Abstract

1. GENE THERAPY FOR PARKINSON’S
INTRODUCTION
A cardinal feature of Parkinson’s disease (PD) is the loss of dopaminergic neurons in the substantia nigra, leading to a decrease in axonal connections to the striatum. The resulting loss of dopamine causes the motor, and some non-motor symptoms. Increasing the presence of dopamine in the target areas of the putamen is one way to restore some of the lost function.
This restoration can be achieved in several ways, by reintroduction of dopaminergic neurons via implanted stem cells; stimulation of neuron regrowth and/or awakening via infusion of exogenous molecules, e.g. Glial Cell-Derived Neurotrophic Factor (GDNF); or gene therapy, the introduction of engineered DNA sequences able to code for in situ production of the relevant molecule. This article will briefly summarize the current approach to gene therapy for Parkinson’s and then describe the projects currently in the clinic.
The feasibility of gene therapy has been proven clinically, in indications such as Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA) [1], lysosomal storage diseases [2] and hereditary leukodystrophy [2]. As unprotected DNA or RNA sequences are rapidly degraded and are thus not feasible, these therapies use a delivery vehicle which in most cases is a viral vector, usually Adeno-Associated Virus (AAV) or Lentivirus (LV).
An excellent review of the therapeutic use of AAV in the nervous system was recently published by Huidry and Vandenberghe [2]. Many years of pre-clinical and now clinical experience have demonstrated the safety and efficacy of AAV. It is easily manipulated to insert the desired sequence with little residual viral DNA. It has rarely been shown to integrate into the host genome, primarily existing as episomal DNA, with the viral particles unable to replicate and devoid of viral genes. Lentivirus-delivered sequences can integrate into the host genome, but only in non-dividing cells.
The highest technical hurdle for any gene therapy is delivering the engineered virus to the target tissue. In the context of Parkinson’s, where the targets lie either deep inside the brain or widely located in the periphery, intravenous, intranasal and intrathecal delivery are not currently feasible. The only remaining option is direct administration, in the case of the CNS usually to the putamen, in a complicated surgical procedure.
The advantage of gene therapy over infusion of molecules such as GDNF is that, in practice thus far and in theory in the future, only one administration of drug product is needed for long-term biological activity. The addition of a double-blind placebo arm is also easier as simple sham surgery without dura penetration is possible. Whilst it may be easier, it is still not easy and the logistics of surgical delivery bring complications to the design, conduct and funding of clinical trials.
The therapeutic benefits of gene therapy for Parkinson’s must also be assessed in the context of the symptom relief provided by Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS), for both efficacy and safety. While gene delivery still requires a surgical intervention, it offers a potentially attractive alternative to DBS as there is no requirement for an implantable device or postoperative programming.
Finally, it must be stressed that none of the gene therapy projects currently in trial can be classified as a “cure”. They are highly unlikely to influence disease pathology, whether that is a-synuclein aggregation, LRRK2 malfunction or another route. Dysfunction in other neurotransmitter routes will continue with residual motor and continued non-motor symptoms.
This is not to underplay the importance and potential of gene therapy in Parkinson’s. The potential to deliver long-term motor (and some non-motor) symptom relief with greater ON time, reduced dyskinesia and significantly improved quality of life from a single surgical procedure will be extremely attractive. After all, if People with Parkinson’s (PwP) retain the pathology but can’t feel it, why should we care?
GENE THERAPIES IN THE CLINIC
There are five gene therapy programmes currently in the clinic, in phase 1 or 2, designed to deliver either biosynthetic enzymes or growth factors. Three projects aim to induce synthesis of dopamine, one to make gamma-amino butyric acid (GABA) and one to introduce GDNF.
