Grassland resources are an important part of land resources. Moreover, it has the functions of regulating the climate, windproof and sand fixation, conserving water sources, maintaining water and soil, raising livestock, providing food, purifying the air, and beautifying the environment in terrestrial ecosystems. Grassland resource evaluation is of great significance to the sustainable development of grassland resources. Therefore, this paper improves the BP neural network, uses the comprehensive index method to calculate the weights in the analytic hierarchy process, and constructs a water resources carrying capacity research and analysis system based on the entropy weight extension decision theory. Meanwhile, this paper analyzes different levels of resource and environmental carrying capacity to achieve the purpose of comprehensive evaluation of resource and environmental carrying capacity. In addition, based on the theory of sustainable development, under the guidance of the principle of index system construction, this paper studies the actual situation of grassland resources and the availability and operability of data, and combines with the opinions given by experts to form an evaluation index system of grassland resources and environmental carrying capacity. Finally, through the actual case study analysis, it is concluded that the model constructed in this paper has a certain effect.
CaiJ., LuoJ., WangS., et al., Feature selection in machine learning: A new perspective, Neurocomputing300(5) (2018), 70–79.
2.
GoetzJ.N., BrenningA., PetschkoH., et al., Evaluating machine learning and statistical prediction techniques for landslide susceptibility modeling, Computers & Geosciences81(3) (2015), 1–11.
3.
DarabiH., ChoubinB., RahmatiO., et al., Urban flood risk mapping using the GARP and QUEST models: A comparative study of machine learning techniques, Journal of Hydrology569(11) (2019), 142–154.
4.
RajkomarA., DeanJ. and KohaneI., Machine learning in medicine, New England Journal of Medicine380(14) (2019), 1347–1358.
5.
XinY., KongL., LiuZ., et al., Machine learning and deep learning methods for cybersecurity, IEEE Access6(3) (2018), 35365–35381.
6.
MeredigB., AgrawalA., KirklinS., et al., Combinatorial screening for new materials in unconstrained composition space with machine learning, Physical Review B89(9) (2014), 094104.
7.
WardL., AgrawalA., ChoudharyA., et al., A general-purpose machine learning framework for predicting properties of inorganic materials, Npj Computational Materials2(1) (2016), 1–7.
8.
FengP., WangB., Li LiuD., et al., Incorporating machine learning with biophysical model can improve the evaluation of climate extremes impacts on wheat yield in south-eastern Australia, Agricultural and Forest Meteorology275(7) (2019), 100–113.
9.
KourouK., ExarchosT.P., ExarchosK.P., et al., Machine learning applications in cancer prognosis and prediction, Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal13(2) (2015), 8–17.
10.
AmershiS., CakmakM., KnoxW.B., et al., Power to the people: The role of humans in interactive machine learning, Ai Magazine35(4) (2014), 105–120.
11.
Rodriguez-GalianoV., Sanchez-CastilloM., Chica-OlmoM., et al., Machine learning predictive models for mineral prospectivity: An evaluation of neural networks, random forest, regression trees and support vector machines, Ore Geology Reviews71(13) (2015), 804–818.
12.
ColeyC.W., BarzilayR., JaakkolaT.S., et al., Prediction of organic reaction outcomes using machine learning, ACS Central Science3(5) (2017), 434–443.
13.
ChowdhuryA., KautzE., YenerB., et al., Image driven machine learning methods for microstructure recognition, Computational Materials Science123(22) (2016), 176–187.
14.
BasithS., ManavalanB., ShinT.H., et al., SDM6A: A web-based integrative machine-learning framework for predicting 6mA sites in the rice genome, Molecular Therapy-Nucleic Acids18(3) (2019), 131–141.
15.
TrostS.G., ZhengY. and WongW.K., Machine learning for activity recognition: hip versus wrist data, Physiological Measurement35(11) (2014), 2183.
16.
VoyantC., NottonG., KalogirouS., et al., Machine learning methods for solar radiation forecasting: A review, Renewable Energy105(21) (2017), 569–582.
17.
FolberthC., BaklanovA., BalkovičJ., et al., Spatio-temporal downscaling of gridded crop model yield estimates based on machine learning, Agricultural and Forest Meteorology264(13) (2019), 1–15.
18.
SiegJ., FlachsenbergF. and RareyM., In need of bias control: evaluating chemical data for machine learning in structure-based virtual screening, Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling59(3) (2019), 947–961.
19.
ThabtahF. and PeeblesD., A new machine learning model based on induction of rules for autism detection, Health Informatics Journal26(1) (2020), 264–286.
20.
NarudinF.A., FeizollahA., AnuarN.B., et al., Evaluation of machine learning classifiers for mobile malware detection, Soft Computing20(1) (2016), 343–357.
21.
YaoQ., YangH., ZhuR., et al., Core, mode, and spectrum assignment based on machine learning in space division multiplexing elastic optical networks, IEEE Access6(3) (2018), 15898–15907.
22.
BzdokD. and Meyer-LindenbergA., Machine learning for precision psychiatry: opportunities and challenges, Biological Psychiatry: Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging3(3) (2018), 223–230.
23.
ChenM., HaoY., HwangK., et al., Disease prediction by machine learning over big data from healthcare communities, Ieee Access5 (2017), 8869–8879.
24.
ItuL., RapakaS., PasseriniT., et al., A machine-learning approach for computation of fractional flow reserve from coronary computed tomography, Journal of Applied Physiology121(1) (2016), 42–52.
25.
JayasingheU., LeeG.M., UmT.W., et al., Machine learning based trust computational model for IoT services, IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Computing4(1) (2018), 39–52.
26.
RathoreM.M., PaulA., HongW.H., SeoH.C., AwanI. and SaeedS., Exploiting IoT and big data analytics: Defining smart digital city using real-time urban data, Sustainable Cities and Society40 (2018), 600–610.
27.
StefanovaK., HristovaS. and GolevA., Discrete Leader-Following Consensus for Multi-Agent System with Non-Instantaneous Impulses, Dynamic Systems and Applications28 (2019), 743–755.
28.
YimnetS. and NiamsupP., Finite-Time Stability of Discrete Linear Singular Switched Positive Systems with Time-Delay by a Mode-Dependent Average Dwell Time Approach, Dynamic Systems and Applications29(2) (2020), 192–219.
29.
PaulA., Internet of Things: A primer’, R Jeyaraj Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies1(1) (2019), 37–47.
30.
PaulA., DanielA., AhmadA. and RhoS., Cooperative cognitive intelligence for internet of vehicles, IEEE Systems Journal11(3) (2017), 1249–1258.
31.
PaulA., AhmadA., Mazhar RathoreM. and JabbarS., Smartbuddy: defining human behaviors using big data analytics in social internet of things, IEEE Wireless Communications23(5) (2016), 68–74.
32.
PaulA., JiangY.C., WangJ.F. and YangJ.F., Parallel reconfigurable computing-based mapping algorithm for motion estimation in advanced video coding, ACM Transactions on Embedded Computing Systems (TECS)11(S2) (2012), 1–18.
