Multiple sclerosis (MS) symptoms often make it difficult for individuals with MS to stay at work or return to work. It is important to understand the relationship between symptom clusters and employment. Person-environment (P-E) contextual factors such as core self-evaluations (CSE) and social support have been found to be effective mediators for the relationship between disability and participation in rehabilitation research and may be able to reduce the adverse impact of MS symptom cluster on employment outcome of people with MS.
OBJECTIVE:
To evaluate the mediation effect of CSE and social support on the relationship between symptom cluster and employment in MS.
METHOD:
Quantitative descriptive research design using two simple mediation analyses. 154 persons with multiple sclerosis participated in this study.
RESULTS:
Results show that symptom cluster, CSE, and social support were significantly related to employment. Both CSE and social support were significant mediators of the relationship between symptom cluster and employment, with CSE a stronger mediator than social support.
CONCLUSIONS:
Managing MS symptoms and increasing CSE and social support will reduce the adverse impact of MS symptom cluster on employment outcome. Therefore, CSE and social support can be viewed as protective factors for maintaining employment in MS. These results provide support for the use of positive psychology interventions by vocational rehabilitation counselors working with individuals with multiple sclerosis.
BanduraA. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 191–215.
2.
CastarlenasE., JensenM., & von BaeyerC. L., MiroJ. (2017). Psychometric properties of the numerical rating scale to assess self-reported pain intensity in children and adolescents: A systematic review. Clinical Journal of Pain, 33, 376–383.
3.
ChanF., TarvydasV., BlalockD., StrauserD., & AtkinsB. J. (2009). Unifying and elevating rehabilitation counseling through model-driven, diversity-sensitive evidence-based practice. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 52, 114–119.
4.
CharlifueR. H. S. (1999). Ageing with spinal cord injury: The impact of spousal support. Disability and Rehabilitation, 21(5-6), 250–257.
5.
ChildsJ. D., PivaS. R., & FritzJ. M. (2005). Responsiveness of the numeric pain rating scale in patients with low back pain. Spine, 30(11), 1331–1334.
6.
ChiuC. Y., ChanF., SharpS. E., DuttaA., HartmanE., & BezyakJ. (2015). Employment as a health promotion intervention for persons with multiple sclerosis. WORK: A Journal of Prevention, Assessment & Rehabilitation, 52, 749–756.
7.
ChiuC., ChanF., SharpS., DuttaA., HartmanE., & BezyakJ. (2015). Employment as a health promotion intervention for persons with multiple sclerosis. Work, 52(4), 749–756.
8.
ChronisterJ., ChouC., FrainM., & CardosoE. (2008). The relationship between social support and rehabilitation related outcomes: A meta-analysis. Journal of Rehabilitation, 74(2), 16–32.
9.
ChronisterJ., JohnsonE., & BervenN. (2006). Measuring social support in rehabilitation. Disability and Rehabilitation, 28(2), 75–84.
10.
CohenS., MermelsteinR., KamarckT., & HobermanH. M. (1985). Measuring the functional components of social support. In SarasonI. G., SarasonB. R.(Eds.) Social support: Theory, research, and applications (pp. 73–94). The Hague, Holland: Martinus Nijhoff.
11.
CostaD. C., SáM. J., & CalheirosJ. M. (2012). The effect of social support on the quality of life of patients with multiple sclerosis, 70(2), 108–113. doi:10.1590/S0004-282X2012000200007
12.
CostaD., Marques SáC., & CalheirosM. (2013). Social Characteristics and Quality of Life of Portuguese Multiple Sclerosis Patients. Neurology and Therapy, 2(1), 43–56.
13.
CraytonH. J., & RossmanH. S. (2006). Managing the symptoms of multiple sclerosis: A multimodal approach. Clinical Therapeutics, 28(4), 445–460.
14.
DoddM. J., MiaskowskiC., & PaulS. M. (2001). Symptom clusters and their effect on the functional status of patients with cancer. Oncology Nursing Forum, 28, 465–470.
15.
DuttaA., GerveyR., ChanF., ChouC. C., & DitchmanN. (2008). Vocational rehabilitation services and employment outcomes of people with disabilities: A United States study. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 18, 326–334.
16.
ElliottT. R., HerrickS. M., WittyT. E., GodshallF., & SpruellM. (1992). Social support and depression following spinal cord injury. Rehabilitation Psychology, 37(1), 37–48.
17.
EysenckH. J. (1990). Biological dimensions of personality. In PervinL. A. (Ed.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp. 244–276). New York, NY.: Guilford Press.
18.
HallJ. P., KurthN. K., & HuntS. L. (2013). Employment as a health determinant for working-age, dually-eligible people with disabilities. Disability and Health Journal, 6, 100–106.
