BACKGROUND: Supported employment has long been regarded as a good investment for individuals with disability and taxpayers. However, not all supported employees are cost-effective to serve in the community. By examining supported employees who are not cost-effective, we can better understand how to make supported employment more effective and efficient.
METHODS: The costs-per-month served and per-hour worked of 40,118 supported employees funded by state-federal VR agencies were compared to estimates of costs of sheltered workshops found in the literature. Rates of cost-ineffectiveness were examined by demographic variables (e.g., gender, ethnicity, impairment) and across all state-federal VR agencies throughout the United States and its territories.
RESULTS: Supported employees cost state-federal VR agencies an average of $342.07 (SD = $418.45) per month they received services. This was well below the lowest estimated monthly cost of sheltered workshops of (i.e., $593.72). However, supported employees cost VR agencies $7.23 (SD = $15.46) per hour they worked in the community. This was well above the lowest estimated hourly cost of sheltered workshops (i.e., $6.73). Costs-per-month served and costs-per-hour worked varied considerably from agency to agency, with substantial proportions of supported employees served by most agencies not being cost-effective to serve in the community.
CONCLUSION: Rates of cost-ineffectiveness did not appear to be significantly influenced by supported employee demographics. Disparities among state-federal VR agencies were most likely the result of differences in policies or training of adult service providers. Future research will need to explore these issues.
BondG. R., DietzenL. L., VoglerK., KatuinC. H., McGrewJ. H., & MillerL. D. (1995). Toward a framework for evaluating cost and benefits of psychiatric rehabilitation: Three case examples. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 5, 75–88.
2.
CimeraR. E. (2012). The economics of supported employment: What new data tell us. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 37, 109–118.
3.
CimeraR. E. (2011a). Does being in sheltered workshops improve the employment outcomes of supported employees with intellectual disabilities?Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 35, 21–28.
4.
CimeraR. E. (2011b). Supported versus sheltered employment: Cumulative costs, hours worked, and wages earned. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 35, 85–92.
5.
CimeraR. E. (2010). The national cost-efficiency of supported employees with intellectual disabilities: 2002 to 2007. American Journal on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 115, 19–29.
6.
CimeraR. E. (2007). The cost-effectiveness of supported employment and sheltered workshops in Wisconsin: FY 2002-2005. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 26, 153–158.
7.
CimeraR. E., &
BurgessS. (2011). Do adults with autism benefit monetarily from working in their communities?Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 34, 173–180.
8.
CimeraR. E., BurgessS., &
BedsemP. (2014). Does providing transition services by age 14 produce better vocational outcomes for students with intellectual disabilities?Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 39, 47–54.
9.
ConleyR. W., RuschF. R., McCaughrinW. B., & TinesJ. (1989). Benefits and costs of supported employment: An analysis of the Illinois supported employment project. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 22, 441–447.
10.
HillM. L., BanksP. D., HandrichR. R., WehmanP. H., HillJ. W., & ShaferM. S. (1987). Benefit-cost analysis of supported competitive employment for persons with mental retardation. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 8, 71–89.
11.
JaegerJ., BernsS., DouglasE., CreechB., GlickB., & KaneJ. (2006). Community-based vocational rehabilitation: Effectiveness and cost impact of a proposed program model. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 40, 452–461.
LatimerE. A. (2001). Economic impacts of supported employment for persons with severe mental illness. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 46, 496–505.
14.
LeeD., YooB., & PetersR. (2003). Cost-benefit analysis of a supported employment program: An experience in Korea. Journal of Rehabilitation, 69, 46–52.
15.
LewisD. R., JohnsonD. R., BruininksR. H., KallsenL. A., & GuilleryR. P. (1992). Is supported employment cost-effective in Minnesota?Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 3, 67–92.
16.
LevinH. M., &
McEwanP. J. (2000). Cost-effectiveness analysis: Methods and applications.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
RogersE. S., SciarappaK., MacDonald-WilsonK., & DanleyK. (1995). A benefit-cost analysis of a supported employment model for persons with psychiatric disabilities. Evaluation and Program Planning, 18, 105–115.
19.
RuschF. R., ConleyR. W., & McCaughrinW. B. (1993). Benefit-cost analysis of supported employment in Illinois. Journal of Rehabilitation, 59, 31–36.
20.
TinesJ., RuschF. R., McCaughrinW., & ConleyR. W. (1990). Benefit-cost analysis of supported employment in Illinois: A statewide evaluation. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 95, 44–54.
21.
TuckermanP., SmithR., & BorlandJ. (1999). The relative cost of employment for people with significant intellectual disability: The Australian experience. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 13, 109–116.
22.
WehmanP., HillM., HillJ., BrookeV., PendletonP., & BrittC. (1985). Competitive employment for persons with mental retardation: A follow-up six years later. Mental Retardation, 23, 274–281.
23.
ZivolichS., ShuemanS. A., & WeinerJ. S. (1997). An exploratory cost-benefit analysis of natural support strategies in the employment of people with severe disabilities. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 8, 211–221.
