Kidney function assessment from renography has great potential for clinical diagnosis. Compartment models are the main analytical models in this field and the vascular compartment is the most important one, whether in the two-compartment model or three-compartment model. Currently, there are some published research studies on renal cortex segmentation. However, there are few publications introducing the methods on how to segment the vascular compartment yet.
OBJECTIVE:
The objective of this paper is to segment the vascular compartment automatically.
METHODS:
This method was tested on multi-phase scan images. A feature image reconstructed from the original images was used to segment the vascular compartment. It used the features of the time-density curve of each voxel in the contrast-enhanced images to distinguish vascular space from other areas.
RESULTS:
The segmentation result was evaluated by the renal glomerular filtration rate (GFR) analysis of a two-compartment model with the Patlak-Rutland technique. The dataset contained 11 kidney subjects whose GFR ranged from 19.8 ml/min to 74.9 ml/min. The results showed that the correlation between reference GFR and model derived GFR was 0.919(P< 0.001).
CONCLUSION:
Compared with segmentation performed on certain phase images, this method can avoid the problem of subjective phase selection. For a given kidney data, the proposed method can always obtain the same segmentation result automatically.
BaumannD. and RudinM., Quantitative assessment of rat kidney function by measuring the clearance of the contrast agent Gd (DOTA) using dynamic MRI, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, vol. 18, pp. 587-595,6, 2000.
2.
LaurentD., PoirierK., WasvaryJ., and RudinM., Effect of essential hypertension on kidney function as measured in rat by dynamic MRI, Magn Reson Med, vol. 47, pp. 127-34, Jan 2002.
3.
HacksteinN., KooijmanH., TomaselliS., and RauW.S., Glomerular filtration rate measured using the Patlak plot technique and contrast-enhanced dynamic MRI with different amounts of gadolinium-DTPA, J Magn Reson Imaging, vol. 22, pp. 406-14, Sep 2005.
4.
HacksteinN., HeckrodtJ., and RauW.S., Measurement of single-kidney glomerular filtration rate using a contrast-enhanced dynamic gradient-echo sequence and the Rutland-Patlak plot technique, Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, vol. 18, pp. 714-725, 2003.
5.
PatlakC.S., BlasbergR.G., and FenstermacherJ.D., Graphical evaluation of blood-to-brain transfer constants from multiple-time uptake data, J Cereb Blood Flow Metab, vol. 3, pp. 1-7, 1983.
6.
RutlandM.D., A single injection technique for subtraction of blood background in 131I-hippuran renograms, The British Journal of Radiology, vol. 52, pp. 134-137, 1979.
7.
BuckleyD.L., ShurrabA.E., CheungC.M., JonesA.P., MamtoraH., and KalraP.A., Measurement of single kidney function using dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI: comparison of two models in human subjects, J Magn Reson Imaging, vol. 24, pp. 1117-23, Nov 2006.
8.
AnnetL., HermoyeL., PeetersF., JamarF., DehouxJ.P., and Van BeersB.E., Glomerular filtration rate: assessment with dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI and a cortical-compartment model in the rabbit kidney, J Magn Reson Imaging, vol. 20, pp. 843-9, Nov 2004.
9.
LeeV.S., RusinekH., BokachevaL., HuangA.J., OesingmannN., ChenQ. et al., Renal function measurements from MR renography and a simplified multicompartmental model, American Journal of Physiology-Renal Physiology, vol. 292, pp. F1548-F1559, 2007.
10.
ZhangJ.L., RusinekH., BokachevaL., LermanL.O., ChenQ., PrinceC. et al., Functional assessment of the kidney from magnetic resonance and computed tomography renography: impulse retention approach to a multicompartment model, Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, vol. 59, pp. 278-288, 2008.
11.
HermoyeL., AnnetL., LemmerlingP., PeetersF., JamarF., GianelloP. et al., Calculation of the renal perfusion and glomerular filtration rate from the renal impulse response obtained with MRI, Magn Reson Med, vol. 51, pp. 1017-25, May 2004.
12.
VivierP.-H., StoreyP., RusinekH., ZhangJ.L., YamamotoA., TantilloK. et al., Kidney function: glomerular filtration rate measurement with MR renography in patients with cirrhosis, Radiology, vol. 259, pp. 462-470, 2011.
13.
RusinekH., BoykovY., KaurM., WongS., BokachevaL., SajousJ.B. et al., Performance of an automated segmentation algorithm for 3D MR renography, Magn Reson Med, vol. 57, pp. 1159-67, Jun 2007.
14.
BoykovY. and VekslerO., Graph cuts in vision and graphics: Theories and applications, in Handbook of mathematical models in computer vision, ed: Springer, pp. 79-96, 2006.
15.
BoykovY. and Funka-LeaG., Graph cuts and efficient ND image segmentation, International Journal of Computer Vision, vol. 70, pp. 109-131, 2006.
16.
ChapmanA.B., Guay-WoodfordL.M., GranthamJ.J., TorresV.E., BaeK.T., BaumgartenD.A. et al., Renal structure in early autosomal-dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD): The Consortium for Radiologic Imaging Studies of Polycystic Kidney Disease (CRISP) cohort1, Kidney international, vol. 64, pp. 1035-1045, 2003.