Voyager Therapeutics in the USA and Jichi Medical University with Takara in Japan use AAV to deliver the gene for amino acid decarboxylase (AADC), the enzyme that converts levodopa to dopamine. Axovant’s Axo-Lenti-PD, licensed from Oxford Biomedica, codes for two enzymes that synthesize dopamine - AADC and tyrosine hydroxylase (TH) – and GTP cyclohydrolase 1 (GCH1), coding for production of an essential enzyme cofactor.
Axovant’s phase 2 trial of Axo-Lenti-PD, SUNRISE-PD, is in phase 2, building on successful safety trials conducted by Oxford Biomedica on a previous version, ProSavin®. Jichi’s AAV-HAADC-2 is in phase 1/2, following on from a successful phase 1 trial in inherited AADC deficiency.
MeiraGTx are developing AAV-GAD, which codes for glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD), an essential enzyme for GABA synthesis. Neurologix had previously taken this potential therapy to a Phase 2 trial prior to the company folding. MeiraGTx acquired the rights from Vector Neurosciences and plan to continue phase 2 studies.
The National Institutes of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) in the USA are developing AAV-GDNF, currently in Phase 1, involving a smaller open-label cohort primarily testing safety. Finally, Prevail Therapeutics are investigating AAV vectors to correct lysosomal malfunction in Parkinson’s, although the date of entry to clinical trials is as yet unknown.
The site of delivery is the striatum, primarily the putamen, in all of the projects except one; AAV-GAD is targeted at the sub-thalamic nucleus (STN) in an effort to reduce the overactivity seen in Parkinson’s. All of the therapies have a single surgical procedure with no further infusions.
The duration of treatment and observation varies. Axovant will assess safety at 3 months and efficacy (as a secondary outcome) at 6 months. Jichi will assess both at 6 months and Voyager at 12 months post-operation. NINDS will assess both at regular intervals over 12 years. The details of MeiraGTx’s next study are not yet available.
Primary outcomes are all on safety measures, with one exception. Voyager’s AAV2-hAADC has an additional assessment of efficacy, measuring the patient-rated change in ON time without dyskinesia. UPDRS and PDQ-39 are both secondary outcome measures. The Axovant study has only three secondary outcomes, all on efficacy.
The more advanced a patient is in the course of their condition, the greater the therapeutic range over which improvement may be detected. All the studies are looking for moderately advanced patients, with a minimum duration of disease of 5 years (4 years in the Voyager study). In addition, Axovant are actively seeking patients with motor fluctuations and dyskinesia.
The time to study end is highly variable. Voyager’s RESTORE-1 started in 2018 and will finish in 2020, with a separately listed follow up trial ending in 2026. The NINDS trial started in 2012 and is targeted to complete in 2026. Axovant’s follow up is to 2031, with primary reporting in 2022. From the perspective of PwP, the time taken to complete these phase 2 studies with phase 3 still to come is highly frustrating, although the prospect exists for phase 3 to run in parallel with the follow up stage of phase 2.
In summary, the number of gene therapies in the clinic for Parkinson’s is relatively small but builds on a generation of technical and clinical feasibility in this and other indications. The complexity of drug administration limits the numbers of patients that can be included in clinical trials. The direct delivery to the anatomy of choice holds great potential for significant therapeutic benefit and symptom relief with reduced motor complications.
[1] Mendell, JR., Al-Zaidy S., Shell R., et al., (2017) N Engl J Med, 377, 1713-1722.
[2] Huidry, E and Vandenberghe, L (2019) Neuron, 101, 839-862.
AAV-hAADC – Jichi Medical University
A small Phase I study was conducted in Japan demonstrating acceptable safety/tolerability and trends for efficacy [1]. The group has since then launched a phase 1/2 dose escalation study.
Takara Bio Inc.
Gene Therapy Research Institution, Co., Ltd.
There are two sequential study arms. Cohort 1 receives low dose (3x1011 vector genome/subject) and is infused with a total volume of 200 μl of the drug (50 μl per site). If there are no safety concerns at 6 months, then the study moves to cohort 2. Cohort 2 will receive high dose (9x1011 vector genome/subject) with 600 μl of total infusion volume (150 μl per site).
