The in-depth understanding of human anatomy is the foundation for safety in nursing practice. Augmented reality is an emerging technology that can be used for integrative learning in nursing education.
OBJECTIVE:
The study aimed to develop a human anatomy-based skill training system and pilot test its usability and feasibility.
METHODS:
Twenty-seven nursing students participated in 3D anatomy-based skill training for intramuscular injection and Levin tube feeding using HoloLens 2. Various user interfaces including pictures, videos, animation graphics, and annotation boxes assisted users with a comprehensive understanding of the step-by-step procedures for these techniques. A one-group pre-post test was conducted to observe changes in skill performance competency, usability, and learning satisfaction.
RESULTS:
After study participation, a statistically significant improvement in skill performance competency ( 0.05) was observed. The usability results showed that students were satisfied with the usefulness of the program (9.55 0.49) and scored highly for the intention to participate in other educational programs (9.62 0.59). A high level of learning satisfaction was achieved (9.55 0.49), with positive responses in fostering students’ engagement and excitement in the application of cutting-edge technology.
CONCLUSION:
The 3D anatomy-based nursing skill training demonstrated good potential to improve learning outcomes and facilitate engagement in self-directed practice. This can be integrated into undergraduate nursing education as an assistant teaching tool, contributing to the combination of knowledge and practice.
McVicarAAndrewSKembleR. The ‘bioscience problem’ for nursing students: An integrative review of published evaluations of year 1 bioscience, and proposed directions for curriculum development. Nurse Education Today.2015; 35(3): 500-509.
2.
BerneySBétrancourtMMolinariGHoyekN. How spatial abilities and dynamic visualizations interplay when learning functional anatomy with 3D anatomical models. Anatomical Sciences Education.2015; 8(5): 452-462.
3.
SinghRTubbsRSGuptaKSinghMJonesDGKumarR. Is the decline of human anatomy hazardous to medical education/profession? – A review. Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy.2015; 37: 1257-1265.
4.
AzumaRT. A survey of augmented reality. Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.1997; 6(4): 355-385.
5.
AlarajACharbelFTBirkDTobinMLucianoCBanerjeePPRizziSSorensonJFoleyKSlavinKRoitbergB. Role of cranial and spinal virtual and augmented reality simulation using immersive touch modules in neurosurgical training. Neurosurgery.2013; 72(01): 115.
6.
LeitritzMAZiemssenFSuesskindDPartschMVoykovBBartz-SchmidtKUSzurmanGB. Critical evaluation of the usability of augmented reality ophthalmoscopy for the training of inexperienced examiners. Retina.2014; 34(4): 785-791.
7.
YudkowskyRLucianoCBanerjeePSchwartzAAlarajALemoleGM JrCharbelFSmithKRizziSByrneRBendokBFrimD. Practice on an augmented reality/haptic simulator and library of virtual brains improves residents’ ability to perform a ventriculostomy. Simulation in Healthcare.2013; 8(1): 25-31.
8.
LangloisJWellsGALecourtoisMBergeronGYetisirEMartinM. Spatial abilities of medical graduates and choice of residency programs. Anatomical Sciences Education.2015; 8(2): 111-119.
9.
McMenaminPGQuayleMRMcHenryCRAdamsJW. The production of anatomical teaching resources using three-dimensional (3D) printing technology. Anatomical Sciences Education.2014; 7(6): 479-486.
10.
AbouHashemYDayalMSavanahSStrkaljG. The application of 3D printing in anatomy education. Medical Education Online.2015; 20(1): 29847.
11.
BarmakiRYuKPearlmanRShinglesRBorkFOsgoodGMNavabN. Enhancement of anatomical education using augmented reality: An empirical study of body painting. Anatomical Sciences Education.2019; 12(6): 599-609.
12.
AlalharethNHowarthM. The effectiveness of simulation training on nursing students’ neonatal resuscitation skills: A systematic review. International Journal of Nursing and Health Care Research.2020; 3(2): 1187.
13.
BlackburnMBWangSCRossBEHolcombeSAKempskiKMBlackburnANDeLorenzoRARyanKL. Anatomic accuracy of airway training manikins compared with humans. Anaesthesia.2021; 76(3): 366-372.
14.
CulhaI. Active learning methods used in nursing education. Journal of Pedagogical Research.2019; 3(2): 74-86.
15.
ChytasDJohnsonEOPiagkouMMazarakisABabisGCChronopoulosENikolaouVSLazaridisNNatsisK. The role of augmented reality in anatomical education: An overview. Annals of Anatomy-Anatomischer Anzeiger.2020; 229: 151463.
16.
FidaBCutoloF, FrancoGFerrariMFerrariV. Augmented reality in open surgery. Updates in Surgery.2018; 70(3): 389-400.
17.
TangKSChengDLMiEGreenbergPB. Augmented reality in medical education: A systematic review. Canadian Medical Education Journal.2020; 11(1): e81.
