Employees exposed to work-related threats and violence in human services sectors: Are any employees members particularly exposed to violence and threats and what role do supervisors play?
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online May 24, 2019
Employees exposed to work-related threats and violence in human services sectors: Are any employees members particularly exposed to violence and threats and what role do supervisors play?
The frequency of being exposed to work-related violence and threats is high in employees working in the human service sector. The question is whether certain employees are particularly exposed to violence and threats than others.
OBJECTIVE:
This study examined whether particular employees were especially exposed to work-related violence and threats due to personal characteristics, coping styles, attitudes or participating in violence prevention training. We also examined the role played by supervisors.
METHODS:
Questionnaire data were collected in 2010 and 2011. In all, 3584 employees from special schools, psychiatric wards, eldercare and the Prison and Probation Service participated. We used multivariate logistic regression analyses.
RESULTS:
We found persons high on the extroversion and introversion scales were associated with statistical significant increased risk for work-related threats. Furthermore, accepting attitudes concerning work-related violence were also statistical significant associated with increased the risk for both work-related threats and violence. Associations between coping styles and work-related threats and violence were very small and statistically non-significant and we found no effect of violence prevention training. The risk for work-related threats for persons high on the extroversion scale was decreased if supervisor violence prevention behaviour was high. Furthermore, if supervisor prevention behaviour was high, prevention training decreased the risk for work-related violence. However, these associations weren’t statistically significant.
CONCLUSION:
The results stress that effective prevention requires involvement of both employees and supervisors.
International Labour Organization (ILO). ILO ode of practice: Work-related violence in services sectors and measures to combat this phenomenon. 2004.
2.
Vidal-MartíC, Pérez-TestorC. Patient assaults on professionals. Type II workplace violence: A known phenomenon in Barcelona nursing homes. Work2015;51(4):879–886.
3.
RenkerP, ScribnerSA, HuffP. Staff perspectives of violence in the emergency department: Appeals for consequences, collaboration, and consistency. Work2015;51(1):5–18.
4.
SperoniKG, FitchT, DawsonE, DuganL, AthertonM. Incidence and Cost of Nurse Workplace Violence Perpetrated by Hospital Patients or Patient Visitors. Journal of Emergency Nursing 52014;40(3):218–228.
5.
RasmussenCA, HoghA, AndersenL.P.. Threats and Physical Violence in the Workplace: A Comparative Study of Four Areas of Human Service Work. J Interpers Violence2013 05/15; 28(13):2749–2769.
6.
HartleyD, DomanB, HendricksSA, JenkinsEL. Non-fatal workplace violence injuries in the United States – A follow back study. Work2012;42(1):125–135.
7.
BaronRA, RichardsonDR. Human aggression (2nd ed.). New York, NY, US: Plenum Press, New York, NY; 1994.
8.
BeechB, LeatherP. Workplace violence in the health care sector: A review of staff training and integration of training evaluation models. Aggression and violent behavior2006;11(1):27–43.
9.
BowersL, StewartD, PapadopoulosC, DackC, RossJ, KhanomH, . Inpatient violence and aggression: a litterature review. 2011.
10.
HoghA, BorgV, MikkelsenK.L., Work-related violence as a predictor of fatigue: A 5-year follow-up of the Danish Work Environment Cohort Study. Work & Stress2003;17(2):182–194.
11.
BealeD, ClarkeD, CoxT, LeatherP, LawrenceC. System memory in violent incidents: Evidence from patterns of reoccurrence. J Occup Health Psychol1999;4(3):233–244.
12.
BondK, BrimblecombeN. Violent Incidents and Staff Views. Mental Health Nursing2004;23(6):10–12.
13.
SpokesK, BondK, LoweT, JonesJ, IllingworthP, Brimblecombe. The Hertfordshire/Oxfordshire Violent Incident Study. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs2002;9(2):199–209.
14.
ShepherdM, LavenderT. Putting aggression into context: An investigation into contextual factors influencing the rate of aggressive incidents in a psychiatric hospital. Journal of Mental Health1999;8(2):159–170.
15.
GerberichSG, NachreinerNM, RyanAD, ChurchTR, McGovernPM, GeisserMS, . Violence against educators: A population-based study. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine2011;53(3):294–302.
16.
WykesT, WhittingtonR. Prevalence and predictors of early traumatic stress reactions in assaulted psychiatric nurses. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry1998;9(3):643–658.
17.
HoghA, MikkelsenEG. Is sense of coherence a mediator or moderator of relationships between violence at work and stress reactions?Scand J Psychol (2005;46(5):429–437.
18.
