Workplace walking interventions can lead to positive physical and psychological outcomes for employees. For optimal success, however, innovative approaches that appeal to employees are needed.
OBJECTIVE:
The purpose of this study was to assess the physical activity levels and experiences of university staff members who walked shelter dogs during their lunch breaks.
METHOD:
Participants walked with a dog and a partner for 30 minutes during their lunch break one day a week for four weeks. Accelerometer data was collected during participant walks and interviews conducted post-intervention.
RESULTS:
Quantitative results indicated that participants averaged 24.9±7.4 minutes of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (range 12– 37 min) during the walk. Qualitative findings suggested that the incorporation of shelter dogs into a walking intervention encouraged participants to take part in the study and continue each week.
CONCLUSIONS:
Both the quantitative and qualitative data from this pilot study support the notion that including shelter dogs into a university-based walking program encouraged physical activity engagement and adherence.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Physical Activity Basics. [Internet]. Atlanta, GA, US: Center for Disease Control and Prevention; 2015 [cited 2018 Feb 15]. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/physicalactivity/basics/index.htm.
2.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.Walking. [Internet]. Atlanta, CA, US: Center for Disease Control and Prevention; 2015 [cited 2018 Feb 15]. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/physicalactivity/walking/index.htm.
3.
ChurchTS, ThomasDM, Tudor-LockeC, KatzmarzykPT, EarnestCP, RodarteRQ, MartinCK, BlairSN, BouchardC. Trends over 5 decades of U.S. occupation-related physical activity and their associations with obesity. PLoS. 2011;6(5):1.
4.
DasBM, MaileyE, MurrayK, PhillipsSM, TorresC, KingAC. From sedentary to active: Shifting the movement paradigm in workplaces. Work. 2016;54(2):481.
5.
RydeG, BrownH. Physical activity and workplace wellbeing. In Cooper CL, Leiter MP, editors. The Routledge Companion to Wellbeing at Work. New York: Taylor & Francis; 2017, p. 298.
6.
MalikSH, BlakeH, SuggsLS. A systematic review of workplace health promotion interventions for increasing physical activity. Br J Health Psychol. 2014;19:149.
7.
AbrahamC, Graham-RowE. Are worksite interventions effective in increasing physical activity? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Health Psychol Rev. 2009;3:108.
8.
SchroerS, HauptJ, PieperC. Evidence-based lifestyle interventions in the workplace – an overview. Occup Med. 2014;64(1):8.
9.
GilsonND, FaulknerG, MurphyMH, MeyerRU, WashingtonT, RydeGC, Arbour-NicitopoulosKP, DillonKA. Walk@Work: An automated intervention to increase walking in university employees not achieving 10,000 daily steps. Prev Med. 2013;56(5):283.
10.
MansiS, MilosavljevicS, TumiltyS, HendrickP, HiggsC, BaxterDG. Investigating the effect of a 3-month workplace-based pedometer-driven walking programme on health-related quality of life in meat processing workers: A feasibility study within a randomized controlled trial. BMC Public Health. 2015;15:410.
11.
HainesDJ, DavisL, RancourP, WagnerS. A pilot intervention to promote walking and wellness and to improve the health of college faculty and staff. J Am Coll Health. 2007;55(4):219.
12.
PlotnikoffR, CollinsCE, WilliamsR, GermovJ, CallisterR. Effectiveness of interventions targeting health behaviors in university and college staff: A systematic review. Am J Health Promot. 2015;29(5):169.
13.
MorganW. Prescription of physical activity: A paradigm shift. Quest. 2001;53(3):366.
14.
HigginsJW, TempleV, MurrayH, KummE, RhodesR. Walking sole mates: Dogs motivating, enabling, and supporting guardians’ physical activity. Anthrozoos. 2013;26(2):237.
15.
JohnsonRA, MeadowsRL. Dog walking: Motivation for adherence to a walking program. Clin Nurs Res. 2010;19(4):387.
16.
WestgarthC, ChristleyRM, ChristianHE. How might we increase physical activity through dog walking? A comprehensive review of dog walking correlates. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2014;11(83):1.
