Over the past decade, knowledge translation (KT) has emerged as a framework for turning research findings into actions which will improve outcomes for individuals with disabilities.
OBJECTIVE:
This article examines how the origins of KT in healthcare have shaped (and perhaps limited) how it has been conceptualized in the realm of disability and, more specifically, disability and employment.
CONCLUSION:
We focus on three questions. First, how have the origins of KT shaped the epistemological commitments informing its use in the realms of healthcare and disability? What features do these commitments draw attention to? What features do they render invisible? Second, the realm of disability is characterized by a more complex and disparate landscape of stakeholders than is the case in healthcare. Stakeholder groups are not simply neutral knowledge users. Each stakeholder group has a unique culture, discourse, epistemology and view of “success.” What does this mean for KT in the realm of disability? Third, the Knowledge-to-Action (K2A) Framework (Graham et al., 2006) has been widely adopted in several realms: Healthcare, education, international development and disability. Given the unique challenges of KT in the realm of disability, how might the K2A Framework need to be adapted to strengthen its effectiveness?
Agency for Health Research and Quality (2001). Translating research into practice (TRIP)-II. Washington, DC: Agency for Health Research and Quality 2001. http://www.ahrq.gov/research/trip2fac.htm.
2.
Ameri, M.,
Schur, L.,
Adya, M.,
Bentley, P. M., &
Kruse, D. (2015). The Disability employment puzzle: A field experiment on employer hiring behavior. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper No. 21560. Available online at http://www.nber.org/papers/w21560.
3.
Aranda, C. (2015). Targeting disability discrimination: Findings and reflections from the national study on housing discrimination against people who are deaf and people who use wheelchairs. Department of Housing and Urban Development Office of Policy Development and Research, 17(3), Cityscape: A Journal of Policy Development and Research.
4.
Archibald, T. (2015). Lost in translation: The politics of evidence. Keynote presentation at the NARRTC 2015 Conference, Alexandria VA.
5.
Arthur, B. (1994). Inductive reasoning and bounded rationality (The El Farol Problem). American Economics Review (Papers and Proceedings), 84, 406.
6.
Borgerson, K. (2009). Valuing evidence: Bias and the evidence hierarchy of evidence-based medicine. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 52 (2), 218–233. Spring 2009.
7.
Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Knowledge Translation. (2000). “About knowledge translation - CIHR”. Retrieved from Cihr-irsc.gc.ca.
8.
Claridge, J., & FabianT. (2005). History and development of evidence-based medicine. World Journal of Surgery, 29(5), 547–553.
9.
Davison, C.,
Ndumbe-Eyoh, S., &
Clement, C. (2015). Critical examination of knowledge to action models and implications for promoting health equity. International Journal for Equity in Health, 14, 49.
10.
Davies, P.,
Walker, A.,
GrimshawJ. (2010). A systematic review of the use of theory in the design of guideline disination and implementation strategies and interpretation of the results of rigorous evaluations. Implementation Science, 5, 14.
11.
Dijkers, M. (2009). When the best is the enemy of the good: The nature of research used in systematic reviews and guidelines. Austin, TX: National Center for the Dissemination of Disability Research.
12.
Dougherty, D., &
Conway, P. (2008). The “T’s” road map to transform US healthcare. JAMA299, 2319–2321.
13.
El-Jardali, F., &
Fadlallah, R. (2015). A call for a backward design for knowledge translation. International Journal of Health Policy Management, 4(1), 1–5.
14.
Erickson, W. A.,
Von SchraderS.,
Bruyère, S. M., &
VanLooy, S. A. (2013). The employment environment: Employer perspectives, policies, and practices regarding the employment of persons with disabilities. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 57 (4, 195–208. 10.1177/0034355213509841.
15.
Erickson, W.,
Lee, C.,
von SchraderS. (2014). 2013 Disability status report: United States. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Employment and Disability Institute (EDI).
16.
Ferlie, E., &
ShortellS. (2001). Improving the quality of health care in the United Kingdom and the United States: A framework for change. Milbank Quarterly79(2), 281–315.
17.
Field, B.,
Booth, A.,
Ilott, I., &
GerrishK. (2014). Using the knowledge to action framework in practice: A citation analysis and systematic review. Implementation Science, 9, 172.
18.
