Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Background

Charcot-Marie-Tooth (CMT) neuropathies entail a large group of diseases with different gene mutation patterns, which produce heterogeneous phenotypes. Although health-related quality of life (HRQOL) is significantly impaired, a comprehensive assessment of HRQOL in CMT patients in Germany considering phenotypical heterogeneity represented a research gap.

Objective

The aim was to assess HRQOL and the satisfaction with health care in CMT patients in Germany.

Methods

CMT patients > 15 years with a genetically confirmed CMT subtype were recruited through a national CMT patient registry. HRQOL was assessed using the EQ-5D-5L questionnaire. Furthermore, subjective impairments in daily or work activities and satisfaction with health care were assessed using 4-point scales.

Results

HRQOL in CMT patients (n = 385) was impaired compared to the German population. Most patients reported problems in the dimension mobility (89.6%), pain/discomfort (89.4%) and usual activities (81.0%). Except for patients with hereditary neuropathy with liability to pressure palsy (HNPP), we found no differences in HRQOL between the CMT subtypes. 72.0%of CMT patients were satisfied with available health care services. However, patients reported to expect more CMT-specific knowledge and support as well as easier prescription and cost coverage procedures from health professionals and insurances.

Conclusions

The patient-reported outcomes in the assessed CMT cohort elucidate the need for more specific health care services that also address the heterogeneous phenotypes. Although the assessment has been limited to the German health services setting, insights may be applicable to CMT-specific care in other national settings.

Keywords

Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease hereditary sensory and motor neuropathy quality of life patient reported outcome measures

INTRODUCTION

Charcot-Marie-Tooth neuropathies (CMT) entail a group of slowly progressive hereditary motor and sensory neuropathies, with an estimated prevalence of 1:2,500 [1 –3]. The genotype is heterogeneous, with the most common mutations in PMP22, MPZ, GJB1 and MFN2 genes and continuously reported novel causative genes [4 –9]. This heterogeneity is also mirrored in the phenotype with clinical symptoms ranging from mild to severe impairments. Common symptoms encompass distal weakness, atrophy, sensory loss and foot deformities, e.g. pes cavus and claw toes. Typically, first signs appear in the feet and legs in childhood or later in life; the hands become affected with ongoing disease [3 , 11]. Frequently associated CMT comorbidities are restless leg syndrome, fatigue or scoliosis [12]. As there is no causative therapy until now, therapeutic options are restricted to symptomatic and supportive care, e.g. analgesics, physical and occupational therapy as well as medical aids to support the impaired mobility and hand function [5 , 13]. In Germany, the level and specificity of health care services for CMT patients mainly depend on the capacity of the chosen care ecosystem. Accordingly, consumption of resources range from medical aids used, physician contact frequency to supportive therapies like physiotherapy and rehabilitation measures [14].

CMT is associated with a significant impairment of health-related quality of life (HRQOL) [15 –20]. HRQOL comprises a physical, mental and social dimension and is a subjective evaluation of the health status by the patient [21, 22]. Due to the heterogeneity of the disease, health status reported by CMT patients is of high interest [5 , 23] and advanced assessment procedures focusing on CMT-specific symptoms have been suggested [24].

HRQOL in German CMT patients was not assessed comprehensively with a validated tool until now: One study used the SF-36 focusing on fatigue in CMT patients, but only reported the results of selected scales [25]. Another assessed HRQOL indirectly by analysing patients’ attitude toward childbearing considering the risk a child could inherit a similar disability [26].

In this study, we assessed the HRQOL in a German cohort of genetically confirmed CMT patients with the EQ-5D-5L, a validated standardised generic tool to measure HRQOL. Additionally, we compared HRQOL in CMT patients between CMT subtypes and with the German population. Furthermore, disease-associated factors influencing HRQOL were determined and satisfaction with health care services by CMT patients was recorded.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A cross-sectional study was performed in the year 2015 to assess HRQOL in a German cohort of CMT patients. We recruited patients through the national CMT patient registry (www.cmt-register.de) in Germany, which was launched in 2013 as part of the European Network of Excellence TREAT-NMD (www.treat-nmd.eu). Patients were eligible to take part in the study aged > 15 with a genetically confirmed diagnosis of CMT. 622 registered CMT patients met the inclusion criteria.

Subjective impairments in daily activities as well as impact on working life according to time, physical or mental condition, in mobility or flexibility, and in the social dimension were assessed on a 4-point scale.

