When one thinks of jobs with physical employment standards, the first thoughts typically center around firefighting, law enforcement, and military jobs. However, there are 100s of arduous jobs that exist in the public and private sectors that range from moderately demanding to strenuous. The Bureau of Labor Statistics reported that 28% of the workforce in the United States performs physically demanding jobs that involve construction, machinery installation and repair, public safety, and other professions.
OBJECTIVE:
This paper provides a historical perspective of physical employment standards for hiring workers into these arduous jobs, how we arrived at our current knowledge base, and the challenges faced today when determining and implementing physical employment standards.
METHOD:
This narrative review draws on evidence from 62 published sources.
RESULTS:
This paper focuses on the need for a multidisciplinary approach to identifying job requirements, the professions (e.g., medical, psychology, physiology) that underpin the methodologies, and the knowledge used by current researchers. Descriptions of test and cut score development, legal issues, and challenges for the future also are highlighted.
EastWB. A historical review and analysis of Army physical readiness training and assessment. Fort Leavenworth, KS: Combat Studies Institute Press; 2013.
3.
GilbrethFB. Bricklaying system. New York, NY: The M.C. Clark Publishing Co.; 1909.
4.
HoganJC. Physical abilities, In DunnetteM. editor. Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (Vol. 2). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press, Inc.; Chapter 11, 1991, pp. 754–831.
5.
GebhardtDL, BakerTA, VolpeEK, BillerbeckKT. Development and validation of physical performance tests for selection of Walmart orderfillers. Beltsville, MD: Human Performance Systems, Inc.; 2009.
6.
SargentD. Universal test for strength, speed and endurance of the human body. Cambridge, MA: Powell Press; 1902.
7.
MartinEG. Tests of muscular efficiency. Physiological Reviews. 1921;3:454–75.
FleishmanEA. Structure and measurement of physical fitness. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall; 1964.
12.
JacksonAS. Factor analysis of selected muscular strength and motor performance tests. Research Quarterly. 1971;42(2):164–72.
13.
BorchartJW. A cluster analysis of static strength tests. Research Quarterly. 1968;39:258–61.
14.
BaumgartnerTA, ZuidemaMA. Factor analysis of physical fitness tests. Research Quarterly. 1972;43(4):443–50.
15.
SnookSH, IrvineC, Bass, SF. Maximum weights and workloads acceptable to male industrial workers. American Industrial Hygiene Association Journal. 1970;31:579–86.
16.
ÅstrandI, FugelliP, CarlssonCG, RodahlK, VokacZ. Energy output and work stress in coastal fishing. Scandinavian Journal of Clinical and Laboratory Investigations. 1973;31:1105–13.
17.
ÅstrandPO, RodahlK. Textbook of work physiology: Physiological basis of exercise. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill; 1977.
18.
FlanaganJC. The critical incidence technique. Psychological Bulletin. 1954;51(4):327–58.
19.
FineSA, WileWW. An introduction to functional job analysis. Washington, DC: W. E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research; 1971.
20.
GebhardtDL, BakerTA, VolpeEK, Ville KASt. Job analysis of Huntington Ingalls shipbuilding jobs. Volume 1: Job analysis. Beltsville, MD: Human Performance Systems, Inc.; 2015.
21.
FleishmanEA, QuaintanceMK. Taxonomies of human performance. Orlando, FL: Academic Press; 1984.
22.
European Centre for the Development of VocationalTraining (CEDEFOP). Quantifying skill needs in Europe. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union; 2013.
23.
GebhardtDL, BakeTA, VolpeEK, Ville MASt. Development and validation of physical assessments for Huntington-Ingalls shipyard jobs: Volume 2: Test development and validation. Alexandria, VA: HumRRO; 2016.
24.
TurnerD. Energy cost of some industrial operations. British Journal of Industrial Medicine. 1955;12:237–41.
25.
PassmoreRC, DurninJVGA. Human Energy expenditure. Physiological Reviews. 1955;35(4):801–40.
26.
SnookSH, CirielloVM. Maximum weights and workload acceptable to female workers. Journal of Occupational Medicine. 1974;16(8):527–34.
27.
ChaffinDB, ParkKS. A longitudinal study of low-back pain ass associated with occupational lifting factors. American Industrial Hygiene Association Journal. 1973;34:513–25.
National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH). Work practices guide for manual lifting. Cincinnati, OH: NIOSH; 1981.
30.
AyoubMM, MitalA, BakkenGM, AsfourSS, BetheaN. Development of strength and capacity norms for manual materials handling activities: The state of the art. Human Factors. 1980;22:271–83.
31.
GargA, SharmaD, ChaffinD, SchmidlerJM. Biomechanical stresses as related to motion trajectory lifting. Human Factor. 1983;25:527–39.
32.
National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH). Applications manual for the revised NIOSH lifting equation. Cincinnati, OH: NIOSH; 1994.
van der MolenHF, SluiterJK, Frings-DresenMHW. Behavioural change phases of different stakeholders involved in the implementation process of ergonomics measures in bricklaying. Applied Ergonomics. 2005;36:S449–59.
35.
