Organizational citizenship behavior (OCB) is important to the development of an organization. Research into factors that foster OCB and the underlying processes are therefore substantially crucial.
OBJECTIVE:
The current study aimed to test the association between trait self-control and OCB and the mediating role of consideration for future consequence.
METHOD:
Four hundred and ninety-four Chinese employees (275 men, 219 women) took part in the study. Participants completed a battery of self-report measures online that assessed trait self-control, tendencies of consideration of future consequence, and organizational citizenship behavior. Path analysis was conducted and bootstrapping technique (N = 5000), a resampling method that is asymptotically more accurate than the standard intervals using sample variance and assumptions of normality, was used to judge the significance of the mediation.
RESULTS:
Results of path analysis showed that trait self-control was positively related to OCB. More importantly, the “trait self-control-OCB” link was mediated by consideration of future consequence-future, but not by consideration of future consequence-immediate.
CONCLUSIONS:
Employees with high trait self-control engage in more organizational citizenship behavior and this link can be partly explained by consideration of future consequence-future.
JoiremanJ, KamdarD, DanielsD, DuellB. Good citizens to the end? It depends: Empathy and concern with future consequences moderate the impact of a short-term time horizon on organizational citizenship behaviors. Journal of Applied Psychology2006;91(6):1307–20.
2.
CavusMF. Socialization and organizational citizenship behavior among Turkish primary and secondary school teachers. Work: A Journal of Prevention, Assessment, and Rehabilitation2012;43(3):361–8.
3.
PodsakoffPM, MacKenzieSB, PaineJB, BachrachDG. Organizational citizenship behaviors: A critical review of the theoretical and empirical literature and suggestions for future research. Journal of Management2000;26(3):513–63.
4.
OrganDW. Organizational citizenship behavior: The good soldier syndrome. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books; 1988.
5.
LepineJA, ErezA, JohnsonDE. The nature and dimensionality of organizational citizenship behavior: A critical review and meta-analysis. The Journal of applied psychology2002;87(1):52–65.
6.
PodsakoffNP, WhitingSW, PodsakoffPM, BlumeBD. Individual- and organizational-level consequences of organizational citizenship behaviors: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology2009;94(1):122–41.
7.
LemoineGJ, ParsonsCK, KansaraS. Above and beyond, again and again: Self-regulation in the aftermath of organizational citizenship behaviors. The Journal of applied psychology2015;100(1):40–55
.
8.
FishbachA, ConverseBA. Walking the line between goals and temptations: Asymmetric effects of counteractive control. In Hassin R.R., Ochsner K.N., & TropeY. (Eds.). Self control in society, mind, and brain. New York: Oxford University Press; 2010. pp. 389–407
.
9.
SheldonOJ, FishbachA. Resisting the temptation to compete: Self-control promotes cooperation in mixed-motive interactions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology2011;47(2):403–10.
10.
RighettiF, FinkenauerC. If you are able to control yourself, I will trust you: The role of perceived self-control in interpersonal trust. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology2011;100(5):874–86.
11.
DewitteS, CremerDDE. Self-control and cooperation: Different concepts, similar decisions? A question of the right perspective. The Journal of Psychology2001;135(2):133–53.
12.
NieYG, LiJB, VazsonyiAT. Self-control mediates the associations between parental attachment and prosocial behavior among Chinese adolescents. Personality and Individual Differences2016;96:36–9.
13.
MartinssonP, MyrsethKOR, WollbrantC. Reconciling pro-social vs. selfish behavior: On the role of self-control. Judgment & Decision Making2012;7(3):304–15.
14.
MartinssonP, MyrsethKOR, WollbrantC. Social dilemmas: When self-control benefits cooperation. Journal of Economic Psychology2014;45:213–36.
15.
StrathmanA, GleicherF, BoningerDS, EdwardsCS. The consideration of future consequences: Weighing immediate and distant outcomes of behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology1994;66(4):742–52.
16.
JoiremanJ, BallietD, SprottD, SpangenbergE, SchultzJ. Consideration of future consequences, ego-depletion, and self-control: Support for distinguishing between CFC-Immediate and CFC-Future sub-scales. Personality and Individual Differences2008;45(1):15–21.
17.
HeveyD, PertlM, ThomasK, MaherL, CraigA, Ni ChuinneagainS. Consideration of future consequences scale: Confirmatory factor analysis. Personality and Individual Differences2010;48(5):654–7.
