Do personal resources matter beyond job demands and job resources? Main and interaction effects on health-related outcomes among women working within the welfare sector
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online November 21, 2019
Do personal resources matter beyond job demands and job resources? Main and interaction effects on health-related outcomes among women working within the welfare sector
Overall, health-related correlates of job demands and job resources are well-known. However, in today’s working life, personal resources are considered to be of increasing importance. Beyond general mental ability, knowledge regarding personal resources remains limited. This is particularly so among women working in the welfare sector, a sector mainly employing women and with the work typically involving clients.
OBJECTIVE:
This study investigated the importance of job demands, job resources, and personal resources for health-related outcomes, as well as the mitigating effects of resources, among women working within the Swedish welfare sector.
METHODS:
Self-reports from 372 women employed within the welfare sector were analyzed using hierarchical multiple regression.
RESULTS:
Overall, increasing job demands were associated with poorer health outcomes while increasing job resources and personal resources were associated with better health. Additionally, lower control aggravated the effects of quantitative job demands on health outcomes while lower feedback mitigated the effect of qualitative demands. However, personal resources had no moderating effect.
CONCLUSIONS:
Job resources seem more pertinent to health than personal resources, at least among women working within the welfare sector in Sweden.
BowlingNA, AlarconGM, BraggCB, HartmanMJ. A meta-analytic examination of the potential correlates and consequences of workload. Work & Stress. 2015;29(2):95–113.
2.
StansfeldS, CandyB. Psychosocial work environment and mental health: A meta-analytic review. Scandinavian Journal of Work Environmental Health. 2006;32(6):443–62.
3.
TheorellT, HammarströmA, AronssonG, Träskman BendzL, GrapeT, HogstedtC, MarteinsdottirI, SkoogI, HallC. A systematic review including meta-analysis of work environment and depressive symptoms. BMC Public Health. 2015;15(1):1–14.
4.
DuijtsSFA, KantI, SwaenGMH, van den BrandtPA, ZeegersMPA. A meta-analysis of observational studies identifies predictors of sickness absence. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 2007;60:1105–15.
5.
MiragliaM, JohnsG. Going to work ill: A meta-analysis of the correlates of presenteeism and a dual-path model. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology. 2015;21(3):261–83.
6.
GroteG, GuestD. The case for reinvigorating quality of working life research. Human Relations. 2017;70(2):149–67.
7.
DemeroutiE, BakkerAB, NachreinerF, SchaufeliWB. The Job Demands–Resources model of burnout. Journal of Applied Psychology. 2001;86(3):499–512.
8.
HackmanJR, OldhamGR. Development of the job diagnostic survey. Journal of Applied Psychology. 1975;60(2):159–70.
9.
KarasekRA, TheorellT. Healthy work: Stress, productivity and the reconstruction of working life. New York: Basic Books; 1990.
10.
BakkerAB, DemeroutiE, Sanz-VergelAI. Burnout and work engagement: The JD–R approach. The Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior. 2014;1:389–411.
11.
SchaufeliW, TarisT. A critical review of the job demands–resources model; Implications for improving work and health. In: Bauer G and Hämmig O (eds) Bridging occupational, organizational and public health. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer; 2014, pp. 43–68.
12.
XanthopoulouD, BakkerAB, DemeroutiE, SchaufeliWB. The role of personal resources in the Job Demands-Resources model. International Journal of Stress Management. 2007;14(2):121–41.
13.
TremblayMA, MesserveyD. The Job Demands-Resources model: Further evidence for the buffering effect of personal resources. SA Journal of Industrial Psychology/SA 37. 2011;2:1–10.
14.
WrzesniewskiA, DuttonJE. Crafting a job: Revisioning employees as active crafters of their work. Academy of Management Review. 2001;26(2):179–201.
15.
AFS. The Swedish Work Authority’s Statute Book 2015:4. Organisational and social work environment: The Swedish work environment authority provisions on organisational and social work environment, with general recommendations and application thereof. Stockholm: The Swedish Work Environment Authority provisions; 2015.
16.
CazesS, HijzenA, Saint-MartinA. Measuring and assessing job quality: The OECD job quality framework, OECD social, employment and migration working papers (No. 174). Paris: OECD Publishing; 2015. Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/5jrp02kjw1mr-en.
