There is a need for a better understanding of how the use of technology to complete work outside regular office hours is related to work-life outcomes. Few studies have also investigated how individual differences in work-nonwork boundary management relate to work-life outcomes.
OBJECTIVE:
This study was conducted to examine how teleworking outside regular office hours and individual boundary management relate to work-family conflict.
METHODS:
A web survey was sent to fulltime employees at the headquarters of a multinational high-tech firm in Sweden. A total of 71 answers were obtained and analyzed using regression analysis.
RESULTS:
The extent of teleworking after hours was unrelated to work-family conflict. However, as previous research has shown, having more permeable boundaries and allowing work to interrupt nonwork behavior was related to higher levels of conflict.
CONCLUSIONS:
The findings suggest that teleworking after hours is not as problematic in terms of work-family conflict as has been reported in previous studies. Furthermore, in order to prevent high levels of work-family conflict, it is seemingly beneficial to avoid work interruptions during nonwork behavior.
BaileyDE, KurlandNB. A review of telework research: Findings, new directions, and lessons for the study of modern work. Journal of Organizational behavior. 2002;23(4):383–400. 10.1002/job.144
2.
KurlandNB, BaileyDE. The advantages and challenges of working here, there anywhere, and anytime. Organizational Dynamics. 1999;28(2):53–68.
3.
MannS, HoldsworthL. The psychological impact of teleworking: Stress, emotions and health. New Technology, Work and Employment. 2003;18(3):196–211.
4.
GajendranRS, HarrisonDA. The good, the bad, and the unknown about telecommuting: Meta-analysis of psychological mediators and individual consequences. Journal of Applied Psychology. 2007:92(6):1524–41. 10.1037/0021-9010.92.6.1524
5.
MadsenSR. The effects of home-based teleworking on work-family conflict. Human Resource Development Quarterly. 2003;14(1):35–58.
6.
AllenTD, JohnsonRC, KiburzKM, ShockleyKM. Work-family conflict and flexible work arrangements: deconstructing flexibility. Personnel Psychology. 2013;66(2):345–76. 10.1111/peps.12012
7.
GoldenTD, VeigaJF, SimsekZ. Telecommuting’s differential impact on work-family conflict: Is there no place like home?Journal of Applied Psychology. 2006;91(6):1340–50. 10.1037/0021-9010.91.6.1340
8.
ShockleyKM, AllenTD. When flexibility helps: Another look at the availability of flexible work arrangements and work-family conflict. Journal of Vocational behavior. 2007;71(3):479–93. 10.1016/j.jvb.2007.08.006
9.
GoldenTD. Altering the effects of work and family conflict on exhaustion: Telework during traditional and nontraditional work hours. Journal of Business and Psychology. 2012;27(3):255–69. 10.1007/s10869-011-9247-0
10.
DuxburyLE, HigginsCA, MillsS. After-hours telecommuting and work-family conflict: A comparative analysis. Information Systems Research. 1992;3(2):173–89.
11.
DuxburyLE, HigginsCA, ThomasDR. Work and family environments and the adoption of computer-supported supplemental work-at-home. Journal of Vocational Behavior. 1996;49(1):1–23.
12.
FennerGH, RennRW. Technology-assisted supplemental work: Construct definition and a research framework. Human Resource Management. 2004;43(2-3):179–200. 10.1002/hrm.20014
13.
FennerGH, RennRW. Technology-assisted supplemental work and work-to-family conflict: The role of instrumentality beliefs, organizational expectations and time management. Human Relations. 2010;63(1):63–82. 10.1177/0018726709351064
14.
BoswellWR, Olson-BuchananJB. The use of communication technologies after hours: The role of work attitudes and work-life conflict. Journal of Management. 2007;33(4):592–610. 10.1177/0149206307302552
15.
GreerTW, PayneSC. Overcoming telework challenges: Outcomes of successful telework strategies. The Psychologist-Manager Journal. 2014;17(2):87–111.
16.
BulgerCA, MatthewsRA, HoffmanME. Work and personal life boundary management: Boundary strength, work/personal life balance, and the segmentation-integration continuum. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology. 2007;12(4):365–75. 10.1037/1076-8998.12.4.365
17.