17.
RhodesRE, MurrayH, TempleVA, TuokkoH, HigginsJW. Pilot study of a dog walking randomized intervention: Effects of a focus on canine exercise. Prev Med. 2012;54(5):309.
18.
ChristianH, WestgarthC, BaumanA, RichardsEA, RhodesRE, EvensonKR, MayerJA, ThorpeRJ. Dog ownership and physical activity: A review of evidence. J Phys Act Health. 2013;10(5):750.
19.
KushnerRF, BlatnerDJ, JewellDE, RudloffK. The PPET Study: People and pets exercising together. Obes. 2006;14(10):1762.
MaharajN, HaneyCJ. A qualitative investigation of the significance of companion dogs. West J Nurs Res. 2015;37(9):1175.
22.
CampbellK, SmithCM, TumiltyS, CameronC, TreharneGJ. How does dog-walking influence perceptions of health and wellbeing in healthy adults? A qualitative dog-walk-along study. Anthrozoös. 2016;29(2):181.
23.
Menor-CamposDJ, Molleda-CarbonellJM, Lopez-RodriguezR. Effects of exercise and human contact on animal welfare in a dog shelter. Vet Rec. 2011;169(15):288.
24.
BeerdaB, SchilderMBH, van HooffJARAM, de VriesHW, MolJA. Chronic stress in dogs subjected to social and special restriction. I. Behavioral Responses. Phys Behav. 1999;66(2):233.
25.
HennessyMB, DavisHN, WilliamsMT, MellottC, DouglasCW. Plasma cortisol levels of dogs at a county animal shelter. Phys Behav. 1997;62(3):485.
26.
HubrechtRC, SerpellJA, PooleTB. Correlates of pen size and housing conditions on the behavior of kenneled dogs. Appl Anim Behav Sci. 1992;34:365.
27.
CoppolaCL, GrandinT, EnnsM. Noise in the animal shelter environment: Building design and the effects of daily noise exposure. J Appl Anim Welf Sci. 2006a;9(1):1.
28.
CoppolaCL, GrandinT, EnnsM. Human interaction and cortisol: Can human contact reduce stress for shelter dogs?Phys Behav. 2006b;87(3):537.
29.
HennessyMB. Hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal responses to brief social separation. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 1997;21(1):11.
30.
SasakiJE, DineshJ, FreedsonPS. Validation and comparison of ActiGraph activity monitors. J Sci Med Sport. 2011;14:411.
31.
MayringP. Qualitative content analysis. Forum Qual Soc Res. 2000;1(2).
32.
FountaineCJ, PiacentiniM, LiguoriGA. Occupational sitting and physical activity among university employees. Int J Exerc Sci. 2014;7(4):295–301.
33.
PerrineRM, WellsM. Labradors to Persians: Perceptions of pets in the workplace. Anthrozoos. 2006;19(1):65.
34.
WilkinCL, FairlieP, EzzedeenSR. Who let the dogs in? A look at pet-friendly workplaces. Int J Workplace Health Manag. 2016;9(1):96.
35.
BaickerK, CutlerD, SongZ. Workplace wellness programs can generate savings. Health Aff. 2010;29(2):304.
36.
FletcherGM, BehrensTK, DominaL. Barriers and enabling factors for worksite physical activity programs: A qualitative examination. J Phys Act Health. 2008;5:418.
37.
RyanRM, DeciEL. Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. Am Psychol. 2000;55(1):68.
38.
PodlogL, DionigiRA. Psychological need fulfillment among workers in an exercise intervention: A qualitative investigation. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2013;80(4):774.
39.
HoersterKD, MayerJA, SallisJF, PizziN, TalleyS, PichonLC, ButlerDA. Dog walking: Its association with physical activity guideline adherence and its correlates. Prev Med. 2011;52(1):33.
40.
HealyG, LawlerS, ThorpA, NeuhausM, RobsonE, OwenN, DunstanD. Reducing prolonged sitting in the workplace. An evidence review: full report. [Internet]. VicHealth; 2012 [cited 2018 Feb 15]. Available from http://www.vichealth.vic.gov.au.