WHO. Global strategy on occupational health for all: The way to health atwork. Recommendation of the second meeting of theWHOcollaborating centres in occupational health 11-14 October 1994 Beijing, China. Geneva: World Health Organization; 1995.
AronssonG, AstvikW, GustafssonK. Work conditions, recovery and health: A study among workers within pre-school, home care and social work. British Journal of Social Work. 2013;1–19.
21.
SmythE, SteinmetzS. Field of study and gender segregation in European labour markets. International Journal of Comparative Sociology. 2008;49(4–5):257–81.
22.
Statistics Sweden. Women and men in Sweden: Facts and figures 2014. Örebro: SCB-Tryck; 2014.
23.
Campos-SernaJ, Ronda-PérezE, ArtazcozL, MoenB, BenavidesF. Gender inequalities in occupational health related to the unequal distribution of working and employment conditions: A systematic review. International Journal for Equity in Health. 2013;12(1):1–18.
24.
HärenstamA. MOA Research Group. Different development trends in working life and increasing occupational stress require new work environment strategies. Work. 2005;24:261–77.
FalkenbergH, NäswallK, LindforsP, SverkeM. Working in the same sector, in the same organization and in the same occupation: Similarities and differences between women and men physicians’ work climate and health complaints. Nordic Journal of Working Life Studies. 2015;5(4):67–84.
27.
KjellssonS, MagnussonC, TåhlinM. Arbete, hälsa och genus: Betydelsen av yrkets könssammansättning för kvin-nors och mäns villkor i arbetslivet (Work, health, and gender: The importance of the gender composition of women’s and men’s working conditions). In: Jämställt arbete? Organisatoriska ramar och villkor i arbetslivet (Equal work? Organizational framework and conditions in working life). Stockholm: Research report for the Delegation for Gender Equality in Working Life. 2014;151-94. SOU 2014:30.
28.
LloydC, KingR, ChenowethL. Social work, stress and burnout: A review. Journal of Mental Health. 2002;11(3):255–65.
29.
McLeanJ, AndrewT. Commitment, satisfaction, stress and control among social services managers and social workers in the UK. Administration in Social Work. 1999;23(3–4):93–117.
30.
BakkerAB, DemeroutiE. The job demands–resources model: State of the art. Journal of Managerial Psychology. 2007;22(3):309–28.
31.
KarasekR, BrissonQ, KawakamiN, HoutmanI, BongersP, AmickB. The Job Content Questionnaire (JCQ): An instrument for internationally comparative assessments of psychosocial job characteristics. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology. 1998;3(4):322–55.
32.
Van der DoefM, MaesS. The Job Demand-Control(-Support) model and psychological well-being: A review of 20 years of empirical research. Work & Stress. 1999;13(2):87–114.
33.
BrometEJ, DewMA, ParkinsonMA, SchulbergHC. Predictive effects of occupational and marital stress on the mental health of a male workforce. Journal of Organizational Behavior. 1988;9:1–13.
34.
Estryn-BeharM, KaminskiM, PeigneE, BonnetN, VaichereE, GozlanC, AzoulayS, GiorgiM. Stress at work and mental health status among female hospital workers. British Journal of Industrial Medicine. 1990;47(1):20–8.
35.
AronssonG, GustafssonK. Sickness presenteeism: Prevalence, attendance-pressure factors, and an outline of a model for research. Journal of Occupational & Environmental Medicine. 2005;47(9):958–66.
36.
DeeryS, WalshJ, ZatzickCD. A moderated mediation analysis of job demands, presenteeism, and absenteeism. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology. 2014;87:352–69.
37.
KarasekRA. Job demands, job decision latitude and mental strain: Implications for job redesign. Administrative Science Quarterly. 1979;24:285–311.
38.
de JongeJ, KompierAJ. A critical examination of the Demand-Control-Support model from a work psychological perspective. International Journal of Stress Management. 1997;4(4):235–58.
39.
DemeroutiE, BakkerAB. The Job Demands–Resources model: Challenges for future research. SA Journal of Industrial Psychology. 2011;37(2):1–9.
40.
