BACKGROUND: Musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) have been identified as a predisposing factor for lesser productivity, but no validated tool has been developed to assess them in the Sri- Lankan context.
OBJECTIVE: To develop a validated tool to assess the neck and upper limb MSDs.
METHODS: It comprises three components: item selections, item reduction using principal component analysis, and validation. A tentative self-administrated questionnaire was developed, translated, and pre-tested. Four important domains – neck, shoulder, elbow and wrist – were identified through principal component analysis.
RESULTS: Prevalence of any MSDs was 38.1% and prevalence of neck, shoulder, elbow and wrist MSDs are 12.85%, 13.71%, 12%, 13.71% respectively. Content and criterion validity of the tool was assessed. Separate ROC curves were produced and sensitivity and specificity of neck (83.1%, 71.7%), shoulder (97.6%, 91.9%), elbow (98.2%, 87.2%), and wrist (97.6%, 94.9%) was determined. Cronbach’s Alpha and correlation coefficient was above 0.7.
CONCLUSION: The tool has high sensitivity, specificity, internal consistency, and test re-test reliability.
Van EerdD, BeatonD, ColeD, LucasJ, Hogg-JohnsonS, BombardierC. Classification systems for upper-limb musculoskeletal disorders in workers. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology2003;56(10):925–36.
2.
The main risk factors for work related musculo skeletal disorders. World Heath Organization [Internet]. 1985 [cited 8 January 2014];. Available from: http://www.ilo.org/safeworkbookshelf
3.
AnderssonH. The epidemiology of spinal disorders principles and practice. 2nd ed. New York: Raven Press Ltd; 1996.
4.
AraujoT, KarasekR. Validity and reliability of the job content questionnaire in formal and informal jobs in Brazil. Scand J Work Environmental Health Supplement2008;6:52–9.
5.
BjelleA, HagbergM, MichaelsonG. Occupational and individual factors in acute shoulder-neck disorders among industrial workers. Occupational and Environmental Medicine1981;38(4):356–63.
6.
PunnetL, WegmanD. work related musculoskeletal disorders: The epidemiological evidence and the debate. J ElectromyogrKinesiol2004;14:13–23.
7.
ArthurM, HawkinsJ, PollardJ, CatalanoR, BaglioniJ. Measuring risk and protective factors for substance use, delinquency and other adolescent problem behaviors: The communities care youth surveys. Evaluation Review2002;26(6):575–601.
8.
DavidG. Ergonomic methods for assessing exposure to risk factors for work-related musculoskeletal disorders. Occupational Medicine2005;55(3):190–9.
9.
FrankJ, PulcinsI, KerrM, ShannonH, StansfeldS. Occupational back pain – an unhelpful polemic. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health1995;21(1):3–14.
10.
Central bank of Sri Lanka, Annual Report: Future challenges of the apparel industry’s report on consumer finance and socio-economic survey Colombo. Central Bank of Sri Lanka; 2003.
11.
PereraS. Occupational overuse disorders in upper limbs of female garment workers and rapid ergonomic assessment of individual work areas. Post Graduate Institute of Medicine, University of Colombo; 1993.
12.
HaneefaR. The effects of posture and musculoskeletal disorders among automated sewing machine operators and also on productivity among female garment factory workers. Post graduate institute of Medicine, University of Colombo; 2003.
13.
International classification of diseases and related health problems [Internet]
10th ed. World Health Organization; 2010 [cited 22 March 2010]. Available from: http://www.who.int.
Viikari-JunturaE, VuoriJ, SilversteinB, KalimoR, KuosmaE, VidemanT. A Life-long prospective study on the role of psychosocial factors in neck-shoulder and low-back pain. Spine1991;16(9):1056–61.
16.
StetsonD, SilversteinB, KeyserlingW, WolfeR, AlbersJ. Median sensory distal amplitude and latency: Comparisons between non exposed managerial/professional employees and industrial workers. Am J Ind Med1993;24(2):175–89.
17.
BaronS, HalesT, HurrellJ. Evaluation of symptom surveys for occupational musculoskeletal disorders. Am J Ind Med1996;29(6):609–17.
18.
GrandjeanE. Ergonomics in computerized offices. London: Taylor & Francis; 1987.
19.
PunnettL, FineL, KeyserlingW, HerrinG, ChaffinD. Back disorders and no neutral trunk postures of automobile assembly workers. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health1991;17(5):337–46.
20.
Encyclopedia of occupational safety and health. 4th ed. International Labour organization; 2004.
21.
SnookS, CampanelliR, HartJ. A study of three preventive approaches to low back injury. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine1978;20(7):478–81.
22.
HadlerN. Repetitive upper-extremity motions in the workplace are not hazardous. The Journal of Hand Surgery1997;22(1):19–29.
23.
HansenG, JensenI. musculoskeletal disorders in the work place: Low back and upper extremities. Work Place Ergonomics. Washington DC: National Academy press; 1993.
24.
JonesJ, HunterD. Qualitative research: Consensus methods for medical and health services research. BMJ1995;311(7001):376–80.
25.
KatzJ, PunnettL, SimmonsB, FosselA, MooneyN, KellerR. Workers’ compensation recipients with carpal tunnel syndrome: The validity of self-reported health measures. Am J Public Health1996;86(1):52–6.
26.
HullyS, CummingsS, BrownerW. Designing clinical research. 5th ed. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2001.
27.
NunnallyJ, Bernstein. Psychometric theory. USA: McGraw Hill Inc.; 1994.
28.
AbramsonJ, AbramsonZSurvey methods in community medicine epidemiological research programme evaluation. Clinical Trials. 5th ed. New York: Churchill Livingstone Harcourt Brace and Company Limited; 1999.
29.
LitwinN. The survey kit: How to measure survey reliability and validity. California: University of California; 1995.
