Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2022-7
Organizational quality specific immune evaluation of manufacturing enterprises: Multi-attribute group decision-making method with complete ignorance of weight information based on evidence distance and fuzzy entropy transformation
This study adopts multi-attribute group decision-making method with complete ignorance of weight information based on evidence distance and fuzzy entropy transformation, uses linear weighting to integrate and sort out the evaluation information of each evaluated object. The method is applied to the evaluation of organizational quality specific immune of actual large manufacturing enterprises, and the practicability and feasibility of the method are proved by empirical analysis research. The empirical analysis results will provide method guidance and practical inspiration for improving organizational quality specific immune of manufacturing enterprises.
GuoKHLiWL. A method for multiple attribute group decision making with complete unknown weight information and its extension. Chin J Manage Sci.2011; 19(5): 94-103.
2.
BoranFEGencSKurtMAkayD. A multi-criteria intuitionistic fuzzy group decision making for supplier selection with TOPSIS method. Expert Syst Appl.2009; 36(8): 11363-11368.
3.
LiuYZXuDPJiangYC. Method of adaptive adjustment weights in multi-attribute group decision-making. Syst Eng Electron.2007; 29(1): 45-58.
4.
YangJB. Rule and utility-based evidential reasoning approach for multi-attribute decision analysis under uncertainties. Eur J Oper Res.2001; 131(1): 31-61.
5.
YangJBXuDL. On the evidential reasoning algorithm for multiple attribute decision analysis under uncertainty. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Part A: Syst Humans.2002; 32(3): 289-304.
6.
SentzKFersonS. Combination of evidence in Dempster-Shafer theory. Albuquerque: Sandia National Lab; 2002.
7.
DengYShiWKZhuZFLiuQ. Combining belief functions based on distance of evidence. Decis Support Syst.2004; 38(3): 489-493.
8.
JousselmeALGrenierDBosseE. A new distance between two bodies of evidence. Inf Fusion.2001; 2(2): 91-101.
9.
MostaghimiM. Bayesian estimation of a decision using information theory. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Part A: Syst Humans.1997; 27(4): 506-517.
10.
ShuiabiEThomsonVBhuiyanN. Entropy as a measure of operational flexibility. Eur J Oper Res.2005; 165(3): 696-707.
11.
ChenZM. Research and application of evidence theory decision-making method under the environment of group decision-making [Dissertation]. Hefei: Hefei University of Technology; 2006.
12.
LiHXWangQDuanQZXueJX. Engineering fuzzy mathematics methods and applications [Dissertation]. Tianjin: Tianjin Science and Technology Press; 1993.
13.
DempsterAP. Upper and lower probabilities induced by a multi-valued mapping. Annuals Math Stat.1967; 38(4): 325-339.
14.
YehCHChangYH. Modeling subjective evaluation for fuzzy group multi-criteria decision making. Eur J Oper Res.2009; 194(2): 464-473.
15.
YagerRR. OWA aggregation over a continuous interval argument with applications to decision making. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern (Part B).2004; 34: 1952-1963.
16.
XuZS. Consistency of interval fuzzy preference relations in group decision making. Appl Soft Comput.2011; 11(5): 3898-3909.
17.
XuZSCaiXQ. Nonlinear optimization models for multiple attribute group decision making with intuitionistic fuzzy information. Int J Intell Syst.2010; 25(6): 489-513.
18.
PacanaASiwiecD. Analysis of the possibility of used of the quality management techniques with non-destructive testing. Tehnicki Vjesnik-Tech Gazette.2021; 28(1): 45-51.
19.
FangIWLinWT. A multi-objective optimal decision model for a green closed-loop supply chain under uncertainty: A real industrial case study. Adv Prod Eng Manage.2021; 16(2): 161-172.
20.
ParastMM. A learning perspective of supply chain quality management: empirical evidence from US supply chains. Supply Chain Manage-An Int J.2020; 25(1): 17-34.
21.
SalimianHRashidiradMSoltaniE. Supplier quality management and performance: The effect of supply chain oriented culture. Prod Plann Control.2020; 32(11): 942-958.
22.
KoganKElOF. False quality claims: Prevention and supply chain implications. J Oper Res Soc.2020; 72(6): 1347-1357.
23.
StrmenikKWallFMitschCModritscherG. Volume allocation in multi-sourcing: Effects of the quantity-quality trade-off. Cent Eur J Oper Res.2020; 29(2): 753-771.
24.
RoyBGiriBC. A three-echelon supply chain model with price and two-level quality dependent demand. Rairo-Oper Res.2020; 54(1): 37-52.
25.
HongJTZhouZHLiXLauKH. Supply chain quality management and firm performance in China’s food industry-the moderating role of social co-regulation. Int J Logistics Manage.2020; 31(1): 99-122.
26.
SoltaniEWilkinsonA. TQM and performance appraisal: complementary or incompatible? Eur Manage Rev.2020; 17(1): 57-82.