GebhardtDL, BakerTA. Physical performance tests. In FarJL, TippinsNT, editors. Handbook of Employee Selection. New York, NY: Routledge; 2017. Chapter 12, pp. 277–97.
36.
MyersDC, GebhardtDL, CrumpCE, FleishmanEA. The dimensions of human physical performance: Factor analysis of strength, stamina, flexibility, and body composition measures. Human Performance. 1993;6(4):309–44.
37.
GebhardtDL, BakerTA. Physical Performance. In ScottJ, ReynoldsD, editors. Handbook of Work Assessment. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 2010, Chapter 7, pp. 165–196.
38.
CourtrightSH, McCormickBW, PostlethwaiteBE, ReevesCJ, MountMK. A meta-analysis of sex differences in physical ability: Revised estimates and strategies for reducing differences in selection contexts. Journal of Applied Psychology. 2013;98:623–41.
39.
BakerTA. Physical performance test results across ethnic groups: Does the type of test have an impact?Paper presented at the Society of Industrial and Organizational Psychology; New York, NY, 2007.
40.
CheungSS, LeeJK, OksaJ. Thermal stress, human performance, and physical employment standards. Applied Physiology, Nutrition, and Metabolism. 2016;41(6 Suppl 2):S148–64.
41.
DormanLE, HavenithG. The effects of protective clothing on energy consumption 508 during different activities. European Journal of Applied Physiology. 2009;105:463–70.
42.
McLellanTM. Sex-related differences in thermoregulatory responses while wearing 1122 protective clothing. European Journal of Applied Physiology. Occupational Physiology. 1998;78(1):28–37.
43.
WhetzelDL, GebhardtDL, BakerTA, Erk RT FleisherMS, VolpeEK, Ville KASt, OliverJT, GeimerJL, ChangT, Job analysis of transportation security officer job series. Alexandria, VA: Human Resources Research Organization; 2012.
44.
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Civil Service Commission Department of Labor and Department of Justice. Uniform Guidelines on Employee Selection Procedures. Washington, DC: Bureau of National Affairs, Inc.; 1978.
45.
PayneW, HarveyJ. A framework for the design and development of physical employment tests and standards. Ergonomics. 2010;53(7):858–71.
46.
AdamsEM. Human rights at work: Physical standards for employment and human rights law. Applied Physiology, Nutrition, and Metabolism. 2016;42(6 Suppl 2):S63–73.
47.
LathamGP, Sue-ChanC. A meta-analysis of the situational interview: An enumerative review of reasons for its validity. Canadian Psychology. 1999;40:56–67.
CohenDB, AamodtMG, DunleavyEM. Technical advisory committee report on best practices in adverse impact analysis. Washington, DC: Center for Corporate Equality; 2010.
50.
Berkman v. City of New York, 536 F. Supp. 117 (E. D. N.Y. 1982).
51.
British Columbia(Public Service Employee Relations Commission v. British Columbia Government and Service Employees’ Union (B.C.G.S.E.U.) (Meiorin Grievance). 1999.
52.
HoganJC, QuigleyAM. Physical standards for employment and the courts. American Psychologist. 1986;41:1193–217.
53.
Bauer v. Holder, 25 F. Supp. 3d 842, 865 (E.D. Va. 2014).
54.
Bauer v. Lynch, 812 F.3d 340 (4th Cir. 2016).
55.
Bauer v. Sessions, No. 1:13-cv-93 (E.D. Va.Mar. 24, 2017).
56.
GebhardtDL. Establishing performance standards. In ConstableS, PalmerB, editors. The process of physical fitness standards development – State of the art report. Wright-Patterson AFB, OH: Human Systems Information Analysis Center (HSIAC-SOAR); Chapter 6, 2000, pp. 179–99.
57.
SongQC, WeeS, NewmanDA. Diversity shrinkage: Cross-validating Pareto-optimal weights to enhance diversity via hiring practices. Journal of Applied Psychology. 2017;102(12):1636–57.
58.
ArnoldJD, RauschenbergerJN, SoubelWG, GuionRM. Validation and utility of strength test for selecting steelworkers. Journal of Applied Psychology. 1982;67:588–604.
59.
BakerTA, GebhardtDL. Development and validation of physical performance tests for train service positions. Hyattsville, MD: Human Performance Systems, Inc.; 1994.
60.
BakerTA, GebhardtDL. Utility of physical performance tests in reduction of days lost and injuries in railroad train service positions. Beltsville, MD: Human Performance Systems, Inc.; 2001.
61.
AndersonC, BriggsJ. A study of the effectiveness of ergonomically based functional screening tests and their relationship to reducing worker compensation injuries. Work. 2008;31(1):27–37.
62.
LeggeJ. Job-specific functional; assessment associated with reduction in musculoskeletal injuries in building security workers. Paper presented at Physical Employment Standards, Canmore, Alberta Canada, 2015.
63.
KnapikJ, SpiessA, SwedlerD, TysonG, HauretK, YoderJ, JonesB. Retrospective examination of injuries and physical fitness during Federal Bureau of Investigation new agent training. Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology. 2011;6:26–37.
