The addition of the MEP amplitude of finger extension muscles to clinical predictors of hand function after stroke: A prospective cohort study

Abstract

Background:

Within the first 72 hours after stroke, active finger extension is a strong predictor of long-term dexterity. Transcranial magnetic stimulation may add prognostic value to clinical assessment, which is especially relevant for patients unable to follow instructions.

Objective:

The current prospective cohort study aims at determining whether amplitude of motor evoked potentials of the extensor digitorum communis (EDC) can improve clinical prediction after stroke when added to clinical tests.

Methods:

the amplitude of motor evoked potentials of the affected EDC muscle at rest was measured in 18 participants within 4 weeks after stroke, as were the ability to perform finger extension and the Fugl-Meyer Motor Assessment of the upper extremity (FMA_UE). These three determinants were related to the FMA_UE at 26 weeks after stroke (FMA_UE26), both directly, and via the proportional recovery prediction model. The relation between amplitude of the motor evoked potentials and FMA_UE26 was evaluated for EDC. For comparison, also the MEP amplitudes of biceps brachii and adductor digiti minimi muscles were recorded.

Results:

Patients’ ability to voluntarily extend the fingers was strongly related to FMA_UE26, in our cohort there were no false negative results for this predictor. Our data revealed that the relation between amplitude of motor evoked potential of EDC and FMA_UE26 was significant, but moderate (r_s = 0.58) without added clinical value. The other tested muscles did not correlate significantly to FMA_UE26.

Conclusions:

Our study demonstrates no additional value of motor evoked potential amplitude of the affected EDC muscle to the clinical test of finger extension, the latter being more strongly related to FMA_UE26.

Keywords

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS)upper extremity prognosis

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bakker,

C.D

, van Kuijk

A.A

, Stegeman,

D.F

, Geurts,

A.C.H

, Pasman,

J.W

, Stegeman,

D.F

, & Pasman,

J.W.

(2014). Can forearm muscle activity be selectively recorded using conventional surface EMG-electrodes in transcranial magnetic stimulation? A feasibility study. Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology, 24, 325–331.

Bembenek,

J.P

, Kurczych,

, Karlinski,

, & Czlonkowska,

(2012). The prognostic value of motor-evoked potentials in motor recovery and functional outcome after stroke – a systematic review of the literature. Functional Neurology, 27, 79–84.

Boniface,

S.J.

(2001). Plasticity after acute ischaemic stroke studied by transcranial magnetic stimulation. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, 71, 713–715.

Boyd,

L.A

, Hayward,

K.S

, Ward,

N.S

, Stinear,

C.M

, Rosso,

, Fisher,

R.J

, . . . Cramer,

S.C.

(2017). Biomarkers of Stroke Recovery: Consensus-Based Core Recommendations from the Stroke Recovery and Rehabilitation Roundtable*. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 31, 864–876.

Byblow,

W.D

, Stinear,

C.M

, Barber,

P.A

, Petoe,

M.A

, & Ackerley,

S.J.

(2015). Proportional Recovery After Stroke Depends on Corticomotor Integrity. Annals of Neurology, 78, 848–859.

Chipchase,

, Schabrun,

, Cohen,

, Hodges,

, Ridding,

, Rothwell,

, . . . Ziemann,

(2012). A checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies using transcranial magnetic stimulation to study the motor system: An international consensus study. Clinical Neurophysiology: Official Journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology, 123, 1698–1704.

Connell,

L.A

, Smith,

M.C

, Byblow,

W.D

, & Stinear,

C.M.

(2018). Implementing biomarkers to predict motor recovery after stroke. NeuroRehabilitation, 43, 41–50.

Coupar,

, Pollock,

, Rowe,

, Weir,

, & Langhorne,

(2012). Predictors of upper limb recovery after stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clinical Rehabilitation, 26, 291–313.

Epstein,

C.M

, Wassermann,

E.M

, & Ziemann,

(2012). Oxford Handbook of Transcranial Stimulation. Oxford Handbook of Transcranial Stimulation. doi: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198568926.001.0001.

