Abstract
The concept of frailty refers to heterogeneity in the risk of adverse outcomes for people of the same age. It is traditionally thought of as the inability of the body to maintain homeostasis. It can help explain differences between chronological and biological age and can quantify healthspan in experimental studies. Although clinical studies have developed tools to quantify frailty over the past two decades, preclinical models of frailty have only recently been introduced. This review describes the notion of frailty and outlines two commonly used clinical approaches to quantify frailty: the frailty phenotype and the frailty index. Translation of these methodologies for use in animals is introduced and studies that use these models to evaluate interventions designed to attenuate or exacerbate frailty are discussed. These include studies involving manipulation of diet, implementation of exercise regimens and tests of pharmaceutical agents to exacerbate or attenuate frailty. Together, this body of work suggests that preclinical frailty assessment tools are a valuable new resource to quantify the impact of interventions on overall health. Future studies could deploy these models to evaluate new frailty therapies, test combinations of interventions and assess interventions to enhance the ability to resist stressors in the setting of ageing.
Introduction
The number of people aged 60 and older is incre-asing worldwide at an unprecedented rate, so that between 2015 and 2050 the percentage of people in this age group will rise from 12 to 22%[1]. Older individuals accumulate health deficits with age, from the subcellular and cellular levels through to the organ and system levels [2]. These deficits increase an individual’s susceptibility to environmental and phy-siological stressors, which can affect their overall health [3, 4]. In other words, this can compromise healthspan, which can be defined as the portion of an individual’s life spent in generally good health [3]. Vulnerable older people pose challenges in terms of health management, as they have higher rates of adverse health outcomes than do people of the same age who do not have multiple health deficits [4–6]. This is an emerging global health challenge.
The notion that there is heterogeneity in the risk of death in people of the same age was termed “frailty” by demographers in the 1970’s [7]. In clinical practice, the term frailty refers to variability in the risk of adverse outcomes for people of the same age. Since 2001, two approaches to its measurement predominate, with frailty as either a specific syndrome [8] or as a vulnerability state arising from a range of health deficits [9]. The latter can be quantified across the life course as the age-related accumulation of health deficits [2, 10]. The ability to measure frailty provides a valuable tool to quantify underlying heterogeneity in individual health status and predict mortality risk [11]. Because frailty can increase the risk of adverse outcomes including death in older people, strategies that can delay or prevent frailty can improve the quality of life and life expectancy in older people.
Interventions including drug therapies, exercise, and dietary modifications have been proposed to att-enuate ageing, frailty and associated mortality [12–14]. These strategies have recently been investigated in various preclinical models, especially rodents as they are mammals with a relatively short lifespan [15, 16]. Rodents exhibit many deleterious changes in physical appearance, activity levels, strength, cognitive function and behaviour patterns with age [17–22]. These characteristics make them a good choice for preclinical studies designed to investigate frailty and its prevention. In addition, a number of preclinical frailty models have now been developed [15] and used in intervention studies [23]. These investigations have begun to shed light on novel interventions that may be translated to humans [23]. Here we will first review animal models of frailty and then focus on interventions tested in these models that have the potential to treat frail older adults in the future.
Frailty Measurement
Frailty assessment in humans
Efforts to quantify frailty in clinical practice have used two distinct operational approaches [8, 9]. The frailty phenotype approach was first proposed by Fried and colleagues in 2001 [8]. This approach assesses an individual’s frailty level based on the presence of five criteria: unintentional weight loss, self-reported exhaustion, low grip strength, slow walking speed, and low physical activity [8]. An individual is considered “frail” if they show poor performance in three or more of these criteria [8]. Those with poor performance in one or two criteria are deemed “prefrail” and those with good performance on all measures are considered “robust” [8].
A second common clinical method evaluates frailty with a frailty index. This approach measures the number of health deficits accumulated with increasing age [9, 24]. A frailty index score is created by measuring the number of health deficits in an individual and dividing this by the total number of health deficits considered. If a sufficiently large number of deficits is considered (e.g.>30), the score becomes independent of the precise nature of the items considered [25]. It produces a numerical score between 0 to 1, where values close to “0” indicate low frailty and higher values denote increasing levels of frailty [9]. A frailty index is created from clinical signs and symptoms that can be viewed as health deficits, although a frailty index based solely on standard laboratory tests (called the FI-Lab) has also been developed [26]. There is a sub-maximal limit to frailty, and those with scores near 0.7 cannot survive additional deficits [27].