HRQOL was measured with a German version of the EuroQol five-dimension questionnaire (EQ-5D™ is a trade mark of the Stichting EuroQol Research Foundation) to enable comparability. We used the version EQ-5D-5L and asked patients to rate their current problems in five dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activity, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression) on a 5-point scale. With this information a total of 3,125 (5⁵) possible health states are described. Additionally, a visual analogue scale (EQ-5D VAS) ranging from 0 (worst) to 100 (best state) is deployed for health status assessment [27]. Each EQ-5D health state corresponds to a country-specific single index value (EQ-5D index) reflecting the societal utility or preference-based value estimated by the general population [27]. According to the value sets from Germany, the EQ-5D index ranges from –0.661 (worst health state) to 1 (best health state) [28].

In addition, we asked for the satisfaction of health care services on a 4-point scale and collected suggestions for improvement in a free text format. Our questionnaire captured sociodemographic and disease-specific aspects. Patients were asked for known comorbidities and performed surgeries associated with their CMT in a free text format. The educational level of the patients was classified according to the International Standard Classification of Education [29] and summarized as low, middle, or high. Patients could choose between a paper- and a web-based version of the questionnaire. Information about the CMT severity were gathered via the CMT-Neuropathy Score second version (CMTNS2) [30, 31], genetic findings and diagnoses were used as assigned in the registry.

The informed consent to participate was confirmed by patients prior to the study implementation. Ethical approval was obtained from the ethics committee of the Ludwig-Maximilians-University of Munich.

Differences in HRQOL measured by the EQ-5D-5L VAS between CMT patients and the German reference population [32] were analysed by t-test. To determine differences in HRQOL between subgroups regarding sociodemographic and disease-specific factors, we first used the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test to check for normal distribution followed by t-test, Mann-Whitney U test, Kruskal-Wallis test or one-way ANOVA as appropriate. Additionally, we analysed correlations between metric patients’ characteristics and HRQOL with Spearman’s ρ. A p <0.05 was used as significance level. We used IBM® SPSS® Statistics Version 25 for statistical analyses.

RESULTS

Patient characteristics

Finally, 464 patients aged > 15 answered the questionnaire (74.6 %). Of these, 385 (83.0 %) had a genetically confirmed diagnosis and were included in this study. 62.3 %had a genetically confirmed CMT1A subtype. Patients were 16 to 95 years old with a mean age of 47.1 years (SD: 13.4). The severity range of CMT was measured by the CMTNS2 and showed a broad distribution within the study population as well as the duration of disease as given in Table 1. Most patients could take care for themselves. However, 23 patients reported the need for permanent attendance by another person. One third of the patients lived with another CMT patient in one household. Most often, these persons were the patients’ children or their parents (58.4 %and 46.4 %, respectively).

Table 1

Sociodemographic and disease-specific patient characteristics

Characteristics	Values
Age [median (IQR), n = 384]	47 (37–56)
Female [%]	57.1
Marital status [%, n = 384]
Single, divorced, widowed	21.4
Married/living together	78.6
CMT subtype¹ [%]
CMT1A	62.3
HNPP	9.1
CMTX1	8.6
CMT1B	6.2
CMT2A	3.9
CMT4C	2.9
Other subtypes	< 1.0 each
CMTNS2¹ [median (IQR), n = 271]	17 (12–20)
Disease duration in years since first	28 (16–41)
symptoms [median (IQR), n = 373]
Comorbidities [%]
CMT-associated	32.2
Further comorbidities	73.0
CMT-associated surgeries performed [%]	33.2
Permanent attendance of another person necessary [%]	6.0
Educational level [%, n = 371]
Low	4.3
Medium	49.6
High	46.1
Current status of employment [%, n = 383]
Study/school	4.4
Quit working life due to CMT	20.6
Currently working	60.8
Non-working	4.2
Retired	9.9
Body mass index category [%, n = 382]
Underweight (< 18.5 kg/m²)	2.1
Normalweight (18.5 –< 25 kg/m²)	46.9
Overweight (25 –< 30 kg/m²)	32.7
Obesity (≥30 kg/m²)	18.3

As data were not normally distributed, median and interquartile range (IQR) are reported. Unless otherwise stated data refer to the study population of n = 385. Because of rounding, percentage might not add up to exactly 100%. ¹Data of the national patient registry.

We found a high percentage of patients reporting CMT-associated comorbidities, including scoliosis (cohort prevalence of 11.4 %), foot or toe deformities (6.8 %), restless leg syndrome and hip dysplasia (4.4 %each), hearing loss (4.2 %) or sleep disorders including sleep apnoea (3.9 %). Additionally, patients reported further comorbidities like other spinal problems (25.5 %), organ dysfunctions like diabetes, thyroid or liver disease (20.8 %), cardiovascular (16.6 %) and other neurological diseases (15.6 %). One third of patients reported surgeries due to their CMT, in most cases foot corrections in general (15.8 %of patients), tendon transfers (13.5 %), osteotomy (7.8 %) or arthrodesis (6.5 %) were performed. The educational level in the population was higher compared to representative data for Germany [33]. Table 1 shows further sociodemographic and clinical features of the patients.