The study includes patients with clinical diagnosis of idiopathic PD aged between 35 to 75 years of age with no other known or suspected cause of parkinsonism. Patients should be levodopa responsive and should have been on it for at least 5 years. An OFF state MDS-UPDRS score between 30 – 100 and Hoehn and Yahr stage IV is required. Patients with a history of 3 hours or more of intensive or violent dyskinesia are excluded from the study. Standard surgical exclusionary criteria are applied.
Secondary outcomes include two measures:
The treatment effect of the drug at the end of 6 months. This is assessed by improvement in PD symptoms as recorded in subject diaries, clinical assessment and change in levodopa dosage.
The amount of intra-putaminal expression of AAV-hAADC-2 after 6 months, as measured by FMT-PET imaging.
Investigators will continue to assess the safety for 5 years after baseline examination and long term follow up will continue for 10 years.
[1] S. Muramatsu, K. Fujimoto, S. Kato, H. Mizukami, S. Asari, K. Ikeguchi, T. Kawakami, M. Urabe, A. Kume, T. Sato, E. Watanabe, K. Ozawa, I. Nakano, A phase I study of aromatic L-amino acid decarboxylase gene therapy for Parkinson’s disease., Mol. Ther. 18 (2010) 1731–5. doi:10.1038/mt.2010.135.
VY-AADC02 - VOYAGER THERAPEUTICS
Two phase 1 studies (NCT01973543 and NCT03065192) evaluated the safety of escalating doses of VY-AADC01, a precursor of VY-AADC02. The Phase 1b, open-label, three dose-escalation trial included 15 patients with advanced Parkinson’s Disease (an average of 10 years post-diagnosis) and disabling motor fluctuations, despite treatment with optimal anti-parkinsonian medications.
Putaminal coverage (as measured by co-administration of the MRI contrast agent, gadoteridol) was up to 42%. AADC activity increased by up to 79% as measured by 18F fluoro-L-DOPA PET. After 18 months, results showed an increase in ON time without troublesome dyskinesia of 2.4 hours in the combination of cohorts 2 and 3. These results were achieved with clinically meaningful and sustained reductions in daily oral levodopa and related medications of up to 42% [1]. Infusions of VY-AADC have been well-tolerated in all 15 patients treated in these cohorts, with no reported vector-related serious adverse events (SAEs).
This progress enabled Voyager to start the phase 2 RESTORE-1 study summarized below. Patients from the earlier phase 1 studies and RESTORE-1 will be invited to participate in a long-term follow up observational safety study (NCT03733496).
Voyager have now agreed with the FDA to increase the number of patients in RESTORE-1 to 75-100 and to commence another trial of similar size and design, RESTORE-2, to act as a staggered-parallel phase 3 study. Together with the granting of RMAT (Regenerative Medicine Advanced Therapy) status, this will hopefully be sufficient to enable regulatory submission of the full package [2].
T
change in patient rated motor fluctuations.
percent coverage within the putamen at time of administration of VY-AADC02.
change in AADC enzyme activity (distribution).
safety of VY-AADC02 as measured by:
number of treatment emergent adverse events.
changes in vital signs.
physical examinations and routine clinical laboratory analysis, (hematology and clinical chemistry).
changes in findings on brain images.
the Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS).
change in impulse control disorders.
Secondary outcomes are all related to efficacy, as measured at the twelve-month timepoint by changes in:
activities of daily living (UPDRS II).
PD related quality of life (PDQ-39).
time course response to levodopa (UPDRS III).
clinical global function (CGI).
overall non-motor symptoms (NMSS).
The assessment of coverage of the putamen on administration and distribution of enzyme activity, both already validated in the phase 1b trial, will give a good indication of target engagement and change in biological activity. The combination of a good safety profile thus far; the change in biological activity leading to significant clinical change; and a favourable regulatory review, give cause for optimism with VY-AADC02.