18.
SchoemanSChandratilakeM. The weak relationship between anatomy competence and clinical skills in junior medical students. Anatomical Sciences Education.2012; 5(4): 217-224.
19.
FitriaTN. Augmented reality (AR) and virtual reality (VR) technology in education: Media of teaching and learning: A review. International Journal of Computer and Information System (IJCIS).2023; 4(1): 14-25.
20.
QuqandiEJoyMDrummIRushtonM. Augmented reality in supporting healthcare and nursing independent learning: Narrative review. CIN: Computers, Informatics, Nursing.2022; 10: 1097.
21.
VIRNECT Make – Digital information production XR solution: https://www.virnect.com/products/make.
22.
VIRNECT View – The XR content viewing solution: https://www.virnect.io/view.
23.
KimSKLeeYYoonHChoiJ. Adaptation of extended reality smart glasses for core nursing skill training among undergraduate nursing students: Usability and feasibility study. Journal of Medical Internet Research.2021; 23(3): e24313.
24.
JiYRChungHM. Effects of case-based learning on task achievement and learning satisfaction in the university class. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction.2014; 14(9): 243-265.
25.
MoroCBirtJStrombergaZPhelpsCClarkJGlasziouPScottAM. Virtual and augmented reality enhancements to medical and science student physiology and anatomy test performance: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Anatomical Sciences Education.2021; 14(3): 368-376.
26.
KimKJChoiMJKimKJ. Effects of nursing simulation using mixed reality: A scoping review. Healthcare MDPI.2021; 9(8): 947.
27.
FrostJDelaneyLFitzgeraldR. Exploring the application of mixed reality in nurse education. BMJ Simulation & Technology Enhanced Learning.2020; 6(4): 214.
28.
RichardsS. Student engagement using HoloLens mixed-reality technology in human anatomy laboratories for osteopathic medical students: An instructional model. Medical Science Educator.2023; 33(1): 223-231.
29.
Pijl-ZieberEMBartonSKonkinJAwosogaOCaineV. Competence and competency-based nursing education: Finding our way through the issues. Nurse Education Today.2014; 34(5): 676-678.
30.
CronjeJ. Towards a new definition of blended learning. Electronic Journal of e-Learning.2020; 18(2): 114-121.
31.
WongFMFTangACYChengWLS. Factors associated with self-directed learning among undergraduate nursing students: A systematic review. Nurse Education Today.2021; 104: 104998.
32.
RegmiKJonesL. A systematic review of the factors-enablers and barriers-affecting e-learning in health sciences education. BMC Medical Education.2020; 20(1): 1-18.
33.
VergelRSTenaPMYrurzumSCCruz-NeiraC. A comparative evaluation of a virtual reality table and a HoloLens-based augmented reality system for anatomy training. IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems.2020; 50(4): 337-348.
34.
JulienBFranckGSylvainG. Augmented reality application for HoloLens dedicated to the accuracy test: Evolution and results. Healthcare and Medical Devices.2022; 51: 45.
35.
LocatelliCCatenazziNSommarugaLBesenzoniM. A case study to explore issues and potentials of HoloLens 2 for training. INTED2022 Proceedings IATED. 2022; pp. 7342-7348.
36.
KangHJShinJHPontoK. A comparative analysis of 3D user interaction: How to move virtual objects in mixed reality. 2020 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR). 2020; pp. 275-284.
37.
JangJTschabrunnCMBarkaganMAnterEMenzeBNezafatR. Three-dimensional holographic visualization of high-resolution myocardial scar on HoloLens. PloS one.2018; 13(10): e0205188.
38.
GsaxnerCLiCPepeAJinYKleesiekJSchmalstiegDEggerJ. The HoloLens in medicine: A systematic review and taxonomy. Medical Image Analysis. 2023; 102757.
39.
El-HaririHPandeyPHodgsonAJGarbiR. Augmented reality visualisation for orthopaedic surgical guidance with pre-and intra-operative multimodal image data fusion. Healthcare Technology Letters.2018; 5(5): 189-193.
40.
TeatiniAKumarRPElleOJWiigO. Mixed reality as a novel tool for diagnostic and surgical navigation in orthopaedics. International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery.2021; 16: 407-414.
41.
KumarNPandeySRahmanE. A novel three-dimensional interactive virtual face to facilitate facial anatomy teaching using Microsoft HoloLens. Aesthetic Plastic Surgery.2021; 45: 1005-1011.
42.
GaoYZhaoYXieLZhengG. A projector-based augmented reality navigation system for computer-assisted surgery. Sensors.2021; 21(9): 2931.
43.
ZhouGNagleATakahashiGHornbeckTLoomisASmithBDuerstockBYuD. Bringing patient mannequins to life: 3D projection enhances nursing simulation. Proceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 2022; pp. 1-15.