Subjectively evaluated impairments

92.4 %of the patients evaluated themselves as being impaired in the activities of daily living and 67.9 %reported impairments in school or work activities. This reflected physical constraints and the associated perceived limitations in mobility, flexibility and time (Fig. 1). Impairments concerning both physical and emotional status seemed to be of higher importance in school/work activities as compared to activities of daily living. The consequences are reflected in changing employment situations in 39.2 %of the CMT patients: 24.0 %of the working patients had to reduce their working times in the course of the disease, 20.6 %of the patients had to give up their occupational activities due to CMT, and 13.7 %had to change their working place or their profession to remain active.

Fig. 1

Subjectively evaluated impairments in activities of daily living and in school or work. Percentage of patients who indicated impairments in activities of daily living and school/work activities, respectively (n = 352–354 for activities of daily living and n = 243–245 for school/work activities). ADL: activities of daily living; work: school/work activities.

Quality of life

According to the EQ-5D-5L most patients reported problems in the dimension mobility (89.6 %of patients), followed by pain/discomfort (89.4 %) and usual activities (81.0 %, Fig. 2). The least problems occurred in self-care, 66.6 %of CMT patients reported no problems in this dimension. Extreme problems in the dimensions pain/discomfort (3.9 %) and mobility (3.6 %, Table 2) were quite low. Patients rated their current health status at a mean of 58.5 (SD: 19.8, median: 60, IQR: 45–75) on the EQ-5D VAS. The EQ-5D VAS rating by CMT patients was significantly lower compared to the German reference population (84.3; p < 0.001, Fig. 2). The mean EQ-5D index in CMT patients according to the societal preferences in Germany was 0.65 (SD: 0.28, median: 0.75, IQR: 0.52–0.85, Table 2).

Fig. 2

HRQOL in CMT patients and the German general population measured with the EQ-5D-5L. a) percentage of reported problems in each dimension, b) mean score of the visual analogue scale (VAS). “No problems” reflects level 1 of the EQ-5D-5L in each dimension, “problems” summarizes level 2 to 5 (slight to extreme problems). VAS: visual analogue scale (0: worst, 100: best health). For comparability purposes results of the VAS are presented as mean and standard deviation, although they were not normally distributed. Error bars indicate standard deviation. Data for the general population are based on [32].

Table 2

Results of the EQ-5D-5L in CMT subtypes

		Total n = 385	CMT1 n = 266	CMT2 n = 35	CMT4 n = 13	CMTX n = 33	HNPP n = 35	p
Mobility [%]	No problems	10.4%	10.9%	8.6%	0.0%	6.1%	17.1%	0.035
	Slight problems	18.8%	19.2%	8.6%	7.7%	18.2%	31.4%
	Moderate problems	38.8%	37.7%	42.9%	53.8%	42.4%	31.4%
	Severe problems	28.4%	30.2%	25.7%	23.1%	27.3%	20.0%
	Unable to	3.6%	1.9%	14.3%	15.4%	6.1%	0.0%
Self-care [%]	No problems	66.6%	66.3%	60.0%	69.2%	57.6%	82.9%	0.202
	Slight problems	21.7%	22.3%	22.9%	0.0%	27.3%	17.1%
	Moderate problems	7.6%	7.6%	8.6%	15.4%	12.1%	0.0%
	Severe problems	2.9%	3.0%	2.9%	7.7%	3.0%	0.0%
	Unable to	1.3%	0.8%	5.7%	7.7%	0.0%	0.0%
Usual activities [%]	No problems	19.0%	20.7%	20.0%	15.4%	15.2%	8.6%	0.988
	Slight problems	32.2%	30.5%	31.4%	23.1%	42.4%	40.0%
	Moderate problems	30.9%	29.7%	37.1%	46.2%	18.2%	42.9%
	Severe problems	16.1%	16.9%	8.6%	15.4%	24.2%	8.6%
	Unable to	1.8%	2.3%	2.9%	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%
Pain/discomfort [%]	No pain	10.7%	10.6%	11.4%	30.8%	9.1%	5.7%	0.297
	Slight pain	28.6%	29.8%	31.4%	15.4%	27.3%	22.9%
	Moderate pain	39.3%	39.6%	37.1%	38.5%	42.4%	40.0%
	Severe pain	17.4%	16.6%	20.0%	15.4%	12.1%	25.7%
	Extreme pain	3.9%	3.4%	0.0%	0.0%	9.1%	5.7%
Anxiety/depression [%]	Not anxious	31.3%	34.2%	20.0%	30.8%	24.2%	23.5%	0.594
	Slightly anxious	35.7%	33.1%	42.9%	38.5%	48.5%	38.2%
	Moderately anxious	22.9%	23.3%	28.6%	23.1%	15.2%	20.6%
	Severely anxious	8.6%	8.3%	5.7%	7.7%	12.1%	11.8%
	Extremely anxious	1.6%	1.1%	2.9%	0.0%	0.0%	5.9%
EQ-5D VAS		60.0	60.0	60.0	50.0	65.0	50.0	0.880
[median, (IQR)]		(45.0–75.0)	(45.0–75.0)	(37.0–70.0)	(43.0–70.0)	(50.0–70.0)	(45.0–80.0)
EQ-5D index		0.75	0.76	0.72	0.77	0.77	0.69	0.804
[median, (IQR)]		(0.52–0.85)	(0.54–0.85)	(0.57–0.87)	(0.42–0.82)	(0.48–0.85)	(0.43–0.84)

