The influence of Task-Related Training combined with Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation on paretic upper limb muscle activation in patients with chronic stroke
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online May 4, 2017
The influence of Task-Related Training combined with Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation on paretic upper limb muscle activation in patients with chronic stroke
OBJECTIVES: This study investigated the efficacy of Task-Related Training (TRT) Combined with Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) on the improvement of upper limb muscle activation in chronic stroke survivors with mild or moderate paresis.
METHODS: A single-blind, randomized clinical trial was conducted with 46stroke survivors with chronic paresis. They were randomly allocated two groups: the TRT+TENS group (n = 23) and the TRT+ placebo TENS (TRT+PLBO) group (n = 23). The TRT+TENS group received 30 minutes of high-frequency TENS on wrist and elbow extensors, while the TRT+PLBO group received placebo TENS that was not real ES. Both groups did 30 minutes of TRT after TENS application. Intervention was given five days a week for four weeks. The primary outcomes of upper limb muscle activation were measured by integrated EMG (IEMG), a digital manual muscle tester for muscle strength, active range of motion (AROM) and Fugl-Meyer Assessment of the upper extremity (FMA-UE). The measurements were performed before and after the 4 weeks intervention period.
RESULTS: Both groups demonstrated significant improvements of outcomes in IEMG, AROM, muscle strength and FMA-UE during intervention period. When compared with the TRT+PLBO group, the TRT+TENS group showed significantly greater improvement in muscle activation (wrist extensors, P = 0.045; elbow extensors, P = 0.004), muscle strength (wrist extensors, P = 0.044; elbow extensors, P = 0.012), AROM (wrist extension, P = 0.042; elbow extensors, P = 0.040) and FMA-UE (total, P < 0.001; shoulder/elbow/forearm, P = 0.001; wrist, P = 0.002; coordination, P = 0.008) at the end of intervention.
CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate that TRT Combined with TENS can improve paretic muscle activity in upper limb paresis, highlighting the benefits of somatosensory stimulation from TENS.
BlouinJ. S., WalshL. D., NickollsP., & GandeviaS. C. (2009). High-frequency submaximal stimulation over muscle evokes centrally generated forces in human upper limb skeletal muscles. J Appl Physiol, 106(2), 370–377.
2.
CarrJ. H., & ShepherdR. B. (1998). Neurological Rehabilitation: Optimizing Motor Performance. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.
3.
CharltonC. S., RiddingM. C., ThompsonP. D., & MilesT. S. (2003). Prolonged peripheral nerve stimulation induces persistentchanges in excitability of human motor cortex. J Neurol Sci, 208(1-2), 79–85.
4.
ConfortoA. B., CohenL. G., dos SantosR. L., ScaffM., & MarieS. K. (2007). Effects of somatosensory stimulation on motor function in chronic cortico-subcortical strokes. J Neurol, 254(3), 333–339.
5.
DeanC. M., & ShepherdR. B. (1997). Task-related training improves the performance of seated reaching tasks after stroke. A randomized controlled trial. Stroke, 28(4), 722–728.
6.
DicksteinR., & KafriM. (2008). Effects of antecedent TENS on EMG activity of the finger flexor muscles and on grip force. Somatosens Mot Res, 25(2), 139–146.
7.
FloelA., HummelF., DuqueJ., KnechtS. & CohenL. G. (2008). Influence of somatosensory input on interhemispheric interactions in patients with chronic stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair, 22(5), 477–485.
8.
GolaszewskiS., KremserC. H., WagnerM., FelberS., AichnerF. & DimitrijevicM. M. (1999). Functional magnetic resonance imaging of the human motor cortex before and after whole-hand afferent electrical stimulation. Scand J Rehabil Med, 31(3), 165–173.
9.
HermensH. J., FreriksB., MerlettiR., StegemanD., BlokJ., RauG., Disselhorst-KlugC., & HäggG. (1999). European recommendations for surface electromyography: Results of the SENIAM project. Roessingh Research and Development, Enschede, The Netherlands.
10.
KimT. H., InT. S., & ChoH. Y. (2013). Task-related training combined with transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation promotes upper limb functions in patients with chronic stroke. Tohoku J Exp Med, 231(2), 93–100.
11.
KrahnG. L. (2011). WHO World Report on Disability: A review. Disabil Health J, 4(3), 141–142.
12.
MichaelsenS. M., DannenbaumR., & LevinM. F. (2006). Task-specific training with trunk restraint on arm recovery in stroke: Randomized control trial. Stroke, 37(1), 186–192.
13.
NgS. S., & Hui-ChanC. W. (2007) Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation combined with task-related training improves lower limb functions in subjects with chronic stroke. Stroke, 38(11), 2953–2959.
14.
O’DellM. W., LinC. C., & HarrisonV. (2009). Stroke rehabilitation: Strategies to enhance motor recovery. Annu Rev Med, 60, 55–68.
15.
ParkerV. M., WadeD. T., & Langton HewerR. (1986). Loss of arm function after stroke: Measurement, frequency, and recovery. Int Rehabil Med, 8(2), 69–73.
16.
PrabhakaranS., ZarahnE., RileyC., SpeizerA., ChongJ. Y., LazarR. M., MarshallR. S., & KrakauerJ. M. (2008). Inter-individual variability in the capacity for motor recovery after ischemic stroke. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 22(1), 64–71.
17.
RakelB., CooperN., AdamsH. J., MesserB. R., Frey LawL. A., DannenD. R., MillerC. A., PolehnaA. C., RuggleR. C., VanceC. G., WalshD. M., & SlukaK. A. (2010). A new transient sham TENS device allows for investigator blinding while delivering a true placebo treatment. J Pain, 11(3), 230–238.
18.
RiddingM. C., BrouwerB., MilesT. S., PitcherJ. B., & Thompson, P. D. (2000). Changes in muscle responses to stimulation of the motor cortex induced by peripheral nerve stimulation in human subjects. Exp Brain Res, 131(1), 135–143.
19.
SiebersA., ObergU., & SkargrenE. (2010). The effect of modified constraint-induced movement therapy on spasticity and motor function of the affected arm in patients with chronic stroke. Physiother Can, 62(4), 388–396.
20.
SondeL., GipC., FernaeusS. E., NilssonC. G., & ViitanenM. (1998). Stimulation with low frequency (1.7Hz) transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation (low-tens) increases motor function of the post-stroke paretic arm. Scand J Rehabil Med, 30(2), 95–99.
21.
SondeL., KalimoH., FernaeusS. E., & ViitanenM. (2001). Low TENS treatment on post-stroke paretic arm: A three-year follow-up. Clin Rehabil, 15(5), 545–551.
22.
TinazziM., ZarattiniS., ValerianiM., RomitoS., FarinaS., MorettoG., SmaniaN., FiaschiA., & AbbruzzeseG. (2005). Long-lasting modulation of human motor cortex following prolonged transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) of forearm muscles: Evidence of reciprocal inhibition and facilitation. Exp Brain Res, 161(4), 457–464.
23.
TysonS. F., Sadeghi-DemnehE., & NesterC. J. (2013). The effects of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation on strength, proprioception, balance and mobility in people with stroke: A randomized controlled cross-over trial. ClinRehabil, 27(9), 785–91.
24.
WuC. W., SeoH. J., & CohenL. G. (2006). Influence of electric somatosensory stimulation on paretic-hand function in chronic stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 87(3), 351–357.
25.
WuC. W., van GelderenP., HanakawaT., YaseenZ., & CohenL. G. (2005). Enduring representational plasticity after somatosensory stimulation. Neuroimage, 27(4), 872–884.
