Background: Recent studies exploring the combined effect of motor learning and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) for stroke rehabilitation have shown partially conflicting results.
Objective: To test the efficacy of an optimized hand training approach combined with tDCS in stroke patients.
Methods: In the present pilot study we investigated motor effects of four-week training with a visuomotor grip force tracking task combined with tDCS in 11 chronic stroke patients. Anodal (0.5 mA) or sham tDCS was applied over the primary motor cortex of the lesioned side for 20 minutes, twice a day, during training.
Results: No difference between the Active and Sham groups in the total upper extremity (UE) Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA) score was found. The most prominent recovery occurred in the shoulder-elbow FMA sub-score; in this segment a significantly greater improvement in the Active compared to the Sham group was observed up to two months after the intervention. Mean hold force during the first treatment session predicted the change in the total UE FMA score after treatment.
Conclusion: Four-week visuo-motor training combined with tDCS showed no difference between the Active and Sham groups in the total UE FMA score, which may be explained by heterogeneity of the degree of recovery in the Active group. However, the shoulder-elbow FMA sub-score improved significantly more in the Active compared to the Sham group, which deserves further study.
AntalA., NitscheM.A., KincsesT.Z., KruseW., HoffmannK.P., & PaulusW. (2004). Facilitation of visuo-motor learning by transcranial direct current stimulation of the motor and extrastriate visual areas in humans. European Journal of Neuroscience, 19, 2888–2892.
2.
BatoolS., SoomroN., AmjadF., & FauzR. (2015). To compare the effectiveness of constraint induced movement therapy versus motor relearning programme to improve motor function of hemiplegic upper extremity after stroke. Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences, 31, 1167–1171.
3.
BologniniN., VallarG., CasatiC., LatifL.A., El-NazerR., WilliamsJ., BancoE., & FregniF. (2011). Neurophysiological and behavioral effects of tDCS combined with constraint-induced movement therapy in poststroke patients. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 25, 819–829.
4.
BradnamL.V., StinearC.M., BarberP.A., & ByblowW.D. (2012). Contralesional hemisphere control of the proximal paretic upper limb following stroke. Cerebral Cortex, 22, 2662–2671.
5.
ChenH.M., ChenC.C., HsuehI.P., HuangS.L., & HsiehC.L. (2009). Test-retest reproducibility and smallest real difference of 5 hand function tests in patients with stroke. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 23, 435–440.
6.
CogiamanianF., MarcegliaS., ArdolinoG., BarbieriS., & PrioriA. (2007). Improved isometric force endurance after transcranial direct current stimulation over the human motor cortical areas. European Journal of Neuroscience, 26, 242–249.
7.
FlöelA. (2014). tDCS-enhanced motor and cognitive function in neurological diseases. Neuroimage, 85(Pt 3), 934–947.
8.
Fugl-MeyerA.R., JaaskoL., LeymanI., OlssonS., & SteglindS. (1975). The post-stroke hemiplegic patient. 1. a method for evaluation of physical performance. Scandinavian Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 7, 13–31.
9.
GladstoneD.J., DanellsC.J., & BlackS.E. (2002). The Fugl– Meyer assessment of motor recovery after stroke: A critical review of its measurement properties. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 16, 232–240.
10.
HammerA., & LindmarkB. (2003). Test-retest intra-rater reliability of grip force in patients with stroke. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 35, 189–194.
11.
HesseS., WaldnerA., MehrholzJ., TomelleriC., PohlM., & WernerC. (2011). Combined transcranial direct current stimulation and robot assisted arm training in subacute stroke patients: An exploratory, randomized multicenter trial. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 25, 838–846.
12.
KangN., SummersJ.J., & CauraughJ.H. (2016). Transcranial direct current stimulation facilitates motor learning post-stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, 87, 345–355.
13.
KhedrE.M., ShawkyO.A., El-HammadyD.H., RothwellJ.C., DarwishE.S., MostafaO.M., & TohamyA.M. (2013). Effect of anodal versus cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation on stroke rehabilitation: A pilot randomized controlled trial. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 27, 592–601.
14.
KimD.Y., LimJ.Y., KangE.K., YouD.S., OhM.K., OhB.M., & PaikN.J. (2010). Effect of transcranial direct current stimulation on motor recovery in patients with subacute stroke. American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, 89, 879–886.
15.