Although the frailty phenotype and frailty index predict mortality in older individuals [8, 24], there are differences in these two approaches [28]. A key difference is that the frailty phenotype assesses physical frailty only [8]. In contrast, the frailty index measures health deficits across a wide range of systems beyond just physical strength and activity [9, 24]. Still, these two approaches are widely used as clinical frailty assessment tools [29–31]. Other clinical frailty assessment tools including the Tilburg Frailty Index, the FRAIL scale, the Frailty Trait Scale, and the Groningen Frailty Indicator, are described in a recent review [32]. However, only the frailty phenotype and frailty index approaches have been reverse-translated into animal models, as discussed next.
Frailty assessment in laboratory animals
A range of approaches have been used to investigate frailty in preclinical models. Some studies have focused on physical frailty and sarcopenia to develop specialized neuromuscular scoring systems for use in mice [17]. Others have used genetically manipulated animals such as interleukin-10 (IL-10tm/tm) and Cu/Zn superoxide dismutase (Sod1 KO) knockout mice [33, 34]. In addition, the frailty phenotype and frailty index approaches have been recently adapted for use in ageing animals. These tools can not only help us understand the biology of frailty, but they provide a platform for the development of new frailty interventions.
The neuromuscular healthspan scoring system
The loss of muscle mass and strength with age is known as sarcopenia, a condition that is closely associated with physical frailty in older people [35]. Graber and colleagues developed a neuromuscular healthspan scoring system (NMHSS) to quantify age- related sarcopenia in ageing mice [17]. This scoring system evaluates muscle contractility and physical strength in individual mice; results show that force production and strength decline with age although there is considerable heterogeneity [17]. The authors suggest that the NMHSS is a sensitive method to assess physical frailty in ageing, where inter-individual variation can limit the true evaluation of neuromuscular health [17]. Although this is a useful approach, the NMHSS is time-consuming, requires specialized equipment and the evaluation of muscle contractility is invasive [17]. Therefore, simpler, less invasive approaches to frailty assessment in animals have been developed.
Frailty assessment in animals based on the frailty phenotype
The frailty phenotype was first operationalized in 27-28 month-old male C57BL/6 mice by employing criteria similar to those used for human frailty phenotype assessment [36]. Grip strength, walking speed, physical activity and endurance are assessed in individual mice by setting a cut off value of 1.5 SD below the cohort mean for each criterion. Animals that fall below the cut-off for three of criteria are considered frail, two criteria below are considered mildly frail and fewer than two are considered robust. Comparative analysis shows that the prevalence of frailty is 9%in mice at this age, which is comparable to the prevalence in humans at similar survival ages [36].
These four physical frailty criteria (grip strength, endurance, walking speed, and physical activity) have also been used to quantify frailty in 17-month old male Fischer 344 rats [37]. Rats in the lowest 20%of performance on three or more tests are considered frail. Those in the lowest 20%on two tests are considered mildly-frail and those in the lowest 20%on fewer than two tests are non-frail [37]. The percentage of rats identified as frail (2.3%) in this study is lower than that reported by Liu and colleagues [36, 37]. However, the rats were tested at an age with more than 90%survival, while mice were tested at an age with only 50%survival, so it is not surprising that their frailty prevalence was lower [36, 37]. Thus, both tools identify animals as frail consistent with studies that use the phenotype approach in people [36, 37].
Interestingly, both of these rodent studies omitted the clinically relevant criterion of weight loss [36, 37]. It is possible that these studies did not assess weight loss because they were cross-sectional in design. However, even in a cross-sectional study it may be possible to assess this outcome by comparing an individual’s weight to mean values for mice of the same age and sex. As weight loss is a key component of the frailty phenotype in people [8, 9], other investigators have added this variable to frailty phenotype scoring in animals. For example, the Valencia score is a five-item frailty phenotype instrument for mice that uses weight loss as one component of the scale [38]. These authors show that the Valencia score identifies premature ageing as frailty and that Valencia scores predict lifespan in ageing male mice [39].