[1] Christine, CW et al, (2019) Ann Neurol 00 1-11
[2] http://ir.voyagertherapeutics.com/phoenix.zhtml?c=254026&p=irol-newsArticle&ID=2382295
MeiraGTx - AAV-GAD
NCT00195143 was a phase 1 open label trial assessing the safety and tolerability of AAV-GAD injections into unilateral STN in patients with PD. Three cohorts with 4 patients each received either low, medium or high dose AAV-GAD. There were no safety concerns and clinical benefits were noted in reduced motor UPDRS scores beginning at 3 months after the surgery and maintained at the 12 months assessment. PET scans revealed reduced thalamic metabolism on the implanted side which correlated with reduced pallidal activity [1].
A subsequent phase 2, double-blind, randomized, sham surgery-controlled trial with bilateral STN injection of high dose (1x1012 viral genomes) AAV-GAD was completed in 2010 and analysed data from 37 patients (NCT00643890). At the end of 6 months the AAV-GAD group showed significant improvement in motor scores as compared to the sham group (23% reduction in the active group vs 13% in the sham, p< 0.003) with no treatment or surgery related adverse events. A 12-month analysis showed reduction of levodopa induced dyskinesias in the treated group. Furthermore, reduced metabolic activities on FDG-PET in the thalamus, striatum, prefrontal, anterior cingulate and orbitofrontal cortices were noted in AAV-GAD treated patients [2, 3]. A phase 3 trial was planned but was terminated by the sponsoring company Neurologix due to financial reasons.
A recent analysis used the FDG-PET data from the phase 2 study to understand the metabolic brain network involved. The included patients had completed imaging visits at baseline, 6 and 12 months. The data suggested that the clinical improvement was not exerted via suppressing the abnormal PD related networks, but by developing new polysynaptic networks connecting STN to the cortices [4].
In October 2018, MeiraGTx acquired the vector company (Vector Neurosciences Inc.) and as a result acquired clinical development of the AAV-GAD therapy [5]. According to the company website, a phase1/2 trial of AAV-GAD in PD patients is in the pipeline. No further information is available at this time and no trial is posted on clinicaltrials.gov.
[1] M.G. Kaplitt, A. Feigin, C. Tang, H.L. Fitzsimons, P. Mattis, P.A. Lawlor, R.J. Bland, D. Young, K. Strybing, D. Eidelberg, M.J. During, Safety and tolerability of gene therapy with an adeno-associated virus (AAV) borne GAD gene for Parkinson’s disease: an open label, phase I trial, Lancet. 369 (2007) 2097–2105. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60982-9.
[2] P.A. LeWitt, A.R. Rezai, M.A. Leehey, S.G. Ojemann, A.W. Flaherty, E.N. Eskandar, S.K. Kostyk, K. Thomas, A. Sarkar, M.S. Siddiqui, S.B. Tatter, J.M. Schwalb, K.L. Poston, J.M. Henderson, R.M. Kurlan, I.H. Richard, L. Van Meter, C. V Sapan, M.J. During, M.G. Kaplitt, A. Feigin, AAV2-GAD gene therapy for advanced Parkinson’s disease: a double-blind, sham-surgery controlled, randomised trial, Lancet Neurol. 10 (2011) 309–319. doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(11)70039-4.
[3] M. Niethammer, C.C. Tang, P.A. LeWitt, A.R. Rezai, M.A. Leehey, S.G. Ojemann, A.W. Flaherty, E.N. Eskandar, S.K. Kostyk, A. Sarkar, M.S. Siddiqui, S.B. Tatter, J.M. Schwalb, K.L. Poston, J.M. Henderson, R.M. Kurlan, I.H. Richard, C. V. Sapan, D. Eidelberg, M.J. During, M.G. Kaplitt, A. Feigin, Long-term follow-up of a randomized AAV2-GAD gene therapy trial for Parkinson’s disease, JCI Insight. 2 (2017) e90133. doi:10.1172/jci.insight.90133.