As EQ-5D VAS and EQ-5D index data were not normally distributed, we present median and interquartile range. p < 0.05 indicates significant differences between subtypes (result of a Kruskal-Wallis Test). Results for other subtypes, e.g. HSANIA, HSANIC, are not displayed due to the small number of patients (n = 3).

We found gender differences in the dimension self-care reflecting a higher impairment in men, as well as in the dimension anxiety suggesting a higher impact on women (p < 0.05). EQ-5D scores were worse in patients who reported CMT-associated or other comorbidities. Patients who have undergone surgery had a lower overall HRQOL according to EQ-5D VAS and EQ-5D index and significantly more problems with mobility and daily activities compared to patients without performed surgeries (p < 0.05). In addition, patients with more problems in the EQ-5D dimensions reported themselves as being impaired in daily activities or in school or at work, others were not working or reported need for permanent attendance (p < 0.05). Single, divorced or widowed patients reported far reaching problems in the dimensions self-care and anxiety compared to married patients or patients in a partnership (p < 0.05). Differences between CMT types existed within the dimension mobility showing more extensive problems along with their impact on HRQOL for CMT types 1, 2, 4 and X as compared to hereditary neuropathy with liability to pressure palsy (HNPP) (p < 0.05, Table 2). No differences in HRQOL between sexes by CMT subtype were found with exception of more problems in the dimension self-care in male compared to female CMT1 patients (p < 0.05).

HRQOL, measured as patient-reported EQ-5D VAS and valued according to the societal preferences as EQ-5D index, declined with the severity of disease (CMTNS2, ρ= –0.38 and –0.42), age (ρ= –0.22 and –0.16), the duration of disease (ρ= –0.18 and –0.23) and higher BMI (ρ= –0.13 and –0.14), and improved with a higher educational status (ρ= 0.20 and 0.28, all p < 0.05).

Satisfaction with health care

The majority of patients were very (17.6 %) or rather (54.4 %) satisfied with health care services. Increasing satisfaction with health care was associated with higher HRQOL (ρ= 0.26 with EQ-5D VAS and 0.30 with EQ-5D index, p < 0.05). Satisfaction with health care was also associated with the scores in the EQ-5D subscales anxiety/depression (ρ= 0.35), pain/discomfort (ρ= 0.26), usual activities (ρ= 0.24) and mobility (ρ= 0.17), indicating a lower satisfaction with increasing problems in the corresponding dimensions. No association was detected in the dimension self-care (p > 0.05).

272 patients suggested improvements for health care services. Most frequently, patients referred to the lack of CMT-specific knowledge of caring health professionals and health insurances (25.7 %). Other issues involved problems with prescription, cost coverage and ineffective supportive CMT therapies including physiotherapy or occupational therapy (25.4 %). Furthermore, patients reported a general improvement need (20.2 %), need for psychological support (13.2 %), as well as general medical assistance (13.2 %).

