BACKGROUND: Stroke patients develop compensatory movements due to limitations of ankle dorsiflexion and knee flexion. To solve the limitations, there are many adjustable walking assistive devices such as robotic devices, ankle-foot orthoses, and functional electric stimulation in rehabilitation session. However, these assistive devices have some disadvantages, including expense and discomforts. Therefore, the development of a new assistive device for stroke patients is needed to assist ankle dorsiflexion and knee flexion.
OBJECTIVE: This study investigated the effects of a wearable tubing assistive walking device (WTAWD) on gait parameters (gait speed, cadence, and step length and stride length on affected and less affected sides) in patients with stroke.
METHODS: Gait parameters were measured using the GAITRite system. One-way repeated measures analysis of variance was used to determine gait differences under three conditions (WTAWD, barefoot, and conventional elastic band orthosis).
RESULTS: Gait speed, cadence, and step length and stride length on both affected and less affected sides were significantly greater with WTAWD, compared to barefoot and conventional elastic band orthosis conditions.
CONCLUSION: WTAWD could be effective for patients with stroke.
AbeH., MichimataA., SugawaraK., SugayaN., & IzumiS. (2009). Improving gait stability in stroke hemiplegic patients with a plastic ankle-foot orthosis. Tohoku J Exp Med, 218(3), 193–199.
2.
AlexanderR. M. (1991). Energy-saving mechanisms in walking and running. J Exp Biol, 160, 55–69.
3.
BalasubramanianC. K., BowdenM. G., NeptuneR. R., & KautzS. A. (2007). Relationship between step length asymmetry and walking performance in subjects with chronic hemiparesis. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 88(1), 43–49.
4.
BartonekA., ErikssonM., & Gutierrez-FarewikE. M. (2007). A new carbon fibre spring orthosis for children with plantarflexor weakness. Gait Posture, 25(4), 652–656. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2006.07.013
5.
BensoussanL., MathelinA., VitonJ.-M., ColladoH., & DelarqueA. (2010). Improvement of gait in a stroke patient. A 7-year longitudinal study. Disability and Rehabilitation, 32(20), 1705–1711.
6.
CapadayC. (2002). The special nature of human walking and its neural control. Trends in Neurosciences, 25(7), 370–376.
7.
ChenC.-L., ChenH.-C., TangS. F.-T., WuC.-Y., ChengP.-T., & HongW.-H. (2003). Gait performance with compensatory adaptations in stroke patients with different degrees of motor recovery. American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, 82(12), 925–935.
8.
ChenG., PattenC., KothariD. H., & ZajacF. E. (2005). Gait differences between individuals with post-stroke hemiparesis and non-disabled controls at matched speeds. Gait & Posture, 22(1), 51–56.
9.
ChenI. H., YangY. R., ChanR. C., & WangR. Y. (2014). Turning-based treadmill training improves turning performance and gait symmetry after stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair, 28(1), 45–55. doi: 10.1177/1545968313497102
10.
CollenF. M., WadeD. T., & BradshawC. M. (1990). Mobility after stroke: Reliability of measures of impairment and disability. Int Disabil Stud, 12(1), 6–9.
11.
ConesaL., CostaU., MoralesE., EdwardsD. J., CortesM., LeonD., & ...Medina, J. (2012). An observational report of intensive robotic and manual gait training in sub-acute stroke. J Neuroeng Rehabil, 9, 13–doi: 10.1186/1743-0003-9-13
12.
DaherN., LeeS., & YangY. J. (2013). Effects of elastic band orthosis (aider) on balance and gait in chronic stroke patients. Physical Therapy Rehabilitation Science, 2(2), 81–86.
13.
EulerM. (2008). Hooke’s law and material science projects: Exploring energy and entropy springs. Physics Education, 43(1), 57.
14.
FlinnN. A., SmithJ. L., TrippC. J., & WhiteM. W. (2009). Effects of robotic-aided rehabilitation on recovery of upper extremity function in chronic stroke: A single case study. Occupational Therapy International, 16(3-4), 232–243.
15.
FlansbjerU. B., DownhamD., & LexellJ. (2006). Knee muscle strength, gait performance, and perceived participation after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 87(7), 974–980. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2006.03.008
16.
ForresterL. W., RoyA., KrebsH. I., & MackoR. F. (2011). Ankle training with a robotic device improves hemiparetic gait after a stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair, 25(4), 369–377. doi: 10.1177/1545968310388291
17.
FranceschiniM., MassucciM., FerrariL., AgostiM., & ParoliC. (2003). Effects of an ankle-foot orthosis on spatiotemporal parameters and energy cost of hemiparetic gait. Clin Rehabil, 17(4), 368–372.
18.
GattiM. A., FreixesO., FernándezS. A., RivasM. E., CrespoM., WaldmanS. V., & OlmosL. E. (2012). Effects of ankle foot orthosis in stiff knee gait in adults with hemiplegia. Journal of Biomechanics, 45(15), 2658–2661.