[4] M. Niethammer, C.C. Tang, A. Vo, N. Nguyen, P. Spetsieris, V. Dhawan, Y. Ma, M. Small, A. Feigin, M.J. During, M.G. Kaplitt, D. Eidelberg, Gene therapy reduces Parkinson’s disease symptoms by reorganizing functional brain connectivity, Sci. Transl. Med. 10 (2018) 713.
AXO-Lenti-PD - AXOVANT
Oxford BioMedica successfully completed a phase 1/2 study for ProSavin®, which met its primary endpoint. The design was an open label dose escalation (NCT00627588), followed by a long-term observation study (NCT01856439). The results showed favourable safety and tolerability, with a statistically significant improvement of motor function as measured by the UPDRS part III score at 6 and 12 months [1]. This improvement was sustained in most patients for up to six years [2].
The FDA have confirmed that the previous studies of ProSavin® can be considered as part of a single development program for AXO-Lenti-PD.
incidence of treatment emergent adverse events and serious adverse events.
changes in clinical laboratory analysis.
changes in vital signs.
changes in brain MRI findings.
changes in physical examination.
Secondary outcomes are all related to efficacy, as measured at the six-month timepoint by changes in:
the Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) scores compared to baseline in defined “OFF” and “ON” medication states.
motor fluctuations compared to baseline as assessed by patient diaries.
the dyskinesia rating scale from baseline.
Results from the first cohort using the lowest dose of AXO-Lenti-PD in two patients, were announced in March 2019 [3], showing efficacy greater than the highest dose of ProSavin® used in previous studies. No serious adverse events were reported. Clearly, caution must be applied given the number of patients and further results are awaited.
[1] Palfi, S, et al., Lancet (2014) 383, 1138-46.
AAV2-GDNF
Further exploring the neuroprotective aspect of GDNF in PD, preclinical data in rat and primate models have positively shown the ability of transduced GDNF to induce sprouting from the lesioned axons or axon terminals. However, the positive meaningful effects were dependent on the location and timing of injection. Injecting the striatum during the early stage of disease process when the dopaminergic innervation of the striatum, particularly the putamen, is still relatively preserved was shown to have meaningful impact [2]. The promising neuroprotective benefits in the animal models supported the assessment of GDNF in human trials.
A number of studies explored the efficacy of direct infusion of GDNF into the putamen and while open label studies were promising, not a single randomized study demonstrated efficacy [3, 4]. One potential reason for failure was attributed to limitations of the direct putaminal delivery.
Gene vector delivery of GDNF is considered as a potentially more efficient alternative. Another growth factor, neurturin, was studied with vector delivery into the putamen and substantia nigra but the studies were negative [5]. Sangamo therapeutics were conducting a phase 1/2 study of AAV- neurturin in PD (https://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT00985517) but the company has terminated the project.
A single on-going study is exploring gene delivery GDNF in PD:
NINDS - AAV2-GDNF
Cohort 1: 9x1010 vg
Cohort 2: 3x1011 vg
Cohort 3: 9x1011 vg
Cohort 4: 3x1012 vg
The study includes individuals 18 years and above with clinical idiopathic PD of at least 5 years disease duration with no other known or suspected cause for parkinsonism. An Off state UPDRS score of more than or equal to 30 and Hoehn and Yahr stage of III and IV are required for inclusion. The study also requires a 30% or greater improvement in the UPDRS total motor score on sinemet study according to the CAPSIT guidelines.
The participants in the study will be followed for 5 years with 18 outpatient study visits and a 3-day stay in the hospital post-surgery. Lumbar puncture for CSF analysis will be done at the time of surgery, 6 months and 18 months after surgery.
Secondary outcome measures: To obtain preliminary data regarding the potential for clinical responses of the 4 dose levels testing by assessing the magnitude and variability of any treatment effects including clinical, laboratory and neuroimaging studies.
