Abstract
Objectives:
To determine whether a community-based, interdisciplinary, traumatic brain injury (TBI) team was more beneficial than existing services, and whether Early was better than Late intervention.
Design:
Subjects were consecutive hospital admissions. Assignment, to pre-discharge (Early), post-discharge (Late) intervention or control condition (existing services only), was by a prespecified timetable. Outcomes were compared at six months post-injury using logistic regression analyses.
Results:
104 (73%) of those eligible participated. Adjusting for potential confounding factors confirmed a clinically plausible superior outcome for both intervention groups compared to the control group in some areas but not others. These were not statistically significant (p>0.01).
Conclusions:
The lack of evidence of effectiveness must be treated with caution due to limitations with certain design issues (e.g. statistical power). Analysis of intervention data suggested that team-working took place but lack of experience may have hindered their efficacy at identifying all those in need of intervention.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.