19.
GokH., KucukdeveciA., AltinkaynakH., YavuzerG., & ErginS. (2003). Effects of ankle-foot orthoses on hemiparetic gait. Clin Rehabil, 17(2), 137–139.
20.
GoldbergS. R., AndersonF. C., PandyM. G., & DelpS. L. (2004). Muscles that influence knee flexion velocity in double support: Implications for stiff-knee gait. Journal of Biomechanics, 37(8), 1189–1196.
21.
HesseS., LueckeD., JahnkeM. T., & MauritzK. H. (1996). Gait function in spastic hemiparetic patients walking barefoot, with firm shoes, and with ankle-foot orthosis. Int J Rehabil Res, 19(2), 133–141.
22.
HusemannB., MullerF., KrewerC., HellerS., & KoenigE. (2007). Effects of locomotion training with assistance of a robot-driven gait orthosis in hemiparetic patients after stroke: A randomized controlled pilot study. Stroke, 38(2), 349–354. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000254607.48765.cb
23.
HwangY. I., YooW. G., & AnD. H. (2013). Effects of the Elastic Walking Band on gait in stroke patients. NeuroRehabilitation, 32(2), 317–322. doi: 10.3233/NRE-130850
24.
HwangY. I., YooW. G., AnD. H., & HeoH. J. (2013). The effect of an AFO-shaped elastic band on drop-foot gait in patients with central neurological lesions. NeuroRehabilitation, 32(2), 377–383. doi: 10.3233/NRE-130858
25.
IshikawaM., KomiP. V., GreyM. J., LepolaV., & BruggemannG. P. (2005). Muscle-tendon interaction and elastic energy usage in human walking. J Appl Physiol (1985), 99(2), 603–608. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00189.2005
26.
JorgensenH. S., NakayamaH., RaaschouH. O., & OlsenT. S. (1995). Recovery of walking function in stroke patients: The Copenhagen Stroke Study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 76(1), 27–32.
27.
JorgensenH. S., NakayamaH., RaaschouH. O., Vive-LarsenJ., StoierM., & OlsenT. S. (1995). Outcome and time course of recovery in stroke. Part II: Time course of recovery. The Copenhagen Stroke Study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 76(5), 406–412.
28.
KottinkA. I., HermensH. J., NeneA. V., TennigloM. J., van der AaH. E., BuschmanH. P., & IJzermanM. J. (2007). A randomized controlled trial of an implantable 2-channel peroneal nerve stimulator on walking speed and activity in poststroke hemiplegia. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 88(8), 971–978.
29.
KottinkA. I. R., OostendorpL. J. M., BuurkeJ. H., NeneA. V., HermensH. J., & IJzermanM. J. (2004). The orthotic effect of functional electrical stimulation on the improvement of walking in stroke patients with a dropped foot: A systematic review. Artificial Organs, 28(6), 577–586.
30.
KuysS. S., BrauerS. G., & AdaL. (2011). Test-retest reliability of the GAITRite system in people with stroke undergoing rehabilitation. Disabil Rehabil, 33(19-20), 1848–1853. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2010.549895
31.
LehmannJ. F., CondonS. M., PriceR., & deLateurB. J. (1987). Gait abnormalities in hemiplegia: Their correction by ankle-foot orthoses. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 68(11), 763–771.
32.
LiebensonC. (2005). Sensory-motor training— an update. Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies, 9(2), 142–147.
33.
MagoraA., RobinG. C., RozinR., GonenB., & SaltielJ. (1973). Investigation of gait. 5. Effect of a below-knee brace on the contralateral, unbraced leg. Electromyography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 13(3), 355.
34.
MehrholzJ., WernerC., KuglerJ., & PohlM. (2007). Electromechanical-assisted training for walking after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, (4), CD006185. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006185.pub2
35.
innesota. Injury and Violence Prevention Unit.,Minnesota Hospital and Healthcare Partnership., $#x0026; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (U.S.). (2001). Injury-relatedmortality in Minnesota 1990-1999 : Who was injured? what caused the injuries? (disparities by race, age, gender, residence) how can we prevent injury-related mortality? Minnesota: The Unit;.
36.
NolanK. J., SavaliaK. K., YarossiM., & ElovicE. P. (2010). Evaluation of a dynamic ankle foot orthosis in hemiplegic gait: A case report. NeuroRehabilitation, 27(4), 343–350. doi: 10.3233/NRE-2010-0618
37.
OlsenT. (2004). Stroke–Understanding the problem. Paper presented at the Report of a Consensus Conference on the Orthotic Management of Stroke Patients. 1st ed. Copenhagen, Denmark: International Society for Prosthetics and Orthotics.
38.
PageP., LabbeA., & ToppR. V. (2000). Clinical force production of thera-band elastic bands. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther, 30(1), 47–48.