Baumann and colleagues evaluated frailty in 14–37 month-old male C57BL/6 mice with a tool that included body weight as well as walking speed, stre-ngth, endurance and physical activity [40]. However, they used weight gain rather than weight loss as a criterion for frailty [40]. Even with weight gain as a criterion, they found that frailty could be seen as early as 17 months, its prevalence increased with age, and frailer mice had higher mortality [40]. Similar results were seen in female mice, where the frailty phenotype also predicted mortality [41]. This work used high body weight as a frailty criterion [40], unlike human frailty phenotype studies where unintentional weight loss is considered a key component of frailty [8, 9]. With respect to weight gain and its relationship to frailty, it is worth noting that some performance measures in mice may need to be adjusted for body mass prior to evaluating frailty with the frailty phenotype approach. Weight gain might also indicate the development of maladaptive organ hypertrophy and/or tumours, which could exacerbate frailty in older animals. It also would be fascinating to compare frailty in mice with low and high body weights, by measuring frailty with a frailty index instrument as outlined later in this review.
One limitation of the frailty phenotype studies in rodents discussed so far is that they used only one sex, typically males. Sex is an important factor that influences the degree of frailty observed in clinical studies [42, 43]. For instance, although women have higher frailty scores than men at any age, they live longer [42, 43]. This so-called morbidity-mortality paradox is compelling, although the underlying mechanisms are unclear. To determine whether this could be detected in animals, male and female C57BL/6 mice were assessed with a five-parameter frailty phenotype instrument [44]. They found that, although the prevalence of frailty increased with age in both sexes, it was greater in 26-month-old females than in males of the same age [44]. However, the females died earlier than the males in this study, so when frailty scores were normalized by mean lifespan there were no sex differences in frailty [44]. This may indicate differences between humans and animal models, although additional studies to explore this are certainly warranted.
The five component frailty phenotype approach has been adapted for use in companion animals [45]. These investigators explored age-associated changes and mortality in domestic dogs of both sexes [45]. The five components modelled after the human instrument include chronic undernutrition, exhaustion, low physical activity level, poor mobility, and weakness [45]. Dogs with two or more of these frailty components are considered frail while those with 1 or less are non-frail [45]. Critically, they show that higher frailty scores increase the risk of death [45].
Together, these observations show that the frailty phenotype is a flexible and potentially powerful instrument that can be used for frailty assessment and mortality prediction not only in humans but in other species including rodents and dogs. As in human work [46], preclinical studies with various modifications to the frailty phenotype tool demonstrate increased risk of adverse outcomes with higher levels of frailty.
Experimental knockout models of frailty
The biological basis for frailty is not well understood, although mechanisms involved in the ageing process including inflammation and oxidative stress have been implicated [16]. Indeed, genetically engineered interleukin (IL)-10 (IL-10tm/tm) and Cu/Zn superoxide dismutase (Sod1KO) knockout mice [33, 34] have been proposed as frailty models. These models rely on the inflammation and oxidative stress-associated mechanisms implicated in frailty [47] to mimic aspects of age-associated frailty in people [33, 34].
In the IL-10tm/tm mouse, the anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10 is knocked out, which results in en-hanced circulating levels of the proinflammatory cytokine IL-6 [33]. These mice exhibit muscle weakness and changes in the expression of genes associated with muscle energetics and apoptosis [33]. IL-10tm/tm knockout mice also exhibit abnormal skeletal muscle energetics and cardiovascular dysfunction [48, 49]. Thus, inflammation, cardiovascular abnormalities and skeletal muscle dysfunction contribute to the phenotype seen in IL-10tm/tm mice. Based on these data, strategies that reduce inflammation may attenuate frailty in older individuals.
