Background: A growing body of evidence supports the effectiveness of using transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in patients with chronic hand motor impairment resulting from stroke.
Objective: In this study, we investigate and compare the combined effects of anodal tDCS and occupational therapy (OT) to sham stimulation with OT (control) on fine motor skill deficits of chronic stroke patients.
Methods: A total of 26 stroke patients (at ≥ 9 months) were randomly assigned to an active treatment or a control group in a double-blinded, sham-controlled, parallel design study. Each group received OT for 45 min/day (10 sessions for 2 weeks). Treatment was preceded by either 20 minutes of 2 mA anodal tDCS over ipsilesional M1 or sham tDCS. A modified Jebsen-Taylor Hand Function Test (mJTHFT) was administered as primary outcome measure, and handgrip dynamometer and upper limb Fugl-Meyer (ULFM) assessments were performed as secondary outcomes. The assessment was done at baseline (T0), after the interventions on day 1(T1), day 10 (T2) and day 40 (T3).
Results: We observed a statistically significant effect in the tDCS group when the results were compared to the sham group. The mJTHFT times were significantly shorter immediately after treatment and at day 40. The intervention had no effect on handgrip strength or ULFM score.
Conclusion: Fine motor skill deficits in chronic stroke survivors can be improved when intensive OT is primed with anodal tDCS over the ipsilesional hemisphere.
AckerleyS.J., ByblowW.D., BarberP.A., MacDonaldH., McIntyre-RobinsonA., & StinearC.M. (2016). Primed physical therapy enhances recovery of upper limb function in chronic stroke patients. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 30, 339–348.
2.
AckerleyS.J., StinearC.M., BarberP.A., & ByblowW.D. (2010). Combining theta burst stimulation with training after subcortical stroke. Stroke; a Journal of Cerebral Circulation, 41, 1568–1572.
3.
AdkinsD.L., HsuJ.E., & JonesT.A. (2008). Motor cortical stimulation promotes synaptic plasticity and behavioral improvements following sensorimotor cortex lesions. Experimental Neurology, 212, 14–28.
4.
AgnewP.J., & MaasF. (1982). Hand function related to age and sex. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 63, 269–271.
5.
BindmanL.J., LippoldO.C.J., & RedfearnJ.W.T. (1964). The action of brief polarizing currents on the cerebral cortex of the rat (1) during current flow and (2) in the production of long-lasting after-effects. The Journal of Physiology, 172, 369–382.
6.
BologniniN., VallarG., CasatiC., LatifL.A., El-NazerR., WilliamsJ., ... & FregniF. (2011). Neurophysiological and behavioral effects of tDCS combined with constraint-induced movement therapy in poststroke patients. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 25, 819–829.
7.
BradnamL.V.,
StinearC.M.BarberP.A., & ByblowW.D. (2012). Contralesional hemisphere control of the proximal paretic upper limb following stroke. Cerebral Cortex (New York, N.Y.:1991), 22, 2662–2671.
8.
ChhatbarP.Y., RamakrishnanV., KautzS., GeorgeM.S., AdamsR.J., & FengW. (2016). Transcranial direct current stimulation post-stroke upper extremity motor recovery studies exhibit a dose-response relationship. Brain Stimulation, 9, 16–26.
9.
Di LazzaroV., ProficeP., RanieriF., CaponeF., DileoneM., OlivieroA., & PilatoF. (2012). I-wave origin and modulation. Brain Stimulation, 5, 512–525.
10.
Fugl-MeyerA.R., JääsköL., LeymanI., OlssonS., & SteglindS. (1975). The post-stroke hemiplegic patient. 1. a method for evaluation of physical performance. Scandinavian Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 7, 13–31.
11.
GiacobbeV., KrebsH.I., VolpeB.T., Pascual-LeoneA., RykmanA., ZeiaratiG., ... & EdwardsD.J. (2013). Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and robotic practice in chronic stroke: The dimension of timing. NeuroRehabilitation, 33, 49–56.
12.
GrundeyJ., ThirugnanasambandamN., KaminskyK., DreesA., SkwirbaA.C., LangN., ... & NitscheM.A. (2012). Rapid effect of nicotine intake on neuroplasticity in non-smoking humans. Frontiers in Pharmacology, 3, 186.
13.
GuoY., LoganH.L., GlueckD.H., & MullerK.E. (2013). Selecting a sample size for studies with repeated measures. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 13, 100.
14.
HuangY.-Z., EdwardsM.J., RounisE., BhatiaK.P., & RothwellJ.C. (2005). Theta burst stimulation of the human motor cortex. Neuron, 45, 201–206.
15.
HummelF., CelnikP., GirauxP., FloelA., WuW.-H., GerloffC., & CohenL.G. (2005). Effects of non-invasive cortical stimulation on skilled motor function in chronic stroke. Brain: A Journal of Neurology, 128, 490–499.
16.
JebsenR.H., TaylorN., TrieschmannR.B., TrotterM.J., & HowardL.A. (1969). An objective and standardized test of hand function. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 50, 311–319.
17.
KangN., SummersJ.J., & CauraughJ.H. (2015). Transcranial direct current stimulation facilitates motor learning post-stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry, jnnp-2015-311242.
18.
LanghorneP., CouparF., & PollockA. (2009). Motor recovery after stroke: A systematic review. Lancet Neurology, 8, 741–754.
19.
LefebvreS., DricotL., LalouxP., GradkowskiW., DesfontainesP., EvrardF., ... & VandermeerenY. (2015). Neural substrates underlying stimulation-enhanced motor skill learning after stroke. Brain: A Journal of Neurology, 138, 149–163.