DISCUSSION

To our knowledge, this is the first study in a German sample reporting comprehensively the HRQOL of CMT patients with a validated tool. In line with earlier studies from Germany [25, 26], we found a lower HRQOL in patients with comorbidities and a higher disease severity. Nevertheless, the association between HRQOL and CMTNS2 was moderate (ρ<0.5). Earlier studies reported inconsistent results regarding the association between the HRQOL and the objectively evaluated disease severity, showing both a significant correlation between the modified Rankin Scale [26] or the Barthel and Deambulation Index [20] and the HRQOL, and no differences in quoting CMT-specific symptoms depending on the CMTNS2 [34]. Other indicators of disease severity, e.g. the toe or heel walk [35], were also associated with HRQOL in CMT patients. Besides the apparent influence of increasing impairments on HRQOL, other factors like coping with the disease might counteract a stronger decrease in HRQOL over time: Psychosocial aspects might improve over time in CMT patients –although the physical dimension deteriorates [17, 36].

C omorbidities and surgeries of CMT patients are frequently not recorded or analysed in studies focusing on the HRQOL. However, both comorbidities and surgeries are an essential part of the disease. In our study cohort, almost 75 %reported CMT-associated or further comorbidities, one third had undergone surgeries due to their impairments. These patients showed a worse HRQOL as compared to patients without comorbidities or without surgeries. Although orthopaedic surgeries often imply significant improvements in the physical dimension, our results reflect continued major impairments even after performed foot corrections. For CMT patients with comorbidities the constraints in the physical, mental and social dimension lead to a higher total consumption of health care resources[14].

The perceived disease-specific impairments in daily activities and school or work, which are not reflected with the EQ-5D, demonstrated specific needs. As to be expected, patient-reported physical constraints seem to be of higher relevance in CMT patients as compared to emotional and social aspects. Especially at workplaces and in schools, environment, conditions and processes are not adapted to compensate CMT-specific impairment pattern. Instead, they pose significant problems, whereas in daily activities patients can adapt more easily to their health status related deficits.

Interestingly, we could detect differences between CMT types in the dimension mobility, as patients with HNPP reported significantly fewer problems. Similar results were observed in the Italian health care setting: No significant HRQOL reductions (except for physical functioning) were detected in HNPP patients as compared to the general population, because impairments are often focal and transitory [37]. Other authors report differences in pain and in the psychosocial dimension between CMT subtypes [20], or no differences at all [15, 19]. This could be explained by the level of precision by which CMT subtypes are assigned (patient-reported, based on clinical symptoms or molecular genetic confirmation). In this regard, the precision of CMT diagnosis regarding genetically confirmed diagnosis is an added value in our study.

Compared to the German population, each dimension of the EQ-5D in CMT patients revealed impairment effects, with greatest differences in mobility and usual daily activities. Due to the CMT-specific symptoms starting in the feet with weakness, atrophy and foot deformities, the physical impairments are the most prevalent and lead to reduced HRQOL scores in mobility, vitality, physical function and pain [15 , 38]. In the dimension self-care scoring suggests only minor problems. However, as soon as patients need permanent attendance, their HRQOL scores declined significantly.

Nevertheless, the range of standard deviation in the evaluation of the current problems in the five dimensions as well as of the current health state reveals the heterogeneity of the CMT phenotypes also from a patients’ perspective.

EQ-5D was applied in two studies analyzing the HRQOL in CMT cohorts in the United Kingdom and the Netherlands [38, 39]. Both former studies used the EQ-5D-3L, assessing the current problems in the five dimensions on a 3-point scale. In line with our results, Calvert et al. show more intense problems in CMT patients as compared to the general population, particularly in the dimensions mobility, usual activities and pain/discomfort. In contrast to the results from UK, the EQ-5D index was higher in our population (0.44 vs. 0.69) and patients reported problems with self-care less frequently. This can be explained by the slightly higher mean age in the UK CMT cohort enrolled. This is also supported by the results from the Dutch CMT population, where only 11 %of the patients reported problems with self-care [39]. These patients were younger compared to our study population and showed a slightly better health status on the EQ-5D VAS (66 vs. 58). Age is a known influencing factor in HRQOL in CMT since it adds burden to the progressing disease. Interestingly, the duration of disease seems to have a minor impact on the overall HRQOL. Correlations between the EQ-5D index, the EQ-5D VAS rating and the time elapsed since the first CMT-symptoms appeared were rather weak. In CMT, a longer duration of the disease is associated with higher HRQOL, especially in the psychosocial dimension. However, this process of accepting, coping and adaptation is compensated by the disease progression in the physical dimension [17, 36].

Gender differences in HRQOL are also inconsistent in the published literature with deteriorated HRQOL in female CMT patients primarily in France, Italy and the USA [16 , 35].

Other sociodemographic factors, e.g. the employment and family status, had also an influence on the HRQOL, in line with results from Italy, the USA and Australia, respectively [15 , 19]. Factors such as BMI and educational status with a potential influence on HRQOL have been considered for the first time, although they might be important confounders in HRQOL assessments [40]. Especially the body composition seems to be a relevant indicator for the health status CMT patients, as reported recently [41]. The dimension mobility of CMT patients seems to reflect the highest relevance.

