In this study, it is aimed to integrate CODAS method with circular intuitionistic fuzzy sets as a new solution method for MCDM problems. Containing a radius notation with degrees of central membership and non-membership degrees is the main advantage of circular intuitionistic fuzzy in decision making. On the other side, Combinative Distance-based Assessment (CODAS) method contains many advantages such as basing on two types of distance calculations (Euclidean and Taxicab distances) comparing with other MCDM methods. When the advantages of circular intuitionistic fuzzy sets and CODAS method are considered, proposed circular intuitionistic fuzzy CODAS method (CIFS-CODAS) presents many superiorities compared to other MCDM techniques. By this way, an application for green logistics park location selection will be handled by using CIFS-CODAS to show the validity of the methodology. After, a comparative analysis with intuitionistic fuzzy CODAS (IFS-CODAS), intuitionistic fuzzy TOPSIS (IFS-TOPSIS) and intuitionistic fuzzy EDAS (IFS-EDAS) methods will be performed for green logistics park location selection problem to confirm the robustness of presented method. Green logistics and Green Deal are also emphasized considering environmental factors as a scope of the article. Finally, the results will be evaluated in the context of the logistics sector and green logistics.
SharmaS., GandhiM.A. Exploring correlations in components of green supply chain practices and green supply chain performance, Competitiveness Review, 2016.
2.
SbihiA. and EgleseR.W., Combinatorial optimization and green logistics, 4OR5(2) (2007), 99–116.
3.
US EPA, Inventory of U.S. Greenhouse gas emissions and sinks: 1990-2016, EPA 430-R-2018-003, 2018.
4.
WangD.F., DongQ.L., PengZ.M., KhanS. and TarasovA., The Green Logistics Impact on International Trade: Evidence from Developed and Developing Countries, Sustainability10(7) (2018), 2235.
5.
DekkerR., BloemhofJ. and MallidisI., Operations Research for green logistics–An overview of aspects, issues, contributions and challenges, European Journal of Operational Research219(3) (2012), 671–679.
6.
European Commission, The European Green Deal 2019. vol. Communicat, Brussels, Belgium.
7.
GhorabaeeK.M., AmiriM., ZavadskasE.K., HooshmandR. and AntuchevicieneJ., Fuzzy extension of the CODAS method for multi-criteria market segment evaluation, Journal of Business Economics and Management18(1) (2017), 1–19.
8.
AlkanN. and KahramanC., Circular intuitionistic fuzzy TOPSIS method: pandemic hospital location selection, Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems42(1) (2021), 1–22.
9.
JedlińskiM., The position of logistics in sustainabledevelopment of a smart green city, Procedia-Social andBehavioral Sciences151(xx) (2014), 102–111.
10.
MurphyP.R., PoistR.F. and BraunschweigC.D., Green logistics: comparative views of environmental progressives, moderates, and conservatives, Journal of Business Logistics17(1) (1996), 191.
11.
KimY., TanakaK. and MatsuokaS., Environmental and economic effectiveness of the Kyoto Protocol, Plos One15(7) (2020), 236–299.
12.
WuH.J. and DunnS.C., Environmentally responsible logistics systems, International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management25 (1995), 265–289.
13.
ZamanK. and ShamsuddinS., Green logistics and national scale economic indicators: Evidence from a panel of selected European countries, Journal of Cleaner Production143 (2017), 51–63.
14.
Seroka-StolkaO. and Ociepa-KubickaA., Green logistics and circular economy, Transportation Research Procedia39 (2019), 471–479.
15.
KwakS.Y., ChoW.S., SeokG.A. and YooS.G., Intention to Use Sustainable Green Logistics Platforms, Sustainability12(8) (2020), 3502.
16.
ChhabraD., GargS.K. and SinghR.K., Analyzing alternatives for green logistics in an Indian automotive organization: A case study, Journal of Cleaner Production167 (2017), 962–969.
17.
TrivellasP., MalindretosG. and ReklitisP., Implications of Green Logistics Management on Sustainable Business and Supply Chain Performance: Evidence from a Survey in the Greek Agri-Food Sector, Sustainability12(24) (2020), 10515.
18.
ÇelikE., ErdoğanM., GümüşA.T.An extendedfuzzy TOPSIS–GRA method based on different separationmeasures for green logistics service provider selection, International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology13(5) (2016), 1377–1392.