An increase in oxidative stress is implicated in the development of frailty [47] so Sod1KO mice have been proposed as a frailty model [34]. These mice lack the antioxidant enzyme Cu/Zn superoxide dismutase, which reduces defence against oxidative stress [34]. Although frailty has not been quantified in these mice, they do exhibit phenotypic components of frailty including weight loss, weakness, low physical activity levels and reduced levels of endurance. Moreover, Sod1KO mice exhibit enhanced sarcopenia and have an abbreviated lifespan [34]. These observations suggest that increasing oxidative stress accelerates frailty and increases mortality. Thus, interventions that reduce oxidative damage, such as antioxidant therapies, may reduce frailty in the setting of ageing.
Although both IL-10tm/tm and Sod1KO models have been developed to investigate frailty [33, 34], there are limitations to their use as a model of frailty. First, these genetically manipulated models do not necessarily represent the natural ageing process and the multitude of mechanisms implicated in the development of frailty [16]. Second, frailty has not been formally quantified in either IL-10tm/tm or Sod1KO mice. It would be important to use either the murine frailty phenotype tool outlined above, or the frailty index approach described in the next section to quantify frailty in these animals.
Frailty assessment based on the frailty index approach in animals
Building on more than a decade of clinical work, Howlett and colleagues first adapted the frailty index for use in naturally ageing male and female C57BL/6 mice [50]. This frailty index is based on 31 health deficits derived from open field activity data, body composition measures, hemodynamic data, and serum markers of metabolism. To determine the frailty level of each animal, each deficit is given a score of 0, 0.25, 0.5 0.75 or 1 based on the number of standard deviations (SDs) each deficit differs from mean reference values [50]. The scores for each health deficit are summed and divided by the total number of deficits (e.g. 31) to provide a frailty index score between 0 and 1, as in humans [9, 10]. This tool shows that 30-month-old mice have higher frailty index scores than 12-month old mice [50]. This initial study demonstrates that a frailty index based on deficit accumulation can be reverse-translated from humans to experimental animals [50]. However, limitations to this approach include the use of invasive procedures, time-consuming nature of the techniques used, and requirement for specialized equipment.
To address these limitations, a non-invasive clin-ical frailty index for mice was created by the same group [51]. This frailty index evaluates 31 potential clinical deficits that sample many systems including the integument, musculoskeletal, vestibulococh-lear/auditory, ocular/nasal, digestive/urogenital, and respiratory systems, as well as signs of discomfort, body temperature and body weight parameters [51]. Based on the presence of clinical deficits and their severity, a numerical score is provided for each deficit. Each deficit can be scored as 1 (severe), 0.5 (mild) or 0 (none present). The sum of these individual deficit scores is divided by the total number of deficits measured (e.g. 31) to produce a frailty index score [51]. Interestingly, the mouse clinical frailty index shows a graded increase with age as seen clinically [51]. This instrument also is flexible, as it has recently been adapted for use in other species including rats [52] and dogs [53]. Indeed, the age-associated accumulation of health deficits increases the risk of mortality in both species as well as in mice [53].
The mouse frailty index tool has been validated against data obtained in people across the life course [54]. Key features of deficit accumulation are similar in humans and mice, including the rates of deficit accumulation, submaximal limit to frailty and ability to predict mortality [54]. In addition, a murine frailty index based on laboratory data has been created [55], similar to the human FI-lab [26]. This tool is a collection of 23 standard laboratory tests related to blood pressure, blood chemistry and echocardiography. It has been used to explore mechanisms of frailty development in mice, including studies of the positive relationship between frailty and inflammation [55]. A frailty index based on laboratory plus clinical frailty data showed that female mice have higher frailty scores than males [55], similar to what is seen in people [42, 43]. Thus, quantifying deficit accumulation in mice provides a powerful new translational tool for research on ageing.
The mouse frailty index can be used to evaluate links between frailty and disease, including models of neurodegenerative disease [56]. Todorovic and colleagues used a modified 24-item clinical frailty index to assess the impact of age and sex on frailty in the 5xFAD mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease [56]. They show that frailty scores increase with age in 5xFAD mice and females have lower frailty scores than males [56]. Females also have lower frailty scores than males in the 3xTg-AD mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease [57]. This study also reported that the 3xTg-AD had higher frailty scores than wild-type controls, and that frailty increased mortality risk especially in female 3xTg-AD mice [57]. Together, these observations suggest that the frailty index can be used to investigate the impact of overall health on neurodegenerative disease expression in animal models.
