With the increasing popularity of XML for data representations, there is a lot of interest in keyword query on XML. Many algorithms have been proposed for XML keyword queries. But the existing approaches fall short in their abilities to analyze the logical relationship between keywords of spatiotemporal data. To overcome this limitation, in this paper, we firstly propose the concept of query time series (QTS) according to the data revision degree. For the logical relationship of keywords in QTS, we study the intra-coupling logic relationship and the inter-coupling logic relationship separately. Then a calculation method of keyword similarity is proposed and the best parameter in the method is found through experiment. Finally, we compare this method with others. Experimental results show that our method is superior to previous approaches.
AhujaA.G. and GadichaA.B., Answering XML query using tree based association rule, Int J Appl Innov Eng Manage3(3) (2014), 143–146.
2.
BillhardtH., BorrajoD. and MaojoV., A context vector model for information retrieval, J Assoc Inf Sci Technol53(3) (2002), 236–249.
3.
BhalotiaG., NakheC., HulgeriA., et al., Keyword searching and browsing in databases using BANKS, In: Proceedings of the 18th conference on data engineering (2002), 431–440.
4.
ChangT.P. and ChenS.Y., An efficient algorithm of frequent XML query pattern mining for ebXML applications in E-commerce, Expert Syst Appl39(2) (2012), 2183–2193.
5.
ChengH., Modeling and querying fuzzy spatiotemporal objects, Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems31(6) (2016), 2851–2858.
6.
CohenS., MamouJ., KanzaY. and SagivY., XSEarch: a semantic search engine for XML, In: Proceedings of 29th International Conference on Very Large Data Bases (2003), 45–46.
7.
CostS. and SalzbergS., A weighted nearest neighbor algorithm for learning with symbolic features, Machine Learning10(1) (1993), 57–78.
8.
DeerwesterS., DumaisS., FurnasG., et al., Indexing by latent semantic analysis, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci.41(6) (1990), 391–407.
9.
GuoL., ShaoF., BotevC. and ShanmugasundaramJ., XRANK: ranked keyword search over XML documents, In: Proceedings of the ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data (2003), 28–39.
10.
HristidisV., KoudasN., PapakonstantinouY. and SrivastavaD., D, Keyword proximity search in xml trees, IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng18(4) (2006), 525–539.
11.
HristidisV. and PapakonstantinouY., Keyword Search in Relational Databases, In: Proceedings of 28th International Conference on Very Large Data Bases (2002), 670–681.
12.
HuG.Z. and HammadR., Querying and indexing XML documents, Journal of Computer and System Sciences5(4) (2005), 219–233.
13.
KongL.B. and GilleronR., LemayARetrieving meaningful relaxed tightest fragments for XML keyword search, In: Proceedings of 12th International Conference on Extending Database Technology (2009), 815–826.
14.
LiuZ.Y. and ChenY., Identifying meaningful return information for XML keyword search, In: Proceedings of the ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data (2007), 329–340.
15.
LiG.L., FengJ.H., WangJ.Y. and ZhouL.Z., Efficient keyword search for valuable LCAs over XML documents, In: Proceedings of the 16th ACM conference on conference on information and knowledge management (2007), 31–40.
16.
LiJ., LiuC., RuiZ. and BoN., Processing XML keyword search by constructing effective structured queries, In: Proceedings of the joint international conferences on advances in data and web management 88–99.
17.
LiT. and MZ.M., A structure-based approach of keyword querying for fuzzy XML data, International Journal of Intelligent Systems22(2) (2018), 125–140.
18.
LiT., XinL. and MengX.F., Rtop-k: a keyword proximity search method based on semantic and structural relaxation, In: Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on systems, man and cybernetics (2012), 2079–2084.
19.
LiY.Y., YuC. and JagadishH.V., Schema-free XQuery, In: Proceedings of VLDB (2004),72–83.
20.
MazuranM., QuintarelliE. and TancaL., Data mining for XML query answering support, IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng24(8) (2012), 1393–1407.
21.
SunC., ChanC.Y. and GoenkaA.K., Multiway SLCA-based keyword search in XML data, In: Proceedings of WWW (2007), 1043–1052.
22.
WangC., TaoL.B. and WangM.C., Coupled nominal similarity in unsupervised learning, In: Proceedings of the 20th ACM Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (2011), 973–978.
23.
WangC., DongX.J. and F. Z, Coupled Attribute Similarity Learning on Categorical Data, Trans Neural Networks Learn Syst26(4) (2015), 781–797.
24.
WilsonD. and MartinezT., Improved heterogeneous distance functions, Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research6(1) (1997), 1–34.
25.
WongS., ZiarkoW. and WongP., Generalized vector spaces model in information retrieval, In: Proceedings of the 8th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on research and development in information retrieval (1985), 18–25.
26.
XuY. and PapakonstantinouY., Efficient keyword Search for Smallest LCAs in XML Databases, In: Proceedings of the ACM SIGMOD international conference on Management of data (2005), 527–538.
27.
XuY. and PapakonstantinouY., Effificient LCA based keyword search in XML data, In: Proceedings of the ACM conference on Conference on information and knowledge management (2008), 535–546.