39.
PageP. (2006). Sensorimotor training: A “global” approach for balance training. Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies, 10(1), 77–84.
40.
ParkJ. H., ChunM. H., AhnJ. S., YuJ. Y., & KangS. H. (2009). Comparison of gait analysis between anterior and posterior ankle foot orthosis in hemiplegic patients. American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, 88(8), 630–634.
41.
PatilP., & RaoS. (2011). Effects of Thera-Band® elastic resistance-assisted gait training in stroke patients: A pilot study. European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, 47(3), 427–433.
42.
PerryJ., & BurnfieldJ. M. (2010), Gait analysis: Normal and pathological function. 2nd ed.
43.
PiazzaS. J., & DelpS. L. (1996). The influence of muscles on knee flexion during the swing phase of gait. Journal of Biomechanics, 29(6), 723–733.
44.
PlattsM. M., RaffertyD., & PaulL. (2006). Metabolic cost of over ground gait in younger stroke patients and healthy controls. Med Sci Sports Exerc, 38(6), 1041–1046. doi: 10.1249/01.mss.0000222829.34111.9c
45.
PyoS., YoonJ., & OhM.-K. (2014). A novel robotic knee device with stance control and its kinematic weight optimization for rehabilitation. Robotica, 32(08), 1245–1263.
46.
RaoN., ChaudhuriG., HassoD., D’SouzaK., WeningJ., CarlsonC., & AruinA. S. (2008). Gait assessment during the initial fitting of an ankle foot orthosis in individuals with stroke. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol, 3(4), 201–207. doi: 10.1080/17483100801973023
47.
RichardsC. L., MalouinF., & DeanC. (1999). Gait in stroke: Assessment and rehabilitation. Clin Geriatr Med, 15(4), 833–855.
48.
RichieD. H.Jr (2007). Effects of foot orthoses on patients with chronic ankle instability. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc, 97(1), 19–30.
49.
SimkinA., RobinG. C., MagoraA., RozinR., GonenB., & SaltielJ. (1973). Investigation of gait. 6. Relationship between muscle action and mechanical stresses in below-knee braces. Electromyography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 13(5), 495.
50.
ShinY. (2013). Effect of elastic tubing gait on knee joint muscle activity in children with cerebral palsy, Graduate School, Yonsei University, Wonju.
51.
SulzerJ. S., GordonK. E., DhaherY. Y., PeshkinM. A., & PattonJ. L. (2010). Preswing knee flexion assistance is coupled with hip abduction in people with stiff-knee gait after stroke. Stroke, 41(8), 1709–1714.
52.
TitianovaE. B., PitkanenK., PaakkonenA., SiveniusJ., & TarkkaI. M. (2003). Gait characteristics and functional ambulation profile in patients with chronic unilateral stroke. Am J Phys Med Rehabil, 82(10), 778–786. quiz 787-779, 823.doi: 10.1097/01.PHM.0000087490.74582.E0
53.
TombaughT. N. (2005). Test-retest reliable coefficients and 5-year change scores for the MMSE and 3MS. Arch Clin Neuropsychol, 20(4), 485–503. doi: 10.1016/j.acn.2004.11.004
54.
TysonS. F., & RogersonL. (2009). Assistive walking devices in nonambulant patients undergoing rehabilitation after stroke: The effects on functional mobility, walking impairments, and patients’ opinion. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 90(3), 475–479. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2008.09.563
55.
TysonS. F., & ThorntonH. A. (2001). The effect of a hinged ankle foot orthosis on hemiplegic gait: Objective measures and users’ opinions. Clin Rehabil, 15(1), 53–58.
56.
Van GestelL., MolenaersG., HuenaertsC., SeylerJ., & DesloovereK. (2008). Effect of dynamic orthoses on gait: A retrospective control study in children with hemiplegia. Dev Med Child Neurol, 50(1), 63–67. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.2007.02014.x
57.
WangR. Y., LinP. Y., LeeC. C., & YangY. R. (2007). Gait and balance performance improvements attributable to ankle-foot orthosis in subjects with hemiparesis. Am J Phys Med Rehabil, 86(7), 556–562. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0b013e31806dd0d3
58.
WebsterK. E., WittwerJ. E., & FellerJ. A. (2005). Validity of the GAITRite walkway system for the measurement of averaged and individual step parameters of gait. Gait Posture, 22(4), 317–321. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2004.10.005
59.
WernerC., LindquistA. R., BardelebenA., & HesseS. (2007). The influence of treadmill inclination on the gait of ambulatory hemiparetic subjects. Neurorehabil Neural Repair, 21(1), 76–80. doi: 10.1177/1545968306289958
60.
WongC. K., BishopL., & SteinJ. (2012). A wearable robotic knee orthosis for gait training: A case-series of hemiparetic stroke survivors. Prosthetics and Orthotics International, 36(1), 113–120.