Improvements suggested by the patients regarding prescriptions and CMT-specific implementation of promising therapeutic options, e.g. physiotherapy or occupational therapies, indicate a relevant unmet need in health care provision. This emphasizes the relevance of patient-reported outcomes to identify unmet care needs, particularly those that can be solved. The perceived impairments and their impact on overall health status of CMT patients can successfully guide the search for feasible care improvements in the light of a still missing magic bullet against CMT.

The mainstay of improving the HRQOL of CMT patients is the preservation of physical functions including long-term mobility. Occupational therapy, which is used by approximately 50 %of US American and 33 %of German CMT patients [14, 42], can be an effective instrument. The reasons for not using occupational therapies were recently assessed in CMT patients. It was found that the informed physicians and therapists are pivotal for providing access to state-of-the-art treatment [42]. Suggested improvements by patients in our study cohort are accordingly indicating a lack of support, advice and information of physicians and therapists. These patients confirmed shortcomings might be explained by a lack of specific knowledge regarding existing and effective CMT care options. Accordingly, the care pathway for CMT patients need to be nourished with existing and effective interventions as well as treatment guidelines that support health professionals who do see CMT patients less frequently. Access and implementation should be measurable by using patient-reported outcomes along with HRQOL instruments.

There are some limitations, which could have influenced our results. First, we recruited our study cohort via the German CMT patient registry. Accordingly, external validity could be low and conclusions are limited to the cohort enrolled, which might not be fully representative. We need to consider that the participating study cohort is dealing actively and highly motivated with their disease. Thus, patients with severe forms of CMT might be underrepresented. Second, important disease-specific aspects like the CMT subtype and the CMTNS2 could be derived from the national patient registry. Other potential influencing factors on HRQOL were assessed by patient report. For comorbidities and performed surgeries free text formats were used. Therefore, an underestimation is possible. Third, we used the generic EQ-5D to evaluate the HRQOL in German CMT patients. Although the EQ-5D is commonly used (as reflected by the high number of almost 9,000 results in the data base MEDLINE via PubMed in February 2021), it is rather rarely used to assess the HRQOL in CMT populations. With its five dimensions, it might be too generic to assess the disease-specific limitations in a heterogeneous disease like CMT. The higher number of subscales of the generic SF-36 seems to be more frequently used in CMT, e.g. [15 , 20]. Nevertheless, the development of a disease-specific instrument for the assessment of HRQOL in CMT patients and other instruments, e.g. [24], will allow a more comprehensive and precise assessment to better understand both the clinically and patient-reported health status as requested in the literature [34, 43].

In conclusion, our results underpin the importance of patient-reported outcomes for the advancement of CMT care pathways in a broader context. The patients’ perspective helps to identify, prioritize and better understand disease-specific factors that influence the range of CMT specific health states. The generic EQ-5D could be replaced once a disease-specific HRQOL instrument has gained international acceptance. Although the results were gathered in the German health care setting, some findings might be generalized. This include acquaintance with the heterogeneity of CMT and the full range of effective interventions among health professionals and payers, particularly as it represents a rather rare disease with its typical challenges in this regard.

Footnotes

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was supported by the Friedrich-Baur Public Trust, Burgkunstadt within the ‘Oberfranken Förderprogramm’ (Upper Frankonia Program).

The authors wish to thank the CMT patients for participating in this study, H. Saodiy, I. Hirschmann, F. Walter, C. Klug and K. Fernando Samarappuli, for scientific assistance and database research. We thank the PIs of the CMT-NET centers (Profs. B. Gess, Aachen, M. Sereda, Göttingen, P. Young, Münster) for cooperation and support.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors have no conflict of interest to report.

References

Skre

. Genetic and clinical aspects of Charcot-Marie-Tooth’s disease. Clinical Genetics. 1974;6(2):98–118. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-0004.1974.tb00638.x.

Barreto

LCLS

, Oliveira

, Nunes

, Franca Costa de

IMP

, Garcez

, Goes

et al. Epidemiologic Study of Charcot-Marie-Tooth Disease: A Systematic Review. Neuroepidemiology. 2016;46(3):157–65. https://doi.org/10.1159/000443706.

Pareyson

, Scaioli

, Laura

. Clinical and electrophysiological aspects of Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease. Neuromolecular Med. 2006;8(1-2):3–22. https://doi.org/10.1385/NMM:8:1:123.