18.
GottfredsonMR, HirschiT. A general theory of crime. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press; 1990.
19.
MischelW, ShodaY, RodriguezMI. Delay of gratification in children. Science1989; 244(4907):933–8.
20.
BallietD, FerrisDL. Ostracism and prosocial behavior: A social dilemma perspective. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes2013;120(2):298–308.
21.
JoiremanJ, DanielsD, George-FalvyJ, KamdarD. Organizational citizenship behaviors as a function of empathy, consideration of future consequences, and employee time horizon: An initial exploration using an in-basket simulation of OCBs1. Journal of Applied Social Psychology2006;36(9):2266–92.
22.
ZhangW, WangH, PearceCL. Consideration for future consequences as an antecedent of transformational leadership behavior: The moderating effects of perceived dynamic work environment. The Leadership Quarterly2014;25(2):329–43.
23.
TangneyJP, BaumeisterRF, BooneAL. High self-control predicts good adjustment, less pathology, better grades, and interpersonal success. Journal of Personality2004;72(2):271–324.
24.
SituQM, LiJB, DouK. Reexamining the linear andU-shaped relationships between self-control and emotional and behavioural problems. Asian Journal of Social Psychology2016;19(2):177–85.
25.
DouK, NieYG, WangYJ, LiuYZ. The relationship between self-control, job satisfaction and life satisfaction in Chinese employees: A preliminary study. Work: A Journal of Prevention, Assessment, and Rehabilitation2016;55(4):797–803.
26.
AryeeS, BudhwarPS, ChenZX. Trust as a mediator of the relationship between organizational justice and work outcomes: Test of a social exchange model. Journal of Organizational Behavior2002;23(3):267–85.
27.
XiH. Study of the mechanism of characteristics of corporate social responsibility on employee organizational commitment and citizenship behavior. Zhejiang, China: Zhejiang University; 2009.
28.
HayesAF. Introduction to mediation. Aregression-based approach. New York: Guilford Publications; 2013.
29.
ChiNW, ChangHT, HuangHL. Can personality traits and daily positive mood buffer the harmful effects of daily negative mood on task performance and service sabotage? A self-control perspective. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes2015;131:1–15.
30.
GinoF, SchweitzerME, MeadNL, ArielyD. Unable to resist temptation: How self-control depletion promotes unethical behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes2011;115(2):191–203.
31.
MaloneyPW, GrawitchMJ, BarberLK. The multi-factor structure of the Brief Self-Control Scale: Discriminant validity of restraint and impulsivity. Journal of Research in Personality2012;46(1):111–5.
32.
SchmeichelBJ, ZellA. Trait self-control predicts performance on behavioral tests of self-control. Journal of Personality2007;75(4):743–56.
33.
Kiffin-PetersenSA, JordanCL, SoutarGN. The big five, emotional exhaustion and citizenship behaviors in service settings: The mediating role of emotional labor. Personality and Individual Differences2011;50(1):43–8.
34.
HalbeslebenJRB, BowlerWM, BolinoMC, TurnleyWH. Organizational concern, prosocial values, or impression management? How supervisors attribute motives to organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology2010;40(6):1450–89.
35.
vanDellenMR, ShahJY, LeanderNP, DeloseJE, BornsteinJX. In good company: Managing interpersonal resources that support self-regulation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin2015.
36.
Siebert-AdzicM. Emotions and leadershiReasons and impact of emotions in organizational context. Work: A Journal of Prevention, Assessment, and Rehabilitation2012;41(1):5671–3.
37.
DyneLV, AngS. Organizational citizenship behavior of contingent workers in Singapore. Academy of Management Journal1998;41(6):692–703.
38.
LiJB, DelvecchioE, LisA, NieYG, Di RisoD. Parental attachment, self-control, and depressive symptoms in Chinese and Italian adolescents: Test of a mediation model. Journal of Adolescence2015;43:159–70.
39.
LiJB, DelvecchioE, LisA, NieYG, Di RisoD. Positive coping as mediator between self-control and life satisfaction: Evidence from two Chinese sample. Personality and Individual Differences2016;accepted.
40.
De RidderDT, Lensvelt-MuldersG, FinkenauerC, StokFM, BaumeisterRF. Taking stock of self-control a meta-analysis of How trait self-control relates to a wide range of behaviors. Personality and Social Psychology Review2012;16(1):76–99.
