Abstract
Background
In recent years, the increasing demand for educational innovation and quality has created multiple occupational stressors for teachers. Long-term exposure to these stressors increases the risk of burnout, which influences mental and public health. Although numerous studies have evaluated the effectiveness of stress reduction interventions for educators, a gap exists in evidence-based research on mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs), specifically targeting this professional group.
Objects
This study aims to evaluate the overall effects of MBIs on teachers’ work stress.
Methods
This systematic review and meta-analysis focused on randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to evaluate the effectiveness of MBIs in alleviating teachers’ work-related stress. Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses 2020 guidelines, we searched five databases (PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane, Web of Science, and PsycINFO) for relevant RCTs up to July 2025. We assessed the risk of bias using Cochrane RoB 2 tool.
Results
Pooled data from 13 trials (N = 2119) showed that, compared with the waitlist control group, perceived stress significantly decreased after intervention (standardized mean difference, SMD = −2.37, 95% CI = [−4.40, −0.35]. Additionally, mindfulness levels increased (SMD = 0.59, 95% CI = [0.39, 0.79], p < 0.001), and negative emotions decreased (SMD = −0.95, 95% CI = [−1.27, −0.62], p < 0.001). However, the presence of methodological and clinical heterogeneity requires a cautious interpretation of these results.
Conclusion
Findings suggest that MBIs serves as an effective tool for reducing general perceived stress and improving teacher well-being. Results also emphasize the need to design and conduct studies with long-term follow-up.
Keywords
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
