Hesitation to employ females for physically demanding jobs is often due to sex related physical abilities. A physical employment standard (PES) identifies individuals who are physically capable for work.
OBJECTIVE:
A database containing 300 + sources of physical performance tests (PFTs) will inform potential sex bias for PES development.
METHODS:
Weighted means and probability density curves illustrate the percentage overlap between male and female performance on PFT data from the armed forces of 11 countries and the open literature. Where female training data were available, the change in percentage overlap illustrates the potential for reduction in sex-related differences.
RESULTS:
PFTs demonstrating the extremes of sex disparity were bench press (11 sources) and sit-ups (14 sources) with 9% and 93% overlap in performance, respectively. Training for bench press; pull ups; VO2max; and upright pull improved female performance by 12%, 22%, 35%, and 23% respectively. This translated into narrowing the gap between male and female mean performance by 1%, 4%, 5%, and 10% respectively.
CONCLUSIONS:
The ability of PFT to predict performance is essential; however, PFTs with more overlap will facilitate development of PES with reduced sex bias. PFTs with the greatest potential for improvement in females are identified here.
RobertsD, GebhardtDL, GaskillSE, RoyTC, SharpMA. Current considerations related to physiological differences between the sexes and physical employment standards. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2016;6(Supple 2):S108–20.
3.
FinestoneAS, MilgromC, YanovichR, EvansR, ConstantiniN, MoranDS. Evaluation of the performance of females as light infantry soldiers. Biomed Res Int. 2014;Epub:Article ID 572953.
4.
CourtrightSH, McCormickBW, PostlethwaiteBE, ReevesCJ, MountMK. A meta-analysis of sex differences in physical ability: Revised estimates and strategies for reducing differences in selection contexts. J Appl Psychol. 2013;98(4):623–41.
5.
PloyhartRE, HoltzBC. The diversity-validity dilemma: Strategies for reducing racioethnic and sex subgroup differences and adverse impact in selection. Pers Pscyhol. 2008;61(1):153–72.
6.
KnapikJ, ReynoldsK. Load carriage in military operations: A review of historical, physiological, biomechanical and medical aspects. SanteeWR, FriedlKE, editors. Washington, D.C.: Borden Institute; 2010.
7.
GordonCC, BlackwellCL, BradtmillerB, ParhamJL, BarrientosP, PaquetteSP, et al.2012 Anthropometric survey of U.S. Army personnel: Methods and summary statistics. Natick, MA: Natick Soldier Research, Development and Engineering Center; 2014, p. 454.
8.
MalinaRM, BouchardC. Growth, Maturation, and Physical Activity. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics Academic; 1991.
9.
ReillyT, LaframboiseJ. Gender Neutral to Gender Free: Physical Employment Standard Evolution in the Canadian Armed Forces. 3rd International Congress on Soldiers’ Physical Performance; Boston, MA, 2014.
10.
PayneW, HarveyJ. A framework for the design and development of physical employment tests and standards. Ergonomics. 2010;53(7):858–71.
11.
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. Section 60-3, Uniform Guidelines on Employee Selection Procedures (1978). Department of Labor; 1978.
12.
JamnikV, GumienakR, GledhillN. Developing legally defensible physiological employment standards for prominent physically demanding public safety occupations: A Canadian perspective. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2013;113:2447–57.
13.
HydrenJR, BorgesAS, SharpMA. Systematic review and meta-analysis of predictors of military task performance: Maximal lift capacity. J Strength Cond Res. 2017;31(4):1142–64.
14.
HendricksonNR, SharpMA, AlemanyJA, WalkerLA, HarmanEA, SpieringBA, et al.Combined resistance and endurance training improves physical capacity and performance on tactical occupational tasks. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2010;109(6):1197–208.
15.
KnapikJJ. The influence of physical fitness training on the manual material handling capabilty of women. Appl Ergon. 1997;28(5-6):339–45.
16.
KraemerWJ, MazzettiSA, GotshalkLA, VolekJS, BushJA, MarxJO, et al.Effect of resistance training on women’s strength/power and occupational performances. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2001;33(6):1011–25.
17.
HarmanE, FrykmanP, PalmerC, LammiE, ReynoldsK, BackusV. Effects of a specifically designed physical conditioning program on the load carriage and lifting performance of female soldiers. In: DivisionMP, editor. Natick, MA: U.S. Army Research Institute of Environmental Medicine; 1997.