Fortin, M.,
Couture, M.,
Bouhali, T.,
Leclerc, E., &
Stewart, M. (2016). It takes two to tango: Researchers and decision-makers collaborating to implement practice changes for patients with multimorbidity. Healthcare Quarterly, 19(2), 55–59.
19.
Foucault, M. (1997). The Politics of Truth. New York: Semiotext(e).
20.
Gewurtz, R.,
Langan, S., &
Shand, D. (2016). Hiring people with disabilities: A scoping review. Work, 54 (1), 135.
21.
Gigerenzer, G.,
Selten, R. (Eds) (2001). Bounded rationality: The adaptive toolbox. MIT Press, Cambridge MA.
22.
Ginsburg, L.,
Lewis, S.,
Zackheim, L., &
Casebeer, A. (2007). Revisiting interaction in knowledge translation. Implementation Science, 2, 34.
23.
Goldenberg, M. (2009). Iconoclast or creed?: Objectivism, pragmatism, and the hierarchy of evidence. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 52 (2), 168–187.
24.
Gould, R.,
Parker HarrisS.,
Caldwell, K.,
Fujiura, G.,
Jones, R.,
Ojok, P., &
Perez, K. (2015). Assessing the ADA’s social impact: A rapid evidence review of the ADA research on Knowledge, attitudes and perceptions. Disability Studies Quarterly.
25.
GrahamI.,
LoganJ.,
HarrisonM.,
Straus, S.,
Tetroe, J.,
Caswell, W., &
Robinson, N. (2006). Lost in knowledge translation: Time for a map?J of Continuing Education in the Health Professions, 26,13–24.
26.
Granek, L., &
Nakash, O. (2016). The impact of qualitative research on the “real world”: Knowledge translation as education, policy, clinical training, and clinical practice. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 56 (4), 414–435.
27.
Green, T., &
Kalev, A. (2008). Discrimination-reducing measures at the relational level. Hastings Law Review, 59, 1435.
28.
Greenhalgh, T., &
Wieringa, S. (2011). Is it time to drop the ‘knowledge translation’ metaphor? A critical literature review. Journal of Research in Social Medicine, 104, 501–509.
29.
Golden, T. P.,
Bruyère, S. M.,
Karpur, A.,
Nazarov, Z.,
VanLooy, S. A., &
Reiter, B. (2012). Workforce development policy: Unrealized potential for Americans with disabilities. Rehabilitation Education, 26 (1), 5–18.
30.
HallockK.,
JinX.,
BarringtonL., (2013a). The Pay gap and the total compensation gap by disability status. Working Paper. Ithaca, NY, ILR School, Institute for Compensation Studies.
31.
HallockK.,
JinX., & BarringtonL., (2013b). The role of tasks and skills in explaining the disability pay gap. Working Paper. Ithaca, NY, ILR School, Institute for Compensation Studies, 2013.
32.
HoffmanS. (2008). Settling the matter: Does Title I of the ADA work?Alabama Law Review, 59(2), 305.
33.
Karpur, A.,
VanLooy, S. A., &
Bruyère, S. M. (2014). Employer practices for employment of people with disabilities: A literature scoping review. Rehabilitation Research, Policy, and Education, 28(4), 225–241.
34.
Kinsella, E. (2007). Technical rationality in Schön’s reflective practice: Dichotomous or non-dualistic epistemological position. Nursing Philosophy, 8, 102–113.
35.
KittoS.,
SargeantJ.,
ReevesS., &
Silver, I. (2012). Towards a sociology of knowledge translation: The importance of being dis-interested in knowledge translation. Advances in Health Sciences Education17(2), 289–299.
Lane, J., &
Rogers, J. (2011). Knowledge value mapping of national organizations: A knowledge translation strategy to efficiently communicate research-based knowledge to multiple stakeholder audiences. National Center for the Dissemination of Disability Research Brief no. 32.
38.
LillehagenI.,
VøllestadN.,
HeggenK., &
Engebretsen, E. (2013). Protocol for a qualitative study of knowledge translation in a participatory research project. BMJ Open3, e003328.
39.
Linkow, P.,
Barrington, L.,
Bruyère, S. M.,
Figueroa, I., &
Wright, M. (2013). Leveling the Playing Field: Attracting, Engaging, and Advancing People with Disabilities (Research Report No. R-1510-12-RR). New York, NY. Retrieved from http://digitalcommons.ilr.cornell.edu/edicollect/1292/
40.