The frailty index also can be used to evaluate the relationship between frailty and cardiovascular dis-ease in mouse models [58–61]. Indeed, the develop-ment of age-related cardiac hypertrophy and contractile dysfunction is graded by frailty in ageing male mice [59]. Further, these maladaptive changes in the structure and function of the ageing ventricle are proportional to, and graded by frailty index scores at the organ, cellular and molecular levels [59]. More recent work has shown that most of the relationships between cardiac ageing and heart function are graded by frailty in males, but not in females [58]. These findings are important as they suggest that frailty promotes maladaptive changes in the heart that may contribute to heart diseases in older males, while females may be resistant to these deleterious effects of frailty. Additional work in both sexes would be important.
The concept of deficit accumulation has also been used to explore the influence of frailty on heart rate and sinoatrial node dysfunction in ageing male mice [61]. This work shows that age-related sinoatrial node (SAN) dysfunction is proportional to and graded by the degree of frailty at the organ, cellular and subcellular levels [61]. These observations indicate that mice with the worst overall health had pronounced changes in atrial structure and function that create the ideal substrate for atrial arrhythmias [60]. Together, these studies strongly suggest that disease expression is modified by overall health and that individuals with high frailty scores exhibit marked signs of disease when compared to age-matched animals with low frailty scores.
Frailty interventions
Animal models of frailty are an exciting new dev-elopment that offer the chance to systematically in-vestigate interventions that may delay or attenuate the development of frailty. These can be broadly categorized as either non-pharmacological or pharmacological interventions. Interventions such as diet management, calorie restriction (Table-1) and exercise (Table-2) represent non-pharmacological interventions, while drugs and antioxidants are considered pharmacological interventions (Tables-3 & 4). The efficacy of these interventions has been evaluated with the frailty phenotype and/or frailty index in preclinical models, as discussed in the following sections.
Influence of diet and calorie restriction on frailty in animal models
Influence of diet and calorie restriction on frailty in animal models
1High-fat diet (HFD).
The impact of exercise on frailty in animal models
Diet and calorie balance are important components of daily life that can be manipulated to modify lifespan in animal models [62, 63]. Therefore, studies have explored whether these interventions can affect “healthspan”, quantified as frailty, in preclinical models. These studies are summarized in Table-1.
Several investigations have explored the impact of a low-calorie diet for frailty prevention (Table-1). Kane and colleagues first reported that a calorie-restricted diet (40%fewer calories) for 13 months reduced clinical frailty index scores in older C57BL/6 mice and in DBA/2 mice, which are a model of accelerated ageing [64]. However, the benefits of dietary restriction on frailty are only seen in male mice in both strains [64]. Similar results have been reported in ageing male Wistar rats, where 40%calorie restriction reduced frailty phenotype scores, enhanced physical activity and improved spatial memory [65]. Whether female rats benefit from this was not investigated. Calorie restriction (40%fewer calories) also reduces frailty index scores and enhances longevity in wild-type mice and in insulin-resistant adipose-specific mTORC2 null mice of both sexes [66]. Thus, it seems clear that fewer calories lead to improved overall health as assessed by various frailty measures in mice and rats, although whether this differs between the sexes is controversial.
Only one study explored the influence of a dietary “stressor” on frailty in animal models [67]. These investigators showed that a high-fat diet (35%lard) increased weight in both male and female mice, but it enhanced frailty and reduced lifespan only in males [67]. Thus unlike males, females are protected from detrimental effects of a high fat diet on overall health [67]. This ability to resist a stressor may contribute to the morbidity-mortality paradox, where females have higher frailty scores than males but they live longer [42, 55].
Together, these observations suggest that calorie restriction attenuates frailty progression in ageing male rodents and calorie excess (at least in the form of fat) exacerbates frailty (Table-1). Females may be resistant to both detrimental and beneficial effects of dietary modifications, although this has not been reported in all studies and additional experimental work is required to explore this question.