19.
QianX., FangS.C., YinM., HuangM. and LiX., Selecting green third party logistics providers for a loss-averse fourth party logistics provider in a multiattribute reverse auction, Information Sciences548 (2021), 357–377.
20.
ZadehL.A., Fuzzy sets, Information and Control8 (1965), 338–356.
AtanassovK. and MarinovE., Four distances for circular intuitionistic fuzzy sets, Mathematics9(10) (2021), 1121.
24.
KhanM.J., KumamW. and AlreshidiN.A., Divergence measures for circular intuitionistic fuzzy sets and their applications, Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence116 (2022), 105455.
25.
BoltürkE. and KahramanC., Interval-valued and circular intuitionistic fuzzy present worth analyses, Informatica33(4) (2022), 693–711.
26.
KahramanC., OtayI. Extension of VIKOR method using circular intuitionistic fuzzy sets, In Intelligent and Fuzzy Techniques for Emerging Conditions and Digital Transformation: Proceedings of the INFUS 2021 Conference, held August 24-26, 2021. Volume 2 (pp. 48–57). Springer International Publishing.
27.
ÇakírE.,TaşM.A Circular intuitionistic fuzzy analytic hierarchy process for remote working assessment in Covid-19, In Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems: Digital Acceleration and The New Normal-Proceedings of the INFUS 2022 Conference, Volume 1 (pp. 589–597). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
28.
İremO.T.AY. and KahramanC., A novel circular intuitionisticfuzzy AHP&VIKOR methodology: an application to a multi-expertsupplier evaluation problem,, Pamukkale Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi28(1) (2022), 194–207.
29.
GhorabaeeK.M., ZavadskasE.K., TurskisZ. and AntuchevicieneJ., A new combinative distance-based assessment (CODAS) method formulti-criteria decision-making, Economic Computation &Economic Cybernetics Studies & Research50(3) (2016).
30.
BolturkE. and KahramanC., A Modified Interval-valued Pythagorean Fuzzy CODAS Method and Evaluation of AS/RS Technologies, Journal of Multiple-Valued Logic & Soft Computing33 (2019).
31.
BolturkE. and KarasanA., Prioritization of Investment Alternatives for a Hospital by Using Neutrosophic CODAS Method, Journal of Multiple-Valued Logic & Soft Computing33 (2019).
32.
GvndoğduF.K. and KahramanC., Extension of CODASwith Spherical Fuzzy Sets, Journal of Multiple-Valued Logic &Soft Computing33 (2019).
33.
PanchalD., ChatterjeeP., ShuklaR.K., ChoudhuryT. and TamosaitieneJ., Integrated Fuzzy AHP-Codas Framework for Maintenance Decision in Urea Fertilizer Industry, Economic Computation & Economic Cybernetics Studies & Research51(3) (2017).
34.
AydogmuşH.Y., KamberE. and KahramanC., ERP selectionusing picture fuzzy CODAS method, Journal of Intelligent &Fuzzy Systems40(6) (2021), 11363–11373.
HeT., ZhangS., WeiG., WangR., WuJ. and WeiC., CODAS method for 2-tuple linguistic Pythagorean fuzzy multiple attribute group decision making and its application to financial management performance assessment, Technological and Economic Development of Economy26(4) (2020), 920.
37.
ChenL. and GouX., The application of probabilistic linguistic CODAS method based on new score function in multi-criteria decision-making, Computational and Applied Mathematics41 (2022), 1–25.
38.
FarahaniR.Z., SteadieSeifiM. and AsgariN., Multiple criteria facility location problems: A survey, Applied Mathematical Modelling34(7) (2010), 1689–1709.
39.
RaoC., GohM., ZhaoY. and ZhengJ., Location selection of city logistics centers under sustainability, Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment36 (2015), 29–44.
40.
PhamT.Y., MaH.M. and YeoG.T., Application of Fuzzy Delphi TOPSIS to locate logistics centers in Vietnam: The Logisticians’ perspective, The Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics33(4) (2017), 211–219.
41.
Van ThaiV. and GrewalD., Selecting the location of distribution centre in logistics operations: A conceptual framework and case study, Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics17(3) (2005), 3–24.
42.
TurskisZ. and ZavadskasE.K., A new fuzzy additive ratio assessment method (ARAS-F). Case study: The analysis of fuzzy multiple criteria in order to select the logistic centers location, Transport25(4) (2010), 423–432.