17.
van den DoolS.W., WasserM.N., de FijterJ.W., HoekstraJ., and van der GeestR.J., Functional renal volume: quantitative analysis at gadolinium-enhanced mr angiography - feasibility study in healthy potential kidney donors 1, Radiology, vol. 236, pp. 189-195, 2005.
18.
de PriesterJ.A., KesselsA.G.H., GieleE.L.W., den BoerJ.A., ChristiaansM.H.L., HasmanA. et al., MR renography by semiautomated image analysis: performance in renal transplant recipients, Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, vol. 14, pp. 134-140, 2001.
19.
BokachevaL., RusinekH., ZhangJ.L., ChenQ., and LeeV.S., Estimates of glomerular filtration rate from MR renography and tracer kinetic models, Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, vol. 29, pp. 371-382, 2009.
20.
MørkenborgJ., PedersenM., JensenF.T., Stødkilde-JørgensenH., DjurhuusJ.C., and FrøkiærJ., Quantitative assessment of Gd-DTPA contrast agent from signal enhancement: an in-vitro study, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, vol. 21, pp. 637-643,7, 2003.
21.
LeeV.S., RusinekH., JohnsonG., RofskyN.M., KrinskyG.A., and WeinrebJ.C., MR renography with low-dose gadopentetate dimeglumine: feasibility 1, Radiology, vol. 221, pp. 371-379, 2001.
22.
WolfG.L., HoopB., CannilloJ.A., RogowskaJ.A., and HalpernE.F., Measurement of renal transit of gadopentetate dimeglumine with echo-planar MR imaging, Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, vol. 4, pp. 365-372, 1994.
23.
KatzbergR.W., BuonocoreM.H., IvanovicM., Pellot-BarakatC., RyanJ.M., WhangK. et al., Functional, dynamic, and anatomic mr urography: feasibility and preliminary findings, Academic Radiology, vol. 8, pp. 1083-1099,11, 2001.
24.
TaylorJ., SummersP.E., KeevilS.F., SaksA.M., DiskinJ., HiltonP.J. et al., Magnetic resonance renography: optimisation of pulse sequence parameters and Gd-DTPA dose, and comparison with radionuclide renography, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, vol. 15, pp. 637-649, 1997.
25.
LeeV.S., RusinekH., NozM.E., LeeP., RaghavanM., and KramerE.L., Dynamic Three-dimensional MR renography for the measurement of single kidney function: initial experience 1, Radiology, vol. 227, pp. 289-294, 2003.
26.
RusinekH., LeeV.S., and JohnsonG., Optimal dose of Gd-DTPA in dynamic MR studies, Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, vol. 46, pp. 312-316, 2001.
27.
BokachevaL., RusinekH., ChenQ., OesingmannN., PrinceC., KaurM. et al., Quantitative determination of Gd-DTPA concentration in T1-weighted MR renography studies, Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, vol. 57, pp. 1012-1018, 2007.
28.
BuonaccorsiG.A., O'ConnorJ.P.B., CaunceA., RobertsC., CheungS., WatsonY. et al., Tracer kinetic model-driven registration for dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI time-series data, Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, vol. 58, pp. 1010-1019, 2007.
29.
SongT., LeeV.S., ChenQ., RusinekH., and LaineA.F., An automated three-dimensional plus time registration framework for dynamic MR renography, Journal of Visual Communication and Image Representation, vol. 21, pp. 1-8, 2010.
30.
RohlfingT., MaurerC.R., O'DellW.G., and ZhongJ., Modeling liver motion and deformation during the respiratory cycle using intensity-based nonrigid registration of gated MR images, Medical Physics, vol. 31, pp. 427-432, 2004.
31.
ValléeJ.P., LazeyrasF., KhanH.G., and TerrierF., Absolute renal blood flow quantification by dynamic MRI and Gd-DTPA, European Radiology, vol. 10, pp. 1245-1252, 2000/07/01 2000.
32.
MichaelyH.J., SchoenbergS.O., OesingmannN., IttrichC., BuhligC., FriedrichD. et al., Renal artery stenosis: functional assessment with dynamic MR perfusion measurements - feasibility study 1, Radiology, vol. 238, pp. 586-596, 2006.
33.
MontetX., IvancevicM.K., BelengerJ., Jorge-CostaM., PochonS., PechèreA. et al., Noninvasive measurement of absolute renal perfusion by contrast medium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging, Investigative Radiology, vol. 38, pp. 584-592, 2003.
34.
SourbronS.P., MichaelyH.J., ReiserM.F., and SchoenbergS.O., MRi-measurement of perfusion and glomerular filtration in the human kidney with a separable compartment model, Investigative Radiology, vol. 43, pp. 40-48 10.1097/RLI.0b013e31815597c5, 2008.
35.
ParkerG.J., RobertsC., MacdonaldA., BuonaccorsiG.A., CheungS., BuckleyD.L. et al., Experimentally-derived functional form for a population-averaged high-temporal-resolution arterial input function for dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI, Magn Reson Med, vol. 56, pp. 993-1000, Nov 2006.