[1] C.M. Bäckman, L. Shan, Y.J. Zhang, B.J. Hoffer, S. Leonard, J.C. Troncoso, P. Vonsatel, A.C. Tomac, Gene expression patterns for GDNF and its receptors in the human putamen affected by Parkinson’s disease: A real-time PCR study, Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 252 (2006) 160–166. doi:10.1016/J.MCE.2006.03.013.
[2] A. Björklund, D. Kirik, C. Rosenblad, B. Georgievska, C. Lundberg, R.J. Mandel, Towards a neuroprotective gene therapy for Parkinson’s disease: use of adenovirus, AAV and lentivirus vectors for gene transfer of GDNF to the nigrostriatal system in the rat Parkinson model, Brain Res. 886 (2000) 82–98. doi:10.1016/S0006-8993(00)02915-2.
[3] A. Whone, M. Luz, M. Boca, M. Woolley, L. Mooney, S. Dharia, J. Broadfoot, D. Cronin, C. Schroers, N.U. Barua, L. Longpre, C.L. Barclay, C. Boiko, G.A. Johnson, H.C. Fibiger, R. Harrison, O. Lewis, G. Pritchard, M. Howell, C. Irving, D. Johnson, S. Kinch, C. Marshall, A.D. Lawrence, S. Blinder, V. Sossi, A.J. Stoessl, P. Skinner, E. Mohr, S.S. Gill, Randomized trial of intermittent intraputamenal glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor in Parkinson’s disease, Brain. 142 (2019) 512–525. doi:10.1093/brain/awz023.
[4] A.E. Lang, S. Gill, N.K. Patel, A. Lozano, J.G. Nutt, R. Penn, D.J. Brooks, G. Hotton, E. Moro, P. Heywood, M.A. Brodsky, K. Burchiel, P. Kelly, A. Dalvi, B. Scott, M. Stacy, D. Turner, V.G.F. Wooten, W.J. Elias, E.R. Laws, V. Dhawan, A.J. Stoessl, J. Matcham, R.J. Coffey, M. Traub, Randomized controlled trial of intraputamenal glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor infusion in Parkinson disease, Ann. Neurol. 59 (2006) 459–466. doi:10.1002/ana.20737.
[5] C. Warren Olanow, R.T. Bartus, T.L. Baumann, S. Factor, N. Boulis, M. Stacy, D.A. Turner, W. Marks, P. Larson, P.A. Starr, J. Jankovic, R. Simpson, R. Watts, B. Guthrie, K. Poston, J.M. Henderson, M. Stern, G. Baltuch, C.G. Goetz, C. Herzog, J.H. Kordower, R. Alterman, A.M. Lozano, A.E. Lang, Gene delivery of neurturin to putamen and substantia nigra in Parkinson disease: A double-blind, randomized, controlled trial, Ann. Neurol. 78 (2015) 248–257. doi:10.1002/ana.24436.
[6] D. Davis Palmer Argersinger, B.S.; Codrin Lungu, MD; Dima Hammoud, MD; Peter Herscovitch, MD; Debra Ehrlich, MD; Gretchen Scott; Krystof Bankiewicz, MD, PhD; Kareem Zaghloul, MD, PhD; Mark Hallett, MD; Russell Lonser, MD; John Heiss, MD (Washington, Phase 1 Trial of Convection-Enhanced Delivery of Adeno-Associated Virus Encoding Glial Cell Line-Derived Neurotrophic Factor in Patients With Advanced Parkinson’s Disease, (n.d.). https://www.aans.org/Annual-Scientific-Meeting/2019/Online-Program/Eposter?eventid=48888&itemid=SSIII&propid=45733&fbclid=IwAR2pqhDXYvm_gmsI34suPwELe0WyexMndU2U59rZFaDkqmHw6wx3-avguuo. https://www.aans.org/Annual-Scientific-Meeting/2019/Eposter
2. PHASE 3 STUDY IN FOCUS – INTEC PHARMA’S ACCORDION PILL
Intec Pharma have developed the Accordion Pill, a gastric-retentive capsule containing multiple layers of both immediate release and controlled release levodopa and carbidopa. The pill remains in the stomach for up to 12 hours [1].
