This mixed methods study explored older adults’ experience using a bespoke active computer gaming (ACG) system designed to deliver falls prevention exercise.
METHODS:
Usability, acceptability and safety were evaluated through observation of system use, questionnaires, in-system ratings, and semi-structured interviews. Quantitative and qualitative data were synthesised concurrently to provide a deeper understanding of older adults’ experience with the system.
RESULTS:
N = 7 older adults (aged 73–88 years, most with increased fear of falling, and over half with reduced physical functioning) completed up to six uses of the system. Observations and qualitative feedback suggested that older adults’ experience with the system was influenced by physical health changes associated with ageing. Overall feedback after using the system was positive. Social support, from either the clinician or a peer, was a key theme influencing experience.
CONCLUSIONS:
Findings suggested that autonomous use of the system may not be feasible given the requirement and preference for social support.
O’LoughlinJL, RobitailleY, BoivinJF, SuissaS. Incidence of and risk factors for falls and injurious falls among the community-dwelling elderly. American Journal of Epidemiology. 1993;137(3):342–54.
2.
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Falls: Assessment and prevention of falls in older people, NICE CG161, United Kingdom; 2013.
3.
SherringtonC, FairhallNJ, WallbankGK, TiedemannA, MichaleffZA, HowardK, ClemsonL, HopewellS, LambSE. Exercise for preventing falls in older people living in the community. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2019(1).
4.
FrancoMR, TongA, HowardK, SherringtonC, FerreiraPH, PintoRZ, FerreiraML. Older people’s perspectives on participation in physical activity: a systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative literature. British Journal of Sports Medicine. 2015;49(19):1268–76.
5.
ShahidZ, KalayanamitraR, McClaffertyB, KepkoD, RamgobinD, PatelR, AggarwalCS, VunnamR, SahuN, BhattD, JonesK. COVID-19 and older adults: what we know. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. 2020;68(5):926–9.
Aubertin-LeheudreM and RollandY. The importance of physical activity to care for frail older adults during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Post-Acute and Long-term Care Medicine. 2020;21(7):973–76.
9.
HowesSC, CharlesDK, MarleyJ, PedlowK and McDonoughSM. Gaming for health: systematic review and meta-analysis of the physical and cognitive effects of active computer gaming in older adults. Physical Therapy. 2017;97(12):1122–37.
10.
HowesSC, CharlesDK, PedlowK, WilsonI, HolmesD and McDonoughSM. “User-centred design of an active computer gaming system for strength and balance exercises for older adults”. Journal of Enabling Technologies. 2019;13(2):101–11.
11.
NawazA, SkjæretN, HelbostadJL, VereijkenB, BoultonE, SvanaesD. Usability and acceptability of balance exergames in older adults: A scoping review. Health Informatics Journal. 2016;22(4):911–31.
12.
DabbsAD, MyersBA, Mc CurryKR, Dunbar-JacobJ, HawkinsRP, BegeyA, DewMA. User-centered design and interactive health technologies for patients. Computers, informatics, nursing: CIN. 2009;27(3):175.
13.
ProffittR, LangeB. User Centered Design and Development of a Game for Exercise in Older Adults. International Journal of Technology, Knowledge & Society. 2012;8(5):95–112.
14.
BroxE, KonstantinidisST, EvertsenG. User-centered design of serious games for older adults following 3 years of experience with exergames for seniors: a study design. JMIR Serious Games. 2017;5(1):e6254.
15.
CampbellAJ, RobertsonMC. Otago exercise programme to prevent falls in older adults. Wellington, New Zealand: ACC Thinksafe; 2003.
16.
ThomasS, ReadingJ, ShephardRJ. Revision of the physical activity readiness questionnaire (PAR-Q). Canadian Journal of Sport Sciences. 1992;17(4):338–45.
17.
FolsteinMF, FolsteinSE, McHughPR. “Mini-mental state”: a practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal of Psychiatric Research. 1975;12(3):189–98.
18.
