The clinical value of using magnetic resonance contrast-enhanced three-dimensional nerve view in the diagnosis and management of sacral fracture accompanied by sacral plexus injury

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

The treatment of sacral fractures accompanied by nerve injury is complex and often leads to an unsatisfactory prognosis and poor quality of life in patients.

OBJECTIVE:

The present study aimed to investigate the clinical value of using 3.0T magnetic resonance contrast-enhanced three-dimensional (MR CE-3D) nerve view magnetic resonance neurography (MRN) in the diagnosis and management of a sacral fracture accompanied by a sacral plexus injury.

METHODS:

Thirty-two patients with a sacral fracture accompanied by a sacral plexus injury, including 24 cases of Denis spinal trauma type II and 8 cases of type III, were enrolled in the study. All patients had symptoms or signs of lumbosacral nerve injury, and an MRN examination was performed to clarify the location and severity of the sacral nerve injury. Segmental localization of the sacral plexus was done to indicate the site of the injury as being intra-spinal (IS), intra-foraminal (IF), or extra-foraminal (EF), and the severity of the nerve injury was determined as being mild, moderate, or severe. Surgical nerve exploration was then conducted in six patients with severe nerve injury. The location and severity of the nerve injury were recorded using intra-operative direct vision, and the results were statistically compared with the MRN examination results.

RESULTS:

MRN showed that 81 segments had mild sacral plexus injuries (8 segments of IS, 20 segments of IF, 53 segments of EF), 78 segments had moderate sacral plexus injuries (8 segments of IS, 37 segments of IF, and 33 segments of EF), and 19 segments had severe sacral plexus injuries (7 segments of IS, 9 segments of IF, and 3 segments of EF). The six patients who underwent surgery had the following intra-operative direct vision results: 3 segments of moderate injury (IF) and 20 segments of severe injury (7 segments of IS, 10 segments of IF, 3 segments of EF). There was no statistically significant difference in the results between the intra-operative direct vision and those of the MRN examination ( $p>$ 0.05).

CONCLUSION:

MR CE-3D nerve view can clearly and accurately demonstrate the location and severity of sacral nerve injury accompanied by a sacral fracture, and has the potential for being the first choice of examination method for this kind of injury, which would be of important clinical value.