KuoM.F., PaulusW., & NitscheM.A. (2014). Therapeutic effects of non-invasive brain stimulation with direct currents (tDCS) in neuropsychiatric diseases. Neuroimage85(Pt 3), 948–960.
16.
LeeS.J., & ChunM.H. (2014). Combination transcranial direct current stimulation and virtual reality therapy for upper extremity training in patients with subacute stroke. Arch Phys Medical Rehabilitation, 95, 431–438.
17.
LiebetanzD., NitscheM.A., TergauF., & PaulusW. (2002). Pharmacological approach to the mechanisms of transcranial DC-stimulation-induced after-effects of human motor cortex excitability. Brain, 125(Pt 10), 2238–2247.
18.
LindbergP., OdyC., FeydyA., & MaierM.A. (2009). Precision in isometric precision grip force is reduced in middle-aged adults. Experimental Brain Research, 193, 213–224.
19.
LindbergP.G., FeydyA., & MaierM.A. (2010). White matter organization in cervical spinal cord relates differently to age and control of grip force in healthy subjects. Journal of Neuroscience, 30, 4102–4109.
20.
LindbergP.G., RocheN., RobertsonJ., Roby-BramiA., BusselB., & MaierM.A. (2012). Affected and unaffected quantitative aspects of grip force control in hemiparetic patients after stroke. Brain Research, 1452, 96–107.
21.
LindenbergR., RengaV., ZhuL.L., NairD., & SchlaugG. (2010). Bihemispheric brain stimulation facilitates motor recovery in chronic stroke patients. Neurology, 75, 2176–2184.
22.
LindenbergR., ZhuL.L., RüberT., & SchlaugG. (2012). Predicting functional motor potential in chronic stroke patients using diffusion tensor imaging. Human Brain Mapping, 33, 1040–1051.
23.
MarquezJ., van VlietP., McElduffP., LagopoulosJ., & ParsonsM. (2015). Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS): Does it have merit in stroke rehabilitation? A systematic review. International Journal of Stroke, 10, 306–316.
24.
Monte-SilvaK., KuoM.F., HessenthalerS., FresnozaS., LiebetanzD., PaulusW., & NitscheM.A. (2013). Induction of late LTP-like plasticity in the human motor cortex by repeated non-invasive brain stimulation. Brain Stimulation, 6, 424–432.
25.
MortensenJ., FiglewskiK., & AndersenH. (2016). Combined transcranial direct current stimulation and home-based occupational therapy for upper limb motor impairment following intracerebral hemorrhage: A double-blind randomized controlled trial. Disability and Rehabilitation, 38, 637–643.
26.
MurphyD.N., BoggioP., & FregniF. (2009). Transcranial direct current stimulation as a therapeutic tool for the treatment of major depression: Insights from past and recent clinical studies. Current Opinion in Psychiatry, 22, 306–311.
27.
NairD.G., RengaV., LindenbergR., ZhuL., & SchlaugG. (2011). Optimizing recovery potential through simultaneous occupational therapy and non-invasive brain-stimulation using tDCS. Restorative Neurolology and Neuroscience, 29, 411–420.
28.
NitscheM.A., FrickeK., HenschkeU., SchlitterlauA., LiebetanzD., LangN., . . . , PaulusW. (2003a). Pharmacological modulation of cortical excitability shifts induced by transcranial direct current stimulation in humans. Journal of Physiology, 553(Pt 1), 293–301.
29.
NitscheM.A., SchauenburgA., LangN., LiebetanzD., ExnerC., PaulusW., & TergauF. (2003b). Facilitation of implicit motor learning by weak transcranial direct current stimulation of the primary motor cortex in the human. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 15, 619–626.
30.
NitscheM.A., JaussiW., LiebetanzD., LangN., TergauF., & PaulusW. (2004). Consolidation of human motor cortical neuroplasticity by D-cycloserine. Neuropsychopharmacology, 29, 1573–1578.
31.
NitscheM.A., BoggioP.S., FregniF., & Pascual-LeoneA. (2009). Treatment of depression with transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS): A review. Expimental Neurology, 219, 14–19.
32.
O’SheaJ., BoudriasM.H., StaggC.J., BachtiarV., KischkaU., BlicherJ.U., & Johansen-BergH. (2014). Predicting behavioural response to TDCS in chronic motor stroke. Neuroimage, 85(Pt 3), 924–933.