GuralnikJM, SimonsickEM, FerrucciL, GlynnRJ, BerkmanLF, BlazerDG, ScherrPA, WallaceRB. A short physical performance battery assessing lower extremity function: association with self-reported disability and prediction of mortality and nursing home admission. Journal of Gerontology. 1994;49(2):M85–94.
19.
BergKO, Wood-DauphineeSL, WilliamsJI, MakiB. Measuring balance in the elderly: validation of an instrument. Canadian Journal of Public Health=Revue Canadienne De Sante Publique. 1992;83, S7–11.
20.
BergK, Wood-DauphineeS, WilliamsJI. The Balance Scale: reliability assessment with elderly residents and patients with an acute stroke. Scandinavian Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine. 1995;27(1):27–36.
21.
YardleyL, BeyerN, HauerK, KempenG, Piot-ZieglerC, ToddC. Development and initial validation of the Falls Efficacy Scale-International (FES-I). Age and Ageing. 2005;34(6):614–9.
22.
FriedmanB, HeiselMJ, DelavanRL. Psychometric properties of the 15-item geriatric depression scale in functionally impaired, cognitively intact, community-dwelling elderly primary care patients. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. 2005;53(9):1570–6.
23.
BrookeJ. System usability scale (SUS). Usability Evaluation in Industry. London: Taylor and Francis; 1996.
24.
BangorA, KortumPT, MillerJT. An empirical evaluation of the System Usability Scale. International Journal of Human Computer Interactions. 2008;24, 574–94.
25.
KortumPT, BangorA. Usability ratings for everyday products measured with the system usability scale. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction. 2013;29(2):67–76.
26.
YardleyL, Donovan-HallM, FrancisK, ToddC. Older people’s views of advice about falls prevention: a qualitative study. Health Education Research. 2006;21(4):508–17.
27.
YardleyL, Donovan-HallM, FrancisK, ToddC. Attitudes and beliefs that predict older people’s intention to undertake strength and balance training. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences. 2007;62(2):P119–25.
28.
DavisFD. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly. 1989;:319-40.
29.
VaziriDD, AalK, OgonowskiC, Von RekowskiT, KrollM, MarstonHR, PovedaR, GschwindYJ, DelbaereK, WiechingR, WulfV. Exploring user experience and technology acceptance for a fall prevention system: results from a randomized clinical trial and a living lab. European Review of Aging and Physical Activity. 2016;13(1):1–9.
30.
CavillNA, FosterCE. Enablers and barriers to older people’s participation in strength and balance activities: A review of reviews. Journal of Frailty, Sarcopenia and Falls. 2018;3(2):105.
31.
GerlingK, LivingstonI, NackeL, MandrykR. Full-body motion-based game interaction for older adults. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. 2012 May 5:1873-1882.
32.
CzajaSJ, CharnessN, FiskAD, HertzogC, NairSN, RogersWA, SharitJ. Factors predicting the use of technology: findings from the Center for Research and Education on Aging and Technology Enhancement (CREATE). Psychology and Aging. 2006;21(2):333.
33.
IjsselsteijnW, NapHH, de KortY, PoelsK. Digital game design for elderly users. In Proceedings of the 2007 conference on Future Play. 2007;Nov 14:17-22.
34.
FiskD, RogersW, CharnessN, CzajaS, SharitJ. Principles and creative human factors approaches, Second Edition. Florida: Human Factors and Aging Series; 2009.
35.
De GrootGC, FagerströmL. Older adults’ motivating factors and barriers to exercise to prevent falls. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy. 2011;18(2):153–60.
36.
Barbosa NevesB, FranzR, JudgesR, BeermannC, BaeckerR. Can digital technology enhance social connectedness among older adults? A feasibility study. Journal of Applied Gerontology. 2019;38(1):49–72.
37.
CzajaSJ, BootWR, CharnessN, RogersWA, SharitJ. Improving social support for older adults through technology: Findings from the PRISM randomized controlled trial. The Gerontologist. 2018;58(3):467–77.