FrancisLJ, BrownLB, PhilipchalkR. The development of an abbreviated form of the revised Eysenck personality questionnaire (EPQR-A): Its use among students in England, Canada, the U.S.A. and Australia. Personality and Individual Differences1992 04; 13(4):443–449.
19.
EdelmannRJ, McCuskerG. Introversion, neuroticism, empathy and embarrassibility. Personality and Individual Differences1986;7(2):133–140.
20.
PalS, BhardwajR. Personality, stress and coping resources among working women. Indian Journal of Health and Wellbeing2016;7(9):877.
21.
Connor-SmithJK, FlachsbartC. Relations between personality and coping: a meta-analysis. J Pers Soc Psychol2007;93(6):1080.
22.
BanduraA, GrusecJE, MenloveFL. Observational learning as a function of symbolization and incentive set. Child Dev1966;37(3):499–506.
23.
BanduraA. Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY, US: W H Freeman/Times Books/ Henry Holt & Co, New York, NY; 1997.
24.
WhittingtonR, WykesT. Violence in psychiatric hospitals: Are certain staff prone to being assaulted?Journal of Advanced Nursing199402; 19(2):219–225.
25.
CooperCL, DewePJ, O’DriscollMP. Review of Organizational Stress: A Review and Critique of Theory, Research, and Applications. Person Psychol2003;56(1):271–273.
26.
LazarusRS. Emotion and adaptation. New York, NY, US: Oxford University Press, New York, NY: 1991.
27.
Klerx-Van MierloF, BogaertsS. Vulnerability factors in the explanation of workplace aggression: The construction of a theoretical framework. Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice2011;11(4):265–292.
28.
Van den BrandeW, BaillienE, De WitteH, Vander ElstT, GodderisL. The role of work stressors, coping strategies and coping resources in the process of workplace bullying: A systematic review and development of a comprehensive model. Aggression and Violent Behavior2016 0; 29:61–71.
29.
BilginH, BuzluS. A study of psychiatric nurses’ beliefs and attitudes in Turkey. Issues Ment Health Nurs2006;27(1):75–90.
30.
FernsT. Violence, aggression and physical assault in healthcare settings. Nursing Standard2006;21(13):42.
31.
ÅkerströmM. Slaps, Punches, Pinches; But not Violence: Boundary-Work in Nursing Homes for the Elderly. Symbolic Interaction2002;25(4):515–536.
32.
ChapmanR, StylesI, PerryL, CombsS. Nurses’ experience of adjusting to workplace violence: a theory of adaptation. Int. J Mental Health Nurses2010 06; 19(3):186–194.
33.
WassellJT. Workplace violence intervention effectiveness: A systematic literature review. Saf Sci2009;47(8):1049–1055.
34.
PriceO, BakerJ, BeeP, LovellK. Learning and performance outcomes of mental health staff training in de-escalation techniques for the management of violence and aggression. The British Journal of Psychiatry2015;206(6):447–455.
35.
AndersonL, FitzGeraldM, LuckL. An integrative literature review of interventions to reduce violence against emergency department nurses. J Clin Nurs2010;19(17–18):2520–2530.
36.
JohnsG. The essential impact of context on organizational behavior. Academy of management review2006;31(2):386–408.
37.
HofmannDA, StetzerA. A cross-level investigation of factors influencing unsafe behaviors and accidents. Person Psychol1996;49(2):307–339.
38.
NealA, GriffinMA, HartPM. The impact of organizational climate on safety climate and individual behavior. Saf Sci2000;34(1-3):99–109.
39.
SpectorPE, CoulterML, StockwellHG, MatzMW. Perceived violence climate: A new construct and its relationship to workplace physical violence and verbal aggression, and their potential consequences. Work & Stress2007;21(2):117–130.
40.
KesslerSR, SpectorPE, ChangCH, ParrAD. Organizational violence and aggression: Development of the three-factor Violence Climate Survey. Work & Stress2008;22(2):108–124.
41.
YangLQ, SpectorPE, ChangCH, Gallant-RomanM, PowellJ. Psychosocial precursors and physical consequences of workplace violence towards nurses: A longitudinal examination with naturally occurring groups in hospital settings. Int J Nurs Stud2012;49(9):1091–1102.
42.
ChangC, EatoughEM, SpectorPE, KesslerSR.. Violence-prevention climate, exposure to violence and aggression and prevention behavior: A mediation model. J Organ Behav2012;33(5):657–677.
43.
GadegaardCA, AndersenLP, HoghA. Effects of Violence Prevention Behavior on Exposure to Workplace Violence and Threats: A Follow-Up Study. Journal of Interpersonal Violence2015 November 29.
44.
AndersenLP, MikkelsenKL. Recall of occupational injuries: A comparison of questionnaire and diary data. Saf Sci2008;46(2):255–260.