10.

Escudero,

J.V

, Sancho,

, Bautista,

, Escudero,

, & López-Trigo,

(1998). Prognostic value of motor evoked potential obtained by transcranial magnetic brain stimulation in motor function recovery in patients with acute ischemic stroke. Stroke; a Journal of Cerebral Circulation, 29, 1854–1859.

11.

Groppa,

, Oliviero,

, Eisen,

, Quartarone,

, Cohen,

L.G

, Mall,

, . . . Siebner,

H.R.

(2012). A practical guide to diagnostic transcranial magnetic stimulation: Report of an IFCN committee. Clinical Neurophysiology: Official Journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology, 123, 858–882.

12.

Hendricks,

H.T

, Zwarts,

M.J

, Plat,

E.F

, & van Limbeek,

(2002). Systematic review for the early prediction of motor and functional outcome after stroke by using motor-evoked potentials. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 83, 1303–1308.

13.

Hoonhorst,

M.H

, Nijland,

R.H

, van den Berg

J.S

, Emmelot,

C.H

, Kollen,

B.J

, & Kwakkel,

(2015). How Do Fugl-Meyer Arm Motor Scores Relate to Dexterity According to the Action Research Arm Test at 6 Months Poststroke? Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 96, 1845–1849.

14.

Hoonhorst,

M.H.J

, Nijland,

R.H.M

, van den Berg

P.J.S

, Emmelot,

C.H

, Kollen,

B.J

, & Kwakkel,

(2018). Does Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Have an Added Value to Clinical Assessment in Predicting Upper-Limb Function Very Early After Severe Stroke? Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair. doi: 10.1177/1545968318785044.

15.

Hoyer,

E.H

, & Celnik,

P.A.

(2011). Understanding and enhancing motor recovery after stroke using transcranial magnetic stimulation. Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience, 29, 395–409.

16.

Khim Kwah

, & Herbert,

R.D.

(2016). Prediction of Walking and Arm Recovery after Stroke: A Critical Review. Brain Sciences, 6, 53.

17.

Kim,

, & Winstein,

(2017). Can Neurological Biomarkers of Brain Impairment Be Used to Predict Poststroke Motor Recovery? A Systematic Review. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 31, 3–24.

18.

Koski,

, Mernar,

T.J

, & Dobkin,

B.H.

(2004). Immediate and long-term changes in corticomotor output in response to rehabilitation: Correlation with functional improvements in chronic stroke. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 18, 230–249.

19.

Kwakkel,

, & Kollen,

(2007). Predicting improvement in the upper paretic limb after stroke: A longitudinal prospective study. Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience, 25, 453–460.

20.

Kwakkel,

, Kollen,

, & Twisk,

(2006). Impact of Time on Improvement of Outcome After Stroke. Stroke, 37, 2348–2353.

21.

Kwakkel,

, Meskers,

C.G.M

, van Wegen

E.E

, Lankhorst,

G.J

, Geurts,

A.C.H

, van Kuijk

A.A

, . . . Arendzen,

J.H.

(2008). Impact of early applied upper limb stimulation: The EXPLICIT-stroke programme design. BMC Neurology, 8, 49.

22.

Mozaffarian,

, Benjamin,

E.J

, Go,

A.S

, Arnett,

D.K

, Blaha,

M.J

, Cushman,

, . . . Turner,

M.B.

(2015). Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics 2016 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association. Circulation, 133, e38–e360.

23.

Munneke,

M.A.M

, Bakker,

C.D

, Goverde,

E.A

, Pasman,

J.W

, & Stegeman,

D.F.

(2018). On the electrode positioning for bipolar EMG recording of forearm extensor and flexor muscle activity after transcranial magnetic stimulation. Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology, 40, 23–31.

24.

Nakayama,

, Jorgensen,

H.S

, Raaschou,

H.O

, & Olsen,

T.S.

(1994). Recovery of upper extremity function in stroke patients: The Copenhagen Stroke Study. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 75, 394–398.