19.
HamedR., TariahH. A., & HawamdehZ. M. (2012). Personal Factors Affecting the Daily Functioning and Well-Being of Patients with Multiple Sclerosis Using the International Classification of Functioning Model. International Journal of Mental Health, 41(4), 47–61.
20.
HayesA. F. (2009). Beyond Baron and Kenny: Statistical mediation analysis in the new millennium. Communication Monographs, 76(4), 408–420.
21.
HaysR. D., & StewartA. L. (1992). Sleep measures. In StewartA. L., WareJ. E. (eds.), Measuring functioning and well-being: The Medical Outcomes Study approach (pp. 235–259). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
22.
JacksonT., IezziA., & LafreniereK. (1996). The differential effects of employment status on chronic pain and healthy comparison groups. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 3(4), 354–369.
23.
JensenM. P., KarolyP., O’riordanE. F., BlandF., & BurnsR. S. (1989). The Subjective Experience of Acute Pain An Assessment of the Utility of 10 Indices. The Clinical Journal of Pain, 5(2), 153–160.
24.
JudgeT. A., & Kammeyer-MuellerJ. D. (2011). Implications of CSE for a changing organizational context. Human Resource Management Review, 21, 331–341.
25.
JudgeT. A., BonoJ. E., ErezA., & LockeE. A. (2005). Core self-evaluations and job and life satisfaction: The role of self-concordance and goal attainment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 257–268.
26.
JudgeT. A., ErezA., BonoJ. E., & ThoresenC. J. (2003). The CSE Scale (CSES): Development of a measure. Personnel Psychology, 56, 303–331.
27.
JudgeT. A., LockeE. A., & DurhamC. C. (1997). The dispositional causes of job satisfaction: A core evaluations approach. Research in Organizational Behavior, 19, 151–188.
28.
JudgeT. A., LockeE. A., DurhamC. C., & KlugerA. N. (1998). Dispositional effects on job and life satisfaction: The role of core evaluations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 17–34.
29.
KhanF., & PallantJ. (2007). Use of international classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF) to describe patient-reported disability in multiple sclerosis and identification of relevant environmental factors. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 39(1), 63–70.
30.
KimH. J., McGuireD. B., TulmanL., & BarsevickA. M. (2005). Symptom clusters: Concept analysis and clinical implications for cancer nursing. Cancer Nursing, 28(4), 270–282.
31.
KrauseJ. S., CarterR., PickelsimerE., & WilsonD. (2008). A prospective study of health and risk of mortality after spinal cord injury. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 89, 1482–1491.
32.
KroenkeK., SpitzerR. L., WilliamsJ. B. W., & LöweB. (2009). An ultra-brief screening scale for anxiety and depression: The PHQ-4. Psychosomatics, 50, 613–621.
33.
KwiatkowskiA., MarissalJ. P., PouyfauconM., VermerschP., HautecoeurP., & DervauxB. (2014). Social participation in patients with multiple sclerosis: Correlations between disability and economic burden. BMC Neurology, 14(115), 1–8.
34.
LarsonR. D. (2013). Psychometric properties of the modified fatigue impact scale. International Journal of MS Care, 15(1), 15–20.
35.
LevensteinS., PranteraC., VarvoV., ScribanoM. L., BertoE., LuziC., & AndreoliA. (1993). Development of the Perceived Stress Questionnaire: A new tool for psychosomatic research. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 37(1), 19–32.
36.
MankD., CioffiA., & YovanoffP. (1997). Analysis of the typicalness of supported employment jobs, natural supports, and wage and integration outcomes. Mental Retardation, 35(3), 185–197.
37.
MartinP., & MartinM. (2002). Proximal and Distal Influences on Development: The Model of Developmental Adaptation. Developmental Review, 22(1), 78–96.
38.
McFaddenE., HortonM. C., FordH. L., GilworthG., McFaddenM., & TennantA. (2012). Screening for the risk of job loss in multiple sclerosis (MS): Development of an MS-specific Work Instability Scale (MS-WIS). Multiple Sclerosis Journal, 18(6), 862–870.
39.
MiaskowskiC., DoddM., & LeeK. (2004). Symptom clusters: The new frontier in symptom management research. Journal of National Cancer Institute Monographs, 32, 17–21.
40.
MooreP., HardingK., ClarksonH., PickersgillT., WardleM., & RobertsonN. (2013). Demographic and clinical factors associated with changes in employment in multiple sclerosis. Multiple Sclerosis Journal, 19(12), 1647–1654.
41.
MotlR. W., McAuleyE. (2010b). Symptom cluster as a predictor of physical activity in multiple sclerosis: Preliminary evidence. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 38, 270–280.