In two phase 1 trials conducted in healthy adults, a single dose of Intec Pharma’s AP-CD/LD provided more consistent levodopa plasma levels and less peak-trough fluctuation than immediate release carbidopa/levodopa (IR-CD/LD) [2]. The safety of AP-CD/LD was similar to the known safety of CD/LD. AP-CD/LD should be taken with meals as it gives a more favorable pharmacokinetic profile.
A phase 2 study (NCT00918177) in Parkinson’s patients showed that peak-to-trough fluctuations (mean Cmax – mean Cmin) with the AP CD-LD formulation were half of those with the reference product [1]. The levodopa morning plasma levels (pre-first dose) were significantly higher than those achieved with the IR-CD/LD (522ng/<l vs. 68ng/<l). The high bioavailability of levodopa was preserved.
STUDY DESIGN and OUTCOMES
The phase 3 Accordance study is a multi-center (97 study locations), global, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, active-controlled, parallel-group study in adult subjects with fluctuating PD. The study will have 2 open label titration periods of 6 weeks each prior to the double-blind maintenance period. In the open label periods, all patients will be stabilized on the active comparator, IR-CD/LD and then on AP-CD/LD. The double-blind maintenance period will be 13 weeks long.
The primary outcome is change from baseline through to study completion, an average of 27 weeks, in the percentage of daily “Off time” during waking hours, based on Hauser Home Diary assessments.
Secondary outcomes, all measured on the same timescale as the primary outcome, are:
Change in “On time” without troublesome dyskinesia during waking hours.
Change in the number of total daily LD doses.
Clinical Global Impression Improvement (CGI-I), as recorded by physician & patient.
Change in total UPDRS Score (sum of Parts I-III).
[1] https://www.intecpharma.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/AP-CDLD-Phase-II-Poster-.pdf
[3] https://ir.intecpharma.com/static-files/13933a14-add2-4fee-b361-3a50a9300335
3. CLINICAL TRIAL RESOURCES
PARKINSON’S THERAPIES IN DEVELOPMENT
The Hope List - http://bit.ly/ParkinsonsHopeList
FINDING A CLINICAL TRIAL
ClinicalTrials.gov from the US National Library of Medicine - https://clinicaltrials.gov
PD Trial Tracker; analysing ClinicalTrials.gov for Parkinson’s specific trials - http://www.pdtrialtracker.info
Fox Trial Finder - https://foxtrialfinder.michaeljfox.org
European Parkinson’s Disease Association - https://www.epda.eu.com/about-parkinsons/treatments/clinical-trials/
Parkinson’s UK - https://www.parkinsons.org.uk/research/take-part-research
UK NHS Clinical Trials Gateway - https://www.ukctg.nihr.ac.uk
Cure Parkinson’s Trust - https://www.parkinsonsmovement.com/clinical-trials/
Parkinson’s Study Group - http://www.parkinson-study-group.org/clinical-trials
American Parkinson Disease Association - https://www.apdaparkinson.org/resources-support/living-with-parkinsons-disease/clinical-trials/
CenterWatch - https://www.centerwatch.com/clinical-trials/listings/condition/117/parkinsons-disease/
WHAT DOES IT MEAN TO PARTICIPATE IN A PARKINSON’S CLINICAL TRIAL?
Michael J Fox Foundation, Clinical Trial Companion – https://www.michaeljfox.org/pdcompanion.html
Parkinson’s Foundation - https://www.parkinson.org/Understanding-Parkinsons/Treatment/Clinical-Trials