Braathen

. Genetic epidemiology of Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease. Acta Neurol Scand Suppl. 2012(193). https://doi.org/10.1111/ane.12013.

El-Abassi

, England

, Carter

. Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease: An overview of genotypes, phenotypes, and clinical management strategies. PM & R. 2014;6(4):342–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmrj.2013.08.611.

Gutmann

, Shy

. Update on Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease. Curr Opin Neurol. 2015;28(5):462–7. https://doi.org/10.1097/WCO.0000000000000237.

Timmerman

, Strickland

, Zuchner

. Genetics of Charcot-Marie-Tooth (CMT) Disease within the Frame of the Human Genome Project Success. Genes (Basel). 2014;5(1):13–32. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes5010013.

Saporta

, Shy

. Inherited peripheral neuropathies. Neurol Clin. 2013;31(2):597–619. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ncl.2013.01.009.

Pareyson

, Saveri

, Pisciotta

. New developments in Charcot-Marie-Tooth neuropathy and related diseases. Curr Opin Neurol. 2017;30(5):471–80. https://doi.org/10.1097/WCO.0000000000000474.

10.

McCorquodale

, Pucillo

, Johnson

. Management of Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease: Improving long-term care with a multidisciplinary approach. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2016;9:7–19. https://doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S69979.

11.

Rossor

, Evans

MRB

, Reilly

. A practical approach to the genetic neuropathies. Pract Neurol. 2015;15(3):187–98. https://doi.org/10.1136/practneurol-2015-001095.

12.

Dräger

, Young

. Charcot-Marie-Tooth-Erkrankungen: CMT im klinischen Alltag. Nervenheilkunde. 2017;36(1/2):56–60.

13.

. Inherited neuropathies. Semin Neurol. 2012;32(3):204–14. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0032-1329198.

14.

Schorling

, Thiele

, Gumbert

, Krause

, Klug

, Schreiber-Katz

et al. Cost of illness in Charcot-Marie-Tooth neuropathy: Results from Germany. Neurology. 2019;92(17):e2027–e2037. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000007376.

15.

Redmond

, Burns

, Ouvrier

. Factors that influence health-related quality of life in Australian adults with Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease. Neuromuscular Disorders. 2008;18(8):619–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nmd.2008.05.015.

16.

Colomban

, Micallef

, Lefebvre

M-N

, Dubourg

, Gonnaud

P-M

, Stojkovic

et al. Clinical spectrum and gender differences in a large cohort of Charcot-Marie-Tooth type 1A patients. J Neurol Sci. 2014;336(1-2):155–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jns.2013.10.029.

17.

Johnson

, Heatwole

, Dilek

, Sowden

, Kirk

, Shereff

et al. Quality-of-life in Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease: The patient’s perspective. Neuromuscular disorders. 2014;24(11):1018–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nmd.2014.06.433.

18.

Burns

, Ryan

, Ouvrier

. Quality of life in children with Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease. J Child Neurol. 2010;25(3):343–7. https://doi.org/10.1177/0883073809339877.

19.

Vinci

, Serrao

, Millul

, Deidda

, Santis de

, Capici

et al. Quality of life in patients with Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease. Neurology. 2005;65(6):922–4. https://doi.org/10.1212/01.wnl.0000176062.44360.49.

20.

Padua

, Aprile

, Cavallaro

, Commodari

, La Torre

, Pareyson

et al. Variables influencing quality of life and disability in Charcot Marie Tooth (CMT) patients: Italian multicentre study. Neurological Sciences. 2006;27(6):417–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-006-0722-8.

21.

Guyatt

, Feeny

, Patrick

. Measuring health-related quality of life. Ann Intern Med. 1993;118(8):622–9.

22.

The WHOQOL Group. The World Health Organization Quality of Life assessment (WHOQOL): Position paper from the World Health Organization. Social Science & Medicine. 1995;41(10):1403–9.

23.

Reilly

, Murphy

, Laura

. Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease. Journal of the Peripheral Nervous System. 2011;16(1):1–14. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.15298027.2011.00324.x.

24.

Johnson

, Heatwole

, Creigh

, McDermott

, Dilek

, Hung

et al. The Charcot-Marie-Tooth Health Index: Evaluation of a Patient-Reported Outcome. Ann Neurol. 2018;84(2):225–33. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.25282.

25.

Boentert

, Dziewas

, Heidbreder

, Happe

, Kleffner

, Evers

et al. Fatigue, reduced sleep quality and restless legs syndrome in Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease: A web-based survey. J Neurol. 2010;257(4):646–52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-009-5390-1.

26.