20.
LindenbergR., RengaV., ZhuL.L., NairD., & SchlaugG. (2010). Bihemispheric brain stimulation facilitates motor recovery in chronic stroke patients. Neurology, 75, 2176–2184.
21.
LindenbergR., ZhuL.L., & SchlaugG. (2012). Combined central and peripheral stimulation to facilitate motor recovery after stroke: The effect of number of sessions on outcome. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 26, 479–483.
22.
Monte-SilvaK., KuoM.-F., HessenthalerS., FresnozaS., LiebetanzD., PaulusW., & NitscheM.A. (2013). Induction of late LTP-like plasticity in the human motor cortex by repeated non-invasive brain stimulation. Brain Stimulation, 6, 424–432.
23.
NairD.G., RengaV., LindenbergR., ZhuL., & SchlaugG. (2011). Optimizing recovery potential through simultaneous occupational therapy and non-invasive brain-stimulation using tDCS. Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience, 29, 411–420.
24.
NitscheM.A., FrickeK., HenschkeU., SchlitterlauA., LiebetanzD., LangN., ... & PaulusW. (2003). Pharmacological modulation of cortical excitability shifts induced by transcranial direct current stimulation in humans. The Journal of Physiology, 553, 293–301.
25.
NitscheM.A., LiebetanzD., LangN., AntalA., TergauF., & PaulusW. (2003). Safety criteria for transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in humans. Clinical Neurophysiology, 114, 2220–2222.
26.
NitscheM.A., RothA., KuoM.-F., FischerA.K., LiebetanzD., LangN., ... & PaulusW. (2007). Timing-dependent modulation of associative plasticity by general network excitability in the human motor cortex. The Journal of Neuroscience: The Official Journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 27, 3807–3812.
27.
NitscheM.A., SchauenburgA., LangN., LiebetanzD., ExnerC., PaulusW., & TergauF. (2003). Facilitation of implicit motor learning by weak transcranial direct current stimulation of the primary motor cortex in the human. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 15, 619–626.
28.
NoskinO., KrakauerJ.W., LazarR.M., FestaJ.R., HandyC., O’BrienK.A., & MarshallR.S. (2008). Ipsilateral motor dysfunction from unilateral stroke: Implications for the functional neuroanatomy of hemiparesis. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry, 79, 401–406.
29.
NowakD.A., GrefkesC., AmeliM., & FinkG.R. (2009). Interhemispheric competition after stroke: Brain stimulation to enhance recovery of function of the affected hand. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 23, 641–656.
30.
OldfieldR.C. (1971). The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia, 9, 97–113.
31.
OliveriM., RossiniP.M., PasqualettiP., TraversaR., CicinelliP., PalmieriM.G., ... & CaltagironeC. (1999). Interhemispheric asymmetries in the perception of unimanual and bimanual cutaneous stimuli A study using transcranial magnetic stimulation. Brain, 122, 1721–1729.
32.
PurpuraD.P., & McMurtryJ.G. (1965). Intracellular activities and evoked potential changes during polarization of motor cortex. J Neurophysiol, 28, 166–185.
33.
ReisJ., SchambraH.M., CohenL.G., BuchE.R., FritschB., ZarahnE., ... & KrakauerJ.W. (2009). Noninvasive cortical stimulation enhances motor skill acquisition over multiple days through an effect on consolidation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106, 1590–1595.
34.
StinearC.M., BarberP.A., SmaleP.R., CoxonJ.P., FlemingM.K., & ByblowW.D. (2007). Functional potential in chronic stroke patients depends on corticospinal tract integrity. Brain: A Journal of Neurology, 130, 170–180.
35.
TraversaR., CicinelliP., BassiA., RossiniP.M., & BernardiG. (1997). Mapping of motor cortical reorganization after stroke: A brain stimulation study with focal magnetic pulses. Stroke, 28, 110–117.
36.
VianaR.T., LaurentinoG.E.C., SouzaR.J.P., FonsecaJ.B., Silva FilhoE.M., DiasS.N., ... & Monte-SilvaK.K. (2014). Effects of the addition of transcranial direct current stimulation to virtual reality therapy after stroke: A pilot randomized controlled trial. NeuroRehabilitation, 34, 437–446.
37.
WardN.S. (2005). Mechanisms underlying recovery of motor function after stroke. Postgrad Med J, 81, 510–514.
38.
WardN.S., NewtonJ.M., SwayneO.B.C., LeeL., ThompsonA.J., GreenwoodR.J., ... & FrackowiakR.S.J. (2006). Motor system activation after subcortical stroke depends on corticospinal system integrity. Brain, 129, 809–819.
39.
WelmerA.-K., HolmqvistL.W., & SommerfeldD.K. (2008). Limited fine hand use after stroke and its association with other disabilities. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 40, 603–608.
40.
WuD., QianL., ZorowitzR.D., ZhangL., QuY., & YuanY. (2013). Effects on decreasing upper-limb poststroke muscle tone using transcranial direct current stimulation: A randomized sham-controlled study. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 94, 1–8.
41.
ZimermanM., HeiseK.F., HoppeJ., CohenL.G., GerloffC., & HummelF.C. (2012). Modulation of training by single-session transcranial direct current stimulation to the intact motor cortex enhances motor skill acquisition of the paretic hand. Stroke; a Journal of Cerebral Circulation, 43, 2185–2191.