Exercise and frailty interventions
Age-associated sarcopenia and physical inactivity can lead to disability and death in older adults [14]. In consequence, there has been interest in the role of exercise as an intervention for frailty prevention [14]. Studies in rodent models have explored the impact of different types and intensities of exercise on the development of frailty in the setting of ageing [38, 68–70]. These trials are summarized in Table-2 and are discussed in detail below.
The first study to explore the influence of aerobic exercise on frailty in a preclinical model examined the effect of voluntary wheel running on frailty in mice assessed with the frailty phenotype [70]. They showed that even a brief (e.g. 4 weeks) trial of voluntary wheel running could reverse frailty, improve muscle mass and increase strength in 28–30-month-old male C57BL/6 mice [70]. A much longer duration of voluntary wheel running was also effective at preventing frailty in ageing male C57BL/6 mice evaluated with a modified frailty phenotype instrument called the Valencia Score [38]. One limitation of these studies is that they only used male animals; studies of voluntary exercise in females would be important.
Other studies have assessed the ability of high-intensity interval training to attenuate frailty in ageing animals of both sexes. These studies found that as little as ten minutes of high-intensity interval training three times per week for 8–16 weeks enhanced physical performance and attenuated frailty in ageing male mice [68, 69]. Although the duration of exercise was different for males (16 weeks) and females (8 weeks), high-intensity interval training attenuated frailty as quantified with the both phenotype and frailty index approaches [68, 69]. High-intensity interval training also is associated with greater muscle mass, increased fibre cross-sectional area, and more mitochondrial biomass in males, and improved nest-building activity in females [68]. These studies demonstrate that exercise can attenuate frailty in older male and female rodents (Table-2). However, studies conducted so far have used only one sex to explore effects of exercise on frailty. The impact of various exercise regimens on ageing mice of both sexes in the same study, evaluated with the same frailty tool, could be instructive.
Drugs as frailty interventions
Although drugs that target fundamental ageing mechanisms have been shown to affect lifespan in experimental models [12, 71], less is known about effects on overall health. The recent development of preclinical models of frailty has now allowed investigators to determine whether these agents can affect healthspan. The results of studies testing interventions designed to attenuate frailty are summarized in Table-3. Interventions that can be considered stressors and may exacerbate frailty are summarized in Table-4.
Drug treatment regimens that attenuate frailty in animal models
Drug treatment regimens that attenuate frailty in animal models
1Physiological Frailty Index (PFI); High-fat diet (HFD); ovariectomized (OVX); tricarboxylic acid (TCA).
Interventions that exacerbate frailty in animal models
1ovariectomized (OVX).
The first study to demonstrate that drug treatment could attenuate the development of frailty used the antioxidant “resveratrol” [64]. This compound was selected as it is a known longevity intervention that improves many aspects of health and increases lifespan in mice fed a high calorie diet [72]. It also enhances the activity of sirtuin 1, which mediates physiological effects of calorie restriction [73]. Kane and colleagues showed that, when 18-month-old male mice were treated with resveratrol at a dose of 100 mg/kg for 6 months, their frailty index scores were significantly lower than age-matched controls [64]. This work represents the initial “proof-of-concept” that the frailty index is responsive to pharmacological interventions.
The drug “rapamycin” inhibits mammalian/mec-hanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR), a key element in cellular metabolism that regulates processes in-volved in ageing including nutrient sensing, proteostasis, autophagy and cellular senescence [74]. Rapamycin enhances lifespan in preclinical rodent models [75–77] and improves physical strength and endurance in middle-aged mice [77]. Rapamycin treatment also attenuates the development of frailty in NIH Swiss mice challenged with a high fat diet [67]. However, rapamycin reduced frailty index scores in male but not female mice fed a high fat diet [67]. This indicates that rapamycin slows the development of frailty, although reasons for underlying sex differences in responsiveness to rapamycin in mice fed high fat diets are unclear.