HäusserJA, MojzischA, NieselM, Schulz-HardtS. Ten years on: A review of recent research on the Job Demand-Control (-Support) model and psychological well-being. Work & Stress. 2010;24(1):1–35.
41.
NahrgangJD, MorgesonFP, HofmannDA. Safety at work: A meta-analytic investigation of the link between job demands, job resources, burnout, engagement, and safety outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology. 2010;96(1):71–94.
42.
SpectorPE. Perceived control by employees: A meta-analysis of studies concerning autonomy and participation at work. Human Relations. 1986;39(11):1005–16.
43.
WhiteM, WagnerS, SchultzI, MurrayE, BradleySM, HsuV, McGuireL, SchulzW. Modifiable workplace risk factors contributing to workplace absence across health conditions: A stakeholder-centered best-evidence synthesis of systematic reviews. Work. 2013;45:475–92.
44.
LockeEA, LathamGP. New directions in goal-setting theory. Current Directions in Psychological Science. 2006;15(5):265–8.
45.
BakkerAB, Van VeldhovenM, XanthopoulouD. Beyond the Demand–Control model: Thriving on high job demands and resources. Journal of Personnel Psychology. 2010;9(1):3–16.
46.
BakkerAB, DemeroutiE, EuwemaMC. Job resources buffer the impact of job demands on burnout. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology. 2005;10(2):170–80.
47.
XanthopoulouD, BakkerAB, DollardMF, DemeroutiE, SchaufeliWB, TarisTW, SchreursPJG. When do job demands particularly predict burnout? The moderating role of job resources. Journal of Managerial Psychology. 2007;22(8):766–86.
48.
DwyerDJ, GansterDC. The effects of job demands and control on employee attendance and satisfaction. Journal of Organizational Behavior. 1991;12:595–408.
49.
XanthopoulouD, BakkerAB, DemeroutiE, SchaufeliWB. Work engagement and financial returns: A diary study on the role of job demands and personal resources. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology. 2009;82:183–200.
50.
CarverCS, ScheierMF, WeintraubJK. Assessing coping strategies: A theoretically based approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1989;56(2):267–83.
51.
LazarusRS, FolkmanS. Stress, appraisal, and coping. New York: Springer; 1984.
52.
HirschmanAO. Exit, voice, and loyalty: Responses to decline in firms, organizations, and states. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1970.
53.
SverkeM, HellgrenJ. Exit, voice, and loyalty reactions to job insecurity in Sweden: Do unionized and non-unionized members differ?British Journal of Industrial Relations. 2001;39(2):167–82.
54.
BashshurMR, OcB. When voice matters: A multilevel review of the impact of voice in organizations. Journal of Management. 2015;41(5):1530–54.
55.
MorrisonEW. Employee voice and silence. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior. 2014;1:173–97.
56.
MowbrayPK, WilkinsonA, TseHHM. An integrative review of employee voice: Identifying a common conceptualization and research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews. 2015;17:382–400.
57.
HellerF, PusicE, StraussG, WilpertB. Organizational participation: Myth and reality. New York: Oxford University Press; 2004.
58.
AllenTD, HerstDEL, BruckCS, SuttonM. Consequences associated with work-to-family conflict: A review and agenda for future research. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology. 2000;5(2):278–308.
59.
AllvinM, AronssonG, HagströmT, JohanssonG, LundbergU. Work without boundaries. Psychological perspectives on the new working life. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell; 2011.
60.
BakkerAB, DemeroutiE. Job Demands–Resources Theory: Taking stock and looking forward. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology. 2017;22(3):273–85.
61.
BergJM, DuttonJE, WrzesniewskiA. What is job crafting and why does it matter? Available February 9, 2016, from the website of Positive Organizational Scholarship, University of Michigan; 2008.
62.
SettlesIH, CortinaLM, StewartAJ, MalleyJ. Voice matters: Buffering the impact of a negative climate for women in science. Psychology of Women Quarterly. 2007;31:270–81.
LidwallU, BillS, PalmerE, Olsson BohlinC. Mental disorder sick leave in Sweden: A population study. Work. 2018;59:259–72.
70.
FrankenhaeuserM. A biopsychosocial approach to work life issues. International Journal of Health Services. 1989;19(4):747–58.
71.
