Although flow diversion is a promising procedure for aneurysm treatment, the safety and efficacy of this strategy have not been sufficiently characterized. Both mechanical properties and flow reduction effects are important factors in the design of an optimal stent.
OBJECTIVE:
We aimed to clarify the contributions of strut size and pitch to the mechanical properties (radial stiffness and longitudinal flexibility) and geometric characteristics (porosity and pore density) related to flow reduction effects.
METHODS:
Crimping and bending behaviors of the stents were simulated with the finite element method. The relationships between the mechanical properties and geometric characteristics were investigated by changing the strut size and pitch.
RESULTS:
Within the porosity range of 79–82%, the radial stiffness of the stent was similarly influenced by either the strut size or pitch. However, the longitudinal flexibility tended to be influenced more by strut size than by pitch.
CONCLUSIONS:
Adjusting the strut size rather than the pitch can change the mechanical properties while minimizing the change in porosity or pore density related to flow reduction effects.
BrismanJLSongJKNewellDW. Cerebral aneurysms. N Engl J Med.2006; 355(9): 928–939.
2.
VernoojiMWIkramMATangheHLVincentAJHofmanAKrestinGP, et al. Incidental findings on brain MRI in the general population. N Engl J Med.2007; 357(18): 1821–1828.
3.
LylykPMirandaCCerattoRFerrarioAScrivanoELunaHR, et al. Curative endovascular reconstruction of cerebral aneurysms with the pipeline embolization device: the Buenos Aires experience. Neurosurgery.2009; 64(4): 632–643.
4.
PierotL. Flow diverter stents in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms: Where are we? J Neuroradiol.2011; 38(1): 40–46.
5.
LubiczBCollignonLRaphaeliGPruvoJPBruneauMDe WitteO, et al. Flow-diverter stent for the endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms: a prospective study in 29 patients with 34 aneurysms. Stroke.2010; 41(10): 2247–2253.
6.
TsangACFungAMTsangFCLeungGKLeeRLuiWM. Failure of Flow Diverter Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysms Related to the Fetal-type Posterior Communicating Artery. Neurointervention.2015; 10(2): 60–66.
7.
ChiuAHCheungAKWenderothJD, VilliersLRiceHPhatourosCC, et al. Long-Term Follow-Up Results following Elective Treatment of Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms with the Pipeline Embolization Device. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol.2015; 36(9): 1728–1734.
8.
FischerSVajdaZ, PerezMSchmidEHopfNBäznerH, et al. Pipeline embolization device (PED) for neurovascular reconstruction: Initial experience in the treatment of 101 intracranial aneurysms and dissections. Neuroradiology.2012; 54(4): 369–382.
9.
PufferRCKallmesDFCloftHJLanzinoG. Patency of the ophthalmic artery after flow diversion treatment of paraclinoid aneurysms. J Neurosurg.2012; 116(4): 892–896.
10.
ByrneJVBeltechiRYarnoldJABirksJKamranM. Early experience in the treatment of intra-cranial aneurysms by endovascular flow diversion: a multicentre prospective study. PLoS One.2010; 5(9): pii: e12492.
11.
DarsautTEBingFSalazkinIGevryGRaymondJ. Flow diverters failing to occlude experimental bifurcation or curved sidewall aneurysms: an in vivo study in canines. J Neurosurg.2012; 117(1): 37–44.
12.
HuangQXuJChengJWangSWangKLiuJM. Hemodynamic changes by flow diverters in rabbit aneurysm models: A computational fluid dynamic study based on micro-computed tomography reconstruction. Stroke.2013; 44(7): 1936–1941. doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.001202.
13.
PereiraVMBrinaODelattreBMOuaredRBouillotPErcegG, et al. Assessment of intra-aneurysmal flow modification after flow diverter stent placement with four-dimensional flow MRI: a feasibility study. J Neurointerv Surg.2015; 7(12): 913–919.
14.
AurboonyawatTBlancRSchmidtPPiotinMSpelleLNakibA, et al. An in vitro study of silk stent morphology. Neuroradiology.2011; 53(9): 659–667.