Lundblad, J. (2003). Review and critique of Rogers’ Diffusion of Innovation Theory as it applies to organizations. Organization Development Journal.
41.
Lyytinen, K., &
Damsgaard, J. (2001). What’s wrong with the diffusion of innovation theory: The case of complex and networked technology. In
ArdisM. A., et al. (eds.), Diffusing Software Product and Process Innovations. NY, NY: Springer Science and Business Media.
42.
Massey, S. G., &
Barreras, R. E. (2013). Introducing “impact validity.”. Journal of Social Issues, 69, 615–632.
43.
McMahon, B. (2012). An overview of workplace discrimination and disability. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 36, 135–139.
44.
National Center for Dissemination of Disability Research (2005). What is knowledge translation?Technical brief number 10. 2005. Available at: http://www.ncddr.org/du/products/focus/focus 10
45.
Nazarov, Z. E.,
von SchraderS. (2014). Comparison of employer factors in disability. Rehabilitation Research, Policy, and Education, 28(4), 291–30710.1891/2168-6653.38.4.291
46.
Nishii, L., &
Bruyère, S. (2014). Inside the workplace: Case studies of factors influencing engagement of people with disabilities. Research Brief. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Employment and Disability Institute.
47.
Parker HarrisS.,
Gould, R.,
Ojok, P.,
Fujiura, G.,
Jones, R., &
Olmstead, A. (2014). Scoping review of the Americans with Disabilities Act: What research exists, and where do we go from here?Disability Studies Quarterly, 34(3). Retrieved from http://dsq-sds.org/article/view/3883/3645.
48.
Parkhurst, J. (2017). The Politics of Evidence: From Evidence-Based Policy to the Good Governance of Evidence. Routledge.
49.
Phillips, B. N.,
Deiches, J.,
Morrison, B.,
Chan, F., &
Bezyak, J. L. (2015). Disability diversity training in the workplace: Systematic review and future directions. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 26(3), 264–275. 10.1007/s10926-015-9612-3
50.
Prince, M. (2016). Reconsidering knowledge and power: Reflections on disability communities and disability studies in Canada. Canadian Journal of Disability Studies, 5(2).
51.
Rogers, E. M. (1962). Diffusion of innovations. First Edition. New York, NY: Free Press.
52.
Rogers, J., & MartinF. (2009). Knowledge translation in disability and rehabilitation research: Lessons from the application of knowledge value mapping to the case of accessible currency. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 20(2).
53.
Salter, K., &
Kothari, A. (2016). Knowledge Translation as Social Learning: Negotiating the uptake of research-based knowledge in practice. BMC Medical Education16, 76. 10.1186/s12909-016-0585-5
54.
SchönD. (1987). Educating the Reflective Practitioner. New York, NY: Jossey-Bass.
55.
Scriven, M., &
Coryn, C. L. S. (2008). The logic of research evaluation. In
CorynC. L. S. & ScrivenM. (Eds.), Reforming the evaluation of research. New Directions for Evaluation, 118, pp. 89–105.
56.
Shaw, L. (2016). Literature review on hiring persons with disabilities. Presentation at the DEEP Conference, 2016. Toronto, Canada. Available at http://deeidrc.ocadu.ca/lit-review-hiring.
57.
Simon, H. (1978). Rational decision making in business organizations, Nobel Memorial Lecture, 1978, p. 502.
58.
Straus, S.,
Tetroe, J., &
Graham, D. (2013). Knowledge translation in health care: Moving from evidence to practice. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
59.
Sudsawad, P. (2007). Knowledge translation: Introduction to models, strategies, and measures. Available at http://www.ncddr.org/kt/products/ktintro/ index.html.
60.
Thomas, A.,
Menon, A.,
Boruff, J.,
Roriguez, A., &
Ahmed, S. (2014). Applications of social constructivist learning theories in knowledge translation for healthcare professionals: A scoping review. Implementation Science9, 54.
U.S. Department of Education. (2006). National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research—Notice of final long-range plan for fiscal years 2005–2009. Federal Register, 71(31), 8166–8199.
63.
von SchraderS.,
Malzer, V., &
Bruyère, S. M. (2014). Perspectives on disability disclosure: The importance of employer practices and workplace Climate. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 26, 237–255. 10.1007/s10672-013-9227-9.