18.
NindlBC, EagleSR, FrykmanPN, PalmerC, LammiE, ReynoldsK, et al.Functional physical training improves women’s military occupational performance. J Sci Med Sport. 2017;20(4):S91–7.
19.
GumieniakRJ, GledhillN, JamnikVK. Physical employment standard for Canadian wildland firefighters: Examining test-retest reliability and the impact of familiarisation and physical fitness training. Ergonomics. 2018;61(10):1324–1333. DOI: 10.1080/00140139.2018.1464213.
20.
EpsteinY, YanovichR, MoranDS, HeledY. Physiological employment standards IV: Integration of women in combat units physiological and medical considerations. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2013;113(11):2673–90.
21.
TevesMA, WrightJE, VogelJ. Performance on selected screening test procedures before and after Army Basic and Advanced Individual Training. Natick, MA: US Army Research Institute of Environmental Medicine; 1985.
22.
KnapikJJ, SpiessA, SwedlerD, GrierT, HauretK, YoderJ, et al.Retrospective examination of injuries and physical fitness during Federal Bureau of Investigation new agent training. J Occup Med Toxicol. 2011;6(26):1–11.
23.
BuckleyS, KnappK, LackieA, LewryC, HorveyK, BenkoC, et al.Multimodal high-intensity interval training increases muscle function and metabolic performance in females. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2015;40(11):1157–62.
24.
ChilibeckPD, CalderAW, SaleDG, WebberCE. A comparison of strength and muscle mass increases during resistance training in young women. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1998;77(1-2):170–5.
25.
SackettPR, WilkSL. Within-group norming and other forms of score adjustment in preemployment testing. Am Psychol. 1994;49(11):929–54.
26.
PeoplesGE, LeeDS, NotleySR, TaylorNA. The effects of thoracic load carriage on maximal ambulatory work tolerance and acceptable work durations. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2016;116(3):635–46.
27.
SiddallAG, StevensonRDM, TurnerPJF, BilzonJLJ. Physical and physiological performance determinants of a firefighting simulation test. J Occup Environ Med. 2018;60(7):637–43.
28.
ReillyTJ, TingelstadHC, ChasséE. Validation of the maximum recommended duration to complete the FORCE circuit component of FORCE COMBAT™. Ottawa, Canada: Candian Forces Morale and Welfare Services; 2018.
29.
BeckB, CarstairsGL, BillingDC, CaldwellJN, MiddletonKJ. Modifiable anthropometric characteristics are associated with unilateral and bilateral carry performance. J Strength Cond Res. 2017;31(2):489–94.
30.
KnapikJJ, BanderetL, BahrkeM, O’ConnorJ, JonesB, VogelJ. Army Physical Fitness Test (APFT): Normative data on 6022 soldiers. Natick, MA: U.S. Army Research Intitute of Environmental Medicine; 1994.
31.
BellNS, MangioneTW, HemenwayD, AmorosoPJ, JonesBH. High injury rates among female army trainees: A function of gender? Am J Prev Med. 2000;18(3):141–6.
32.
FoulisSA, SharpMA, RedmondJE, FrykmanPN, WarrBJ, GebhardtDL, et al.US army physical demands study: Development of the occupational physical assessment test for combat arms soldiers. J Sci Med Sport. 2017;20(4):S74–8.
33.
HauschildVD, DeGrootDW, HallSM, GrierTL, DeaverKD, HauretKG, et al.Fitness tests and occupational tasks of military interest: A systematic review of correlations. Occup Environ Med. 2017;74(2):144–53.
34.
JamnikVK, thomasSG, GledhillN. Applying the Meiorin Decision requirements to the fitness test for correctional officer applicants; examining adverse impact and accommodation. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2010;35(1):71–81.
35.
PandorfCE, HarmanEA, FrykmanPN, PattonJF, MelloRP, NindlBC. Correlates of load carriage and obstacle course performance among women. Work. 2002;18(2):179–89.
36.
SzivakTK, KraemerWJ, NindlBC, GotshalkLA, VolekJS, GomezAL, et al.Relationships of physical performance tests to military-relevant tasks in women. US Army Med Depart J. 2014;20–6.