Other drugs with anti-ageing properties have been evaluated for potential beneficial effects on frailty in preclinical models. Diarylpropionitrile is an estrogen receptor-β-specific agonist that has anti-aging effects including positive effects on energy metabolism and neuroprotection [78]. Based on these observations, Said and colleagues [79] proposed that it might im-prove healthspan. Indeed, chronic treatment with diarylpropionitrile (3 mg/kg/day) attenuates frailty, improves spatial learning and memory and enhances running in adult, ovariectomized CD-1 female mice [79].
Another approach is to inhibit the renin-angioten-sin system with either angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors or angiotensin II receptor blockers; these drugs can improve grip strength, enhance activity and reduce inflammation in rodents [80, 81]. Interestingly, chronic treatment with the ACE in-hibitor enalapril (30 mg/kg/day) reduces frailty index scores in 12-month old female C57BL/6 mice and in older mice (∼24 months of age) of both sexes [82]. These beneficial effects were attributable to sex-specific effects on inflammation, including a reduction in pro-inflammatory cytokines in female mice and an increase in anti-inflammatory cytokines in male mice [82]. This study was the first longitudinal study to assess drug treatment effects on frailty across the life course.
Yet another approach has exploited the anti-inf-lammatory and anti-osteoporotic properties of allicin, a component of garlic, as a treatment for frailty. Liu and colleagues showed that chronic administration of allicin reduced frailty index scores and protected against senile osteoporosis in ageing Fischer 344 rats [83]. This suggests that chronic administration of allicin may be beneficial in delaying the onset of both frailty and osteoporosis in older adults. A recent novel approach has investigated the impact of treatment with alpha-ketoglutarate, a key metabolite in the tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle [84]. This compound was selected based on its positive effects on lifespan in aging mice and other organisms. Results showed that 18-month-old male and female mice treated chronically with alpha-ketoglutarate had lower frailty index scores than mice fed standard chow [84]. Taken together, these studies show that the new frailty assessment tools are useful in detecting beneficial effects of drug treatments on overall health in preclinical models. This should facilitate exploration of novel drug treatments and the influence of combinations of interventions, such as exercise plus drug treatment and/or dietary supplements.
Drug interventions that exacerbate frailty in animal models
While some studies have examined strategies to mitigate frailty, others have looked at the impact of stressors on frailty scores. The first study to subject mice to stressors and quantify effects on frailty looked at the ability of polypharmacy to promote frailty and other geriatric outcomes [85]. Polypharmacy is common in clinical practice and is associated with adverse health-related outcomes in older individuals [86, 87]. Huizer-Pajkos and colleagues used a polypharmacy regimen based on five commonly prescribed drugs including a lipid-lowering agent, a beta-blocker, a proton pump inhibitor, an analgesic and an antidepressant [85]. They treated 24-month-old male C57BL/6 mice with simvastatin, metoprolol, omeprazole, acetaminophen, and citalopram (2–4 weeks). Short-term exposure to polypharmacy red-uced strength and locomotion, but had no significant effect on frailty index scores [85]. As polypharmacy impaired motor function and strength, it is possible that a frailty assessment with the frailty phenotype might have reached a different conclusion. More recently the same group explored the impact of various polypharmacy regimens charac-terized by different drug burden indices (DBI) [88]. They administered different drug regimens to middle-aged (12 months) male C57BL/6J mice for up to one year [89]. Polypharmacy regimens with a high DBI as well as monotherapy with citalopram increased frailty when compared to zero and low DBI polypharmacy [89]. By contrast, deprescribing of high DBI drugs markedly reduced frailty index scores [89]. These observations indicate that chronic polypharmacy with increasing DBI increases frailty and that drug withdrawal reverses this effect. This suggests that deprescribing is a potentially useful strategy to reduce the burden of frailty in older adults.
The relationship between frailty and the ability to tolerate a stressor has been investigated in young mice where “frailty” was induced by an injection of lipopolysaccharide (LPS; 8 mg/kg IP) [90]. This study used a modified frailty index tool based on 8 frailty components to first show that LPS increased frailty [90]. They also showed mice with pre-exi-sting LPS-induced frailty were more susceptible to postoperative complications including cognitive dysfunction, neuroinflammation and oxidative after a partial hepatic lobectomy [90]. This suggests that pre-existing frailty may reduce resilience to stressors such as surgery. On the other hand, LPS injection in young mice is not a model of frailty in the setting of natural ageing. Additional studies on links between frailty and tolerance to stressors in preclinical models of both ageing and frailty are justified.
