Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

With the development of Internet and information technology, enterprises are facing more challenges. It is urgent and necessary to innovate the mode of enterprise management. In this paper, from the perspective of contingency, a multi-objective genetic algorithm is constructed to introduce Internet of Things technology into enterprise management innovation. Through the function to solve the relationship between the various operating entities of the enterprise, the algorithm obtains the optimal solution of vehicle distribution. Firstly, contingency theory is introduced into the innovative design of enterprise information system to optimize the logistics distribution path under the environment of the Internet of Things (IoT). The multi-objective genetic algorithm steps are designed, and the non-dominant set is constructed. The crossover and mutation operations of the objectives are combined to get the genetic sub-classes, and then the relationships among the parties in the enterprise logistics innovation management activities are solved. The experimental results show that the shortest running time of the algorithm is 0.56 seconds and the longest running time is 2.48 seconds. The average running time in the whole process is not more than 1 second, which meets the actual needs. The genetic algorithm can help enterprises to arrange the distribution path of logistics fleet reasonably. The research in this paper has enlightening effect on the management innovation of enterprises under the information environment, and further expands the application field of the IoT, which has practical significance.

Keywords

Contingency perspective IoT business management innovations

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

C.J.

Chen ,

B.W.

Lin and

Y.H.

Lin , Ownership structure, independent board members and innovation performance: A contingency perspective, Journal of Business Research 69(9) (2016), 3371–3379.

Shao ,

Feng and

Hu , Effectiveness of top management support in enterprise systems success: A contingency perspective of fit between leadership style and system life-cycle, European Journal of Information Systems 25(2) (2016), 131–153.

Caputo ,

Marzi and

M.M.

Pellegrini , The Internet of Things in manufacturing innovation processes: Development and application of a conceptual framework, Business Process Management Journal 6(2) (2016), 1463–7154.

Lopez-Valeiras ,

M.B.

Gonzalez-Sanchez and

Gomez-Conde , The effects of the interactive use of management control systems on process and organizational innovation, Review of Managerial Science 10(3) (2016), 487–510.

Basl , Enterprise information systems and technologies in czech companies from the perspective of trends in industry 4.0, Annals of Operations Research 237(1-2) (2016), 281–300.

Fried , Terminological distinctions of ‘control’: A review of the implications for management control research in the context of innovation, Journal of Management Control 28(1) (2017), 1–36.

C.K.M.

To , A quad model for assessing innovation potential: Toward a theory of innovation orchestration quality, International Journal of Innovation Studies 1(1) (2017), 37–56.

T.H.

Aas and

K.J.

Breunig , Conceptualizing innovation capabilities: A contingency perspective, Social Science Electronic Publishing 13(1) (2018), 7–24.

Zhao ,

Dong and

Xi , Research on the strategic alliance innovation system evolution mechanism: The perspective of knowledge flow, Cluster Computing 8(4) (2018), 1–19.

10.

Strohmeier , Smart HRM – a Delphi study on the application and consequences of the Internet of Things in Human Resource Management, International Journal of Human Resource Management 9(3) (2018), 1–30.

11.

Zhang ,

C.H.

Wang and

Zheng , Process of innovation knowledge increase in supply chain network from the perspective of sustainable development, Industrial Management & Data Systems 7(99) (2018), 10–11.

12.

Lee ,

Park and

Kang , The impact of convergence between science and technology on innovation, Journal of Technology Transfer 43(1) (2018), 1–23.

13.

Desyllas ,

Miozzo and

Lee , Capturing value from innovation in knowledge-intensive business service firms: The role of competitive strategy, British Journal of Management 78(1) (2018), 88–89.

14.

Yang ,

Wen and

Jiang , Marine depth mapping algorithm based on the edge computing in Internet of things, Journal of Parallel & Distributed Computing 114(8) (2018), 1–2.

15.

Asif ,

Rajarajan and

Lestas , Increasing user controllability on device specific privacy in the Internet of Things, Computer Communications 1(16) (2018), 200–211.

16.

D.J.

Teece ,

Pisano and

Shuen , Dynamic capabilities and strategic management, Strategic Management Journal 18(7) (1997), 509–533.

17.

R.E.

Anderson and

S.S.

Srinivasan , E-satisfaction and e-loyalty: A contingency framework, Psychology & Marketing 20(2) (2003), 123–138.

18.

Dodgson ,

Gann and

Salter , The role of technology in the shift towards open innovation: The case of Procter & Gamble, R&D Management 36(3) (2006), 333–346.

19.

T.S.H.

Teo and

Pian , A contingency perspective on Internet adoption and competitive advantage, European Journal of Information Systems 12(2) (2003), 78–92.

20.

W.J.

Orlikowski , Using technology and constituting structures: A practice lens for studying technology in organizations, Organization Science 11(4) (2000), 404–428.

Enterprise management innovation in the internet of things from the perspective of contingency

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References