25.

Nijland,

R.H

, van Wegen

E.E

, Harmeling-van der Wel

B.C

, & Kwakkel,

(2010). Presence of finger extension and shoulder abduction within 72 hours after stroke predicts functional recovery: Early prediction of functional outcome after stroke: The EPOS cohort study. Stroke, 41, 745–750.

26.

Pennisi,

, Rapisarda,

, Bella,

, Calabrese,

, Maertens de Noordhout

, & Delwaide,

P.J.

(1999). Absence of response to early transcranial magnetic stimulation in ischemic stroke patients: Prognostic value for hand motor recovery. Stroke; a Journal of Cerebral Circulation, 30, 2666–2670.

27.

Prabhakaran,

, Zarahn,

, Riley,

, Speizer,

, Chong,

J.Y

, Lazar,

R.M

, . . . Krakauer,

J.W.

(2008). Inter-individual variability in the capacity for motor recovery after ischemic stroke. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 22, 64–71.

28.

Skolarus,

L.E

, Burke,

J.F

, Brown,

, Freedman,

V.A

, Matsuzawa,

, & Lerman,

(2014). Understanding Stroke Survivorship: Expanding the concept of post-stroke disability. Stroke; a Journal of Cerebral Circulation, 45, 224–230.

29.

Smania,

, Gambarin,

, Tinazzi,

, Picelli,

, Fiaschi,

, Moretto,

, . . . Paolucci,

(2009). Are indexes of arm recovery related to daily life autonomy in patients with stroke? European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, 45, 349–354.

30.

Smania,

, Paolucci,

, Tinazzi,

, Borghero,

, Manganotti,

, Fiaschi,

, . . . Gambarin,

(2007). Active finger extension: A simple movement predicting recovery of arm function in patients with acute stroke. Stroke; a Journal of Cerebral Circulation, 38, 1088–1090.

31.

Stinear,

C.M.

(2017). Prediction of motor recovery after stroke: Advances in biomarkers. The Lancet Neurology, 16, 826–836.

32.

Stinear,

C.M

, Barber,

P.A

, Petoe,

, Anwar,

, & Byblow,

W.D.

(2012). The PREP algorithm predicts potential for upper limb recovery after stroke. Brain: A Journal of Neurology, 135, 2527–2535.

33.

Stinear,

C.M

, Barber,

P.A

, Smale,

P.R

, Coxon,

J.P

, Fleming,

M.K

, & Byblow,

W.D.

(2007). Functional potential in chronic stroke patients depends on corticospinal tract integrity. Brain: A Journal of Neurology, 130, 170–180.

34.

Stinear,

C.M

, Byblow,

W.D

, Ackerley,

S.J

, Smith,

M.C

, Borges,

V.M

, & Barber,

P.A.

(2017). PREP2: A biomarker-based algorithm for predicting upper limb function after stroke. Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology, 4, 811–820.

35.

van Kuijk

A.A

, Pasman,

J.W

, Hendricks,

H.T

, Zwarts,

M.J

, & Geurts,

A. C. H.

(2009). Predicting hand motor recovery in severe stroke: The role of motor evoked potentials in relation to early clinical assessment. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 23, 45–51.

36.

Winters,

, Kwakkel,

, Nijland,

, & Van Wegen,

(2016). When does return of voluntary finger extension occur post-stroke? A prospective cohort study. PLoS ONE, 11, 1–12.

37.

Winters,

, van Wegen

E.E.H

, Daffertshofer,

, & Kwakkel,

(2015). Generalizability of the Proportional Recovery Model for the Upper Extremity After an Ischemic Stroke. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 29, 614–622.

38.

Zarahn,

, Alon,

, Ryan,

S.L

, Lazar,

R.M

, Vry,

M.S

, Weiller,

, . . . Krakauer,

J.W.

(2011). Prediction of motor recovery using initial impairment and fMRI 48h poststroke. Cerebral Cortex, 21, 2712–2721.