Scientific decision support system of marine environmental management in China’s Yellow Sea and Bohai Sea based on cloud computing mode

Abstract

Due to the large amount of pollutant discharge, the environmental pollution capacity of the coastal waters of the Yellow Sea and Bohai Sea in China is seriously overloaded, which has caused unacceptable impact on the marine ecological environment. Based on this, this paper is based on the cloud computing model of marine environmental management scientific decision-making evaluation algorithm, constructing a model of complex network dynamic correlation characteristics, and externally describing water bloom. Through the weight parameters in the cloud model, it is effectively applied to the evaluation of marine environmental management science decision support system. According to the complexity characteristics of cyanobacterial bloom management decision, the cyanobacteria bloom control decision model is inferred, and the intuitionistic fuzzy rough set algorithm is improved. The similarity is calculated, the best matching case is found, and the experts are adjusting to form a governance plan. The research results show that the scientific decision-making evaluation algorithm of marine environment management based on cloud computing model is effective for the verification of marine environmental management science decision support system evaluation system, embedding eutrophication evaluation method and cyanobacteria water bloom governance decision-making method into water quality remote monitoring and cyanobacteria water China’s governance decision-making system, to achieve the decision-making of cyanobacteria bloom control in the lake water body.

Keywords

Cloud computing ocean environmental management scientific decision

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Chen and

Ganapin , Polycentric coastal and ocean management in the Caribbean Sea Large Marine Ecosystem: Harnessing community-based actions to implement regional frameworks, Environmental Development 17(3) (2016), 264–276.

Mussap ,

Zavatarelli and

Pinardi , Linking 1D coastal ocean modelling to environmental management: An ensemble approach, Ocean Dynamics 67(12) (2017), 1627–1644.

H.A.

Chouhan ,

Parthasarathy and

Pattanaik , Urban development, environmental vulnerability and CRZ violations in India: Impacts on fishing communities and sustainability implications in Mumbai coast, Environment Development & Sustainability 19(3) (2017), 1–15.

Poslad ,

S.E.

Middleton and

Chaves , A semantic IoT early warning system for natural environment crisis management, IEEE Transactions on Emerging Topics in Computing 3(2) (2017), 246–257.

Kiessling ,

Salas and

Mutafoglu , Who cares about dirty beaches? Evaluating environmental awareness and action on coastal litter in Chile, Ocean & Coastal Management 137(1) (2017), 82–95.

Mcdonald ,

S.J.

Campbell and

Karr , An adaptive assessment and management toolkit for data-limited fisheries, Ocean & Coastal Management 152(5) (2018), 100–119.

Levin ,

Beger and

Maina , Evaluating the potential for transboundary management of marine biodiversity in the Western Indian Ocean, Australasian Journal of Environmental Management 25(1) (2018), 62–85.

Yang ,

Boncoeur and

Liu , Economic assessment and environmental management of green tides in the Chinese Yellow Sea, Ocean & Coastal Management 161(C) (2018), 20–30.

K.H.

Reckhow , Importance of scientific uncertainty in decision making, Environmental Management 18(2) (2016), 161–166.

10.

Ulibarri , Collaborative model development increases trust in and use of scientific information in environmental decision-making, Environmental Science & Policy 82(1) (2018), 136–142.

11.

D.B.

Grant and

Elliott , A proposed interdisciplinary framework for the environmental management of water and air-borne emissions in maritime logistics, Ocean & Coastal Management 163(1) (2018), 162–172.

12.

J.I.

Romero Gelvez and

Garcia-Melon , Influence analysis in consensus search -a multi criteria group decision making aproach in environmental management, International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making 1(2) (2016), 1–23.

13.

N.R.

Haddaway ,

Kohl and

N.R.D.

Silva , A framework for stakeholder engagement during systematic reviews and maps in environmental management, Environmental Evidence 6(1) (2017), 11.

14.

Li ,

Zhang and

Yang , Site-specific risk assessment and integrated management decision-making: A case study of a typical heavy metal contaminated site, Middle China, Human and Ecological Risk Assessment: An International Journal 4(1) (2016), 9.

15.

Leslie ,

T.N.

Song and

T.K.D.

Nguyen , Bringing social and cultural considerations into environmental management for vulnerable coastal communities: Responses to environmental change in Xuan Thuy National Park, Nam Dinh Province, Vietnam, Ocean & Coastal Management 158 (2018), 32–44.

16.

Sherman , Sustainability, biomass yields, and health of coastal ecosystems: An ecological perspective, Marine ecology progress series, Oldendorf 112(3) (1994), 277–301.

17.

Zhao ,

Wang and

Shi , Environmental capacity of chemical oxygen demand in the Bohai Sea: Modeling and calculation, Chinese Journal of Oceanology and Limnology 29(1) (2011), 46–52.

18.

Keyuan , The establishment of a marine legal system in China, The International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law 13(1) (1998), 23–46.

19.

Sanchez-Jerez ,

Karakassis and

Massa , Aquaculture's struggle for space: The need for coastal spatial planning and the potential benefits of Allocated Zones for Aquaculture (AZAs) to avoid conflict and promote sustainability, Aquaculture Environment Interactions 8 (2016), 41–54.

20.

Shi ,

Zheng and

Wang , Sensitivity and uncertainty analysis of regional marine ecosystem services value, Journal of Ocean University of China 8(2) (2009), 150–154.