress. 2014;28(4):387–403.
94.
LevinsonH, PriceCR, MundenKJ, MandlHJ, SolleyCM. Men, management, and mental health. Harvard Business Review. 1963;41(5):146.
95.
RousseauDM. The individual– organization relationship: The psychological contract. In: APA handbook of industrial and organizational psychology, Vol 3: Maintaining, expanding, and contracting the organization.
WashingtonAmerican Psychological Association; 2011. pp. 191–220.
SeeryMD. Resilience: A silver lining to experiencing adverse life events?Current Directions in Psychological Science. 2011;20(6):390–4.
98.
RostgaardT. Family policies in Scandinavia. Study Report. Western Europa/North America: Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung; 2014. Report No.: ISBN 978-3-86498-817-2.
99.
Changes in Child and Family Policies in the EU28 in 2017. European Platform for Investing in Children: Annual Thematic Report. RAND Corporation; 2018. Report No.: doi: 10.2767/14467.
100.
OstnerI. Farewell to the Family as We Know it: Family Policy Change in Germany. German Policy Studies/Politikfeldanalyse. 2010;6(1).
101.
FagnaniJ, MathA. Recent reforms in French and German familypolicies: Similar challenges, different responses. Sociologia, Problemas e Práticas. 2010;(64):11–35.
102.
AddatiL, CassirerN, GilchristK. Maternity and paternity at work: Law and practice across the world. Report. International Labour Office; 2014.
103.
MichelJS, KotrbaLM, MitchelsonJK, ClarkMA, BaltesBB. Antecedents of work– family conflict: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Organizational Behavior. 2011;32(5):689–725.
104.
DrutmanL. The business of America is lobbying: How corporations became politicized and politics became more corporate: Oxford University Press; 2015.
105.
MilkmanR, AppelbaumE. Low-wage workers and paid family leave: The California experience. In Luce SLJMJMR, editor. What Works for Workers?New York: Russell Sage Foundation; 2014. pp. 305–28.
106.
MilkmanR, AppelbaumE. Unfinished business: Paid family leave in California and the future of US work-family policy Ithaca: Cornell University Press; 2013.
107.
Rossin-SlaterM, RuhmCJ, WaldfogelJ. The effects of California’spaid family leave program on mothers’ leave-taking and subsequentlabor market outcomes. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management. 2013;32(2):224–45.
108.
SpectorPE. Method variance in organizational research: truth or urban legend?Organizational Research Methods. 2006;9(2):221–32.
109.
MatthewsRA, KathLM, Barnes-FarrellJL. A short, valid, predictive measure of work– family conflict: Item selection and scale validation. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology. 2010;15(1):75.
110.
WanousJP, ReichersAE, HudyMJ. Overall job satisfaction: how good are single-item measures?Journal of Applied Psychology. 1997;82(2):247.
111.
Peus C. Work-family balance? The case of Germany. Working Paper. Boston: MIT, Sloan School of Management; 2006. Report No.: WPC#0025.
112.
HigginsC, DuxburyL, JulienM. The relationship between work arrangements and work-family conflict. Work. 2014;48(1):69–81.
NicolaM, AlsafiZ, SohrabiC, KerwanA, Al-JabirA, IosifidisC, AghaM, AghaR. The socio-economic implications of the coronavirus pandemic (COVID-19): A review. International Journal of Surgery. 2020;78, 185.
AllenTD, JohnsonRC, KiburzKM, ShockleyKM. Work– family conflict and flexible work arrangements: Deconstructing flexibility. Personnel Psychology. 2013;66(2):345–76.
117.
CarlsonDS, KacmarKM. Work– family conflict in the organization: Do life role values make a difference?Journal of Management. 2000;26(5):1031–54.
118.
HillEJ, HawkinsAJ, FerrisM, WeitzmanM. Finding an extra day a week: The positive influence of perceived job flexibility on work and family life balance. Family Relations. 2001;50(1):49–58.
119.
