A scientific evaluation model can be effectively used for the evaluation of regional talent development level. This paper proposes a set of scientific index systems for evaluating rural science and technology talents, which can be used for understanding the development status and level of rural science and technology talents in various regions; putting forward the corresponding talent cultivation and introduction policies, and; promoting the development of rural economic construction. Moreover, in order to avoid the shortcoming of over-subjective indicator weight in analytic hierarchy process (AHP), this paper uses the entropy weight method to determine indicator weight. Furthermore, giving the fact that the evaluation experts may have individual personal preferences, this paper proposes an extended TODIM method based on hybrid index values, for achieving more scientific and effective evaluation results of rural science and technology talents. Finally, the proposed methods are evaluated on an actual case, where relevant analysis and suggestions are given.
GuoX., Research on the construction of rural practical talent team in Weifang City, Doctoral Dissertation of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, 2009.
2.
LiL., Research on the training mechanism of excellent rural scientific and technological Talents, Doctoral Dissertation of Hunan Agricultural University, 2013.
3.
LeeS.H. and ChoY.H, The Evaluation of Importance-Performance on the Education Program for Human Resource Development in Rural Tourism, Journal of Tourism Sciences38(9) (2014), 265–290.
4.
ChenH., Research on the construction of rural talent team in Qingyuan City, Doctoral Dissertation of Huazhong Agricultural University, 2008.
BohlouliM., et al., Competence assessment as an expert system for human resource management: A mathematical approach, Expert Systems with Applications70 (2017), 83–102.
7.
WuD., MenY., WangA., LiF., ShiL. and SunZ., Research on evaluation indicator system of science and technology talents in “Three Districts” of Hubei province, Hubei Agricultural Sciences57(6) (2018), 116–122.
8.
ChenY. and SunR., Research on talent evaluation in local major science and technology introducing projects under the background of innovation drive, Yunnan Social Sciences2018(4) (2018), 59–64.
9.
LinM., XuZ., ZhaiY. and YaoZ., Multi-attribute group decision-making under probabilistic uncertain linguistic environment, Journal of the Operational Research Society69(2) (2018), 157–170.
10.
LinM., HuangC., XuZ. and ChenR., Evaluating IoT platforms using integrated probabilistic linguistic MCDM method, IEEE Internet of Things Journal7(11) (2020), 11195–11208.
11.
HuangC., LinM. and XuZ., Pythagorean fuzzy MULTIMOORA method based on distance measure and score function: its application in multicriteria decision making process, Knowledge and Information Systems62(11) (2020), 4373–4406.
12.
BoranF.E., GençS. and
AkayD., Personnel selection based on intuitionistic fuzzy sets, Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries21(5) (2011), 493–503.
13.
AfshariA.R., YusuffR.M. and DerayatifarA.R., Linguistic extension of fuzzy integral for group personnel selection problem, Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering38(10) (2013), 2901–2910.
14.
YuD., ZhangW. and XuY., Group decision making under hesitant fuzzy environment with application to personnel evaluation, Knowledge-Based Systems52 (2013), 1–10.
15.
BogdanovicD. and MileticS., Personnel evaluation and selection by multicriteria decision making method, Economic Computation and Economic Cybernetics Studies and Research48(3) (2014), 179–196.
16.
BozburaF.T., BeskeseA. and KahramanC., Prioritization of human capital measurement indicators using fuzzy AHP, Expert Systems with Applications32(4) (2007), 1100–1112.
17.
WeiC., RenZ. and RodríguezR.M., A hesitant fuzzy linguistic TODIM method based on a score function, International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems8(4) (2015), 701–712.
18.
WangL., WangY.M. and MartínezL., Fuzzy TODIM method based on alpha-level sets, Expert Systems with Applications140 (2020), 112899.
19.
WangJ., WangJ. and ZhangH., A likelihood-based TODIM approach based on multi-hesitant fuzzy linguistic information for evaluation in logistics outsourcing, Computers & Industrial Engineering99 (2016), 287–299.
20.
LiuP. and TengF., Ecosystem health evaluation of Dongying City based on mixed indicator value TODIM method, China Population Resources and Environment27(8) (2017), 167–176.
21.
LiuP., RongL. and TengF., The evaluation of ecosystem health based on hybrid TODIM method for Chinese case, Technological and Economic Development of Economy25(3) (2019), 542–570.
22.
LiuP. and TengF., Probabilistic linguistic TODIM method for selecting products through online product reviews, Information Sciences485 (2019), 441–455.
23.
AryaV. and KumarS., A new picture fuzzy information measure based on shannon entropy with applications in opinion polls using extended VIKOR-TODIM approach, Computational & Applied Mathematics39(3) (2020), 197.
24.
GuoJ., YinJ., ZhangL. and Extendedetc., TODIM method for CCUS storage site selection under probabilistic hesitant fuzzy environment, Applied Soft Computing93 (2020), 106381.
25.
LiuP. and YouX., Improved TODIM Method Based on Linguistic Neutrosophic Numbers for Multicriteria Group Decision-Making, International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems12(2) (2019), 544–556.
26.
LiuP. and ZhangP., Normal Wiggly Hesitant Fuzzy TODIM Approach for Multiple Attribute Decision Making, Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems39(1) (2020), 627–644.
27.
HeS., PanX. and WangY., A shadowed set-based TODIM method and its application to large-scale group decision making, Information Sciences544 (2021), 135–154.
28.
AryaV. and KumarS., A novel TODIM-VIKOR approach based on entropy and Jensen-Tsalli divergence measure for picture fuzzy sets in a decision-making problem, International Journal of Intelligent Systems35(12) (2020), 2140–2180.
29.
DavoudabadiR., MousaviS.M. and
MohagheghiV, A new last aggregation method of multi-attributes group decision making based on concepts of TODIM, WASPAS and TOPSIS under interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy uncertainty, Knowledge and Information Systems62(4) (2020), 1371–1391.
30.
YueZ., An extended TOPSIS for determining weights of decision makers with interval numbers, Knowledge-Based Systems24(1) (2011), 146–153.
31.
LiaoH., GouX. and XuZ., A survey of decision making theory and methodologies of hesitant fuzzy linguistic term set, System Engineering-Theory & Practice37(1) (2017), 35–48.
32.
ZhuB. and XuZ.S., Consistency measures for hesitant fuzzy linguistic preference relations, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems22 (2014), 35–45.
33.
LiaoH.C., YangL.Y. and XuZ.S., Two new approaches based on ELECTRE II to solve the multiple criteria decision making problems with hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets, Applied Soft Computing63 (2018), 223–234.
34.
ShiM. and XiaoQ., Optimal Decision-making for Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic Green Supplier Based on Prospect Theory, Statistics and Decision513(21) (2018), 46–52.