15.
BouillotPBrinaOOuaredRLovbladKOFarhatMPereiraVM. Hemodynamic transition driven by stent porosity in sidewall aneurysms. J Biomech.2015; 48(7): 1300–1309.
16.
SeongJWakhlooAKLieberBB. In vitro evaluation of flow divertors in an elastase-induced saccular aneurysm model in rabbit. J Biomech Eng.2007; 129(6): 863–872.
17.
CebralJRMutFRaschiMScrivanoECerattoRLylykP, et al. Aneurysm rupture following treatment with flow-diverting stents: Computational hemodynamics analysis of treatment. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol.2011; 32(1): 27–33.
18.
ChongWZhangYQianYLaiLParkerGMitchellK. Computational hemodynamics analysis of intracranial aneurysms treated with flow diverters: Correlation with clinical outcomes. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol.2014; 35(1): 136–142.
19.
LarrabideIGeersAJMoralesHGAguilarMLRüfenachtDA. Effect of aneurysm and ICA morphology on hemodynamics before and after flow diverter treatment. J Neurointerv Surg.2015; 7(4): 272–280.
20.
AlderaziYJShastriDKass-HoutTPrestigiacomoCJGandhiCD. Flow diverters for intracranial aneurysms. Stroke Res Treat.2014; 2014: 415653.
21.
LeeCJSrinivasKQianY. Three-dimensional hemodynamic design optimization of stents for cerebral aneurysms. Proc Inst Mech Eng H.2014; 228(3): 213–224.
22.
MaJYouZByrneJRizkallahRR. Design and mechanical properties of a novel cerebral flow diverter stent. Ann Biomed Eng.2014; 42(5): 960–970.
23.
ZhaoSLiuX(C)GuL. The Impact of Wire Stent Fabrication Technique on the Performance of Stent Placement. J Med Device.2012; 6(1): 011007.
24.
KimJHKangTJYuWR. Mechanical modeling of self-expandable stent fabricated using braiding technology. J Biomech.2008; 41(15): 3202–3212.
25.
NiXYPanCW, PrustyB. Numerical investigations of the mechanical properties of a braided non-vascular stent design using finite element method. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin.2015; 18(10): 1117–1125.
26.
ShapiroMRazEBecskeTNelsonPK. Variable porosity of the pipeline embolization device in straight and curved vessels: a guide for optimal deployment strategy. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol.2014; 35(4): 727–733.
27.
MaDDargushGFNatarajanSKLevyEISiddiquiAHMengH. Computer modeling of deployment and mechanical expansion of neurovascular flow diverter in patient-specific intracranial aneurysms. J Biomech.2012; 45(13): 2256–2263.
28.
MaDDumontTMKosukegawaHOhtaMYangXSiddiquiAH, et al. High fidelity virtual stenting (HiFiVS) for intracranial aneurysm flow diversion: In vitro and in silico. Ann Biomed Eng.2013; 41(10): 2143–2156.
29.
ShobayashiYTanoueTTateshimaSTanishitaK. Mechanical design of an intracranial stent for treating cerebral aneurysms. Med Eng Phys.2010; 32(9): 1015–1024.
30.
MakoyevaABingFDarsautTESalazkinIRaymondJ. The varying porosity of braided self-expanding stents and flow diverters: an experimental study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol.2013; 34(3): 596–602.
31.
MaDXiangJChoiHDumontTMNatarajanSKSiddiquiAH, et al. Enhanced aneurysmal flow diversion using a dynamic push-pull technique: an experimental and modeling study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol.2014; 35(9): 1779–1785.
32.
XiangJMaDSnyderKVLevyEISiddiquiAHMengH. Increasing flow diversion for cerebral aneurysm treatment using a single flow diverter. Neurosurgery.2014; 75(3): 286–294.
33.
ColbyGPLinLMCaplanJMJiangBHuangJTamargoRJ, et al. Immediate procedural outcomes in 44 consecutive Pipeline Flex cases: the first North American single-center series. J Neurointerv Surg.2015; 1: pii: neurintsurg–2015–011894.