45.
De LangeAH, TarisTW, KompierMAJ, HoutmanILD, BongersPM. The relationships between work characteristics and mental health: Examining normal, reversed and reciprocal relationships in a 4-wave study. Work & Stress2004;18(2):149–166.
46.
ChenG, GullySM, EdenD. Validation of a new general self-efficacy scale. Organ Res Methods2001;4(1):62–83.
47.
CarverCS. You want to measure coping but your protocol’s too long: Consider the Brief COPE. Int J Behav Med1997;4(1):92–100.
48.
LittletonH, HorsleyS, JohnS, NelsonDV. Trauma coping strategies and psychological distress: A meta-analysis. J Trauma Stress2007;20(6):977–988.
49.
BurtMR. Cultural myths and supports for rape. J Pers Soc Psychol1980;38(2):217.
50.
FarringtonDP, LoeberR. Some benefits of dichotomization in psychiatric and criminological research. Criminal Behav Ment Health2000; 06/01; 2018/08; 10(2):100–122.
51.
WynneR, ClarkinN, CoxT, GriffethsA. Guidance on the prevention of violence at work. 1997.
52.
MenckelE, ViitasaraE. Threats and violence in Swedish care and welfare. Magnitude of the problem and impact on municipal personnel. Scand J Caring Sci2002;16(4):376–385.
53.
VegchelNv, JongeJd, SöderfeldtM, DormannC, SchaufeliW. Quantitative Versus Emotional Demands Among Swedish Human Service Employees: Moderating Effects of Job Control and Social Support. International Journal of Stress Management2004;11(1):21–40.
54.
ZapfD, EinarsenS. Mobbing at Work: Escalated Conflicts in Organizations. Counterproductive work behavior: Investigations of actors and targets: American Psychological Association, Washington, DC; 2005. p. 237–270.
55.
WinstanleyS, WhittingtonR. Anxiety, burnout and coping styles in general hospital staff exposed to workplace aggression: A cyclical model of burnout and vulnerability to aggression. Work & Stress2002;16(4):302–315.
56.
JungCG. Collected Works of CG Jung, Volume 6: Psychological Types.: Princeton University Press; 2014.
57.
LanzaML, KayneHL, HicksC, MilnerJ. Environmental Characteristics Related to Patient Assault. Issues Mental Health Nursing 01/011994;15(3):319–335.
58.
WhittingtonR, WykesT. Aversive stimulation by staff and violence by psychiatric patients. British Journal of Clinical Psychology1996;35(1):11–20.
59.
CookWW, MedleyDM. Proposed hostility and Pharisaic-virtue scales for the MMPI. J Appl Psychol1954;38(6):414–418.
60.
Booth-KewleyS, FriedmanHS. Psychological predictors of heart disease: a quantitative review. Psychol Bull1987;101(3):343.
WassersteinRL, LazarNA. The ASA’s statement on p-values: context, process, and purpose 2016. The American Statistician, 70 (2). 129–133.
63.
SkinnerEA, EdgeK, AltmanJ, SherwoodH. Searching for the structure of coping: A review and critique of category systems for classifying ways of coping. Psychol Bull2003;129(2):216–269.
64.
FridrichA, JennyGJ, BauerGF. The context, process, and outcome evaluation model for organisational health interventions. BioMed research international2015.
65.
LipscombJA, LondonM, ChenYM, FlanneryK, WattM, Geiger-BrownJ, . Safety climate and workplace violence prevention in state-run residential addiction treatment centers. Work: Journal of Prevention, Assessment & Rehabilitation2012;42(1):47–56.
66.
FolkmanS, MoskowitzJT. Coping: Pitfalls and promise. Annu Rev Psychol2004;55:745–774.
67.
MuhonenT, TorkelsonE. Collective and individualistic coping with stress at work. Psychol Rep2008;102(2):450–458.
68.
EllemersN, HaslamSA, PlatowMJ, van KnippenbergD. Social identity at work: Developments, debates, directions. Social identity at work: Developing theory for organizational practice New York, NY, US: Psychology Press, New York, NY; 2003. p. 3–26.
69.
MackayC. Violence to health care professionals: a health and safety perspective. In: WykesT., editor. Violence and Health Care Professioals: Chapman and Hall; 1994.
70.
PichJ, HazeltonM, SundinD, KableA. Patient-related violence against emergency department nurses. Nurs Health Sci2010;12(2):268–274.
71.
SpectorPE, BrannickMT. Common method variance or measurement bias?The problem and possible solutions. The SAGE handbook of organizational research methods. Sage Publications; 2009.
72.
KvasA, SeljakJ. Sources of workplace violence against nurses. Work2015;52(1):177–184.