Several other studies have looked at interventions that exacerbate frailty. One recent study showed that, although treatment with the estrogen receptor-ß agonist diarylpropionitrile attenuates frailty in young adult ovariectomized CD-1 female mice it increases frailty in older mice (17–33 months of age) [79]. The reasons for this age-specific differential effect are unclear. However, this does demonstrate the need to investigate frailty interventions across the life course and not just in younger animals [79]. Another preclinical study investigated the influence of radiation therapy on frailty. The rationale is that radiation therapy induces fatigue [91, 92] and reduces physical activity [93], which would be expected to worsen frailty. The impact of radiation on frailty index scores was investigated in male C57BL/6 mice, starting at 20–24 weeks of age [94]. This work shows that mice treated with sublethal irradiation exhibit premature frailty, premature mortality, a decline in cognitive function and early tumour development [94]. This demonstrates that the frailty index may useful to test and validate novel interventions to prevent premature ageing in cancer survivors.
Emerging drug studies
Animal models of frailty provide an excellent platform to assess the impact of potential new the-rapies on healthspan in preclinical models. For example, cellular senescence is a process of cell ageing where cells stop dividing and secrete harmful substances including proinflammatory cytokines, chemokines and growth factors that disrupt nearby healthy tissue [95]. The newly described senolytic drugs act to kill senescent cells and suppress this so-called “senescence-associated secretory phenotype” (SASP) [95]. The impact of these agents on frailty in animal models has not yet been investigated. However, weekly treatment with a combination of senolytic drugs (e.g. 5 mg/kg dasatinib and 50 mg/kg quercetin) in the Ercc1–/Δ mouse model of human progeroid syndrome improves symptoms associated with frailty including low grip strength, poor body condition, gait disorders, kyphosis, and tremor [93]. In addition, intermittent treatment of Ercc1–/Δ mice with an inhibitor of heat shock protein 90 (17-DMAG; 10 mg/kg; 3 times per week every 3 weeks) reduces symptoms of frailty including low grip strength, poor body condition, gait disorders, kyphosis, and tremor [96]. As 17-DMAG is a potential senolytic drug [96], these findings suggest that senolytic drugs may attenuate frailty. It would be of interest to investigate this directly with one of the new preclinical frailty assessment tools.
Other anti-ageing interventions may attenuate the development of frailty. For example, the anti-diabetic drug metformin has anti-ageing effects such as reducing inflammation and oxidative stress [97]. Observational studies in animals show that long-term treatment with metformin mimics some benefits of calorie restriction (e.g. improved metabolic status and physical performance) [98]. Metformin also attenuates high fat diet-induced deleterious effects on body composition, metabolism, and motor function in mice [99]. In addition, metformin reduces anxiety-like behaviors and improves strength, behaviour, locomotion, memory, and antioxidant defence in various mouse models [100–103]. These observations suggest that metformin may attenuate frailty in ageing models and studies that investigate this would be informative.
Summary
Frailty is an emerging area in preclinical ageing research. The ability to quantify frailty with frailty phenotype and frailty index approaches provides some powerful new translational tools for geroscientists, as highlighted in Fig. 1. These instruments already have facilitated the quantification of beneficial effects of interventions including dietary changes, exercise regimens and drug therapies in preclinical models. They have also been used to measure the ability of frail ageing animals to resist various stressors, and thus potentially to estimate resilience. There are now new opportunities to investigate novel drug therapies, repurpose existing therapies and explore the impact of combination therapies on frailty in the setting of ageing. These are exciting times in the emerging field of the biology of frailty.
Preclinical models of frailty. The development of frailty phenotype and frailty index assessment tools has motivated efforts to test novel interventions that can attenuate or exacerbate frailty.
Conflict of interest
Susan E Howlett and Manish Mishra declare no conflict of interest.
Footnotes
Acknowledgments
This work is supported, in part, by grants from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (PJT 155961; PJT 162462) and the Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada (HSFC G-19-0026260).