33.
PageS.J., FulkG.D., & BoyneP. (2012). Clinically important differences for the upperextremity Fugl–Meyer Scale in people with minimal to moderate impairment due to chronic stroke. Physical Therapy, 92, 791–798.
34.
PereiraN.D., MichaelsenS.M., MenezesI.S., OvandoA.C., LimaR.C., & Teixeira-SalmelaL.F. (2011). Reliability of the Brazilian version of the Wolf Motor Function Test in adults with hemiparesis. The Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy, 15, 257–265.
35.
NowakD.A., GrefkesC., AmeliM., & FinkG.R. (2009). Interhemispheric competition after stroke: Brain stimulation to enhance recovery of function of the affected hand. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 23, 641–656.
36.
NowakD.A., BöslK., PodubeckàJ., & CareyJ.R. (2010). Noninvasive brain stimulation and motor recovery after stroke. Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience, 28, 531–544.
37.
ReisJ., SchambraH.M., CohenL.G., BuchE.R., FritschB., ZarahnE., & KrakauerJ.W. (2009). Non-invasive cortical stimulation enhances motor skill acquisition over multiple days through an effect on consolidation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106, 1590–1595.
38.
RochaS., SilvaE., FoersterÁ., WiesiolekC., ChagasA.P., MachadoG., & Monte-SilvaK. (2016). The impact of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) combined with modified constraint-induced movement therapy (mCIMT) on upper limb function in chronic stroke: A double-blind randomized controlled trial. Disability and Rehabilitation, 38, 653–660.
39.
RosenA.C., RamkumarM., NguyenT., & HoeftF. (2009). Non-invasive transcranial brain stimulation and pain. Current Pain and Headache Reports, 13, 12–17.
40.
RossiniP.M., BurkeD., ChenR., CohenL.G., DaskalakisZ., Di IorioR., & ZiemannU. (2015). Non-invasive electrical and magnetic stimulation of the brain, spinal cord, roots and peripheral nerves: Basic principles and procedures for routine clinical and research application. An updated report from an I.F.C.N. Committee. Clinical Neurophysiology, 126, 1071–1107.
41.
SantistebanL., TérémetzM., BletonJ.P., BaronJ.C., MaierM.A., & LindbergP.G. (2016). Upper limb outcome measures used in stroke rehabilitation studies: A systematic literature review. PLoS One, 11(5), e0154792.
42.
SivanM., O’ConnorR.J., MakowerS., LevesleyM., & BhaktaB. (2011). Systematic review of outcome measures used in the evaluation of robot-assisted upper limb exercise in stroke. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 43, 181–189.
43.
SusantoE.A., TongR.K., OckenfeldC., & HoN.S. (2015). Efficacy of robot-assisted fingers training in chronic stroke survivors: A pilot randomized-controlled trial. Journal of Neuroengeneering and Rehabilitation, 25, 12–42.
44.
StevensonT., ThalmanL., ChristieH., & PoluhaW. (2012). Constraint-induced movement therapy compared to dose-matched interventions for upper-limb dysfunction in adult survivors of stroke: A systematic review with meta-analysis. Physiotherapy Canada, 64, 397–413.
45.
TwitchellT.E. (1951). The restoration of motor function following hemiplegia in man. Brain, 74, 443–480.
46.
VianaR.T., LaurentinoG.E., SouzaR.J., FonsecaJ.B., Silva FilhoE.M., DiasS.N., . . . , Monte-SilvaK.K. (2014). Effects of the addition of transcranial direct current stimulation to virtual reality therapy after stroke: A pilot randomized controlled trial. Neuro Rehabilitation, 34, 437–446.
47.
WilliamsJ.A., ImamuraM., & FregniF. (2009). Updates on the use of non-invasive brain stimulation in physical and rehabilitation medicine. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine41, 305–311.
48.
WuA.D., FregniF., SimonD., DeblieckK., & Pascual-LeoneC.A. (2008). Noninvasive brain stimulation for Parkinson’s disease and dystonia. Neurotherapeutics, 5, 345–361.
49.
WuD., QianL., ZorowitzR.D., ZhangL., QuY., & YuanY. (2013). Effects on decreasing upper-limb poststroke muscle tone using transcranial direct current stimulation: A randomized sham-controlled study. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 94, 1–8.