KossekEE, LautschBA, EatonSC. Telecommuting, control, and boundary management: Correlates of policy use and practice, job control, and work-family effectiveness. Journal of Vocational behavior. 2006;68(2):347–67. 10.10l6/j-jvb.2005.07.002
18.
GreenhausJH, BeutellNJ. Sources of conflict between work and family roles. The Academy of Management Review. 1985;10(1):76.
19.
StandenP, DanielsK, LamondD. The home as a workplace: Work-family interaction and psychological well-being in telework. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology. 1999;4(4):368.
20.
CarlsonDS, KacmarKM, WilliamsLJ. Construction and initial validation of a multidimensional measure of work-family conflict. Journal of Vocational Behavior. 2000;56(2):249–76.
21.
GutekBA, SearleS, KlepaL. Rational versus gender role explanations for work-family conflict. Journal of applied psychology. 1991;76(4):560.
22.
KreinerGE. Consequences of work-home segmentation or integration: A person-environment fit perspective. Journal of Organizational behavior. 2006;27(4):485–507. 10.1002/job.386
23.
NetemeyerRG, BolesJS, McMurrianR. Development and validation of work-family conflict and family-work conflict scales. Journal of applied psychology. 1996;81(4):400.
24.
NoonanMC, GlassJL. The hard truth about telecommuting. Monthly Lab Rev. 2012;135:38.
25.
AllenTD, GoldenTD, ShockleyKM. How effective is telecommuting? Assessing the status of our scientific findings. Psychological Science in the Public Interest. 2015;16(2):40–68.
26.
HillEJ, EricksonJJ, HolmesEK, FerrisM. Workplace flexibility, work hours, and work-life conflict: Finding an extra day or two. Journal of Family Psychology. 2010;24(3):349–58. 10.1037/a0019282
27.
GoldenTD. Applying technology to work: Toward a better understanding of telework. Organization Management Journal. 2009;6(4):241–50.
28.
AshforthBE, KreinerGE, FugateM. All in a day’s work: Boundaries and micro role transitions. The Academy of Management Review. 2000;25(3):472. 10.2307/259305
29.
AllenTD, ChoE, MeierLL. Work-family boundary dynamics. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior. 2014;1(1):99–121.
30.
Nippert-EngCE. Home and work. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press1996.
31.
ClarkSC. Work/family border theory: A new theory of work/family balance. Human Relations. 2000;53(6):747–70. 10.1177/0018726700536001
32.
KossekEE, RudermanMN, BraddyPW, HannumKM. Work-nonwork boundary management profiles: A person-centered approach. Journal of Vocational behavior. 2012;81(1):112–28. 10.10l6/jjvb.2012.04.003
33.
Olson-BuchananJB, BoswellWR. Blurring boundaries: Correlates of integration and segmentation between work and nonwork. Journal of Vocational behavior. 2006;68(3):432–45. 10.10l6/jjvb.2005.10.006
34.
KimS, HollensbeE. Work interrupted: A closer look at work boundary permeability. Management Research Review. 11 december. 2017;40(12):1280–97.
35.
MilesJ, ShevlinM. Applying regression & correlation, A guide for students and researchers. London, UK: Sage Publications Ltd2011.
DuxburyLE, HigginsCA, LeeC. Work-family conflict: A comparison by gender, family type, and perceived control. Journal of Family Issues. 1994;15(3):449–66.
38.
RothbardNP, PhillipsKW, DumasTL. Managing multiple roles: Work-family policies and individuals’ desires for segmentation. Organization Science. 2005;16(3):243–58.
39.
AdkinsCL, PremeauxSA. The use of communication technology to manage work-home boundaries. Journal of Behavioral & Applied Management. 2014;15(2):82–100.
40.
PodsakoffPM, MacKenzieSB, LeeJ-Y, PodsakoffNP. Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology. 2003;88(5):879–903. 10.1037/0021-9010.88.5-879
41.
KossekEE. Managing work-life boundaries in the digital age. Organizational Dynamics. juli 2016;45(3):258–70.