43.
AwasthiA., ChauhanS.S. and GoyalS.K., A multi-criteria decision making approach for location planning for urban distribution centers under uncertainty, Mathematical and Computer Modelling53(1-2) (2011), 98–109.
44.
TadićS., ZečevićS. and KrstićM., A novel hybridMCDM model based on fuzzy DEMATEL, fuzzy ANP and fuzzy VIKOR forcity logistics concept selection, Expert Systems withApplications41(18) (2014), 8112–8128.
45.
PamucarD.S., Pejcic TarleS. and ParezanovicT., New hybridmulti-criteria decision-making DEMATELMAIRCA model: sustainableselection of a location for the development of multimodal logistics centre, Economic research-Ekonomska istraživanja31(1) (2018), 1641–1665.
46.
Keshavarz-GhorabaeeM., Assessment of distribution center locations using a multi-expert subjective–objective decision-making approach, Scientific Reports11(1) (2021), 1–19.
47.
OuC.W. and ChouS.Y., International distribution center selection from a foreign market perspective using a weighted fuzzy factor rating system, Expert Systems with Applications36(2) (2009), 1773–1782.
48.
RegmiM.B. and HanaokaS., Location analysis of logistics centres in Laos, International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications16(3) (2013), 227–242.
49.
KieuP.T., NguyenV.T., NguyenV.T. and HoT.P., A spherical fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (SF-AHP) and combined compromise solution (CoCoSo) algorithm in distribution center location selection: A case study in agricultural supply chain, Axioms10(2) (2021), 53.
50.
EryürükS.H., KalaogluF. and BaskakM., A siteselection model for establishing a clothing logistics center, Textile and Apparel22(1) (2012), 40–47.
51.
UysalH. and YavuzK., Selection of logistics centre location via ELECTRE method: A case study in Turkey, International Journal of Business and Social Science5(9) (2014).
52.
ŻakJ. and WęglińskiS., The selection of the logisticscenter location based on MCDM/A methodology, TransportationResearch Procedia3(2014), 555–564.
53.
ÖzceylanE., ErbaşM.,TolonM., KabakM. and DurğutT., Evaluation of freight villages: A GIS-based multi-criteria decisionanalysis, Computers in Industry76 (2016), 38–52.
54.
UlutaşA.,KarakuşC.B. and TopalA., Location selection forlogistics center with fuzzy SWARA and CoCoSo methods, Journalof Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems38(4) (2020), 4693–4709.
55.
CristeaM. and CristeaC., A multicriteria decision-making approach used for the selection of a logistics center location, Annals of the University of Oradea25(15) (2016), 2016–1.
56.
Öndenİ., AcarA.Z. and EldemirF., Evaluation of thelogistics center locations using a multi-criteria spatial approach, Transport33(2) (2018), 322–334.
57.
ShahparvariS., NasirianA., MohammadiA., NooriS. and ChhetriP., A GIS-LP integrated approach for the logistics hub location problem, Computers & Industrial Engineering146 (2020), 106488.
58.
KaragozS., DeveciM., SimicV., AydinN. and BolukbasU., A novel intuitionistic fuzzy MCDM-based CODAS approach for locating an authorized dismantling center: A case study of Istanbul, Waste Management & Research38(6) (2020), 660–672.
59.
BoranF.E., GençS.,KurtM. and AkayD., A multi-criteriaintuitionistic fuzzy group decision making for supplier selectionwith TOPSIS method, Expert Systems with Applications36(8) (2009), 11363–11368.
60.
KahramanC., Keshavarz GhorabaeeM.,ZavadskasE.K., Cevik OnarS., YazdaniM. and OztaysiB., Intuitionistic fuzzy EDAS method: an application to solid waste disposal site selection, Journal of Environmental Engineering and Landscape Management25(1) (2017), 1–12.
61.
DahooeiJ.H., ZavadskasE.K., VanakiA.S., FiroozfarH.R. and GhorabaeeM.K., An evaluation model of business intelligence for enterprise systems with new extension of CODAS (CODAS-IVIF), E+M Ekonomie a Management21(3) (2018), 171–188.
62.
ChenT.Y., Evolved distance measures for circular intuitionistic fuzzy sets and their exploitation in the technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solutions, Artificial Intelligence Review56(7) (2023), 7347–7401.