MätzkeM. The role of old ideas in the new German Family Policy Agenda. German Policy Studies/Politikfeldanalyse. 2010;6(3).
120.
MathieuJE, AguinisH, CulpepperSA, ChenG. Understanding and estimating the power to detect cross-level interaction effects in multilevel modeling. Journal of Applied Psychology. 2012;97(5):951.
121.
MathieuJE, ChenG. The etiology of the multilevel paradigm in management research. Journal of Management. 2011;37(2):610–41.
122.
PavalkoEK, HendersonKA. Combining care work and paid work: Do workplace policies make a difference?Research on Aging. 2006;28(3):359–74.
123.
RaoTS, IndlaV. Work, family or personal life: Why not all three?Indian Journal of Psychiatry. 2010;52(4):295.
124.
RaudenbushSW, LiuX. Statistical power and optimal design for multisite randomized trials. Psychological Methods. 2000;5(2):199.
125.
RuppannerL. Conflict between work and family: An investigation of four policy measures. Social Indicators Research. 2013;110(1):327–47.
126.
ScherbaumCA, FerreterJM. Estimating statistical power and required sample sizes for organizational research using multilevel modeling. Organizational Research Methods. 2009;12(2):347–67.
127.
TaylorBL, DelCampoRG, BlanceroDM. Work– family conflict/facilitation and the role of workplace supports for US Hispanic professionals. Journal of Organizational Behavior. 2009;30(5):643–64.
128.
BrowneWJ. Sample sizes for multilevel models. In Centre for Multilevel Modelling. Bristol, United Kingdom: University of Bristol;2008.
129.
HofstedeG. Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions and organizations across nations. 2nd ed. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications; 2001.
Snijders TAB. Power and sample size in multilevel linear models. Encyclopedia of statistics in behavioral science. 2015 October.
136.
World of work report: Making markets work for jobs. Gevena: International Labour Organization (ILO); 2011.
137.
MessingK, CarolyS. Gender, Work Schedules and Work/Family Regulation. Work. 2011;40, 1–4.
138.
SnirR, HarpazI, Ben-BaruchD. Centrality of and investment in work and family among Israeli high-tech workers: A bicultural perspective. Cross-Cultural Research. 2009;43(4):366–85.
139.
SinclairRR, SearsLE, ProbstT, ZajackM. A multilevel model of economic stress and employee well-being. Contemporary Occupational Health Psychology: Global Perspectives on Research and Practice. 2010;1:1–20.
140.
ProbstTM. Economic stressors. In Barling EKKFM, editor. Handbook of Work Stress. SAGE Publications; 2005.pp.267–97.
141.
BrownLW, QuickJC. Environmental influences on individual burnout and a preventive approach for organizations. Journal of Applied Biobehavioral Research. 2013;18(2):104–21.
142.
MätzkeM, OstnerI. Introduction: Change and continuity in recent family policies. Journal of European Social Policy. 2010;20(5):387–98.
143.
SchoberPS. Parental leave and domestic work of mothers and fathers: A longitudinal study of two reforms in West Germany. Journal of Social Policy. 2014;43(2):351.
144.
CarrJC, BoyarSL, GregoryBT. The moderating effect of work— family centrality on work— family conflict, organizational attitudes, and turnover behavior. Journal of Management. 2008;34(2):244–62.
145.
ParboteeahKP, CullenJB. Social institutions and work centrality: Explorations beyond national culture. Organization Science. 2003;14(2):137–48.
146.
AllenTD, MartinA. The work-family interface: A retrospective look at 20 years of research in JOHP. J Occup Health Psychol. 2017;22(3):259–72.
147.
AllenTD. The work– family role interface: A synthesis of the research from industrial and organizational psychology. In: IrvingB, editor Handbook of Psychology, 2nd ed Wiley Online Library;2012.
148.
MichelJS, KotrbaLM, MitchelsonJK, ClarkMA, BaltesBB. Antecedents of work– family conflict: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Organizational Behavior. 2011;32(5):689–725.