Pfeiffer

, Wicklein

, Ratusinski

, Schmitt

, Kunze

. Disability and quality of life in Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 1. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2001;70(4):548–50.

27.

EuroQol Research Foundation. EQ-5D-5L User Guide: Basic information on how to use the EQ-5D-5L instrument. 2nd ed. Rotterdam; 2015.

28.

Ludwig

, Graf von der Schulenburg

J-M

, Greiner

. German Value Set for the EQ-5D-5L. PharmacoEconomics. 2018;36(6):663–74. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40273-018-0615-8.

29.

UNESCO Institute for Statistics. International standard classification of education: ISCED 2011. Montreal, Quebec: UNESCO UIS; 2012.

30.

Murphy

, Herrmann

, McDermott

, Scherer

, Shy

, Reilly

et al. Reliability of the CMT neuropathy score (second version) in Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease. Journal of the Peripheral Nervous System. 2011;16(3):191–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1529-8027.2011.00350.x.

31.

Shy

, Blake

, Krajewski

, Fuerst

, Laura

, Hahn

et al. Reliability and validity of the CMT neuropathy score as a measure of disability. Neurology. 2005;64(7):1209–14. https://doi.org/10.1212/01.WNL.0000156517.00615.A3.

32.

Huber

, Reitmeir

, Vogelmann

, Leidl

. EQ-5D-5L in the General German Population: Comparison and Evaluation of Three Yearly Cross-Section Surveys. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2016;13(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph13030343.

33.

Statistische Ämter des Bundes und der Länder. Internationale Bildungsindikatoren im Ländervergleich. Wiesbaden; 2016.

34.

Johnson

, Heatwole

, Ferguson

, Sowden

, Jeanat

, Herrmann

. Patient identification of the symptomatic impact of charcot-marie-tooth disease type 1A. J Clin Neuromuscul Dis. 2013;15(1):19–23. https://doi.org/10.1097/CND.0b013e31829e22e3.

35.

Padua

, Shy

, Aprile

, Cavallaro

, Pareyson

, Quattrone

et al. Correlation between clinical/neurophysiological findings and quality of life in Charcot-Marie-Tooth type 1A. Journal of the Peripheral Nervous System. 2008;13(1):64–70. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1529-8027.2008.00159.x.

36.

Arnold

, McEntagart

, Younger

. Psychosocial issues that face patients with Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease: The role of genetic counseling. J Genet Couns. 2005;14(4):307–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10897-005-0760-z.

37.

Padua

, Pazzaglia

, Cavallaro

, Commodari

, Pareyson

, Quattrone

et al. Quality of life is not impaired in patients with hereditary neuropathy with liability to pressure palsies. European Journal of Neurology. 2007;14(1):6. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-1331.2006.01545.x.

38.

Calvert

, Pall

, Hoppitt

, Eaton

, Savill

, Sackley

. Health-related quality of life and supportive care in patients with rare long-term neurological conditions. Quality of life research. 2013;22(6):1231–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-012-0269-5.

39.

van der Linden

, Kalkman

, Hendricks

, Schillings

, Zwarts

, Bleijenberg

, et al. Ambulatory disabilities and the use of walking aids in patients with hereditary motor and sensory neuropathy type I (HMSN I). Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2007;2(1):35–41.

40.

Arrospide

, Machón

, Ramos-Goñi

, Ibarrondo

, Mar

. Inequalities in health-related quality of life according to age, gender, educational level, social class, body mass index and chronic diseases using the Spanish value set for Euroquol 5D-5L questionnaire. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2019;17(1):69. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-019-1134-9.

41.

Hackett

, Roberts-Clarke

, Jain

, Mavros

, Wilson

, Halaki

et al. Body composition and its association with physical performance, quality of life, and clinical indictors in Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease: A pilot study. Disabil Rehabil. 2019;41(4):405–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2017.1395083.

42.

Matyjasik-Liggett

, Wittman

. The utilization of occupational therapy services for persons with Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease. Occup Ther Health Care. 2013;27(3):228–37. https://doi.org/10.3109/07380577.2012.755277.

43.

Burns

, Graham

, Rose

, Simmons

. Quality of life and measures of quality of life in patients with neuromuscular disorders. Muscle Nerve. 2012;46(1):9–25. https://doi.org/10.1002/mus.23245.

Health-related Quality of Life and Satisfaction with German Health Care Services in Patients with Charcot-Marie-Tooth Neuropathy

Abstract

Background

Objective

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Keywords

INTRODUCTION

MATERIALS AND METHODS

RESULTS

Patient characteristics

Subjectively evaluated impairments

Quality of life

Satisfaction with health care

DISCUSSION

Footnotes

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

References