DayA, KellowayEK, HurrellJ. (eds.) Workplace well-being: How to build psychologically healthy workplaces. New York: Wiley; 2014.
72.
NielsenK, AbildgaardJS. Organizational interventions: A research-based framework for the evaluation of both process and effects. Work & Stress. 2013;27(3):278–97.
73.
McQueenRA, KnussenC. Introduction to research methods and statistics in psychology. Essex: Pearson Education; 2006.
74.
De LangeAH, TarisTW, KompierMAJ, HoutmanILD, BongersPM. The very best of the millennium: Longitudinal research and the demand-control (-support) model. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology. 2003;8(4):282–305.
75.
McClellanGH, JuddCM. Statistical difficulties of detecting interactions and moderator effects. Psychological Bulletin. 1993;114(2):376–90.
76.
CampbellDT, FiskeDW. Convergent and discriminant validation by the multi-trait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin. 1959;56(2):81–105.
77.
SpectorPE. Method variance in organizational research: Truth or urban legend?Organizational Research Methods. 2006;9(2):221–32.
78.
KuninT. The construction of a new type of attitude measure. Personnel Psychology. 1998;51:823–4.
79.
LiCY, SungFC. A review of the healthy worker effect in occupational epidemiology. Occupational Medicine. 1999;49(4):225–29.
80.
HarnoisG, GabrielP. Mental health and work: Impact, issues and good practices. Geneva: World Health Organization and the International Labour Organisation; 2000.
81.
HassardJ, TeohK, CoxT, DeweP, CosmarM, GründlerR, FlemmingD, CosemansB, Van den BroekK. Calculating the cost of work-related stress and psychosocial risks: European Risk Observatory, Literature Review. Luxembourg: European Agency for Safety and Health at Work (EU-OSHA); 2014.
82.
BeehrTA, WalshJT, TaberTD. Relationships of stress to individually and organizationally valued states: Higher order needs as a moderator. Journal of Applied Psychology. 1976;61(1):41–7.
83.
SverkeM, HellgrenJ, ÖhrmingJ. Organizational restructuring and health care work: A quasi-experimental study. In Le BlancPM, PeetersMCW, BüssingA, SchaufeliWB (eds), Organizational psychology and health care. European contributions. Munich: Rainer Hampp; 1999, pp. 15–32.
84.
SverkeM, HellgrenJ, ÖhrmingJ. Hospital corporatization: How are nurses’ job perceptions and work-related attitudes affected? Reports from the Department of Psychology, Stockholm University, no 819; 1997.
85.
SverkeM, SjöbergA. Dual commitment to company and union in Sweden: An examination of predictors and taxonomic split methods. Economic and Industrial Democracy. 1994;15:531–64.
86.
WalshJT, TaberTD, BeehrTA. An integrated model of perceived job characteristics. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance. 1980;25:252–67.
87.
EklöfM, PousetteA, DellveL, SkagertK, AhlborgGJr.Gothenburg manager stress inventory (GMSI). Gothenburg manager stress inventory (GMSI). Utveckling av ett variations- och förändringskänsligt fråageinstrument förmätning av stressorexponering, copingbeteende och cop-ingresurser bland 1:a och 2:a linjens chefer inom offentlig våard och omsorg. ISM-rapport 7, Göteborg: Institutet för stressmedicin; 2010.
88.
BanksMH, CleggCW, JacksonPR, KempNJ, StaffordEM, WallTD. The use of the General Health Questionnaire as an indicator of mental health in occupational studies. Journal of Occupational Psychology. 1980;53:187–94.
89.
AronssonG, GustafssonK, DallnerM. Sick but yet at work. An empirical study of sickness presenteeism. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health. 2000;54:502–9.
90.
BorgK, GoineH, SöderbergE, MarnetoftSU, AlexandersonK. Comparison of seven measures of sickness absence based on data from three counties in Sweden. Work. 2006;26:421–8.
91.
HensingG. Chapter 4. Methodological aspects in sickness-absence research. Scandinavian Journal Public Health. 2004;32(63_suppl):44–8.
92.
HensingG, AlexandersonK, AllebeckP, BjurulfP. How to measure sickness absence? Literature review and suggestion of five basic measures. Scandinavian Journal of Social Medicine. 1998;26(2):133–44.