42.
MotlR. W., SuhY., & WeikertM. (2010). Symptom Cluster and Quality of Life in Multiple Sclerosis. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 39(6), 1025–1032.
43.
MullerV., ChiuC., TangX., EagleD., PeeblesM., IwanagaK., & ChanF. (2017). Association of Employment and Health and Well-Being in People with Fibromyalgia. Journal of Rehabilitation, 83(3), 37–43.
44.
MuraliV., & OyebodeF. (2004). Poverty, social inequality and mental health. Advances in Psychiatric Treatment, 10, 216–224.
NgL., AmatyaB., & KhanF. (2013). Outcomes of a peer support program in multiple sclerosis in an Australian community cohort: A prospective study. Journal of Neurodegenerative Diseases, 2013, 1–7.
47.
O’ConnorR., CanoS., ThompsonA., & PlayfordE. (2005). Factors influencing work retention for people with multiple sclerosis. Journal of Neurology, 252(8), 892–896.
48.
PackT. G., SzironyG. M., BellawJ. R., & KushnerJ. D. (2014). Quality of life and employment in persons with multiple sclerosis. Work, 49(2), 281–287.
49.
PreacherK. J., & HayesA. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 879–891.
50.
ReisineS., FifieldJ., WalshS., & ForrestD. D. (2008). Employment and health status changes among women with fibromyalgia: A five-year study. Arthritis Care & Research, 59(12), 1735–1741.
51.
RiniC., & Dunkel SchetterC. (2010). The effectiveness of social support attempts in intimate relationships. Support Processes in Intimate Relationships, 26–67.
52.
RosenbergM. (1979). Conceiving the self. New York, NY: Basic Books.
53.
RotterJ. B. (1966). Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychological Monographs, 80(1), 1–28.
54.
SchulzR., & DeckerS. (1985). Long-term adjustment to physical disability: The role of social support, perceived control, and self-blame. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48(5), 1162.
55.
SchwartzC., & FrohnerR. (2005). Contribution of Demographic, Medical, and Social Support Variables in Predicting the Mental Health Dimension of Quality of Life among People with Multiple Sclerosis. Health & Social Work, 30(3), 203–212.
56.
SmedemaS. M. (2014). CSE and well-being in persons with disabilities. Rehabilitation Psychology, 59(4), 407–414.
57.
SmedemaS. M., ChanF., YaghmaianR. A., CardosoE. D., MullerV., KeeganJ., & EbenerD. J. (2015). The Relationship of Core Self-Evaluations and Life Satisfaction in College Students with Disabilities: Evaluation of a Mediator Model. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 28(3), 341–358.
58.
SmedemaS. M., PfallerJ. S., YaghmaianR. A., WeaverH., CardosoE., & ChanF. (2015). Core self-evaluations as a mediator between functional disability and life satisfaction in college students with disabilities. Rehabilitation Research, Policy, and Education, 29, 1–9.
59.
SmedemaS., ChanJ., & PhillipsB. (2014). Core self-evaluations and Snyder’s hope theory in persons with spinal cord injuries. Rehabilitation Psychology, 59(4), 399–406.
60.
SmedemaS. M., CatalanoD., & EbenerD. (2010). The relationship of coping responses to self-worth and subjective well-being: A structural equation model. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 53, 131–142.
61.
TesarN., BaumhacklU., KoppM., & GüntherV. (2003). Effects of psychological group therapy in patients with multiple sclerosis. Acta Neurologica Scandinavica, 107(6), 394–399.
62.
TortorellaP., TavazziE., CaputoD., RovarisM., LaganàM. M., PretiM. G., & RicciC. (2014). Determinants of disability in multiple sclerosis: An immunological and MRI study. BioMed Research International, 2014. doi:10.1155/2014/875768
63.
WhiteL. J., & DressendorferR. H. (2004). Exercise and multiple sclerosis. Sports Medicine, 34(15), 1077–1100.
64.
WilsonL., CatalanoD., SungC., PhillipsB., ChouC. C., ChanY.C., & ChanF. (2013). Attachment, social support, and coping as psychosocial correlates of happiness in people with spinal cord injuries. Rehabilitation Research, Policy, & Education, 27, 186–205.
65.
WrightB. A. (1983). Physical disability - a psychosocial approach, 2nd ed. New York, NY, US: HarperCollins Publishers.
66.
YamoutB., IssaZ., HerlopianA., El BejjaniM., KhalifaA., GhadiehA. S., & HabibR. H. (2013). Predictors of quality of life among multiple sclerosis patients: A comprehensive analysis. European Journal of Neurology, 20(5), 756–764.
